PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Jergas

Publications and source records attributed to M Jergas.

58 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

[Splenic rupture following colonoscopy: an unusual complication].

A case of splenic rupture after an uneventful diagnostic colonoscopy in a 68-year old man is reported. Conservative management of this complication was successful. Splenic rupture is a unique and severe complication of colonoscopy, which can rarely be managed conservatively.

Aged↗

[Biomechanical considerations concerning the use of internal fixator systems in spinal interventions].

Three different internal fixateurs ("Dick", "Kluger", "SOCON") were investigated in an in-vitro setting. The systems showed nearly identical deformation under physiological loads. A new definition for the stabilizing capacity indicated a distinct weakness under compressive and torsional loading. In order to avoid early failure of the implant and/or the vertebra-implant interface bracing and a restricted mobilisation is recommended until healing of the fracture/fusion has taken place.

Adult↗

[Visual evaluation of conventional roentgen pictures and dual x-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of osteopenia].

Routine radiographs and PA dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine were performed in 253 patients. A T-score of -2SD (approximately 20% reduction from young normal bone mineral density (BMD)) as measured by DXA, was used as threshold for the diagnosis of osteopenia. A lumbar spine index (LSI) as proposed by Barnett and Nordin was assessed by one radiologist. The correlation between LSI and bone mineral density, measured by DXA, was poor, and our results indicate that osteopenic patients cannot be differentiated from non-osteopenic patients by LSI. 100 radiographs of the lumbar spine were evaluated by 9 observers in order to determine observer variation in the detection of osteopenia. A complete agreement between the readers for the diagnosis of osteopenia was achieved in 43 percent of all radiographs. DXA and observers agreed in 68 to 76 percent of all cases. For a decrease of BMD of more than 60 percent compared to young normal adults, as determined by DXA, all readers agreed in the diagnosis of osteopenia, whereas for higher BMD values the agreement between readers and DXA worsened. The inconsistency between DXA and observer agreement was greatest for patients with a BMD reduction between 10 and 20 percent. The mean values of the kappa-coefficients were 0.574 +/- 0.06 for interobserver variation and 0.437 +/- 0.06 for the agreement between readers and DXA-results. An only moderate kappa-coefficient of 0.573 for the intraobserver variation as determined in one reader was found.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Significance of QCT bone mineral density and its standard deviation as parameters to evaluate osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: A study using quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine was carried out to determine whether the standard deviation (SD) of the bone mineral density (BMD) within a given region of interest (ROI) could be used as a parameter to evaluate osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A low dose single energy protocol was used. The elliptical ROIs inside the trabecular bone of the vertebral bodies T12-L3 were analyzed for four patient groups: Group 1, 52 healthy premenopausal women (age 41 +/- 2 years); group 2, 119 healthy early postmenopausal women (53 +/- 4 years); group 3, 45 postmenopausal relatively healthy women (age 65 +/- 5 years); group 4, 26 osteoporotic women (age 67 +/- 5 years). Average group mean BMD values and their coefficients of variation (CV = SD/BMD) were calculated. The t values, percent decrements, z-scores, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) served to compare capabilities of the BMD and the CV to discriminate groups pairwise using all possible group combinations. RESULTS: The use of z-scores and percent decrements gave ambivalent and mostly insignificant results. The CV performed better than BMD in separating group pairs (1,3), (1,4), (2,3), and (2,4), but BMD was superior for group pairs (1,2) and (3,4). Using SD as an independent variable in addition to age and BMD in the ANOVA did not significantly change r2 or the standard error of the estimate. The t test showed highly significant better discriminatory capabilities for BMD compared to CV> CONCLUSION: The results of our study did not indicate a significant potential of the BMD SD as measured in trabecular single energy low dose spinal QCT to improve the discriminatory capabilities of BMD for a separation of osteoporotic from nonosteoporotic subjects.

Adult↗