Biomedical subjects

M I Lavonius

Publications and source records attributed to M I Lavonius.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a prospective randomised study.

43 children between the ages of 7 and 15 years with clinical symptoms of acute appendicitis were randomised to an open appendectomy (OA) or a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). There were 15 acute cases of appendicitis and 5 perforated appendices in the OA group and 17 acute appendicitis, 3 cases of perforated appendices and 3 other diagnoses in the LA group. The operative time was a little shorter in the OA group. There were no differences in hospital stay or the postoperative course of the patients. In the LA group, there were two minor complications, no other complications were seen. When comparing the two surgical methods in the consistent group of patients with non-perforated acute appendicitis no statistical differences were seen in the operative time, hospital stay or in the recovery of the patients between the OA and the LA groups.We conclude that LA has no significant benefit over OA in routine use. In paediatric patients we recommend an open approach for clinically typical acute appendicitis, but there should be no hesitation to choose laparoscopic approach when the clinical diagnosis is unclear.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2001

Role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic tumours.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Radiological imaging alone is not reliable enough in staging of pancreatic cancer. Not only because of poor sensitivity but also because there is a tendency to overstage tumours. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of spiral computed tomography (CT), transabdominal ultrasound (US), laparoscopy (LAP) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) in staging of pancreatic tumours. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study 27 patients underwent pancreatic tumour staging with CT, US, LAP and LUS. The reference standard was operative evaluation or in case of disseminated disease laparoscopic assessment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although LAP was hindered by adhesions in 11% of the patients the benefit of LAP staging was evident in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis. The assessment of the local tumour expansion of a pancreatic carcinoma was difficult for all staging modalities. LUS did not change the decision whether to proceed with laparotomy once. In our experience routine use of laparoscopic staging does not benefit patients with pancreatic tumour but in selected cases it may prevent unnecessary laparotomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Laparoscopy in the evaluation of the incarcerated mass in groin hernia.

BACKGROUND: In hernia patients, the preoperative diagnosis of strangulation is difficult. In this prospective study, we investigated the usefulness of an exploratory laparoscopy to evaluate the viability of a viscus incarcerated in a groin hernia. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with an acute irreducible inguinal mass underwent exploratory laparoscopy. The hernia was reduced, and the viability of the incarcerated viscus was judged laparoscopically on the basis of color, congestion, and contractility. RESULTS: Twenty-four hernias were found. In sixteen patients, the contents of the hernia were viable. In five patients, a necrotic bowel segment was found, and a laparotomy and resection were done. In three patients, no hernias were found. The cause of inguinal pain was spermatic cord hematoma in one patient and inguinal abscess in another; however, the cause of pain in the third patient remained unclear. After laparotomy, one patient developed a fascial rupture that required reoperation. There were no other complications. CONCLUSION: At laparoscopy, the judgment of the viability of the contents of the hernia is similar to that at laparotomy. The early use of laparoscopy can prevent many unnecessary laparotomies.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy.

Although modern gastrointestinal surgery has abandoned the invagination of stapler closures, the traditional technique for appendicectomy with appendix stump invagination is still in common use. In a prospective study altogether 200 patients operated on for acute appendicitis were treated either by simple ligation or ligation and inversion of the appendix stump. The complication rates between the two groups were equal. Thus, we recommend the simple ligation technique for conventional as well as for laparoscopic appendicectomy because it is simpler and faster, and it preserves the intact anatomy of the caecal wall.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1995

Outcome and clinical signs of arthroscopically graded patellar chondromalacia with or without lateral release.

In a follow-up study of 67 patients with an arthroscopically diagnosed patellar chondromalacia, we compared the results of plain conservative treatment with those after an open lateral retinacular release. The mean follow-up was 35 months. In Grade I chondromalacia the lateral release did not affect the result, which was in all cases good or excellent. In Grade II to IV chondromalacia the lateral release appeared beneficial, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. We also examined the validity of three clinical signs in arthroscopically verified patellar chondromalacia. Patellar inhibition and tracking tests were clearly more sensitive than the lateral apprehension test, which often gave a false negative result. If the patellar inhibition test is positive and a Grade II to IV chondromalacia of the patella is found at arthroscopy, lateral release should be considered among other procedures, like patellar shaving or patellar resurfacing.

Adolescent↗