PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Kinney

Publications and source records attributed to M Kinney.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1978

Renal failure in ascites secondary to hepatic, renal, and pancreatic disease. Treatment with a LeVeen peritoneovenous shunt.

Renal failure occurs in ascites of diverse causes. Functional renal failure (the hepatorenal syndrome) in cirrhotic patients is usually progressive and rapidly fatal. Insertion of a LeVeen shunt significantly reduces weight, as well as abdominal girth, and improves preoperative urine flow (488 vs 2,318 ml/24 hr; P less than .001) and natriuresis (12 +/- 15 vs 45 +/- 33 mEq/liter; P less than .003). The shunt should not be inserted in patients with alcoholic hepatitis (bilirubin level greater than 8 mg/100 ml). Ascitic fluid should be discarded at the time of surgery in patients with impaired cardiac function, a bleeding diathesis, and when liver function is more severely deranged.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1977

LaVeen continuous peritoneal-jugular shunt. Improvement of renal function in ascitic patients.

30 consecutive patients with cirrhosis of the liver complicated by refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, or both, received a LeVeen peritoneal-venous shunt. After surgery, these patients demonstrated a decreased abdominal girth (108 vs 93 cm, P less than .001), decreased body weight (80 vs 70 kg, P less than .001), and increased urinary flow (607 vs 4,254 ml, P less than .001). All patients had previously failed to show substantial benefit with 7 to 124 days of medical care. The mean BUN value was significantly decreased, from 39 to 23 mg/100 ml (P less than .005). Adosterone retention was reduced from a mean value of 32 to 12.8 ng/100 ml. The LeVeen continuous peritoneal-venous shunt is an important innovation that completely relieves refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients and reverses the pathophysiology of the hepatorenal syndrome.

Abdomen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Using magnitude estimation scaling to examine the validity of nursing diagnoses.

This paper describes the use of magnitude estimation scaling in the validation of the critical defining characteristics of nursing diagnoses. Magnitude estimation is a sensitive and accurate technique producing ratio level scales that offer advantages over ordinal level scales frequently used in validating nursing diagnoses. Magnitude estimation responses permit a consensus pattern to be achieved by producing stable and repeatable judgments to validate the importance of each sign and symptom investigated. Thus, magnitude estimation shows promise as a methodologic strategy for validating the critical defining characteristics of nursing diagnoses, thereby expanding the effort to identify and classify nursing phenomena.

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Professionalism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Nursing↗