Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M J Howell.
The kinetics of the release of a liver enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase, into the serum of Fasciola hepatica infected rats was studied. The results support previous work that has shown that barriers to reinfection with this parasite are met before any pronounced liver damage takes place. The presence of this enzyme in serum can be used as an indicator of resistance to reinfection.
The effects of three different doses of BCG, given at various periods before infection, on the subsequent establishment of Fasciola hepatica metacercariae were studied. Although evidence was found to suggest that rats which received BCG had mounted a cell mediated immune response, there were no significant differences in worm recovery between BCG-treated rats and controls. The significance of these results in the light of current knowledge on immunity to F. hepatica in rats is discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Immune, hyperimmune, and nonimmune serum samples were collected from inbred rats following 10 to 15 weeks of one [5 metacercariae (mc)/rat], two (5 mc followed by 30 mc/rat) or no (uninfected) exposure to Fasciola hepatica. Lymphoid cells also were collected from these donors. Inbred, naive rats in groups receiving immune serum, hyperimmune serum, nonimmune serum (serum control), immune cells, hyperimmune cells, and nonimmune cells (cell control) received intraperitoneally either a total of 20 ml of serum or a total of 3 x 10(8) viable lymphoid cells. A challenge infection of 30 mc/rat was administered orally at about the time of serum or cell transfer. The transfer of immunity was evaluated by examining recipient rats for parasites 4 and 8 weeks after challenge. Some hematological parameters and the precipitating antibody response of the recipients were monitored also. Hyperimmune serum, unlike immune serum, consistently provided a significant degree of protection in recipient rats. The precipitating antibody titre of this serum was higher than that obtained from the immune donor group. The importance of a second sensitization to obtain sufficiently potent serum was demonstrated. Lymphoid cells from infected donors did not consistently confer protection on recipients. Thus, the expression of protective immunity against F. hepatica seemed to be more dependent on the presence of antibodies than on cells. The hematological parameters of the recipients, in general, supported this observation. The precipitating-antibody response of protected rats was lower than that of unprotected animals following challenge, presumably because the development of fewer worms in the former provided less antigenic stimulation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Following a primary infection of 5 metacercariae (mc) of Fasciola hepatica, rats became immune to challenge with 30 mc. Immunity was less consistently demonstrated following challenge infection with 5 mc. The levels of precipitating and miracidial immobilizing antibodies, and antibodies detected by an indirect fluorescent antibody test, were monitored during the course of a primary infection of 5 mc and challenge infection of 30 mc. Following primary infection, peaks in the antibody response were associated with the invasion and migration of juvenile flukes in the liver parenchyma. Antibody titres fell when flukes entered the bile duct. There was a slight elevation in the titre of all antibodies following challenge, but, apart from those detected by the fluorescent antibody test, this elevation was not as marked as in control animals. It is suggested that flukes become isolated from, or have diminished contact with, the immune system once they enter the bile duct. This might explain why adult flukes survive in immune hosts whereas challenge metacercariae are destroyed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Groups of rats, infected 7 weeks previously with Fasciola hepatica, together with appropriate control groups, were challenged either orally or intraperitoneally with 30 metacercariae. The mean worm recovery from the previously infected, orally challenged rats was significantly lower than from their respective controls (2.2 +/- 1.1 worms as opposed to 9.0 +/- 2.6). There was no significant difference in mean worm recovery from the previously infected, intraperitoneally challenged rats and their respective controls (5.3 +/- 3.2 worms as opposed to 6.2 +/- 1.9). Livers of the orally challenged group appeared to be largely free from secondary damage but considerable damage was evident in rats which received an intraperitioneal challenge. This evidence supports the view that the gut acts as an important barrier to metacercariae of a challenge infection. In a further experiment, young flukes were recovered from the gut, abdominal cavity and liver of immune and control rats 9, 18, 27, 36 and 45 h after oral challenge. It was found that fewer flukes successfully penetrated the guts of immune rats (3%) than those of uninfected controls (13%), again pointing to the gut as a barrier to metacercariae of a challenge infection. Protective mechanisms that may operate at the level of the gut are discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.