PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Roach

Publications and source records attributed to M J Roach.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults.

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with family satisfaction with end-of-life care in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). DESIGN: A prospective cohort study with patients randomized to either usual care or an intervention that included clinical nurse specialists to assist in symptom control and facilitation of communication and decision-making. SETTING: Five teaching hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Family members and other surrogate respondents for 767 seriously ill hospitalized adults who died. MEASUREMENTS: Eight questionnaire items regarding satisfaction with the patient's medical care expressed as two scores, one measuring satisfaction with patient comfort and the other measuring satisfaction with communication and decision-making. RESULTS: Sixteen percent of respondents reported dissatisfaction with patient comfort and 30% reported dissatisfaction with communication and decision-making. Factors found to be significantly associated with satisfaction with communication and decision-making were hospital site, whether death occurred during the index hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.2, 95% CI, 1.3-3.9), and for patients who died following discharge, whether the patient received the SUPPORT intervention (AOR 2.0, 1.2-3.2). For satisfaction with comfort, male surrogates reported less satisfaction (0.6, 0.4-1.0), surrogates who reported patients' preferences were followed moderately to not at all had less satisfaction (0.2, 0.1-0.4), and surrogates who reported the patient's illness had greater effect on family finances had less satisfaction (0.4, 0.2-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction scores suggest the need for improvement in end-of-life care, especially in communication and decision making. Further research is needed to understand how factors affect satisfaction with end-of-life care. An intervention like that used in SUPPORT may help family members.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Employment after spinal cord injury: an analysis of cases from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship of multiple biographic, injury-related, and educational factors with employment outcomes after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Data were collected through 18 model SCI systems, a nationwide network of hospitals that treat approximately 14% of all SCIs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3,756 persons with traumatic SCI who completed the Form II data collection during their annual follow-up at years 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, or 25 years (the most recent Form II was accepted). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Model Systems Forms I and II were used to identify biographic, injury-related status, employment at injury, and productivity status upon follow-up (Form I is used to elicit basic demographic and discharge information, whereas Form II is used to track multiple outcomes during annual follow-ups). The Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique (CHART) was used to assess hours spent in gainful employment and other productive activities. RESULTS: CHART data revealed only a modestly higher Employment rate (24.8%) than that of the traditional single Form II item (22%). Being Caucasian, younger at injury, having lived more years with SCI, having a less severe injury, and having more years of education were all predictive of being employed. Violence at injury was associated with lower employment rates (only 12.9% employed), especially among Caucasians (only 24% employed). Being employed at injury was associated with a greater probability of postinjury employment, but only in the first few years after injury. Among employed participants, women and those who had been injured fewer years averaged fewer hours spent at work. CONCLUSIONS: Findings were consistent with those in previous studies. Interventions to improve employability should focus on education and the needs of individuals from minority backgrounds.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

MediCaring: development and test marketing of a supportive care benefit for older people.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an alternative healthcare benefit (called MediCaring) and to assess the preferences of older Medicare beneficiaries concerning this benefit, which emphasizes more home-based and supportive health care and discourages use of hospitalization and aggressive treatment. To evaluate the beneficiaries' ability to understand and make a choice regarding health insurance benefits; to measure their likelihood to change from traditional Medicare to the new MediCaring benefit; and to determine the short-term stability of that choice. DESIGN: Focus groups of persons aged 65+ and family members shaped the potential MediCaring benefit. A panel of 50 national experts critiqued three iterations of the benefit. The final version was test marketed by discussing it with 382 older people (men > or = 75 years and women > or = 80 years) in their homes. Telephone surveys a few days later, and again 1 month after the home interview, assessed the potential beneficiaries' understanding and preferences concerning MediCaring and the stability of their responses. SETTINGS: Focus groups were held in community settings in New Hampshire, Washington, DC, Cleveland, OH, and Columbia, SC. Test marketing occurred in New Hampshire, Cleveland, OH; Columbia, SC, and Los Angeles, CA. PARTICIPANTS: Focus group participants were persons more than 65 years old (11 focus groups), healthcare providers (9 focus groups), and family decision-makers (3 focus groups). Participants in the in-home informing (test marketing group) were persons older than 75 years who were identified through contact with a variety of services. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, health characteristics, understanding, and preferences. RESULTS: Focus group beneficiaries between the ages of 65 and 74 generally wanted access to all possible medical treatment and saw MediCaring as a need of persons older than themselves. Those older than age 80 were mostly in favor of it. Test marketing participants understood the key points of the new benefit: 74% generally liked it, and 34% said they would take it now. Preferences were generally stable at 1 month. In multivariate regression, those preferring MediCaring were wealthier, more often white, more often living in senior housing, and using more homecare services. However, they were not more often in poor health or needing ADL assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Older persons aged more than 80 years can understand a health benefit choice; most liked the aims of a new supportive care benefit, and 34% would change immediately from Medicare to a supportive care benefit such as MediCaring,. These findings encourage further development of special programs of care, such as MediCaring, that prioritize comfort and support for the old old.

Advance Care Planning↗
PubMed1998

Depressed mood and survival in seriously ill hospitalized adults. The SUPPORT Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship among depressed mood, physical functioning, and severity of illness and to determine the relationship between depressed mood and survival time, controlling for severity of illness, baseline functioning, and characteristics of patients. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of data for 3529 seriously ill hospitalized adults who received care at 5 tertiary care teaching hospitals and who completed a depressed mood assessment 7 to 11 days after admission to the study. The Profile of Mood States depression subscale was used to assess depressed mood. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the independent effect of depressed mood on survival time, adjusting for demographic characteristics of patients and health status. RESULTS: Greater magnitudes of depressed mood were associated with worse levels of physical functioning (r = 0.151; P < .001) and more severity of illness. Depressed mood was associated with reduced survival time after adjusting for patient demographics and health status (hazards ratio, 1.134; 95% confidence interval, 1.071-1.200; P < or = .001). CONCLUSION: Seriously ill patients should be assessed for the presence of depressed mood even if they have not been given a diagnosis of depression. Further study is needed to determine whether interventions aimed at relieving depressed mood may improve prognosis.

Affect↗
PubMed1985

Who divorces and why: a review.

"This review of recent literature on the whos and whys of divorce examines data on the frequency of divorce and research on the predivorce period. The still lingering emphasis on a pathological perspective to explain marital dissolution is posited as a reason for the focus of much of the divorce literature on demography rather than process or outcome. Societal and legal explanations for the increase in the divorce rate are explored. Demographic correlates, mental and physical health issues, and the reasons the divorced themselves give for the decision to end their marriages are reviewed." The geographic focus is on the United States.

Americas↗