PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M Kerscher

Publications and source records attributed to M Kerscher.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Bleomycin-induced PSS-like pseudoscleroderma. Case report and review of the literature].

Although the association between administration of the antitumor agent bleomycin and the development of cutaneous fibrosis is established, there are only a small number of cases of bleomycin-induced scleroderma described in the literature. We report the development of generalised scleroderma with wide spread hyperpigmentation in a 52-year-old male patient, who received a total dose of 360 mg bleomycin in combination with cisplatin and etoposid for therapy of a malignant testicular seminoma. The clinical cutaneous alterations as well as the histological findings were indistinguishable from those encountered in progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS). In contrast to PSS however, Raynaud's phenomenon, cutaneous calcinosis, teleangiectasia, arthritis and involvement of additional organs were all absent. PSS-typical auto-antibodies were negative. Even 18 months after discontinuation of the drug and treatment with UVA1 phototherapy (3-4 times per week with 20 J/cm2) as well as physiotherapy, the skin changes had still not resolved. Based on our case and a detailed review of the literature, we discuss characteristics of bleomycin-induced scleroderma including pathogenesis, treatment modalities and course.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic

Kinetics of photosensitivity in bath-PUVA photochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Bath-PUVA is used to treat a variety of dermatoses. However, the kinetics of 8-methoxypsoralen during treatment are not completely clarified. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the intensity of the phototoxic response and the persistence of phototoxicity after bath-PUVA. METHODS: Twelve volunteers were exposed to UVA doses ranging from 0.5 to 40 J/cm2 from 10 to 240 minutes after bath-PUVA treatment. The resulting phototoxic response of the skin was determined. RESULTS: Irradiation 10 minutes after the psoralen bath led to the lowest assessed minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) of 1.42 J/cm2 (mean, SD +/- 0.29). Thereafter, the MPD increased significantly and sharply every hour. At 4 hours after the psoralen bath, UVA doses up to 40 J/cm2 failed to induce any phototoxic erythema (MPD). CONCLUSION: For optimal effects, UVA irradiation has to be administered immediately after the psoralen bath; no restrictive behavior is necessary after bath-PUVA treatment.

Adult

Low-dose UVA phototherapy for treatment of localized scleroderma.

BACKGROUND: For treatment of localized scleroderma numerous treatments, including ones with potentially hazardous side effects, are currently used with only limited success. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the efficacy of low-dose UVA1 irradiation in patients with severe localized scleroderma. METHODS: Patients were irradiated with 20 J/cm2 UVA1 for 12 weeks (total number of treatments: 30; cumulative UVA1 dose: 600 J/cm2). RESULTS: Low-dose UVA1 irradiation induced significant clinical improvement (clearance of > 80% of lesions) in 18 of 20 patients. Clearance was documented by clinical score as well as by 20 MHz ultrasound and histopathologic analysis. CONCLUSION: Low-dose UVA1 phototherapy can be highly effective for sclerotic plaques, even in patients with advanced localized scleroderma and with lesions rapidly evolving despite conventional therapy.

Adolescent

[Balneophotochemotherapy of lichen ruber. Personal results and comparison with photochemotherapy modalities employed up to now].

Twelve patients with extensive lichen planus, resistant to different regimes of prior external and internal therapy, were treated with PUVA-bath photochemotherapy (psoralen bath followed by UVA irradiation) using bath water containing 0.5 mg/L of 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP). In 11 of the 12 patients, the skin lesions showed a significant improvement or even complete remission within six weeks of treatment. In one patient, only limited clinical improvement could be achieved. A mean of 19.1 (SD +/- 3.6) PUVA-bath treatments were carried out. The mean cumulative UVA-dose given until clearance of the lichen planus was 16.7 (SD +/- 4.8) J/cm2. No side effects were seen except an increased phototoxic reaction in two patients manifested as slight erythema. The results of this trial show, that PUVA-bath photochemotherapy with 8-MOP is an effective therapeutic alternative to all other known therapies in the treatment of extensive, exanthematic and also hypertrophic-hyperkeratotic lichen planus. In comparison to oral PUVA therapy and PUVA-bath therapy using 4,s',8-trimethoxypsoralen, balneophotochemotherapy with 8-MOP shows an excellent efficiency-side effect correlation. The clearance of the refractive skin lesions by balneophotochemotherapy with 8-MOP demonstrates the superiority of this therapy over all other common therapeutic modalities used for lichen planus.

Adult

[Balneophotochemotherapy with 8-methoxypsoralen in lichen sclerosis et atrophicus].

A 66-year-old woman with longstanding lichen sclerosus et atrophicus improved strikingly with PUVA bath photochemotherapy over a period of 6 weeks. The cumulative UVA dose was 31.7 J/cm2; the single UVA dose ranged from 0.3 to 2.3 J/cm2. After 16 treatment sessions, the sclerotic lesions had softened greatly, while after 24 treatments, the skin lesions were almost completely cleared and pruritus was diminished. Histopathological analysis of biopsy specimens from previously affected sites as well as 20 MHz ultrasound examinations showed almost no residual sclerosis. Although long-term results are not yet available, PUVA bath photochemotherapy seems to be a promising and effective new treatment modality without systemic side effects for patients with disseminated lichen sclerosus et atrophicus.

Aged

[The successful monotherapy of hypereosinophilic dermatitis with PUVA-bath photochemotherapy].

A 70-year-old woman with long-standing hypereosinophilic dermatitis improved strikingly with PUVA-bath photochemotherapy. The single UVA doses ranged from 0.3 to 3.3 J/cm2. After 19 treatment sessions pruritus disappeared, and after 32 treatments the erythematous maculae completely cleared. Under continuous treatment three times a week, no relapse has occurred to date. PUVA-bath photochemotherapy seems to be a promising new treatment modality without systemic side effects for patients with hypereosinophilic dermatitis.

Aged

[PUVA-bath photochemotherapy in Hallopeau's acrodermatitis continua suppurativa].

A 73-year-old man presented with severe, relapsing acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau, which had been resistant to prior local and systemic therapy for eight years. The patient was treated with selective hand PUVA-bath photochemotherapy. The cumulative dose of UVA used over 10 weeks of treatment was 54.6 J/cm2 on the palms and 26.8 J/cm2 on the dorsum of the hands. The single UVA doses ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 J/cm2 on the palms and 0.2 to 1.4 J/cm2 on the dorsum of the hands. After 16 treatment sessions, the acrodermatitis continua started to improve, and after 24 treatments, had cleared completely. In the four months following the PUVA therapy, there was no relapse. PUVA-bath photochemotherapy is an efficient therapeutic alternative in the treatment of acrodermatitis continua due to its clinical effectiveness and lack of any systemic side effects. It also possesses the advantage of allowing selective photosensitization of certain areas of the skin such as the hands.

Acrodermatitis

Evaluation of PUVA bath phototoxicity.

Administration of 8-methoxypsoralen in a dilute bath water solution is an effective therapeutic alternative to its systemic application, avoiding systemic side effects. Although PUVA bath photochemotherapy is now widely used, standardized guidelines are not yet available. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine the optimal time interval between 8-methoxypsoralen bath and UVA irradiation and the persistence of photosensitivity after PUVA bath treatment. In volunteers the highest photosensitivity was observed following UVA irradiation immediately after PUVA bath. A sharp increase of the minimal phototoxic dose could be demonstrated after only 1 h, indicating a rapid loss of 8-methoxypsoralen activity. Irradiation 2 h after 8-methoxypsoralen bath failed to induce any PUVA erythema. This indicates that the optimal time for UVA irradiation is immediately after the 8-methoxypsoralen bath. In contrast to systemic PUVA therapy, 2 h after PUVA bath therapy, the remaining phototoxicity is minimal, so that no stringent restrictions of the patient's behaviour are needed.

Adult