Biomedical subjects

M H Steenks

Publications and source records attributed to M H Steenks.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

[Botulinum toxin type A treatment of cosmetically disturbing masseteric hypertrophy].

Two patients, a woman aged 21 and a man aged 29, with asymmetrical swellings of both mandibular angles and a painful, heavy sensation in the masticatory muscles (and in the woman also round the maxillary joint), were diagnosed as having hypertrophy of the masseter muscles. Both had the habit of jaw clenching and tooth grinding. Treatment consisted not of the traditional surgical debulking which also allows correction of overdeveloped osseous mandibular angles, but of injections with botulinum toxin type A. Injection of 40-60 IU (product: Botox) per muscle was followed by some atrophy; cosmetically satisfactory results were achieved after repetition of the treatment a few months later. Reduction of muscle volume was confirmed by a quantitative volumetric assessment of MRI scans. In the female patient, the pain also abated.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Orthodontic and functional aspects.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of early orthodontic treatment of functional unilateral posterior crossbite (FUPC) and to evaluate temporomandibular function in the short and long term. Orthodontic treatment consisted of slow expansion of the maxillary dental arch by means of a removable expansion plate, with flat coverage of the occlusal surfaces of the left and right posterior teeth. Evaluation of the occlusion showed a strong correlation between the crossbite side and the direction of the RCP-ICP slide and with the side of first occlusal contact in RCP. In 26 of 27 children that were treated (one withdrew), the average time required for correction of the crossbite was 7 months, followed by a retention period, on average, for 6 months after completion of treatment. Early orthodontic treatment resulted in an elimination of occlusal disturbances, and the crossbite remained stable on follow-up during an average of 8 years after the retention period, except in two children with a class III tendency. In nine other children an orthodontic anomaly had developed requiring further treatment (two children showed crowding and seven children showed a class II malocclusion). This study showed that FUPC can be treated adequately by early orthodontic intervention; however, its correction does not guarantee the absence of functional disturbances at a later age. Therefore, FUPC should be treated early in order to achieve normal growth and development rather than to prevent temporomandibular disorders.

Child↗

PubMed1996

Temporomandibular and cervical spine disorders. Self-reported signs and symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN: The authors assessed the results of an anamnestic self-administered questionnaire given to 111 patients with temporomandibular disorders and 103 patients with cervical spine disorders. OBJECTIVES: The present study was performed to investigate whether patients with cervical spine disorders and subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorders differ regarding specific and accompanying signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and cervical spine disorders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with temporomandibular disorders frequently show signs and symptoms related to cervical spine disorders, and, vice versa, patients with cervical spine disorders may show signs and symptoms related to temporomandibular disorders. Many authors have pointed out the existence of neuroanatomical and biomechanical relationships. METHODS: The questionnaire included questions about pain, symptoms of temporomandibular disorders, accompanying signs and symptoms, psychosocial factors, and general health. Before their clinical examination, all patients were requested by mail to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients with cervical spine disorders reported fewer symptoms of temporomandibular disorders than the subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorders, more general health symptoms than patients with temporomandibular disorders with an arthrogenous or myogenous component, and fewer ear symptoms than patients with temporomandibular disorders. There was no difference between the patient groups regarding other associated signs and symptoms and psychosocial factors as measured with the questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses showed that six variables (jaws, ears, eyes, temporomandibular joint sounds, complaints of the shoulders, and pain in joints other than the temporomandibular joint) correctly classified 91% of the patients as having temporomandibular disorders or cervical spine disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the theoretical concept that cervical spine disorders may give rise to temporomandibular disorders. The authors' results indicate that the anamnestic questionnaire can be used as an aid to distinguish patients with cervical spine disorders from subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Osteochondroma of the mandibular condyle. A case report.

Osteochondroma of the mandibular condyle is extremely rare and may cause signs and symptoms like those seen in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Differentiation between osteochondroma and condylar hyperplasia is not possible on histologic grounds alone, but the radiographic and intraoperative findings together are usually sufficient to establish a definite diagnosis.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Symptoms of the stomatognathic system in temporomandibular and cervical spine disorders.

This study was performed to assess the prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with cervical spine disorders (CSD) and to compare patients with CSD and subgroups of patients with TMD with regard to the results of orthopaedic tests of the stomatognathic system. A group of 103 consecutive patients with signs and symptoms of CSD and a group of 111 consecutive patients with TMD were examined. All subgroups of TMD patients showed a significantly smaller range of motion than the CSD patients. Patients with TMD had limited mouth opening (< 40 mm) on active and passive mouth opening more often than CSD patients. TMD patients with myogenous problems reported oral habits more often than CSD patients, although no objective differences between CSD and TMD patients were found. Subgroups of TMD patients reported joint sounds, and pain on palpation and joint play tests of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) more frequently than CSD patients. Joint sounds on active movements, pain on palpation of the TMJ, and pain on joint play tests correctly classified 82% of the patients with TMD and 72% of the patients with CSD. In spite of the biomechanical and anatomical relationship between the neck and the stomatognathic system, the results of the study show that CSD patients have signs and symptoms of TMD comparable with those of the adult Dutch population. It was concluded that the function of the masticatory system should be evaluated in patients with neck complaints in order to rule out a possible involvement of the masticatory system.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Symptoms of the cervical spine in temporomandibular and cervical spine disorders.

This study was performed to assess the prevalence of signs and symptoms related to cervical spine disorders (CSD) in subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and to compare TMD patients and CSD patients with regard to the results of orthopaedic cervical spine tests. One hundred and eleven consecutive patients with TMD and 103 consecutive patients with signs and symptoms of CSD were examined. The results indicated that there is a considerable overlap in the signs and symptoms of patients with TMD and patients with CSD. Signs and symptoms on neck extension occurred more often in CSD patients than in subgroups of TMD patients. No significant differences in upper cervical extension, neck flexion, and shoulder girdle function were found between CSD patients and subgroups of patients with TMD. Patients with CSD reported neck pain during active and passive movements of the neck more often than the subgroups of patients with TMD. TMD patients and CSD patients did not differ with regard to pain on shoulder girdle function and palpation of the shoulder girdle. Logistic regression analyses showed that orthopaedic tests of the cervical spine are of minor importance in discriminating between patients with TMD and patients with CSD. It is concluded that TMD with a myogenous involvement in contrast to TMD with only an arthrogenous involvement should no longer be viewed as a local disorder of the stomatognathic system. The upper quarter, including the stomatognathic system, cervical spine, and shoulder girdle, should be evaluated in patients with more complex or persistent symptoms in the head and neck region.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Reliability of clinical findings in temporomandibular disorders.

The aim of the present investigation was to study the interexaminer reliability of orthopedic tests and palpation techniques routinely used in the clinical diagnosis of disorders of the masticatory system. The tests were performed by a dentist and a physiotherapist, who both used the tests routinely when examining patients with temporomandibular disorders. Seventy-nine patients participated in this study. In the analysis, percentage agreement, intraclass correlation, and Cohen's kappa were used. The interexaminer reliability of the tests measuring maximal active mouth opening and registration of clicking during active mouth opening was high. The interexaminer reliability was fair for the tests measuring the intensity of pain during active movements and moderate for tests recording joint sounds (kappa = 0.47 to 0.59). There was high interobserver agreement on several items of the traction and translation tests, although the kappa values were low. The interexaminer reliability of the multitest scores for compression was substantial for joint sounds (kappa = 0.66) and fair for pain (kappa = 0.40). The interexaminer reliability of the multitest scores for muscle palpation and joint palpation was moderate (kappa = 0.51) and fair (kappa = 0.33), respectively. It can be concluded that most variables determined during active movements can be measured with satisfactory reliability, whereas variables for other tests are not measured with the same reliability on the basis of the kappa scores. The main symptoms of temporomandibular disorders can be evaluated reliably with multitest scores. It is recommended that clinicians calibrate their techniques regularly to improve the reliability of results in daily practice.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. Part I: Self-report data and clinical findings.

An overview is given of the most commonly investigated signs and symptoms associated with craniomandibular disorders as detected in a population of patients with craniomandibular disorders and in four defined diagnostic subgroups. The information was collected with a questionnaire and during an extensive clinical examination. Comparison of self-report and clinical data indicated that these two methods reveal different aspects of the patient's complaints and should be interpreted in their own way. The results showed that no statistically significant differences could be found between the four diagnostic subgroups with respect to occlusal factors, trauma, and clinically assessed parafunctional habits. The groups differed considerably with respect to general characteristics, pain variables, signs of craniomandibular disorders, self-reported para-functional habits, psychosocial factors, and general health factors. However, despite the reduction in clinical characteristics of the four subgroups, there was little reduction in the diversity of factors associated with craniomandibular disorders. This implicates that almost all factors associated with craniomandibular disorders may influence the initiation and perpetuation of the different disorders in the individual patient, and therefore, remain of interest in future research.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. Part II: Symptom profiles.

An overview is given of the following four well-defined diagnostic subgroups of patients who have craniomandibular disorders: those with a mainly myogenous component; those with internal derangement with reduction; those with internal derangement without reduction; and those with osteoarthrosis. Although it was inevitable that the subgroups were not completely homogeneous, symptom profiles differed considerably. There even seemed to be reasons to distinguish two osteoarthrosis groups in future research. Although the identification of clinically significant factors in a given patient with craniomandibular disorders remains a difficult clinical task, the symptom profiles provide a framework that may give more insight into the background of the complaint and into possible contributing factors. The symptom profiles also provide the possibility of a more directed choice of treatment and a treatment evaluation that is more aimed at the specific characteristics of the subgroups. It therefore may be concluded that, to increase insight into craniomandibular disorders, the evaluation of diagnostic subgroups has to be preferred in the assessment of a heterogeneous group of patients with craniomandibular disorders.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Psychosocial aspects of craniomandibular dysfunction. An assessment of clinical and community findings.

This study was performed to assess whether subgroups of patients with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) and a control group of dental patients with and without signs of CMD can be characterized by psychosocial variables, and whether there is evidence of stress-induced muscle hyperactivity as a contributing factor in the development of signs and symptoms of CMD. A group of 127 care-seeking patients and a control group of 158 dental patients completed a Questionnaire Battery (QB) designed to measure external stressors, stress-related emotional reactions (anxiety and depression) and personal factors such as coping styles, health locus of control and personality. Patients with CMD with both a myogenous and an arthrogenous component reported more stress and stronger stress-related emotional reactions than patients with either an arthrogenous or a myogenous CMD. However, patients with arthrogenous CMD did not differ on psychosocial variables from patients with myogenous CMD. In contrast to expectations, controls with signs of CMD reported more stress than patients with CMD. Compared with controls, CMD-patients experienced less personal control over their health and they considered health to be determined by chance or fate. CMD-patients also reported to cope differently with stress than controls. Analyses of covariance showed that the results were not influenced by differences in age, sex or pain reported in the head, neck and/or shoulders. Results were interpreted with regard to the psychophysiological theory of the development of signs and symptoms of CMD as a consequence of the progression of stress-induced muscle hyperactivity. Differences between patients and controls in personal factors were interpreted with regard to treatment need for CMD.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1994

Interexaminer reliability of six orthopaedic tests in diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders.

Interexaminer reliability is defined as the degree of consistency among examiners when making observations of the same clinical variable. In the present study, the interexaminer reliability of six orthopaedic tests was determined in a group of 79 patients with signs and/or symptoms of craniomadibular disorders (CMD), subdivided into three subgroups of patients with a mainly myogenous, a mainly arthrogenous, and a combined myogenous and arthrogenous disorder. Multi-test scores were composed for each test and combinations of tests for the three main symptoms of CMD, viz. pain, joint noises and restriction of movement. Although the orthopaedic tests showed different reliability scores, overall reliability of the determination of these three main symptoms of CMD was satisfactory. In the subgroups, arthrogenous signs and symptoms could be determined reliably with the set of six tests, whereas the reliability of the tests in determining pain and joint noises in the myogenous group was rather low. It may be concluded that the tests are well suited to evaluate arthrogenous signs and symptoms, but that the clinician should be aware of erroneous results of the tests in evaluating pain of a myogenous origin.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Multidimensional evaluation of craniomandibular dysfunction. I: Symptoms and correlates.

To standardize clinical history taking, a comprehensive anamnestic questionnaire was developed (Screen). Screen includes questions about (i) pain, (ii) other symptoms of CMD, (iii) correlates of CMD, (iv) psychosocial factors, and (v) general health. Variables discriminating between subgroups of clinical cases and controls were described successively. This study was performed to assess whether subgroups of patients with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD), and a control group of dental patients with and without signs and symptoms of CMD, can be characterized by differential report of signs and symptoms of CMD, as reported in Screen. Results indicate that Screen can be used to discriminate between (i) subgroups of subjects with signs or symptoms of CMD (both clinical cases and controls) and controls without signs or symptoms of CMD; (ii) subgroups of clinical cases and controls with signs and/or symptoms of CMD; and (iii) patients with CMD with mainly a myogenous component and patients with CMD with mainly an arthrogenous component. Differences between patients and controls are interpreted with regard to the correct classification of patients with CMD with mainly a myogenous component and patients with CMD with mainly an arthrogenous component, and with regard to the subjective treatment need for CMD. The results of logistic regression analyses indicate that subsets of items of Screen correctly classified up to 80% of patients with myogenous or arthrogenous CMD. Implications for further research were discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Multidimensional evaluation of craniomandibular dysfunction. II: Pain assessment.

To standardize clinical history taking, a comprehensive anamnestic questionnaire was developed (Screen). Screen includes questions about: (i) pain, (ii) other symptoms of craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD), (iii) correlates of CMD, (iv) psychosocial factors, and (v) general health. The current study focuses on variables in Screen concerning pain reported somewhere in the head, neck and/or shoulders. This study was performed to assess whether subgroups of patients with signs and symptoms of CMD and a control group of dental patients with and without signs and symptoms of CMD can be characterized by differences in areas reported to be painful, in quantitative and qualitative characteristics of pain, and in factors exacerbating pain. Results indicate that several characteristics of pain as measured in Screen can be used to discriminate between: (i) subgroups of subjects with signs and/or symptoms of CMD and controls without signs or symptoms of CMD, (ii) subgroups of clinical cases and controls with signs or symptoms of CMD, and (iii) patients with CMD with mainly a myogenous component and patients with CMD with mainly an arthrogenous component. The results of logistic regression analysis indicate that four adverbs describing pain correctly classified 75% of patients with CMD-myo and patients with CMD-arthro. Differences between patients and controls are interpreted with regard to the correct classification of patients with CMD with a mainly myogenous component and patients with CMD with a mainly arthrogenous component and the subjective treatment need for CMD. Implications for further research are discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Assessment of treatment outcome in patients with craniomandibular dysfunction.

Psychosocial, socio-demographic and symptom characteristics have been shown to be associated with treatment outcome in patients with craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD). This study was performed to assess to what extent symptoms and correlates of CMD change as a consequence of conservative treatment for CMD. Treatment outcome in a group of CMD patients treated with a stabilization splint (experimental group) was compared with that of a group of patients with CMD who were not treated for CMD (control group). Patients in the experimental group had fewer symptoms of CMD at the end of treatment. However, several symptoms and correlates of CMD also improved in the control group (severity of pain, joint noises, ear symptoms). It was therefore questioned whether all improvements in symptoms and correlates of CMD in the experimental group could be attributed to the treatment received. Results suggest that the main improvement that might be ascribed to therapy was a decrease in 'jaw symptoms'. There was a noticeable decrease in depression and an increased use of 'planned actions and rational thinking' as a coping style in the experimental group whereas these variables did not change in the control group. Implications and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1994

Craniomandibular dysfunction: patient characteristics related to treatment outcome.

In a previous study it was concluded that only a few changes in symptoms related to craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) could be attributed to therapy. It was suggested that psychosocial and socio-demographic variables, as well as symptom characteristics, could be responsible for the unconvincing treatment outcome in patients treated with a splint. The present study was performed to investigate whether socio-demographic characteristics, symptom characteristics and various psychosocial variables are associated with treatment outcome in patients with CMD treated with a splint. Treatment outcome was determined by using self-reported follow-up data. Results showed that patients with a negative treatment outcome were older, reported more and more severe symptoms and correlates of CMD, reported fewer stressors and more frequently considered health to be determined by external factors than patients who were treated successfully. The two groups could not be differentiated with regard to anxiety and depression. Results are interpreted with regard to the prediction of treatment outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Temporomandibular joint structures: a comparison between anatomic and magnetic resonance findings in a coronal and an angulated coronal plane.

Two temporomandibular joints from one specimen were investigated using magnetic resonance imaging and cryosectioning. Magnetic resonance images, photography of the tissue block surface, and on-tape histologic sections were compared. The left joint was imaged and sectioned in a coronal plane, and the right joint in an angulated coronal plane parallel to the long axis of the condyle. The temporomandibular joint disc could be seen in coronal and angulated coronal scans. The posterior band was imaged in angulated coronal magnetic resonance scans throughout the temporomandibular joint both medically and laterally. In coronal scans only parts of the disc proper could be seen, depending on the level of imaging or sectioning. The densely plaited fibrous tissue of the intra-articular tissues could be seen in magnetic resonance imaging, primarily anterior to the condyle; this tissue corresponded to the low signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging. Medical and lateral disc attachments as well as the temporomandibular joint capsule were imaged in some of the magnetic resonance scans in both the coronal and the angulated coronal scans. In diagnosing anteromedial, medial, and lateral disc displacements, angulated coronal temporomandibular joint scanning is preferred over coronal scanning.

Aged↗

PubMed1994

Temporomandibular joint structures: a comparison between anatomic and magnetic resonance findings in a sagittal and an angulated plane.

Two temporomandibular joints originating from one specimen were investigated using magnetic resonance imaging and cryosectioning. Magnetic resonance images, photographs of the surface of the tissue block, and on-tape sections were compared. The left joint was imaged and sectioned in a sagittal plane, the right joint in a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the condyle. The densely plaited fibrous tissue of the disc proper correlated extremely well with the low signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging. The transition between the densely plaited fibrous tissue and the looser tissue of the posterior attachment was located anterior to the thickest part of the intra-articular tissues in most sections of the specimen. The temporomandibular joint disc could be seen in angulated as well as in sagittal magnetic resonance scans. The posterior band was imaged best in angulated magnetic resonance scans throughout the temporomandibular joint.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Characteristics and treatment outcome of diagnostic subgroups of CMD patients: retrospective study.

The records of 193 randomly chosen patients with CMD referred 2.5 yr previously were examined retrospectively for anamnestic, clinical and radiological findings and observations related to treatment. These data were supplemented with information from questionnaires sent to all treated patients in which their opinion on the treatment outcome was asked. Within the patient group, four diagnostic subgroups were distinguished. Three subgroups consisted of patients with the diagnoses CMD with a mainly myogenous component, osteoarthrosis and internal derangement respectively, whereas the fourth subgroup consisted of patients who did not fit into one of these categories. Differences between the four groups were found concerning mean age, the prevalence of a limited range of motion, headache, psychosocial factors, loss of posterior tooth support and objective treatment outcome. The patients with CMD with a mainly myogenous component showed the highest percentages of CMD associated disorders, the least successful treatment outcome and the highest percentage of renewed treatment. The patients with internal derangement showed the lowest mean age, the highest prevalence of a limited range of motion and the best treatment outcome. The patients in the osteoarthrosis group showed the highest mean age and the highest percentage of loss of posterior tooth support. It may be concluded that the evaluation of diagnostic subgroups of CMD patients has to be preferred in the assessment of a heterogeneous group of patients with CMD.

Adult↗