PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Hershman

Publications and source records attributed to M J Hershman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Multi-modality approach in curative local treatment of early rectal carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Despite recent advances, surgery remains the mainstay for the management of rectal carcinoma. The conventional surgical treatment for low rectal carcinoma is total mesorectal excision. This results in either abdomino-perineal excision of the rectum (APER) with permanent colostomy or low anterior resection (LAR) usually with a covering stoma. Local resection is an alternative treatment option and this could be offered either using manual trans-anal resection (TAR) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) if the tumour is situated higher. PATIENTS: Patient selection is an important factor if local resection is used. No further treatment is necessary for T1 tumours with clear surgical resection margins. Conventional radical surgery should be offered for T1 tumours with close resection margins (<1 mm) or T2 tumours with higher risk of lymph node metastases. Patients were treated by postoperative chemo-radiotherapy or radiotherapy, if further radical surgery was not considered appropriate or if the patient refused further surgery. Using this approach, we describe our experience of 100 patients treated from January 1992 to June 2002. RESULTS: Only 13 patients had surgery alone and 87 patients had radiotherapy either pre-operative (33 patients), postoperative (25 patients) or radical radiotherapy alone (29 patients). Local recurrence occurred in 10% of patients and salvage surgery was offered in over half (6 patients) of these patients. At median follow up of 33 months (range 3-120 months), the overall survival was 77% reflecting the fact that the majority of these patients were elderly with coexisting medical problems. However, cancer specific survival was 96%. More importantly, only 9 patients had colostomies and colostomy-free survival in our cohort of patients from Liverpool was 91%. CONCLUSION: We concluded that in selected patients, who were not medically fit (ASA 111 or above) or those who were unable to accept a permanent colostomy, local treatment could be offered with curative intent using a multimodality approach. In our experience, relapses can be salvaged effectively and we recommend a long-term close follow up policy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: a single institution experience with a review of the literature.

AIM: Ten percent of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) arise in the retroperitoneal tissues. The prognosis for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma is poor with a 5-year survival rate between 12% and 70%. Stage at presentation, high histological grade, unresectable primary tumour and incomplete resection are associated with a less favourable outcome. METHODS: Complete follow-up data were available on 22 patients who underwent surgery for retroperitoneal STS in our institution between 1990 and 2000. Patient, tumour and treatment variables were analysed including use of adjuvant therapy and survival status. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent surgery for primary disease, four patients were treated for recurrent disease or metastases. Ten patients presented with pain, seven with an abdominal mass, other presentation included weight loss and haematuria. Thirteen patients presented with tumours larger than 10 cm. The tumours were seven liposarcomas, six leiomyosarcomas, three malignant fibrous histiocytomas, two rhabdomyosarcomas, two malignant schwannomas and two undifferentiated sarcomas. Six primary tumours were completely excised, five patients received radiotherapy and five received chemotherapy. Local recurrence rate was 45% and recurrence-free interval for 10 patients with recurrence was 11 months. Five patients received radiotherapy and five received chemotherapy. The median survival for patients with primary tumours was 36 months, and 5-year survival was 44%. Adjuvant therapy was not associated with higher survival rates. CONCLUSION: This study re-emphasizes the poor outcome of patients with retroperitoneal STS. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy do not appear to be any proven benefit and the single most important prognostic factor is aggressive successful en bloc resection of the primary tumour. Our resection rate and 5-year survival rates are comparable with previous reported UK series although lower than large reports from North American centres. This might partly be explained by difficulty in data collection in a retrospective analysis, but may reflect inadequate subspecialization in UK centres.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The aetiology and epidemiology of faecal incontinence.

Faecal incontinence is experienced by at least 2% of the population and 7% of those over 65 years of age. The true incidence is probably much higher because of the stigmata of the affliction leading to underreporting. The common causes of faecal incontinence are discussed.

Anus Diseases↗
PubMed2001

The surgical management of faecal incontinence.

The surgical management of faecal incontinence is complex and technically demanding. Surgery should only be offered once the aetiology has been correctly identified and the patient has been counselled regarding outcomes of success. This may only approach 80%, with long-term results declining with time.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2001

Recent developments in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Many patients with faecal incontinence can be cured using a simple anal sphincter repair. Some patients are unsuitable for this either because the sphincter is absent, too extensively damaged or anal sphincter repair has failed. In these patients novel treatments have been introduced to augment, replace and stimulate the anal sphincter.

Artificial Organs↗
PubMed2000

Improving outcomes in colonic cancer.

Many of the symptoms of colon cancer do not start until the tumour has spread outside the bowel, and treatment at this stage has reduced chances of cure. Early detection and the optimum combination of surgery and adjuvant treatment can make a significant impact on outcome.

Adenomatous Polyps↗
PubMed2000

Improving outcomes in rectal cancer.

Concerted efforts are being made to improve the poor surgical outcomes in rectal carcinomas and this includes the use of total mesorectal excision by specially trained colorectal surgeons, in addition to the use of pre- or postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The role of each modality should be carefully evaluated, and benefits weighed against toxicity and added costs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

The anatomy of the pelvis makes it difficult to perform local excisions in the rectum when a tumour is some distance from the anal verge. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, a minimally invasive procedure, has been developed. It provides an alternative to the transsacral or transabdominal approach, with subsequent shorter hospital stay and fewer complications.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed1997

How to do it in surgery: laparoscopic rectopexy.

Laparoscopically performed rectopexy is now possible, with all the advantages of a minimally invasive technique. It may involve implantation of mesh (Cuesta et al, 1993), suturing (Graf et al, 1995) of the reduced rectum or resection of redundant colon (Baker et al, 1995). Essentially the laparoscopic operation mimics the open procedure.

Female↗