PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Bardsley

Publications and source records attributed to M J Bardsley.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

A self-administered patient questionnaire in the assessment of symptoms before and after prostatectomy.

A self-administered patient questionnaire was developed to assess the severity of key symptoms before and after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP). This questionnaire was validated by comparison with a standard assessment performed by the doctor. Complete data were obtained on 39 men studied before and 3 months after prostatectomy. Close associations were found between the scores resulting from the assessments performed by the patient and those carried out by the doctor. These associations were found for individual scores and for aggregate scores for obstructive and irritative symptoms before and after operation. Symptom scores after operation were significantly related to the patients' overall assessment of whether the operation had been a success--a low score being associated with a satisfactory outcome. It is suggested that self-administered symptom questionnaires can give a reliable picture of the outcome of prostatectomy and might be useful in developing audit systems.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Evidence for validity of a health status measure in assessing short term outcomes of cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Nottingham health profile (NHP) as an indicator of short term outcome of cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective assessment of outcome. SETTING: One teaching hospital. Patients--161 consecutive patients admitted for cholecystectomy between January 1989 and September 1990. MAIN MEASURES: Patients' reported symptoms and self assessed NHP scores before cholecystectomy and at follow up at three and 12 months (76 patients); assessment before admission (19). RESULTS: Complete data were obtained preoperatively and at three months' follow up from 154 patients; seven did not respond to the follow up questionnaire. 76/84(90%) patients in the study 12 months or more answered the 12 month follow up questionnaire; eight did not respond. Significant changes in score before and at three months after the operation were observed for four of the six dimensions: energy (35.34 v 19.53, p < 0.0001), pain (27.38 v 9.8, p < 0.0001), sleep (26.99 v 17.51, p = 0.0002), and emotional reactions (16.12 v 7.56, p = 0.001). The mean scores for 76 patients followed up at three and 12 months showed little subsequent change. Scores in readmitted patients were all significantly higher, suggesting poor health. Patients with five reported symptoms had significantly worse scores for all dimensions. Scores were similar before cholecystectomy whether the questionnaire was completed before or after admission. CONCLUSION: The NHP is an appropriate tool for monitoring changes in health after cholecystectomy.

Cholecystectomy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The performance of three measures of health status in an outpatient diabetes population.

Both the late complications of diabetes and the means used to prevent them have a significant impact on the lives of people with the condition. Measuring quality of life is therefore important in assessing clinical need and evaluating the success of management. Three approaches to measuring health status were therefore compared in 284 randomly selected out-patients attending a hospital diabetes service. The measures used were the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), four categories of an anglicized version of the Sickness Impact Profile (the Functional Limitations Profile (FLP)), and a scale of Positive Well-being (PWB). The results were found to be independent of questionnaire order and place of completion. The distributions of scores on the NHP and FLP scales were highly skewed, with a majority of cases scoring zero. NHP and FLP scores were related (p < 0.001) to age, but not otherwise to type of diabetes. Patients with angina, circulatory problems, and neuropathy scored significantly higher (up to p < 0.001) on several dimensions/categories of the NHP and FLP, but not the PWB scale. Severe visual impairment (worse than 6/36) was only related (p < 0.005) to NHP 'Mobility' and FLP 'Ambulation' and 'Home management'. Validation of scores by interview gave satisfactory results on all dimensions of the NHP except 'Energy', and all FLP categories except 'Recreations and pastimes'. No statistically significant association was observed between the PWB and the interviewer's assessments, but it did correlate (up to tau = 0.45, p < 0.001) with some social and psychological dimensions/categories of the NHP/FLP. In conclusion the PWB scale is independent of physical disability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Measuring outcomes in care of the elderly.

This observational study was designed to assess whether routine measurement of outcomes using standard instruments is possible as part of clinical routine in care of the elderly, and to establish if such instruments are responsive to clinical change. Indices of functional status, cognitive function and subjective health status were collected routinely on admission and discharge in 540 inpatients and 340 patients attending a day hospital. Data collection became integrated into clinical routine. Response rates were generally good and yielded acceptably complete data. For inpatients, outcome was reflected by measurement of survival, physical function (Barthel index) and social status, each of these indicators showing significant change between admission and discharge. For day hospital patients, neither these, nor the Nottingham ADL scale, nor a health status indicator proved sufficiently responsive to clinical change to merit recommendation as outcome indicators for routine use in older patients. In ambulatory care in older patients, such as those attending a day hospital, new approaches are needed to measure clinical outcomes.

Activities of Daily Living↗