PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Hinojosa Macías

Publications and source records attributed to M Hinojosa Macías.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Urticaria induced by antihistamines.

H1-antihistamines are commonly used drugs, and probably the most frequently used for allergic diseases. They are pharmacologic inverse agonists of histamine at H1 receptor sites and try to shift the equilibrium of this receptor toward the inactive state, preventing H1 response. A wide variety of adverse effects have been attributed to antihistamines, and they can exceptionally induce skin reactions. We report the case of a patient with several episodes of urticaria induced by different families of antihistamines - piperazines and piperidines. We performed skin prick tests (SPT), patch tests and oral challenges to different antihistamines. We found positive SPT to some antihistamines, and positive oral challenge in others with negative SPT. The route of sensitization remained unclear, and our patient could not finally tolerate any antihistamine after the oral challenges we performed. We support the hypothesis that antihistamines may shift the H1 histamine receptor to the active conformation instead of the inactive conformation, prompting adverse reactions after dosing. This is the first report of urticaria induced by different antihistamines in the same patient with positive SPT to several others.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Chronic urticaria and Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical manifestations of chronic urticaria (CU) are similar in most patients, a variety of factors should be taken into consideration. In general, the cause of CU cannot be determined in most patients, and it is considered idiopathic. In the past several years, relationships between some patients with CU and hepatitis C or autoimmune thyroid diseases have been established. Similarly, other factors may also be considered as possible causes to explain certain patients with CU. Previously, some patients with CU have had their disease attributed to Helicobacter pylori (HP), but the relationship was only clinical. OBJECTIVE: None of the patients previously described included an immunological study. Thus, we studied a patient with CU, who showed marked clinical improvement after eradication of HP, to demonstrate an IgE relationship with this skin disease. METHODS: First, blood analytical parameters, roentgenograms, fecal examination for parasites, and skin tests were performed to try to establish an etiology. In addition, endoscopy with gastric biopsy confirmed HP colonization, and eradication treatment was prescribed. To investigate an immunological relationship, other tests performed included the following: HP-specific IgG, histamine release induced by HP, HP-specific IgE, and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with immunoblotting. RESULTS: The blood analytical parameters, roentgenograms, fecal examination for parasites, and skin tests were all negative. In contrast, the tests for HP-specific IgG, histamine release induced by HP, and HP-specific IgE were all positive. In addition, the sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with immunoblotting showed specific IgE binding to an extract of HP. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may indicate an immunological IgE relationship between HP colonization and CU in this particular patient.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Urticaria--angioedema induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics].

Forty-two adult patients had been evaluated with a history of Urticaria and Angioedema (U-AE) associated with ingestion of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). None developed attacks of bronchospasm. None had chronic urticaria. The same reaction was repeated in 36 individuals on at least two different occasions following administration of these drugs. Based on patients'history we distinguished three groups: Group A: twenty-three patients who had presented U-AE with the administration of pyrazolone drugs. Thereafter, sixteen of them had taken aspirin without adverse reactions. Group B: Nine patients in whom aspirin caused U-AE, after three of them had taken pyrazolone drugs without intolerance. The remaining six had not taken analgesic drugs since the last reaction. Group C: Ten patients who had developed U-AE with aspirin as well as with pyrazolone drugs. The objective of our study was the following: 1) to observe tolerance level of these patients to other NSAID different from those which had produced the first reactions. 2) To test to see if the patients who had suffered U-AE by noramidopyrine and aminophenazone tolerated other pyrazolone drugs like sulfinpyrazone and phenylbutazone. 3) To see if reactions are produced with tartrazine in patients who had presented U-AE with pyrazolone drugs, given that this colouring (tartrazine) is a pyrazolone derivative. Skin test (prick and intracutaneous test) with noramidopyrine, phenylbutazone and noramidopyrine metasulphonate MG, were carried out on the patients in group A, group C and 30 normal controls. In all the groups oral challenge tests were performed with progressive doses of naproxen, indomethacin, paracetamol, ciclofenac, mefenamic acid, piroxicam and phenylbutazone. Oral challenge tests were accomplished with aspirin in group A and with propiphenazone in group B. Oral challenge tests with sulfinpyrazone and tartrazine were also performed on various patients in group A and group C. The interval between the administration of progressive doses of a drug was 3 and as half hours and were allowed to pass at least 24 hours before testing other different analgesics. The test was considered positive if cutaneous rash, wheals, AE or hypotension were produced. In this case, the test was halted and 7 days were allowed to pass before continuing the study with a new drug. Based on the oral challenge tests performed, three types of patients could be distinguished: 1) individuals sensitive only to the pyrazolone drugs and who can take with impunity other NSAID.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗