PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M J Rybak

Publications and source records attributed to M J Rybak.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

An evaluation of the bactericidal activity of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem or nafcillin alone and in combination with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in time-kill curves with infected fibrin clots.

The activity of piperacillin/tazobactam, ampicillin/sulbactam, imipenem and nafcillin alone and in combination with vancomycin was compared with vancomycin monotherapy against MRSA in test-tube time-kill studies and in infected fibrin clots. Bactericidal activity was achieved with all regimens except nafcillin monotherapy in test tubes but only with imipenem/vancomycin and nafcillin/vancomycin in fibrin clots infected with heterogeneous strains. No regimen was effective against the homogeneous strain. These agents may have potential as alternatives to vancomycin in selected infections.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1997

In-vitro bactericidal activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin alone and in combination against resistant strains of Enterococcus species and Staphylococcus aureus.

In-vitro activities of quinupristin/dalfopristin, a semisynthetic injectable streptogramin, and vancomycin were compared against multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and a methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Combinations of quinupristin/dalfopristin and/or vancomycin with ofloxacin or gentamicin were evaluated using the chequerboard technique. The only synergy observed was that between quinupristin/dalfopristin plus vancomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin plus gentamicin against E. faecium (FIC index < 0.5). Time-kill curves were performed over 24 h with an inoculum of 1 x 10(7) cfu/mL and clinically achievable concentrations of quinupristin/dalfopristin, vancomycin, ofloxacin and gentamicin (6, 30, 5 and 5 mg/L, respectively). In time-kill studies, combinations of quinupristin/dalfopristin plus vancomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin plus gentamicin were additive, not synergic, against E. faecium and achieved 99.9% killing in 21.2 h and 19.6 h, respectively. None of the combination regimens suppressed the regrowth of E. faecalis. Quinupristin/dalfopristin combined with vancomycin demonstrated consistent synergy against ATCC 25923 and the MRSA, achieving 99.9% killing in 12.1 h and 11.9 h, respectively. Overall, quinupristin/dalfopristin alone demonstrated inhibitory activity against E. faecium, but not against E. faecalis, and bactericidal activity was achieved only with quinupristin/dalfopristin in combination with vancomycin or gentamicin against E. faecium. Quinupristin/dalfopristin plus vancomycin was the most potent and reliable combination against both strains of S. aureus in time-kill studies.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin alone and in combination with gentamicin at various dosing intervals against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected fibrin-platelet clots in an in vitro infection model.

We compared the pharmacodynamic activities of vancomycin with or without gentamicin in an in vitro infection model with methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected fibrin-platelet clots. Infected fibrin-platelet clots (FPCs) were prepared with human cryoprecipitate, human platelets, thrombin, and the organism (approximately 10[9] CFU of MRSA-494/g) and were suspended with monofilament line in an infection model capable of simulating human pharmacokinetics. Antibiotics were bolused to simulate vancomycin regimens of 2 g every 24 h (q24h), 1 g q12h, 500 mg q6h, and continuous infusion (steady-state concentration of 20 microg/ml) and gentamicin regimens of 1.5 mg/kg of body weight q12h and 5 mg/kg once daily (q.d.). Model experiments were performed in duplicate over 72 h. FPCs were removed from the models in quadruplicate at 0, 8, 24, 32, 48, 72 h, weighed, homogenized, diluted, and plated to determine colony counts. The inoculum density at 72 h was used to compare bactericidal activities between the regimens. All regimens containing vancomycin significantly decreased the bacterial inoculum compared to the growth control (P < 0.001). Vancomycin monotherapy regimens were similar in bacterial kill regardless of dosing frequency. The addition of gentamicin (either q12h or q.d.) significantly improved the bactericidal activity of the vancomycin q6h, q12h, and q24h regimens (P < 0.001). The greatest reduction in bacterial density at 72 h (P < 0.001) and the most rapid rate of kill (time to 99.9% killing) were achieved with the regimen consisting of 2 g of vancomycin q24h plus gentamicin (q.d. or q12h).

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1997

In vitro activities of an investigational quinolone, glycylcycline, glycopeptide, streptogramin, and oxazolidinone tested alone and in combinations against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

We evaluated the in vitro activities of clinafloxacin, CL331,002, LY333328, quinupristin dalfopristin, and eperezolid (formerly known as U-100,592) against four strains of enterococci. All regimens tested resulted in the growth inhibition of each isolate. Against the three clinafloxacin-susceptible strains, clinafloxacin tested alone was the most active treatment, decreasing the bacterial inoculum by more than 3 log10 CFU/ml after 24 h in time-kill curve studies.

4-Quinolones↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of a new glycopeptide, LY333328, and in vitro activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium.

The objectives of the present study were to compare the in vitro activity of LY333328 (LY) to that of vancomycin (V) alone and in combination with gentamicin (G) and rifampin (R) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and V-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), by using the killing curve methods. In addition, the effect of the inoculum size and protein on LY's activity was evaluated by using MICs and killing curves. MICs, MBCs, and killing curves were determined with supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth (B), B with albumin (4 g/dl) (A), and B with 50% pooled human serum (S). For MRSA, time to 99.9% killing after exposure to LY at four times the MIC (4x MIC) was achieved at 0.5 +/- 0 h (mean +/- standard deviation) and was significantly faster than that by V (8.54 +/- 0.10 h; P = 0.001). Against VREF, LY decreased the inoculum by 2.2 log10 CFU/ml at 24 h (P = 0.002). With a large inoculum of MRSA, the activity of LY and V at 4x MIC was decreased compared to that with the standard inoculum (P = 0.0003) and regrowth occurred at 24 h. The reduction in the number of CFU per milliliter at 24 h to 2 log10 CFU/ml was restored by increasing the LY concentration to at least 16x MIC. At 24 h, the combinations of LY and G, LY and R, LY and V, and V and G were better than either LY or V alone against a large inoculum of MRSA (P = 0.0002). LY and G achieved 99.9% killing at 1.01 +/- 0.03 h and was more rapid (P < 0.007) than all the other regimens studied except for V and G, which achieved 99.9% killing at 3.59 +/- 0.01 h. Killing curves determined with different media against a standard inoculum of MRSA did not demonstrate a significant difference between LY and V at 24 h. Time to 99.9% killing was more rapid with LY than with V in B, A, and S (P = 0.0002). Times to 99.9% killing by LY in B, A, and S were not significantly different from each other. Against VREF, LY killed better than V in B, A, or S at 24 h (P = 0.0002). LY in B was more active than LY in A or S (P = 0.0002). LY is a new potent glycopeptide with a unique activity profile. It has a greater activity than that of V against MRSA and has activity against VREF. LY demonstrated synergism in combination with gentamicin against MRSA. LY was affected by large inoculum sizes and proteins in time-kill studies. However, the effect was compensated for by increasing the drug concentration to 16x MIC.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacodynamics of RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin) administered by intermittent versus continuous infusion against Staphylococcus aureus-infected fibrin-platelet clots in an in vitro infection model.

We evaluated the bactericidal activity of RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin) against fibrin-platelet clots (FPC) infected with two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, one constitutively erythromycin and methicillin resistant (S. aureus AW7) and one erythromycin and methicillin susceptible (S. aureus 1199), in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model. RP 59500 was administered by continuous infusion (peak steady-state concentration of 6 microg/ml) or intermittent infusion (simulated regimens of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h (q6h) q8h, and q12h. FPCs were infected with S. aureus to achieve an initial bacterial density of 10(9) CFU/g. Model experiments were run in duplicate over 72 h. Two FPCs were removed from each model at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h, and the bacterial densities (in CFU per gram) were determined and compared to those of growth control experiments. Additional samples were also removed from the model over the 72-h period for pharmacokinetic evaluation. All regimens significantly (P < or = 0.01) decreased bacterial densities in the infected FPCs for both isolates compared to growth controls. This occurred even though MBCs were equal to or greater than the RP 59500 concentrations achieved in the models. There were no significant differences found between the dosing frequencies and levels of killing when examining each isolate separately. However, examination of the residual bacterial densities (CFU per gram at 72 h) and visual inspection of the overall killing effect (killing curve plots over 72 h) clearly demonstrated a more favorable bactericidal activity against 1199 than against the AW7 isolate. This was most apparent when the q8h and the q12h AW7 regimens were compared to all 1199 treatment regimens by measuring the 72-h bacterial densities (P < or = 0.01). Killing (99.9%) was not achieved against the AW7 isolate. However, a 99.9% kill was demonstrated for all dosing regimens against the 1199 isolate. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h was found to be significantly correlated with reduction in bacterial density for the AW7 isolate (r = 0.74, P = 0.04). No resistance was detected during any experiment for either isolate. RP 59500 efficacy against constitutively erythromycin- and methicillin-resistant S. aureus may be improved by increasing organism exposure to RP 59500 as a function of dosing frequency.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

Influence of antibiotic and E5 monoclonal immunoglobulin M interactions on endotoxin release from Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Recent controversy surrounding the activity of monoclonal antibodies against endotoxin highlights the necessity of identifying all factors associated with increased mortality, one of which is endotoxin concentrations. Antibiotics may induce different patterns of endotoxin release. We compared the release of free endotoxin (in endotoxin units per milliliter) over 6 h and changes in numbers of CFU of exponentially growing Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10(6) to 10(7) CFU/ml) cultured in chemically defined endotoxin-free broth combined with pooled human serum and/or 10 micrograms of E5 immunoglobulin M monoclonal antibody per ml. MICs and MBCs were tested in each medium at the same inoculum. The inoculum was exposed to antibiotics at a single fixed multiple of the MIC for each medium (range, two to eight times the MIC). E5 antibody had no effect on MICs, MBCs, bactericidal activity, or endotoxin release. In the presence of 50% serum, amikacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and ofloxacin each killed equivalent amounts of E. coli over 6 h; however, ceftazidime induced the highest release of endotoxin. Amikacin and ofloxacin produced the most favorable ratio of endotoxin release to amount of bacterial killing. In the presence of 50% serum, ceftazidime and imipenem reduced the P. aeruginosa inoculum to the greatest extent over 6 h. Although its bactericidal activity was diminished, ofloxacin caused the lowest release of free endotoxin. Imipenem and ofloxacin showed similar low ratios of endotoxin release to bacterial killing. In summary, antibiotic class, presence of serum, and type of organism influenced bactericidal activity and endotoxin release.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of methodologies for synergism testing of drug combinations against resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The purpose of this study was to determine if synergism was maintained for various combinations of beta-lactams with an aminoglycoside against four clinical strains and one laboratory strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa which were resistant, according to the MICs, to the beta-lactams and/or aminoglycoside. The results from both the checkerboard and killing curve methodologies were compared. The laboratory strain (ATCC 27853) was manipulated in vitro by serial passage onto agar containing increasing concentrations of each antibiotic to select for resistance. One clinical isolate (R61) was also serially passed to raise the MIC of piperacillin from 128 to 1,024 micrograms/ml. The fractional inhibitory concentration indices for all isolates indicated indifference for all combination therapies, with values ranging from 0.6 to 3. In contrast, killing curve results for all isolates demonstrated synergism with drug concentrations at either one-fourth or one-half the MIC for each organism. The MIC of piperacillin for the laboratory-manipulated clinical isolate R61 was 1,024 micrograms/ml, and synergism was still observed with concentrations of one-half the MIC of piperacillin and amikacin. For clinical isolate R166, which was beta-lactam and tobramycin resistant, synergism continued to be demonstrated with concentrations of tobramycin (1/16 MIC) in combination with piperacillin and cefepime at 1/2 the MIC. The results of this study indicate that against P. aeruginosa, synergism is observed in spite of resistance to beta-lactams and/or aminoglycosides. Synergism appears to be maintained even at very high MICs (piperacillin, 1,024 micrograms/ml; tobramycin, 128 micrograms/ml) with drug concentrations within achievable therapeutic ranges. With current definitions of synergism there was a complete lack of correlation between the results obtained by the checkerboard and killing curve methodologies, with the fractional inhibitory concentration indices showing indifference and killing curves resulting in synergism. The methodologies and definitions of synergism or antagonism are variable and not standardized and should be reevaluated.

Aminoglycosides↗
PubMed1996

Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections.

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime administered by continuous infusion and intermittent bolus over a 4-day period were compared. We conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study of 12 critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections. The patients were randomized to receive ceftazidime either as a 2-g intravenous (i.v.) loading dose followed by a 3-g continuous infusion (CI) over 24 h or as 2 g i.v. every 8 h (q8h), each for 2 days. After 2 days, the patients were crossed over and received the opposite regimen. Each regimen also included tobramycin (4 to 7 mg/kg of body weight, given i.v. q24h). Eighteen blood samples were drawn on study days 2 and 4 to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and its pharmacodynamics against a clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (R288). The patient demographics (means +/- standard deviations) were as follows: age, 57 +/- 12 years; sex, nine males and three females; APACHE II score, 15 +/- 3; diagnosis, 9 of 12 patients with pneumonia. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for ceftazidime given as an intermittent bolus (IB) (means +/- standard deviations) were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum, 124.4 +/- 52.6 micrograms/ml; minimum concentration in serum, 25.0 +/- 17.5 micrograms/ml; elimination constant, 0.268 +/- 0.205 h-1; half-life, 3.48 +/- 1.61 h; and volume of distribution, 18.9 +/- 9.0 liters. The steady-state ceftazidime concentration for CI was 29.7 +/- 17.4 micrograms/ml, which was not significantly different from the targeted concentrations. The range of mean steady-state ceftazidime concentrations for the 12 patients was 10.6 to 62.4 micrograms/ml. Tobramycin peak concentrations ranged between 7 and 20 micrograms/ml. As expected, the area under the curve for the 2-g q8h regimen was larger than that for CI (P = 0.003). For IB and CI, the times that the serum drug concentration was greater than the MIC were 92 and 100%, respectively, for each regimen against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolate. The 24-h bactericidal titers in serum, at which the tobramycin concentrations were < 1.0 microgram/ml in all patients, were the same for CI and IB (1:4). In the presence of tobramycin, the area under the bactericidal titer-time curve (AUBC) was significantly greater for IB than CI (P = 0.001). After tobramycin was removed from the serum, no significant difference existed between the AUBCs for CI and IB. We conclude that CI of ceftazidime utilizing one-half the IB daily dose was equivalent to the IB treatment as judged by pharmacodynamic analysis of critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections. No evaluation comparing the clinical efficacies of these two dosage regimens was performed.

Ceftazidime↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of conventional dosing versus continuous-infusion vancomycin therapy for patients with suspected or documented gram-positive infections.

Ten patients were treated with conventional dosing (CD) and continuous-infusion (CI) vancomycin therapy in this prospective, randomized, crossover study. Patients were randomized to receive either CD or CI therapy for 2 consecutive days and then crossed over to receive the opposite regimen for 2 days. CD therapy consisted of 1 g of vancomycin every 12 h. CI therapy consisted of a 500-mg loading dose followed by 2 g infused over 24 h. Ten serum samples were obtained on the second day of each therapy for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. Two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, one methicillin sensitive (MSSA 1199) and one methicillin resistant (MRSA 494), were chosen for pharmacodynamic evaluation of both regimens. The patient demographics (means +/- standard deviations [SD]) were as follows: sex, six males, four females; age, 36 +/- 11 years; and serum creatinine, 0.72 +/- 0.18 mg/dl. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters +/- SD for CD therapy were as follows: elimination rate constant, 0.16 +/- 0.07 h-1; half-life, 5.6 +/- 3.5 h; volume of distribution, 33.7 +/- 25 liters, 0.5 +/- 0.2 liters/kg; maximum concentration in serum, 53.4 +/- 19.3 micrograms/ml; and minimum concentration, 8.4 +/- 5.9 micrograms/ml. The steady-state concentration for CI was 20.2 +/- 11.1 micrograms/ml. Overall, both regimens resulted in the MIC being exceeded 100% of the time. The mean CD trough serum bactericidal titer (SBT) was 1:8, and the average CI SBTs were 1:16 for both isolates. Even though there was no statistically significant difference between CD trough and CI SBTs, the CI SBTs remained > 1:8 for 100% of the time versus 60% of the time for CD therapy. During CI therapy, 20 and 40% of the patients maintained SBTs of > 1:32 throughout the dosing interval for MSSA 1199 and MRSA 494, respectively. During CD therapy, however, only 10% of patients maintained SBTs of > 1:32 during the entire dosing interval for both isolates. The mean areas under the bactericidal titer-time curve (AUBC24s) +/- SD for MSSA 1199 were 528 +/- 263 for CD therapy and 547 +/- 390 for CI therapy. The mean AUBC24s +/- SD against MRSA 494 were 531 +/- 247 for CD and 548 +/- 293 for CI therapy. Similar to the AUBC24, the mean area under the concentration-time curve for a 24-h dosing interval divided by the MIC (AUC/MIC24) ratios +/- SD were 550.0 +/- 265.7 for CD and 552.6 +/- 373.4 for CI therapy, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between any of the pharmacodynamic parameters for CD and CI therapy. In addition, no adverse effects with either CD or CI therapy were observed during the study. We conclude that CI and CD vancomycin therapy demonstrated equivalent pharmacodynamic activities. Although CI therapy was more likely to result in SBTs that remained above 1:8 for the entire regimen, the clinical impact of this result is unknown. Serum drug concentration variability was observed with both treatment regimens but to a lesser extent with CI administration. CI administration of vancomycin should be further evaluated to determine the clinical utility of this method of administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Pharmacodynamics of once- or twice-daily levofloxacin versus vancomycin, with or without rifampin, against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model with infected platelet-fibrin clots.

We compared the pharmacodynamic activities of levofloxacin versus vancomycin, with or without rifampin, in an in vitro model with infected platelet-fibrin clots simulating vegetations. Infected platelet-fibrin clots were prepared with human cryoprecipitate, human platelets, calcium, thrombin, and approximately 10(9) CFU of organisms (MSSA 1199 and MRSA 494) per g and then were suspended via monofilament line into the in vitro model containing Mueller-Hinton growth medium. Antibiotics were administered by bolus injection into the model to simulate human pharmacokinetics; the regimens simulated included levofloxacin at dosages of 800 mg every 24 h (q24h) and 400 mg q12h, vancomycin at 1 g q12h, and rifampin at 600 mg q24h. Each model was run in duplicate over a 72-h period. Infected platelet-fibrin clots were removed in duplicate from each model, weighed, homogenized, serially diluted with sterile 0.9% saline, and plated on tryptic soy agar plates and plates containing antibiotics at 3, 6, and 12 times the MIC to evaluate the emergence of resistance. Time-kill curves were constructed by plotting the inoculum size versus time. Residual inoculum at 72 h was used to compare regimens. All levofloxacin regimens were significantly better than vancomycin monotherapy against both isolates (P < 0.002). Against MSSA 1199, levofloxacin q24h was significantly better than all other regimens, including levofloxacin q12h (P < 0.002); however, no difference between the levofloxacin monotherapy and combination therapy (with rifampin) regimens against MRSA 494 was seen. Killing activity for levofloxacin appeared to correlate better with the peak/MIC ratio than with the area under the curve/MIC ratio. The addition of rifampin significantly enhanced the activity of vancomycin but had little effect upon the activity of levofloxacin. For MRSA 494, vancomycin plus rifampin resulted in the greatest killing (P < 0.05). Development of resistance was not detected with any regimen. Levofloxacin may be a useful therapeutic alternative in the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis, and further study with animal models of endocarditis or clinical trials are warranted.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

Bactericidal activities of cefprozil, penicillin, cefaclor, cefixime, and loracarbef against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

We examined the bactericidal activities of penicillin, cefprozil, cefixime, cefaclor, and loracarbef against three clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae which were susceptible, moderately susceptible, and resistant to penicillin. An in vitro two-compartment glass infection model was used to simulate human pharmacokinetics in the presence of bacteria. Also, changes in organism susceptibility and development of resistant subpopulations were evaluated. Simulated pediatric dosage regimens and target peak concentrations in the central compartment were as follows: penicillin V-potassium, 26 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h (q6h) and 14 micrograms/ml; cefaclor, 13.4 mg/kg q8h and 16 micrograms/ml; loracarbef, 15 mg/kg q12h and 19 micrograms/ml; cefprozil, 15 mg/kg q12h and 11 micrograms/ml; and cefixime, 8mg/kg q24h and 4 micrograms/ml. Targeted half-lives of each agent were 1 h for penicillin, cefaclor, and loracarbef; 1.3 h for cefprozil; and 3.5 h for cefixime. Growth controls were performed at two different pump rates, 0.8 and 2.0 ml/min (half-lives = 3.5 and 1 h, respectively). Each isolate demonstrated autolysis at the lower rate which was attributed to a decreased supply of fresh nutrients available to the organisms in the infection compartment. Against the susceptible isolate, the time to 99.9% killing was statistically significant between penicillin V-potassium and both cefaclor and cefixime (P < 0.029). Loracarbef never achieved a 99.9% reduction in the inoculum. At 48 h penicillin, cefprozil, and cefaclor were equivalent in extent of killing. Against the intermediately resistant isolate, cefprozil was superior to all other regimens with respect to rate of killing (P < 0.013) and extent of killing at 24 h (P < 0.0003). At 48 h penicillin, cefprozil, and cefaclor were equivalent in extent of killing. All of the regimens exhibited inferior activity against this penicillin-resistant isolate. A 99.9% kill was never obtained with any of the regimens, nor was there an appreciable decrease in the colony counts. In conclusion, it appears that cefprozil, penicillin, and cefaclor are effective therapies against sensitive and even intermediately sensitive isolates of S. pneumoniae. However, none of the oral therapies appear to be of any benefit against penicillin-resistant isolates. The in vitro model may be an effective tool in evaluating other multiple-dose therapies against this fastidious organism, since the continual supply of fresh medium maintains the viability of S. pneumoniae with minimal stationary-phase autolysis.

Cefaclor↗
PubMed1996

Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician.

Therapy with antimicrobial combinations has been used as long as antimicrobials have been available. Combinations of antibiotics are often used to take advantage of different mechanisms of action and/or toxicity profiles. Well established indications for combination antimicrobial therapy include: (a) empirical treatment of life-threatening infections; (b) treatment of polymicrobial infections; (c) prevention of the emergence of bacterial resistance; and (d) for synergism. Disadvantages of combination therapy include: (a) increased expense; (b) increased risk of adverse effects; (c) antagonism; and (d) superinfection. Combination antimicrobial therapy should be considered for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections caused by Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens, and certain Gram-positive infections caused by Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. Selection of agents should be dependent upon local susceptibility patterns, clinical experience, site of infection, potential toxicities and cost.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1995

Comparative in vitro activities of LY191145, a new glycopeptide, and vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus-infected fibrin clots.

Bactericidal activities of LY191145, an investigational glycopeptide, and vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus were evaluated. Only LY191145 at a concentration 16-fold greater than the MIC was able to achieve 99.9% killing against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (ATCC 25923; 8.0 h). Both agents demonstrated 99.9% killing against methicillin-resistant clinical isolate S. aureus MRSA67 over 24 h at concentrations 4-, 8-, and 16-fold greater than the MIC, but bacteria were killed at a more rapid rate by LY191145 (1.63 versus 5.02 h; P < 0.001). Against strain ATCC 25923- and MRSA67-infected fibrin clots, total reductions by LY191145 and vancomycin over 72 h were not statistically significantly different at a concentration 16 times the MIC (1.12 +/- 0.31 and 1.23 +/- 0.13 and 1.40 +/- 0.17 and 1.36 +/- 0.37 CFU/g; respectively). Increasing the drug concentration to 50 times the MIC did not alter the values significantly, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two agents. Overall, LY191145 exhibited more rapid bactericidal activity than vancomycin against S. aureus, and a concentration 16-fold greater than the MIC appears to be optimal.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1995

Pharmacodynamics of RP 59500 alone and in combination with vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro-infected fibrin clot model.

The bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance to RP 59500 (quinupristin/dalfopristin) when it was administered alone and in combination with vancomycin against fibrin clots that have been infected with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) 67 were evaluated in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infected fibrin clot model. Fibrin clots were infected with S. aureus to achieve an inoculum of approximately 10(9) CFU/g. Antibiotics were administered to simulate pharmacokinetics in humans: RP 59500 (7.5 mg/kg of body weight) every 8 h and vancomycin (15 mg/kg) every 12 h over 72 h. Preliminary test tube time-kill experiments with an inoculum of approximately 10(5) CFU/ml suggested that RP 59500 was more rapid in achieving a 99.9% reduction in the number of CFU per milliliter than vancomycin against ATCC 25923 (6.94 versus 24 h; P = 0.0003) and MRSA 67 (6.77 versus 17.03 h; P = 0.004). At a higher inoculum (approximately 10(8) CFU/ml), 99.9% kill was achieved only with the combination regimen against ATCC 25923 and MRSA 67 (10.9 and 10.5 h, respectively), with total reductions of 6.35 and 6.33 log10 CFU/ml over 24 h, respectively. In the fibrin clot model, RP 59500 was more effective than vancomycin in reducing organism titers over 72 h. In the fibrin clot model, the most optimal therapy was the combination regimen.

Blood Coagulation↗
PubMed1995

Bactericidal killing activities of cefepime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone against Staphylococcus aureus and beta-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model.

Cefepime (CP) is a new injectable cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity and stability against common chromosomally and plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. The bactericidal activities of CP, ceftazidime (CZ), cefotaxime (CTX), and ceftriaxone (CAX) against reference and clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus, an isogenic pair of Enterobacter aerogenes strains (wild type and a CZ-resistant derepressed mutant), and a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate possessing a TEM-10 beta-lactamase were investigated in a two-compartment pharmacodynamic in vitro infection model which simulates human pharmacokinetics. An inoculum of approximately 10(6) CFU/ml was used in all model experiments. Antibiotics were administered to simulate the following regimens: CP at 2 g every 12 h (q12h), CZ at 2 g q8h, CTX at 2 g q8h, and CAX at 2 g q24h. Human albumin was added during experiments with CAX and staphylococci to simulate protein binding. Samples were removed at multiple time points over a 48-h period to determine the inoculum size for time-kill curves. Development of resistance was detected by inoculating samples obtained at 0, 24, and 48 h onto antibiotic-containing agar plates. The time to 99.9% killing was used to compare drug regimens. Against staphylococci, the time to bacterial eradication was significantly delayed with CAX-albumin. All regimens had similar activities against the wild-type Enterobacter strain; however, regrowth was noted with CZ, CTX, and CAX against the CZ-resistant strain. There were no differences between the CP, CTX, and CAX regimens against K. pneumoniae. Of interest, no regrowth of any organism was noted with CP. These data indicate that CP has activity against S.aureus and CZ-resistant gram-negative bacilli.

Bacterial Infections↗