PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Grmek

Publications and source records attributed to M Grmek.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

The importance of follow-up of children with vesicoureteral reflux grade 1.

AIM: The objectives of this study were, first, to determine the probability of detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) into the renal collecting system (VUR grade 2 or higher) by follow-up cyclic radionuclide cystography (CRC) in children with VUR 1 on initial examination, and in children without VUR and with the same clinical history; and secondly, to find out whether dividing VUR 1 into three subclasses, including possible reflux into the ureter, reflux into the lower ureter, and reflux into the whole length of the ureter, enhances detection of higher grade reflux in these children. METHODS: 275 children with VUR 1 found on initial CRC, and 31 children without reflux and with the same clinical history were studied. In total, 414 renal units with VUR 1 of different subclasses and 198 renal units without reflux were evaluated. RESULTS: Follow-up CRC disclosed reflux into the renal collecting system in 20% of children with VUR 1 on initial investigation, and in 23% of children with no reflux at the time of initial investigation. The probability that follow-up examination would disclose VUR 2 in 3 in renal units with different subclasses of grade 1 reflux was 8-16%, and did not differ significantly from the probability for detecting reflux in kidneys with no reflux on initial examination. CONCLUSION: In the absence of recurrent urinary tract infection, the management of children with VUR 1 identified by CRC can be the same as in children without reflux. Yet, in children with no reflux or with VUR 1 detected after urinary tract infection, the probability that reflux reaching the pylon was missed should not be underestimated. Dividing VUR 1 into subclasses does not seem to be of diagnostic value.

Child↗

Prevalence of Sjögren's syndrome in Slovenia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) in Slovenia. METHODS: A total of 889 randomly selected adults were invited to take part in our study. The classification of SS was based on the validated criteria reported by a multicentre study performed in Europe. The participants were asked six simple questions for assessing both ocular and oral involvement. Information on co-morbidities and related treatment was collected at the same time. All participants were subjected to a Schirmer-I test, an unstimulated salivary flow test, as well as serological studies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-La/SS-B antibodies). When indicated, Rose Bengal score, salivary scintigraphy and histopathological investigation of the minor salivary glands were carried out until three out of the six European classification criteria for SS were shown to be negative or until SS was diagnosed. RESULTS: Out of the 889 invited subjects, 332 (37.3%) participated in our study: 183 females, mean age (+/- S.D.) 52.2 +/- 13.7 yr (range 20-84) and 149 males, mean age (+/- S.D.) 56.3 +/- 12.9 yr (range 23-84). After the first visit, 244 of the 332 (73.5%) participants proved to be negative for three out of the six above-mentioned criteria, and were eliminated from further tests. The remaining 88 participants were consecutively subjected to Rose Bengal score, salivary scintigraphy and minor salivary gland biopsy. Fifteen participants refused to perform either one or more of the proposed tests at the second study stage. Two females of the 332 study participants [0.60% (exact 95% CI 0.07%, 2.16%)] fulfilled the criteria for primary SS. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated prevalence of definite SS in Slovenia is 0.60%.

Adult↗

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Greece, Ancient↗

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Biology↗

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Diagnosis↗

[Claude Bernard and Daremberg father and son].

Claude Bernard and Charles Daremberg were friends since youth. In a letter dated August 1, 1862, the medical historian tells the physiologist about Galen's experiments on nerves. Eighteen years later, Georges, Charles' son, writes a letter to Ernest Renan and congratulates him about his speech in honour of Claude Bernard, whom he succeeds at the Academie francaise.

France↗