PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M H Andrew

Publications and source records attributed to M H Andrew.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Spectrum of general surgery in rural America.

OBJECTIVES: To define the types of surgery performed by rural surgeons, to compare their experience to that of graduating US surgical residents and to document rural surgical mortality. DESIGN: Prospective registry of consecutive cases recorded by 7 rural general surgeons working in one department of surgery from December 31, 1994, through March 30, 1996. Comparison with the 1995 Report C (Resident Operative Logs) of the Residency Review Committee. National survey of surgical residency programs regarding formal gynecology experience. SETTING: Nine rural community hospitals in the Midwest. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing surgery in 9 cities with populations of fewer than 10000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of surgery and postoperative (30-day) mortality. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred twenty procedures were performed by 7 surgeons practicing in 9 cities with populations of 1500 to 8000. There were 6 (0.25%) postoperative deaths. Case types are as follows: endoscopy, 686 (28.3%); gynecology, 498 (20.6%); hernia, 241 (10%); colorectal, 194 (8%); biliary, 183 (7.6%); cesarean sections, 130 (5.4%); breast, 129 (5.3%); orthopedic, 115 (4.8%); carpal tunnel, 63 (2.6%); otolaryngology, 35 (1.4%); and endocrine, 1 (0.4%); for a total of 2420 (100%). Report C indicated 1995 graduating chief residents averaged 8 obstetric and and gynecologic and 5.3 orthopedic cases during their residency. Of 204 surgical residency programs surveyed, 106 (52%) offered no obstetrics and gynecology rotation. CONCLUSIONS: A large volume of surgery was performed with low mortality by 7 rural general surgeons. The operative experience of 1995 residency graduates differed from our rural surgeons. We recommend a rural surgical track in selected training programs to prepare graduates better for rural practice. Senior level rotations in endoscopic, gynecologic, obstetric, and orthopedic surgery and mentorship with rural surgeons would be optimal.

Humans↗

Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified?

To evaluate the advisability of incidental appendectomy relative to patient age, a retrospective chart review of 905 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy between 1979 and 1983 was undertaken. A total 377 of these patients underwent incidental appendectomy. The overall complication rate in the two groups was the same. Wound infection occurred in 1.5 per cent of patients undergoing cholecystectomy alone, compared with 3.7 per cent in those patients undergoing incidental appendectomy as well. Patients over the age of 50 who underwent incidental appendectomy had a wound infection rate of 5.9 per cent, compared with 0.9 per cent in those patients over 50 who underwent cholecystectomy alone, a difference found to be statistically significant (P less than .05). Therefore, incidental appendectomy cannot be recommended for patients over the age of 50.

Adolescent↗