PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Marín

Publications and source records attributed to M J Marín.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Airway responsiveness to inhaled acetaldehyde in subjects with allergic rhinitis: relationship to methacholine responsiveness.

BACKGROUND: Asthmatic subjects have an exaggerated airway response to inhaled acetaldehyde, but no information is available on airway responsiveness to this bronchoconstrictor agent in subjects with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of inhaled acetaldehyde on lung function in nonasthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A total of 78 adults (43 subjects with allergic rhinitis, 16 asthmatics and 19 healthy subjects) were challenged with increased concentrations of acetaldehyde and methacholine. The response to each bronchoconstrictor agent was measured by the provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)). RESULTS: The geometric mean PC(20) acetaldehyde value for asthmatics was 35.5 mg/ml compared with 67.6 mg/ml in subjects with allergic rhinitis and with 80.0 mg/ml in healthy subjects (p < 0.001). The PC(20) acetaldehyde values in the allergic rhinitis group were also significantly lower than in the healthy control group (p = 0.04). All of the subjects with allergic rhinitis and increased responsiveness to acetaldehyde showed airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, but 9 patients with hyperresponsiveness to methacholine failed to respond to acetaldehyde. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that subjects with allergic rhinitis are less responsive to inhaled acetaldehyde than asthmatic subjects, but more than healthy controls. Furthermore, only approximately half the patients with allergic rhinitis and airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine exhibit bronchoconstriction with inhaled acetaldehyde, thus suggesting that airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine may not be the sole factor leading to bronchoconstriction in response to acetaldehyde.

Acetaldehyde↗

The UV Index on the Spanish Mediterranean coast.

An analysis is made of measured ultraviolet erythemal solar radiation (UVER) data recorded during the year 2003 by the networks of the Catalan Weather Service and the Environment Department of Valencia (both on the Spanish Mediterranean coast). Results show a latitudinal variation at sea level, of 3-4% per degree and an increase with altitude of 10% per km. Based on these data the UV Index has been evaluated for the measuring stations. The maximum experimental value of the UV Index was around 9 during the summer, although higher values were recorded at two stations, one at the highest elevation and the other at the lowest latitude. The annual accumulated doses of irradiation on a horizontal plane have been presented as well as the evolution through the year in units of energy, Standard Erythemal Doses and Minimum Erythemal Doses according to different phototypes. Lastly, the UV Index forecast, determined with a multiple scattering radiative transfer model, has been analyzed. Total agreement or only one unit of difference between measured and modelled values was found in 94% of cloud-free cases.

Journal Article↗

UV Index on tilted surfaces.

Solar ultraviolet erythemal irradiance (UVER) has been studied on inclined planes with different orientations in Valencia, Spain. To do this a platform was designed that could turn through 90 degrees on its own axis. The radiometers were inclined at an angle close to the latitude of Valencia (39.5 degrees N). Using two timers the platform could be turned through 90 degrees every 5 min. On clear or partially cloudy days, including those with different turbidity values, it was observed that the UVER showed a maximum at 1200 h GMT, very close to solar noon, in the north and south positions, while the maximum for east and west orientations was found at approximately one hour before and one hour after midday respectively. It was also observed how the irradiance for the south orientation was greater and for the north was less than for the horizontal plane, as well as the opposite performances of the east and west orientations, for four days close to the summer and winter solstices and each equinox. Some experimental results were also compared with the results from the SMARTS2.9 model for the same conditions. It was found that the model frequently overestimated the experimental data. With respect to the maximum calculated UV Index in the different planes this was always higher for the south orientation than for the north, while it was similar for east and west orientations throughout the year. Finally the accumulated erythemal dosage for the considered period was obtained as a function of phototype and orientation, confirming that the accumulated erythemal dosage decreased by around 37% in the north orientation compared to the horizontal value, while in the south position it was only 6% less and some 20% and 15% less in the east and west positions, respectively.

Journal Article↗