PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Gulley

Publications and source records attributed to M Gulley.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Frequent expression of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 1 in latent membrane protein 1-positive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease and HIV-associated lymphomas.

The tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) participates in the signal transduction of various members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family, including TNFR2, CD40, CD30, and the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). In vitro, TRAF1 is induced by LMP1, and previous studies have suggested that expression of TRAF1 is higher in EBV-associated tumors than in their EBV-negative counterparts. To determine whether this was the case in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and related disorders, we used immunohistochemistry to analyze expression of TRAF1 in a total of 42 such lesions arising in a variety of immunosuppressive states. The specimens consisted of 22 PTLD lesions, 18 acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated lymphomas, including 6 primary central nervous system lymphomas, and 2 cases of Hodgkin disease. The presence of latent EBV infection was determined by EBER in situ hybridization, and expression of EBV-LMP1 was detected by immunohistochemistry. Latent EBV infection, as determined by a positive EBER signal, was detected in 36 of 42 tumors. Of the EBER-positive specimens, 30 of 36 also expressed LMP1. Twenty-four of 30 LMP1-positive tumors, including both Hodgkin disease specimens, expressed TRAF1, compared with only 3 of 12 LMP1-negative tumors. This difference was statistically significant (P <.005). These results show frequent expression of TRAF1 at the protein level in LMP1-positive PTLD and related disorders and suggest an important role for LMP1-mediated TRAF1 signaling in the pathogenesis of EBV-positive tumors arising in immunosuppressive states.

Epstein-Barr Virus Infections↗

Automated platelet counts: accuracy, precision, and range.

The automation of platelet counting is essential in laboratories performing a large number of procedures with high precision. Maintaining this precision and establishing accuracy require an understanding of the special problems of counting platelets, including: (1) the large dynamic range of the measurement, (2) the variable size and aggregability of platelets, and (3) the specific requirements of a quality-control method. In evaluating these problems, we designed experiments that measured the linearity and precision of two types of platelet counters, light scattering and electronic aperture impedance, and that evaluated the suitability of commercially available reference materials. The results show that the instrumentation is excellent and the reference materials are good; such that, given a well-planned quality-control method as presented here, the automated platelet count gives a rapid result with precision and accuracy.

Calibration↗