PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Hojat

Publications and source records attributed to M Hojat.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender.

CONTEXT: Empathy is a major component of a satisfactory doctor-patient relationship and the cultivation of empathy is a learning objective proposed by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) for all American medical schools. Therefore, it is important to address the measurement of empathy, its development and its correlates in medical schools. OBJECTIVES: We designed this study to test two hypotheses: firstly, that medical students with higher empathy scores would obtain higher ratings of clinical competence in core clinical clerkships; and secondly, that women would obtain higher empathy scores than men. MATERIALS AND SUBJECTS: A 20-item empathy scale developed by the authors (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy) was completed by 371 third-year medical students (198 men, 173 women). METHODS: Associations between empathy scores and ratings of clinical competence in six core clerkships, gender, and performance on objective examinations were studied by using t-test, analysis of variance, chi-square and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Both research hypotheses were confirmed. Empathy scores were associated with ratings of clinical competence and gender, but not with performance in objective examinations such as the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT), and Steps 1 and 2 of the US Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE). CONCLUSIONS: Empathy scores are associated with ratings of clinical competence and gender. The operational measure of empathy used in this study provides opportunities to further examine educational and clinical correlates of empathy, as well as stability and changes in empathy at different stages of undergraduate and graduate medical education.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Documenting and comparing medical students' clinical experiences.

CONTEXT: The decentralization of clinical teaching networks over the past decade calls for a systematic way to record the case-mix of patients, the severity of diseases, and the diagnostic procedures that medical students encounter in clinical clerkships. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a system that documents medical students' clinical experiences across clerkships. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Evaluation of a method for recording student-patient clinical encounters using a pocket-sized computer-read patient encounter card at a US university hospital and its 16 teaching affiliates during academic years 1997-1998 through 1999-2000. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 647 third-year medical students who completed patient encounter cards in 3 clerkships: family medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patient encounters, principal and secondary diagnoses, severity of diseases, and diagnostic procedures as recorded on patient encounter cards; concordance of patient encounter card data with medical records. RESULTS: Students completed 86 011 patient encounter cards: 48 367 cards by 582 students in family medicine, 22 604 cards by 469 students in pediatrics, and 15 040 cards by 531 students in internal medicine. Significant differences were found in students' case-mix of patients, the level of disease severity, and the number of diagnostic procedures performed across the 3 clerkships. Stability of the findings within each clerkship across 3 academic years and the 77% concordance of students' reports of principal diagnosis with faculty's confirmation of diagnosis support the reliability and validity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: An instrument that facilitates students' documentation of clinical experiences can provide data on important differences among students' clerkship experiences. Data from this instrument can be used to assess the nature of students' clinical education.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗
PubMed2001

Impact of health care system on physicians' discontent.

This study was designed to investigate the impact of physicians' perceptions of the health care system on their discontent with their profession. By using a random digit dialing technique, a structured telephone interview was conducted with 401 generalist physicians (343 men, 56 women) who were practicing medicine at least for five years and were younger than 65 years. Physicians' willingness to choose medicine again was correlated with their perceptions of different aspects of the health care system. Of the total participants, 288 (72 percent) indicated that they would choose medicine again, 91 (23 percent) would not choose medicine, and 22 (5 percent) were not sure. Results of the step-wise logistic regression showed that after adjustment for physicians' gender and age, those who would not choose medicine again were more than twice as likely as other physicians who would choose medicine to believe that the health care environment will deteriorate more in the future (odds ratio = 2.1, p < .01), were less than half as likely to believe that physicians nowadays share more responsibilities with other health care professionals (odds ratio = .42, p < .01), and were less than half as likely to confirm that patients understand their health insurance better than before (odds ratio = .46, p < .01). Findings suggest that physicians' discontent can be predicted by their negative perceptions of the health care environment. Findings have implications for improving the quality of professional and personal life of the physician, thus improving the quality of care and satisfaction of the patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Correlates of young physicians' support for unionization to maintain professional influence.

PURPOSE: A resolution in support of physicians' unionization was recently approved by the American Medical Association's House of Delegates. This study investigated the factors associated with young physicians' approval of unionization. METHOD: A survey was mailed to all 1987-1992 Jefferson Medical College graduates (n = 1,272); 835 (66%) responded. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 43% supported unionization, 31% did not support unionization, and 26% expressed no opinion. Surgeons, medical subspecialists, pediatricians, and hospital-based specialists were more likely to support unionization than were family physicians. Significant predictors of support for unionization were negative views of the changes in the health care system, negative perceptions of the quality of care provided by managed care, the belief that physicians' independence had been impaired by changes in the health care system, and the belief that physicians' personal satisfaction should take precedence over societal needs in determining the future of health care. Support for unionization correlated with physicians' perceptions that mental health patients should be referred to psychiatrists, physician-assisted suicide should be legalized, and the involvement of nurse practitioners in diagnosis and treatment could compromise the quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Young physicians' support for unionization is a function of frustration with market-driven policies that compromise the quality of care and negatively affect physicians' autonomy and personal satisfaction.

Female↗
PubMed2000

Gender comparisons of income expectations in the USA at the beginning of medical school during the past 28 years.

This study was designed to investigate gender differences in the USA, in anticipated professional income. Participants were 5314 medical students (3880 men, 1434 women) who entered Jefferson Medical College between 1970 and 1997. The annual peak professional income estimated at the beginning of medical school was the dependent variable and gender within selected time periods was the independent variable. Results showed significant differences between men and women on their anticipated future incomes in different time periods. Women generally expected 23% less income than men. The effect size estimates of the differences were moderately high. The gender gap in income expectations was more pronounced for those who planned to pursue surgery than their counterparts who planned to practice family medicine or pediatrics. A unique feature of this study is that its outcomes could not be confounded by active factors such as experience, working hours, age and productivity. Findings suggest that social learning may contribute to gender gap in anticipated income.

Economics, Medical↗
PubMed2000

Physicians' perceptions of the changing health care system: comparisons by gender and specialties.

This study was designed to investigate physicians' perceptions of changes in the United States health care system impacting academic medicine, quality of care, patient referrals, cost, ethical and sociopolitical aspects of medicine. A survey was mailed in 1998 to 1,272 physicians (graduates of Jefferson Medical (College between 1987 and 1992); 835 physicians (66%) responded. Results showed that a substantial majority (92%) believed that learning to work in a managed care environment should become an essential component of medical education. Physicians perceived that current changes impair physicians' autonomy (94%), and restrain physicians' freedom to provide optimal care (84%). A sizable majority (76%) endorsed patients' freedom to seek specialist care, and 55% believed that capitation reduces physicians' motivation for long-term monitoring of patients. The majority endorsed universal health coverage (80%), and agreed to support rather than resist the changes (62%). Only 18% hold a positive view of the changes in the future. The majority believed that medical education should prepare physicians to provide end-of-life care (92%), and that organized medicine should take a stand on social issues that can influence the well-being of society (79%). Only 34% endorsed the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. No gender differences were observed, but a few differences were found between generalists and specialists. Results can help in understanding physicians' perceptions of current changes in the United States health care system, and in providing guidelines for the development of educational programs to prepare physicians to face new challenges.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Characteristics of medical students completing an honors program in pathology.

The Honors Program in pathology at Jefferson Medical College provides a voluntary enrichment opportunity for students who have demonstrated a superior ability to cope with the pathology curriculum and who rank in the upper fifth of their class. This study was performed to determine whether honor students possess cognitive and psychosocial attributes that distinguish them from their classmates. Students from five academic years (entering classes 1991 to 1995) were divided into 3 groups: (1) those who completed the Honors Program (n = 85), (2) those in the top 20% of the class who were offered the option but chose not to participate in the Honors Program (n = 128), and (3) students who did not qualify for the program (n = 953). Comparisons between these three groups were made on the basis of selected measures of academic achievement retrieved from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study database and psychosocial data obtained from a questionnaire completed during the first-year orientation. Students who completed the Honors Program in pathology had scored higher on the physical science section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) and had obtained higher first-year grade point averages than students in both of the other groups. Subsequently, they attained higher second-year grade point averages and scored higher on Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), compared with their peers in the other groups. There were no significant differences in psychosocial measures between honor students and the rest of the cohort (group 3). However, students in the top 20% of the class who declined the invitation to participate in the Honors Program (group 2) showed higher scores on the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale and the Eysenck Emotional Instability (Neuroticism) Scale than did their classmates. Despite these differences, students who completed the Honors Program (group 1) and eligible students who declined participation (group 2) selected similar pathways of postgraduate residency training: both groups preferred internal medicine to family practice, and both were more likely than the rest of the cohort to begin residency training at a top-ranked academic/research medical center. Voluntary participation in an Honors Program is a self-selection system that identifies students who are most likely to succeed academically at the highest levels. Residency selection committees may wish to pay dose attention to student involvement in similar programs, because this information may provide insights into student personality and general aptitude.

Anxiety↗
PubMed1999

Gender comparisons of medical students' psychosocial profiles.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare male and female medical students on selected personality attributes that could influence their academic attainment and personal success. DESIGN: Participants were 1157 medical students (743 men, 414 women) who completed a set of psychosocial questionnaires measuring intensity and chronicity of loneliness, general anxiety, test anxiety, neuroticism, depression, extraversion, self-esteem, locus of control, perceptions of parents, general health and appraisals of stressful life events. Data were analysed by employing multivariate and univariate analysis of variance and chi-square analysis. SETTING: Jefferson Medical College. SUBJECTS: Medical students. RESULTS: Men scored significantly higher on the intensity of loneliness, and women scored higher on general anxiety, test anxiety and neuroticism scales, but the magnitudes of the effect size estimates were not large. No significant gender difference was observed on measures of chronicity of loneliness, depression, extraversion, self-esteem, external locus of control, perception of general health and perceptions of the mother and the father. Women who experienced stressful life events, such as death in the family or personal illness, appraised these events more negatively than did their male counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Implications of the findings for medical education and practice are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Premarital sexual, child rearing, and family attitudes of Iranian men and women in the United States and in Iran.

Sexual, child rearing, and family attitudes of 160 Iranian immigrants in the United States (61 men, 99 women) and 97 Iranians (55 men, 42 women) in Iran were compared. Iranians in the United States in general, and women in particular, compared with their counterparts in Iran, expressed more permissive attitudes toward premarital sex and sex education, more tolerance toward homosexuality, and a greater acceptance of marital dissolution. Iranians in both countries assigned a high value to the maternal role and to family loyalty but did not endorse unrestricted freedom for youngsters. Influences of attitudinal disparity on interpersonal and family relationships are discussed, and implications for marriage counseling and family therapy are suggested.

Acculturation↗
PubMed1999

A statewide system to track medical students' careers: the Pennsylvania model.

In 1994 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania announced a statewide Generalist Physician Initiative (GPI) modeled after The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's GPI. Three-year grants totaling more than $9 million were awarded to seven of Pennsylvania's medical schools, including two that had already received GPI grants from the foundation. Stimulated by these initiatives, the state's six allopathic and two osteopathic medical schools decided to work together to develop a collaborative longitudinal tracking system to follow the careers of all their students from matriculation into their professional careers. This statewide data system, which includes information for more than 18,000 students and graduates beginning with the entering class of 1982, can be used to evaluate the impact of the Pennsylvania GPI, and it also yielded a local longitudinal tracking system for each medical school. This paper outlines the concept of the system, its technical implementation, and the corresponding implications for other medical schools considering the development of similar outcomes assessment systems.

Career Choice↗
PubMed1999

Factors associated with changing levels of interest in primary care during medical school.

PURPOSE: To examine changing levels of interest in primary care as related to clinical experiences during medical school, and to other variables. METHOD: A total of 1,911 (74%) allopathic medical school graduates responded to a national survey in early 1993. Respondents' reported changes of interest in primary care during medical school were cross-tabulated with their clinical experiences in medical school, their demographics, their interests prior to medical school, and their future practice plans. RESULTS: Increased interest in primary care during medical school was strongly associated with the electives taken in primary care. This positive change of interest in primary care was found to be associated with interest prior to medical school and with primary care career plans. CONCLUSION: Schools wishing to graduate more students who enter primary care specialties may want to raise the number of primary care elective courses to increase students' interests, and to help them choose to enter and remain in primary care specialties.

Adult↗