PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Karthaus

Publications and source records attributed to M Karthaus.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Prophylaxis and treatment of chemo- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis - are there new strategies?

Oral mucositis is a major dose-limiting toxic effect of intensive cancer chemotherapy. Oral complications may lead to dose reduction or delay in further cancer treatment. Mucositis can be caused directly by cytotoxic effects and indirectly by sustained neutropenia after cytostatic therapy. An impaired mucosal barrier predisposes to life-threatening septic complications during aplasia. The prevalence of an oral focus in febrile neutropenia has been reported in up to 30% of cases and also reduces quality of life. The basic strategies aim at pain relief and prevention of bacterial and fungal infectious complications. However, no effective causal prophylaxis or treatment of oral mucositis is widely accepted. The introduction of cytokines, eg granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for oral mucositis may be particularly effective and offer a new and hopeful approach. At present, the optimal growth factor, best schedule, effective dosage and best mode of application is not known.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Ceftriaxone in the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.

A study was performed in low-risk cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia to determine the safety and efficacy of ceftriaxone given in an outpatient setting. A total of 126 episodes of febrile neutropenia in 120 clinically stable outpatients were treated with intravenous ceftriaxone alone (n=100) or in combination with other antibiotics (n=26). The mean neutrophil count was 460/mm3; severe neutropenia (< 100/mm3) was observed in 18 episodes. The initial treatment with ceftriaxone (alone or in combination) was successful in 99 episodes (78%). Ninety-five episodes (76%) were successfully treated in an outpatient setting only; admission to hospital was necessary in 31 episodes (24%), but no infection-related death was observed. Ceftriaxone seems to be safe and effective for outpatient therapy of patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Effect of topical oral G-CSF on oral mucositis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Oral mucositis is a dose-limiting toxicity of intensive chemotherapy. It is caused directly by the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents and indirectly by sustained neutropenia. Severe oral mucositis is an important predisposing factor for life-threatening septic complications during aplasia. It also reduces quality of life. At present, no effective causal prophylaxis or treatment against oral mucositis is established. We performed a prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial using topical oral r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) in high-grade lymphoma patients treated according to the B-NHL protocol, which contains high-dose methotrexate and causes severe oral mucositis (WHO grades I-IV) in >50% of patients. Between August 1996 and July 1997, a total of 32 chemotherapy cycles were documented in eight patients (four male, four female). Mucosal erythema and ulceration were recorded. All patients assessed their oral pain and impact on swallowing daily, using a subjective scale from no to maximal discomfort (1-10). In addition, oral mucositis was assessed according to the WHO score. Filgrastim was administered in 16 cycles as a viscous mouthrinse (carboxymethylcellulose 2%, oleum citrii) 4 x 120 microg/day from days 10 to 16. Sixteen cycles were given to control patients, of these 14 with placebo, and another two cycles with no treatment. Severe mucositis (WHO grade III/IV) was documented in 21 of 32 cycles (65.5%). A difference of borderline significance was observed for the reduction of maximum severity of oral mucositis between G-CSF vs placebo (P = 0.058), with a reduction of WHO grade IV of 50% (four G-CSF vs eight control). The number of days in hospital was reduced significantly in the G-CSF group (P = 0.02). In conclusion, topical oral G-CSF mouthrinses may be beneficial to reduce oral mucositis.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1998

Fluorescence in situ hybridization and surface markers of fine needle aspiration specimen confirm extramedullary myeloblastoma in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia.

We report on a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a rapidly growing left cervical tumor 5 months after the initial diagnosis of CML. This tumor was diagnosed as a very early manifestation of extramedullary myeloblastoma by a minimally invasive method. A fine needle aspirate (26-gauge needle) was obtained from the tumor. Morphological and cytochemical analysis of the aspirate revealed 19% undifferentiated blasts. The immunophenotype was suggestive of a myeloid differentiation of the blasts (CD33+). The CML origin of the blasts was confirmed by the detection of the bcr-abl gene rearrangement in the blasts by two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We conclude that fine needle aspiration in combination with immunophenotyping and FISH analysis of the aspirate is a minimally invasive and rapid diagnostic tool to confirm extramedullary manifestation in CML. To our knowledge, this is the first case of extramedullary myeloblastoma confirmed by this combined technique.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Therapy of febrile neutropenia episodes in systemic hematologic illnesses with new once daily ceftriaxone administration].

In this open label prospective multicenter trial, 420 patients with neutropenia < 1000/microliter, fever > 38.5 degrees C and hematological malignancies were treated with ceftriaxone. Acute leukemia (n = 238) and high-grade lymphoma patients (n = 182) from 35 centers were enrolled. Between February 1992 and January 1996, patients were treated with 2 g ceftriaxone i.v. per day either as monotherapy (n = 135), or in combination with aminoglycosides (n = 235), glycopeptides (n = 37), or other antimicrobial agents (n = 13). Patients' median age was 54 years (range 15 to 97) with a median Karnofsky-performance-score of 6.0. The median neutrophil counts were 400/microliter. Fever was of unknown origin (FUO) in 268 (63.8%) of patients. Clinically defined infections (CDI) were diagnosed in 152 (36.2%) cases, including 74 (17.8%) episodes with pneumonia. Response to the initial approach with ceftriaxone was observed in 56.2% of febrile episodes, including 93 (68.8%) treatment courses with ceftriaxone alone. Concerning defervescence of fever ceftriaxone monotherapy was successful as compared to ceftriaxone in combination. Analysis revealed a low risk characterized by higher neutrophil counts (> or = 500/microliter; p < 0.0001), better Karnofsky-performance-score (> or = 7; p = 0.01), duration of neutropenia (< or = 5 days; p = 0.008) from start of antimicrobial treatment and duration of neutropenia per cycle (< or = 10 days; p = 0.0016). At the end of the observation, an overall response was obtained in 88.3% of the patients (n = 371) without statistical difference between patients treated with ceftriaxone alone or in combination. Once daily ceftriaxone either alone or in combination was effective in patients with hematological malignancies. Monotherapy was effective in a low risk group characterized by neutrophil counts (> or = 500/microliter), a Karnofsky-performance-score (> or = 7) and a duration of neutropenia (< or = 5 days) at the commencement of treatment.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

[To what extent is it possible to integrated quality of life as a normative, subjective evaluation into scientific medicine?].

Quality of Life is an increasingly popular concept, often associated with a wish to organize therapy along patient-oriented lines. However, determining the quality of life goes beyond a purely descriptive and objective assessment. It is based on subjective evaluation and is influenced by the ability to adapt to miserable conditions. Further conceptual problems consist in the structure of questionnaires and in the fact that there is no consensus about a clear definition of quality of life. The ideal of multidimensionality is restricted by practical limits of acceptable time and tolerable number of questions. Nevertheless most of the modern instruments focus on the patient's well-being and promote the realisation of their individual preferences. The hope is that quality of life will be an additional scale to enhance the established criteria of treatment success like survival time and remission duration. There is the risk to set value-thresholds on life, which appears to be inappropriate. Quality of life assessment may refine the choices of therapeutic aids, but can never solve the difficult moral questions that appertain to the value of life.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

[Possibilities and limits of ambulatory supportive measures in oncology exemplified by antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenia].

Neutropenia is common after intensive chemotherapy. Hospitalization and intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics are the standard of care for febrile neutropenic patients because of the risk of serious complications and associated mortality. Short neutropenic periods (< 7 days) are considered to be at a low-risk in cases when fever occurs in clinically stable patients. Recent work suggests that such a low-risk population of febrile neutropenic patients might benefit from alternatives to inpatient care. The agents that best qualify for outpatient treatment include quinolones i.v./p.o., glycopeptides, ceftriaxone and aminoglycosides, particularly if the latter are given once daily. Response rates to antimicrobial therapy range from 80 to 95% in low-risk febrile neutropenia episodes. Treating these patients in an outpatient setting avoids hospitalization in 75 to 95%. There is no doubt that outpatient therapy may have several advantages, including lower costs and an improved quality of live. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile low-risk neutropenia should be considered as an acceptable alternative to inpatient treatment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Acute abdomen due to endometriosis as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in the treatment of acute myelocytic leukemia.

Acute abdominal pain is a frequent diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in hematologic patients. We report on the very rare case of organ endometriosis with acute abdominal symptoms in a 43-year-old female patient with AML-M5, starting 4 days after induction chemotherapy with idarubicin, ara-C, and etoposide. The patient presented with an acute abdomen with clinical findings of acute cholecystitis, subileus, and local pain in the right upper abdomen accompanied by severe diarrhea. Probably due to impaired intestinal resorption, menstrual bleeding occurred despite regular administration of lynestrenol. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen disclosed a tumor with poor echoes in the pouch of Douglas, a subcapsular splenic hemorrhage, and a thickened gallbladder wall with surrounding edema. A cystic adnex tumor was confirmed by endovaginal ultrasound. Based on history and the findings on ultrasound, an endometriosis was diagnosed, and the LHRH agonist (nafarelin) was administered nasally in combination with lynestrenol. Following this medication the abdominal pain ceased, supporting the diagnosis of endometriosis. Nasal administration of an LHRH agonist in the following cycles of chemotherapy was effective in preventing further abdominal discomfort and vaginal bleeding. LHRH agonists should be given to patients with known endometriosis before starting myeloablative chemotherapy to prevent painful hemorrhage from endometriosis.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed1997

Immune thyroiditis after transplantation of allogeneic CD34+ selected peripheral blood cells.

A 28-year-old female patient underwent allogeneic PBSCT from her HLA-identical sister for AML in first CR. CD34+ cells were positively selected from PBPC using immunoaffinity columns. She received 8.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 1.74 x 10(6) CD3+ cells/kg body weight (BW). The patient developed acute GVHD III and mild limited chronic GVHD. Thirteen months after transplantation severe thyrotoxicosis requiring plasmapheresis occurred. Immune thyroiditis was confirmed cytologically by lymphocytic infiltration in a fine needle aspirate and by elevated thyroid-Ab-titers. The patient's donor had received thyroid hormone substitution for 10 years for hypothyroidism. The most probable cause of immune thyroiditis after allogeneic BMT is the transfer of antithyroid donor lymphocytes. These lymphocytes can also be transferred with a CD34+ selected peripheral stem cell graft. The transplantation of lymphocyte-depleted autologous bone marrow or PBPC grafts after myeloablative treatment is increasingly considered as potential treatment of severe autoimmune diseases. This case demonstrates that even low numbers of lymphocytes are capable of transferring autoimmune disorders.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Clinical use of hematopoietic growth factors in the myelodysplastic syndromes.

Recent advances in the molecular genetics of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have shed new light on the pathogenesis of MDS allowing a better understanding of the defects of differentiation of the transformed clone and suppression of normal hematopoiesis. The clinical hematologist, however, continues to be challenged with the treatment of patients with MDS. Pancytopenia and defective function of neutrophils and platelets lead to a high risk of infectious and hemorrhagic complications. The progression to acute myeloid leukemia adds to morbidity and mortality. Supportive care including red blood cell and platelet transfusions are still the cornerstone of therapeutic management. While prophylactic administration of G-CSF or GM-CSF cannot be recommended, treatment of febrile neutropenia might benefit from administration of G-CSF in addition to antibiotics. Administration of high-dose erythropoietin will improve erythropoiesis in around 20% of the patients, mainly in those with rather preserved erythroid function and no or low transfusion need. Coadministration of erythropoietin with either G-CSF or GM-CSF could increase the response rate. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation still is the only curative treatment and prolongs survival. Intensive chemotherapy for advanced MDS is possible with an acceptably low rate of early death and a complete remission rate between 45% to 60%, while initial results of autologous transplantation are promising.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

[Current status of clinical indications for hematopoietic growth factors after chemo-/radiotherapy in gynecology].

With the identification and recombinant production of the hematopoietic growth factors, these cytokines have been evaluated in the treatment of primary bone marrow failure states and following myelosuppressive chemotherapy or radiotherapy. An increasing number of clinical trials with hematopoietic factors have been performed in patients with haematological and oncological diseases. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), erythropoietin and, in phase I/II trials, thrombopoietin (TPO) are available for the clinical use. Most studies have been performed with G-CSF and GM-CSF, their beneficial effects are proven regarding acceleration of hematopoietic recovery following chemotherapy. This results in a marked reduction of infectious risks and a shortening of drug- and radiation-induced myelosuppression. CSFs are most important in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and have allowed high-dose therapy combined with stem cell support in gynecological malignancies, e.g. ovarian carcinoma and breast cancer. However, evidence based, clinical practical guidelines for the use of hematopoietic growth factors in gynecological malignancies are not for all circumstances available.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed1996

Clinical use of hematopoietic growth factors.

With the identification of recombinant production of the hematopoietic growth factors, these cytokines have been evaluated in the treatment of primary bone marrow failure states and after myelosuppressive chemo- or radiotherapy. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and erythropoietin have been approved for clinical use, and others including c-mpl-ligand (also called megakaryocyte growth and development factor or thrombopoietin) are in phase I and II trials. Most studies have been done with granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors; their beneficial effects are proven regarding acceleration of granulocyte recovery after chemo- and radiotherapy. In the majority of trials, this acceleration results in a reduction of infectious risks, a shortening of drug- and radiation-induced myelosuppression, and a higher chemotherapy dose intensity; however, an improved remission rate and improved long-term survival rates have not yet been definitively documented. Guidelines have been published to provide a rational basis for the use of these factors in clinical practice. It should be emphasized, however, that for many of the recommendations data from randomized clinical trials are lacking.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

[Current status of the clinical application of hematopoietic growth factors in oncology].

With the identification and recombinant production of the hematopoietic growth factors, these cytokines have been evaluated in the treatment of primary bone marrow failure states and after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A lot of clinical trials with hematopoietic factors have been performed in patients with haematologic and oncologic diseases within the last decade. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF], interleukin-3, interleukin-2, erythropoietin and in phase I/II trials thrombopoietin [TPO] are available for the clinical use. At the present, there is a broad use of growth factors. Most studies have been done with G-CSF and GM-CSF, their beneficial effects are proven regarding improvement of hematopoietic recovery after chemotherapy. This results in a marked reduction of infectious risks and a shortening of drug- and radiation-induced myelosuppression. CSFs are most important in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells [PBPC] and have allowed high dose therapy to be given to patients who would not have been able to undergo conventional bone marrow transplantation. However, an improved outcome and improved survival rates with standard chemotherapy protocols couldn't be documented by studies up to now, even though higher chemotherapy doses are possible by the use of hematopoietic factors.

Colony-Stimulating Factors↗