PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M K W Li

Publications and source records attributed to M K W Li.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection revisited: are there any health-related benefits? A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with less overall morbidity and improved survival for patients with colonic cancers. There are unfortunately limited clinical reports on laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. We therefore designed this study to compare laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with conventional open surgery, with emphasis on health-related issues from the patients' perspective in order to justify its role in the management of low rectal or anal canal tumours. METHODS: We carried out a non-randomized, prospective comparative study on a cohort of patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open abdominoperineal resection between March 1994 and December 2003. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, operative morbidity and mortality, as well as overall survival were considered. The standard endpoints of last follow-up date and deaths were used. Data was analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were recruited: 31 patients underwent conventional open abdominoperineal resection (OAPR) and 71 patients were treated laparoscopically. Patient demographics, median follow-up period, as well as tumour characteristics were similar between groups. The median operating time was similar among groups (145 min in laparoscopic group vs. 156 min in open group; p=0.62). Patients in the laparoscopic group had significantly less blood loss (p=0.01) and fewer requirements for blood transfusion (p=0.01). Despite similar overall morbidity, the laparoscopic group had a reduced incidence of abdominal wound infections (p=0.01) and chest infections (p=0.01). Overall survival was significantly better in the laparoscopic group (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection confers definite health-related benefits the over open approach in terms of reduced septic complications and fewer requirements for blood transfusion. It should be considered the procedure of choice for patients with low rectal or anal canal tumour in whom sphincter excision proved inevitable.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2006

A simple and secure method to fix laparoscopic trocars in children.

We introduce a simple method of fixing trocars to the abdominal wall in children. Before anchoring the trocar, a piece of Tegaderm polyurethrane adhesive (3M Healthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota) is attached to the trocar. A silk stitch is anchored to neighboring skin, and then transfixed over the shaft of the trocar through the adhesive. Both inward and outward movement of the trocar can be restrained. This method is simple, fast, secure, and can be applied to trocars of any size.

Abdominal Wall↗
PubMed2006

Colonic amoebic abscess mimicking carcinoma of the colon.

Amoebiasis is an uncommon disease in developed countries. Its clinical presentation can be variable and non-specific, and the diagnosis can be easily overlooked. We report a case of colonic amoebic abscess mimicking advanced colonic cancer with acute intestinal obstruction and liver metastasis. The presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of amoebiasis are also reviewed.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: 10-year experience of 174 patients from a single centre.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct in the management of common bile duct stones. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Regional minimal access surgery training centre in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct from 1995 to 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, reasons for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and open conversions, and operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 174 laparoscopic explorations of the common bile duct were performed. Indications for surgery (some overlapping) included: concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones (n=68, 39%) in young persons (<60 years), previously failed endoscopic extraction (n=59, 34%), large (>2 cm) or multiple common bile duct stones (n=40, 23%), and need for laparoscopic bypass to improve bile drainage (n=34, 20%). Mean patient age was 63 (standard deviation, 16) years and 103 were female. Altogether 156 choledochotomies and 18 transcystic duct explorations were performed, with 12 (7%) open conversions. The mean operating time was 129 (standard deviation, 57) minutes. Additional procedures included: 54 laparoscopic operative cholangiographies, 34 laparoscopic biliary bypasses, and 31 instances of adhesiolysis in patients with a history of open upper gastro-intestinal surgery. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 160 (92%) patients. Non-lethal complications occurred in 34 (20%) patients and one died of sepsis after a major bile leak. The mean postoperative stay was 9 (standard deviation, 9) days. Stone recurrence ensued in seven (4%) patients after a mean follow-up of 37 (standard deviation, 29) months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is highly successful and can achieve satisfactory ductal clearance even after unsuccessful endoscopic extraction and previous upper gastro-intestinal surgery. In skilled hands, for selected patients laparoscopic bypass can also achieve improved bile drainage.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed2006

A single-centre experience of 40 laparoscopic liver resections.

OBJECTIVE: To review results of laparoscopic liver resections, particularly in those patients with hepatic malignancy and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Minimal access surgery training centre, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Patients with pathologies located at anterio-inferio-lateral segments (Couinaud segments 2, 3, 4b, 5, 6) for laparoscopic resection were recruited during the period 1998 to 2005. Patients were excluded from review if they had: pathologies at central locations and the superior and posterior segments (4a, 7, 8), large tumours (>5 cm in diameter), and those close to major vasculature or the liver hilum. RESULTS: During the study period, we attempted 40 such laparoscopic liver resections, excluding marsupialisations and resections for simple liver cysts. There were 20 female and 20 male patients, with a mean age of 57 (standard deviation, 13; range, 29-81) years. All but one underwent a successful laparoscopic operation. Pathology included hepatocellular carcinoma (n=17), recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (n=14), colorectal liver metastasis (n=4), benign liver tumour (n=4), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=1). All except four were hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resections. The mean operating time was 169 (range, 60-290) minutes and mean blood loss amounted to 270 mL (range, 0-1000 mL). Complications occurred in eight (20%) patients, which included six wound infections, one postoperative bile leak, and two incisional hernias. There was no operative or hospital mortality. For hepatocellular carcinoma, clear resection (>10 mm) was achieved in all except five patients, and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 86% and 59% respectively. Favourable results were also obtained for resections in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis; after a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 29 (23) months, only one was readmitted (for cholangitis). CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe, and achieves acceptable survival among individuals with hepatic malignancy and very favourable long-term outcomes in those with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Immediate preoperative laparoscopic staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Conventional preoperative staging for esophageal carcinoma could be inaccurate. Laparoscopy has been applied for the staging of various upper gastrointestinal malignancies. It can identify peritoneal and liver deposits not shown by imaging, and could reduce the number of nontherapeutic laparotomies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic staging for the management of squamous cell carcinoma involving the mid and distal esophagus. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients with esophageal cancer evaluated for surgical resection from January 1998 to January 2004. Laparoscopy was performed for all the patients with mid and distal esophageal cancer immediately before open gastric mobilization. The efficacy of laparoscopy for the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 63 patients with potentially resectable disease shown on conventional imaging, 54 (84%) underwent esophagectomy with curative intent after laparoscopic staging. Seven patients (11%) underwent laparoscopy alone because of abdominal metastases (n = 5) or other medical conditions (n = 2) that precluded esophagectomy. Two patients (3%) had exploratory right thoracotomy without esophagectomy despite normal laparoscopic findings. The sensitivity and specificity of laparoscopic staging were 100% in this series of patients (100% sensitivity and specificity means no false-positives or -negatives). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic staging is valuable for the management of patients with mid and distal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Patients with metastatic disease and those with prohibitive surgical risk can thus avoid unnecessary laparotomy and be offered other treatment methods.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopy versus open left lateral segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) is a common disease in Southeast Asia. Its classical presentation is repeated attacks of cholangitis with multiple recurrences of bile duct stones. The stones are commonly located in the left lateral segments (2 and 3) and therefore complete clearance is difficult to achieve by either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or surgical exploration of the common bile duct. The definitive treatment usually involves resection of the stone-harboring segments. The recent advent in laparoscopic surgery has shown that hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy is a safe and feasible, alternative. This study aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy with open segmentectomy in patients with recurrent, RPC. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of both open and laparoscopic treatments for RPC in a single center between 1994 and 2004. During this period, patients with RPC and left intrahepatic (segments 2 and 3) ductal stones not amendable to endoscopic treatment were recruited for analysis. Patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones were offered left lateral segmentectomy with cholecystectomy and exploration of the common bile duct. Selected patients would have choledochoduodenostomy drainage during the same operation. The operations were performed via either the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach or the open approach using an ultrasonic surgical aspirator. The two cohorts were compared with respect to perioperative parameters to determine whether there would be any advantage in attempting hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy. RESULTS: During the study period from 1994 to 2004, 17 patients underwent left lateral segmentectomy for RPC. Of the 17 patients, 10 had hand-assisted laparoscopic resections, and 7 underwent open resections. All open resections were performed before 1999. Despite the small number of patients and potential type 2 error, there were no differences in age, sex distribution, number of cholangitic attacks, sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before surgery, or number of previous operation between the two groups. The median operating time was shorter in the open group (232.5 vs 150 min; p = 0.007), whereas the median blood loss was similar (350 vs 400 ml; p = 0.551). The median postoperative stay was 8 days for hand-assisted laparoscopic group versus 14 days for the open group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.019). There was one open conversion in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group because of intraoperative bleeding from the left hepatic vein. Postoperative complication rates were lower in hand-assisted laparoscopic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (20% vs 57%; p = 126). The intramuscular pethidine requirement again was less in hand-assisted laparoscopic group (0 vs 600 mg; p = 0.002). There was no operative mortality in either group of patients. No recurrent cholangitis was noted in either groups during the median follow-up period of more than 3 years. CONCLUSION: This study not only confirmed the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, but also showed that this treatment approach is associated with less pain and shorter hospital stay. However, hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy is a lengthier operation and technically more challenging. Nevertheless, the authors believe that with more experience and further improvement of ancillary technology, this procedure can become a standard treatment for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis in selected cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy.

PURPOSE: The major problem after hemorrhoidectomy is postoperative pain. New techniques have been evolved to circumvent this problem. The present study was conducted to compare the outcomes of Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: This study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients with Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids admitted for hemorrhoidectomy were selected and randomized into two groups: 1) Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy or 2) Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. The primary outcomes measured were the analgesic requirement and the postoperative pain score (assessed by an independent assessor). Secondary outcome criteria included the operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, patient satisfaction score, and early and late complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized into two groups (LigaSure 24, Harmonic Scalpel 25). Two patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 47 patients (LigaSure 24, Harmonic Scalpel 23) available for final analysis. The age and gender distribution were comparable. The postoperative pain score (median 2.6 vs. 4.8, P < 0.001) and postoperative oral analgesic (Dologesic) requirement (median 5 vs. 13, P = 0.001) were significantly less in the LigaSure group. The operating time (median 11 vs. 18 minutes, P < 0.001) was significantly less in the LigaSure group. The hospital stay, patient satisfaction score, percentage of patients requiring pethidine injection, percentage of patients with first bowel movement on or before the first postoperative day, and complication rates were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy reduces the postoperative pain and operating time compared to the Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. It is a safe, effective procedure for treating Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

The present scarcity of literature on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery makes it premature to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be the standard of care for rectal cancer. Notwithstanding that, the available evidence proves its safety and adequate oncological clearance. Moreover, current data do not suggest any detrimental effect on the postoperative and early oncological outcomes. On the contrary, there is level three evidence showing that laparoscopic technique results in less blood loss, shorter length of stay, and reduced abdominal wound disorders and pulmonary complications, albeit the overall morbidity remains similar to that of open surgery. Long-term survival outcomes remain largely unclear, however. Hence, it is high time that laparoscopic technique should be further evaluated, preferably by means of large-scale randomized trials, to define its exact role in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic flip-flap hernioplasty: an innovative technique for pediatric hernia surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hernia repair is especially advantageous for bilateral or recurrent diseases in children because it avoids vas injury. However, it is more technically demanding, and the recurrent rate has been higher than with the open method. The authors developed a method of laparoscopic hernia repair that is easy and secure. METHODS: The hernia opening was repaired with a peritoneal flip-flap anchored with a single tension-free intracorporeal suture. The vas and testicular vessel were completely untouched. The valve mechanism of the flip-flap helped to avoid scrotal collection and prevent hernia recurrence. RESULTS: In 32 patients ages 1 month to 17 years 43 repairs were performed. The early result was promising, and no recurrence was noticed in a median follow-up period of 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic flip-flap hernioplasty is easy to perform and has a number of theoretical advantages, although the long-term result still needs to be evaluated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: This review investigated the role played by laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD) in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed a prospective database of LECBD for difficult choledocholithiasis during the period 1995 to 2003. RESULTS: Of the 97 LECBDs performed in the authors' center from 1995 to 2003, 25 were performed for difficult choledocholithiasis. Difficult choledocholithiasis was defined as failure of endoscopic stone retrieval for the following reasons: access and cannulation difficulty, the difficult nature of common bile duct (CBD) stones, and the presence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications. There were seven unsuccessful cannulations because of previous gastrectomy (n = 5) and periampullary diverticulum (n = 2). Among the 18 patients with failed endoscopic extraction, there were 10 impacted stones, 2 incomplete stone clearances after multiple attempts, 2 type 2 Mirizzi syndromes, 1 proximal stent migration, 1 repeated post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 situs inversus, and 1 stricture at the distal common bile duct. There were 14 male and 11 female patients with a mean age of 67.8 +/- 15 years. Initial presentations included cholangitis (n = 14, 56%), biliary colic (n = 3, 12%), jaundice/deranged liver function ( n = 5, 20%), cholecystitis (n = 2, 8%), and pancreatitis (n = 1, 4%). Regarding the approach for LECBD, there were 2 transcystic duct explorations and 23 choledochotomies. The mean operative time was 149.4 +/- 49.3 min, and there were three conversions (12%). The stone clearance rate was 100%, and no recurrence was detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months. Five complications were encountered, which included bile leak (3 patients) and wound infection (2 patients). When the results were compared with the remaining 72 LECBDs for nondifficult stones during the same period, the complication rate, conversion rate, and rate of residual stones were similar despite a longer operation time (149.4 +/- 49.4 min vs 121.6 +/- 50.5 min). CONCLUSION: When ERCP is impossible or stone retrieval is incomplete, LECBD is the solution to difficult CBD stones.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer was reported in 1990 but has not gained wide acceptance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer between July 1997 and June 2003. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients of mean age 54 (range 14-93) years had perforated peptic ulcer diagnosed by laparoscopy. There were 172 duodenal ulcers, 22 prepyloric and 13 non-juxtapyloric gastric ulcers. One hundred and sixty-five patients underwent omental patch closure of perforations; there were six Pólya gastrectomies and one ulcerectomy. Thirty-seven patients (21.5 per cent) required conversion to laparotomy. The mean operating time was 64.8 (range 14-180) min. The median postoperative requirement for intramuscular pethidine was one dose. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 28 patients (16.3 per cent) resulting in three reoperations. Six patients with intra-abdominal collections were managed by percutaneous drainage. Two patients who underwent conversion developed a wound infection. Fourteen patients (8.1 per cent) died, 11 of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III and IV. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe emergency procedure in routine clinical practice for patients with perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: This article reports the technical aspects of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCD) in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) and the perioperative results are also evaluated. This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. METHODS: Twelve patients diagnosed to have RPC with the absence of intrahepatic stricture were selected for LCD during the period from 1995 to 2002. The majority of our patients had repeated attacks of cholangitis and had already undergone multiple sessions of endoscopic and operative lithotripsy. The LCD was performed using a five-port approach with the patient lying in the supine position. The stones were first cleared through the longitudinal supraduodenal choledochotomy followed by construction of a side-to-side diamond-shaped anastomosis of at least 15 mm between the bile duct and the first part of the duodenum using 2/0 monocryl in the single-layer method. RESULTS: During the period from 1995 to 2002, 12 patients with RPC underwent LCD. There were 3 male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 62 (40-77). The median operation time was 137.5 min (90-270) and the median postoperative stay was 7.5 days (5-20). All cases were successful using the laparoscopic approach. Average analgesic requirement post operation was 126 mg (50-200 mg) intramuscular pethidine. There was one postoperative bile leak, and this complication was settled by conservative measures. Upon a mean follow-up of 37.6 months (6-91), there was no recurrent attack of cholangitis or any evidence of sump syndrome in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: LCD is a safe and effective drainage procedure for patients with RPC. Complications are uncommon and postoperative results are promising.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction for mid and low rectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Results of laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision and colonic J-pouch reconstruction are few. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes after this procedure. METHODS: Patients with mid or low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with construction of a colonic J pouch, performed by a single surgeon. The patients were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: From March 1999 to January 2002, 44 patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. There were 21 men and 23 women of median age 65.5 years. The median operating time was 180 min and median blood loss 80 ml. There was no conversion to an open procedure. The median distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge was 4 cm. No procedure-related death occurred. Four patients developed significant complications that required reoperation. With a median follow-up period of 15 months, no port-site recurrence was noted. Five patients developed distant metastases, and two had local recurrence in the pelvis. Bowel function was satisfactory at 6, 12 and 18 months after ileostomy closure. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction is safe, with a reasonable operating time. Early results suggest satisfactory oncological control and functional outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current place of laparoscopy in the management of colorectal disease. METHOD: A literature search was undertaken on Medline between the period 1991 and 2002. RESULTS: From the literature there is good evidence that the laparoscopic approach is associated with at least some short-term advantages. Improved cosmesis and better patient's satisfaction are also evident. Because of this laparoscopy has been widely employed in various benign conditions. Among others, laparoscopic stoma formation, laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease and Crohn's disease, laparoscopic rectopexy, as well as laparoscopic assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure were commonly reported. As port site recurrence and oncological safety are of less concern, there have been increasing reports on laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Although long-term follow up data is still limited, results of large prospective studies as well as various randomized trials show that recurrence and survival rates of the laparoscopic approach were at least comparable to open surgery. As experience and confidence accumulates, there are also increasing reports on technically demanding, laparoscopic sphincter-saving rectal excision. Articles on functional aspects following this type of resection also start to appear, which might be one of the future directions. CONCLUSION: The applicability of laparoscopy to colorectal disease continues to expand. Laparoscopic approach should be considered for patients with benign conditions. For colorectal cancer, results from randomized trials so far have been favourable. Hence, the authors suggest the utility of laparoscopy in potentially curable cancer can also be judiciously relaxed.

Colonic Diseases↗
PubMed2002

Hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) is a prevalent disease in Southeast Asia and presents a unique challenge to both gastroenterologist and hepatobiliary surgeon. Despite rapid development in endoscopic instrumentation and skill maturation, it is still difficult to clear those pigmented stones lodged in the intrahepatic ducts. The alternative approach to stones through the percutaneous transhepatic route can offer access for repeated ductal dilatation and lithotripsy. However, recurrence is still commonly seen. Resection of the atrophic stone-harboring segment has proven to be an effective treatment option associated with the lowest recurrence rate. Compared to the other technique, it is the only treatment that can potentially offer a cure. The complication rate is higher because of existing bacterial colonization and access trauma. With the accumulation of laparoscopic experience and improved instrumentation, laparoscopic liver resection is demonstrated to be safe and feasible for either benign or malignant conditions. This article reviews a single-center experience of hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy (HALS) in patients with RPC.

Adult↗