PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M K Isaac

Publications and source records attributed to M K Isaac.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Training of primary health care medical officers in mental health care. Errors in clinical judgment before and after training.

This investigation examined the nature and frequency of errors in clinical judgment that were displayed by primary health care medical officers before and after short-term training in mental health care. Thirty-nine medical officers who underwent inservice training for 2 weeks were evaluated using standardized case vignettes. Before the training, doctors displayed a sizable percentage of major and minor errors, which dropped significantly following training. Errors were not unique to psychiatric presentations alone, but occurred with respect to vignettes representing physical disorders as well. The results on the whole demonstrate a satisfactory gain in clinical skills of medical officers following the training and highlight the need for continuation of a program of this nature.

Adult

Development of case vignettes to assess the mental health training of primary care medical officers.

This article reports the development of case vignettes as a method of assessing the short-term in-service training of primary care medical officers in mental health care. A pool of 18 case vignettes representing common psychiatric problems and a standard response sheet were written first. This was mailed to 45 psychiatrists for their comments. Based on the comments received from 21 psychiatrists, 2 sets of questionnaires with 7 vignettes in each set were developed. When administered to a group of 32 medical officers, this method of assessment was found to be sensitive in detecting gain in knowledge and skills following training. Further, performance on case vignettes was found to correlate positively with clinical skills when actual cases were given for assessment.

Curriculum

Training primary care medical officers in mental health care: an evaluation using a multiple-choice questionnaire.

This report aimed to evaluate the mental health knowledge of primary care medical officers following short-term training in mental health care using a multiple-choice questionnaire. Seventy-eight medical officers who underwent 2 weeks' training in mental health care were assessed using parallel forms of a standardized multiple-choice questionnaire administered before and soon after the training. Young doctors scored significantly higher in the pretraining assessment. The medical officers demonstrated a significant gain in knowledge, although the amount of gain varied. Doctors who had relatively lower pretraining scores showed a higher gain. Six doctors (8%) showed less than acceptable posttraining scores. These doctors were older than the rest of the group. The doctors' pretraining knowledge was best with respect to epilepsy and poorest with respect to manic-depressive psychosis. Items pertaining to epidemiology and aetiology elicited relatively less gain than other clinical dimensions.

Adult

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Comparison of the English version and a translated Indian version.

The English version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and a translated Indian version were administered to a sample of hundred bilingual college students. Both the versions of the GHQ showed adequate internal consistency and reliability. There was a high concordance between the two versions on high scorers and low scorers. These results were also applicable to GHQ-30 and GHQ-12. Item analysis revealed certain differences between the two versions attributable to semantic and technical problems. Validity of the GHQ in the Indian setting are discussed.

Adolescent

Standardisation of multiple-choice questionnaire for evaluating medical officers' training in psychiatry.

This study reports the standardisation of a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) for evaluating the training of primary care physicians in psychiatry. An item pool of 104 multiple-choice questions of the 'single best response' type was written. This item pool along with an 'MCQ assessment sheet' was mailed to 90 psychiatrists with a request to evaluate the questionnaire. Twenty five psychiatrists responded to the enquiry, of which 22 gave their detailed comments regarding the MCQ. Based on the responses that were received, 14 items were discarded, 77 items were modified and 13 items accepted without any modification. The final pool of 90 items was split into two comparable sets, one for pre-training assessment and the other for post-training assessment. The questionnaire was administered to a group of 32 medical officers and was found to be sensitive in detecting gains in knowledge following training.

Educational Measurement