PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Hajro

Publications and source records attributed to M Hajro.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

[Parascalene brachial plexus block: experience of 10 years].

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and complications of a parascalene block over a period of 10 years of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 1993 we have been performing parascalene blocks with 18G, 45 mm needles with 30 degrees bevels using the aponeurotic click method. We administer 30 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine and then insert a flexible catheter into the sheath surrounding the plexus to provide additional doses of 1% mepivacaine to ensure the surgical block of the inferior nerve trunk and/or postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The parascalene block technique was used in 2810 patients for shoulder and arm surgery. The block succeeded in 2524 cases (89.82%) and failed in 286 (10.17%). Anesthetic efficacy was excellent in 1921 cases (76.10%), good in 289 cases (11.45%), and insufficient in 312 (12.36%). The most common complications were Bernard-Horner syndrome (71.31%), and ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis (95.72%). Vasovagal events presented in 92 (4.65%) of the shoulder operations in semi-recumbent position. No cases of pneumothorax, respiratory insufficiency, arterial puncture, neuroaxial anesthesia, or medullary or radicular lesion occurred. CONCLUSION: The parascalene block is a simple, safe, and effective technique. The probability of serious complications is lower than with most known supraclavicular techniques, mainly because the puncture is perpendicular to the horizontal plane. A neurostimulator or aponeurotic click technique is used and the nerve trunks can be found between 1,5 and 2 cm deep when the plexus is located in reference to the transverse processes.

Adult↗

[Combined sciatic and inguinal paravascular nerve block: a valid alternative for arthroscopic knee surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a combined transgluteal sciatic and inguinal paravascular nerve block for arthroscopic knee surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective descriptive study of 88 patients scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery. Using a nerve stimulator and a transgluteal approach, we infiltrated the sciatic nerve with 20 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine. Then, with the patient in supine position, we located the femoral nerve and inserted a plastic catheter into the descending inguinal canal, applying pressure near the tip, to inject 20 mL of 1% mepivacaine. We evaluated a) anesthetic effectiveness, b) tolerance of the pressure cuff, c) time in the intensive care recovery unit, and d) time until reversal of the block. RESULTS: Anesthesia was efficacious for 89.77% of the patients: excellent for 54 patients (61.36%), good for 25 (28.41%), and insufficient for 9 (10.23%). The pressure cuff was well tolerated by 70 patients (79.54%) and caused discomfort for 18 (20.45%). Mean postoperative stay in the intensive care recovery unit was 19.05 (SD 8.11) minutes. Reversal took place at a mean 204.09 (SD 22.59) minutes for the sensory nerve block and at 223.45 (SD 20) minutes for the motor block. CONCLUSIONS: The combined sciatic and inguinal paravascular block is effective for arthroscopic knee surgery and offers an alternative when other anesthetic techniques cannot be used. Use of a pressure cuff may require complementary sedation.

Adult↗