PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Kupersmith

Publications and source records attributed to M Kupersmith.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1979

Bromocriptine in Parkinson disease: further studies.

Bromocriptine was administered to 66 patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) and increasing disability despite optimal treatment with levodopa/carbidopa (Sinemet). Forty-five patients tolerated at least 25 mg per day of bromocriptine (the "adequately treated" group) in addition to Sinemet and had significantly decreased rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia, gait disturbance, and total score, but increased involuntary movements. Twenty-five of these 45 patients improved by at least one stage. Among the 45 patients, 27 had "on-off" effects, and in 19 the "on-off" effects decreased on bromocriptine. The mean dose of bromocriptine in adequately treated patients las 47 mg, permitting a 10 percent reduction in the dose of levodopa. Twelve adequately treated patients received bromocriptine for at least 1 year, and 8 continued for longer than this. Bromocriptine was discontinued in 29 of 66 patients because of adverse effects, including mental changes (14 patients) and involuntary movements (9 patients). All adverse effects were reversible. Despite adverse effects, expense, and scarcity, bromocriptine, when added to levodopa, is useful in patients with advanced disease who no longer respond satisfactorily to levodopa, and for whom no other treatment is available.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Treatment of Parkinson's disease with lergotrile mesylate.

Lergotrile mesylate, an ergot alkaloid derivative and putative dopamine agonist, was effective in the majority of patients with Parkinson's disease who were showing signs of disease progression despite treatment with levodopa combined with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor (carbidopa). Among 20 patients completing a six-month trial, there was a significant (P less than .01) reduction in rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia, gait disturbance, and total score when lergotrile was added to levodopa plus carbidopa. Mean daily dose of lergotrile mesylate was 52 mg, and the mean daily dose of levodopa was reduced by 15%. Abnormal involuntary movements were decreased on addition of lergotrile and reduction in levodopa while mental changes and orthostatic hypotension were increased. Elevations in serum transaminase levels were noted in three patients. The ergot alkaloids promise to be an important new class of antiparkinsonian drugs.

Acetonitriles↗
PubMed1976

Treatment of parkinson's disease with bromocriptine.

Bromocriptine in high doses (up to 100 mg per day) was administered to 14 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease whose disorder was progressing despite optimum treatment with levodopa combined with a peripheral dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (carbidopa). In 10, bromocriptine (mean dose, 57 mg) induced a statistically significant (P less than 0.01) improvement in rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia, gait disturbance and total score. In seven patients levodopa with carbidopa was completely replaced by bromocriptine (mean dose, 70 mg), with improvement in four. Adverse effects were similar to those observed with levodopa and carbidopa, except that in individual patients abnormal involuntary movements and diurnal oscillations in performance (on-off effect) were decreased whereas orthostatic hypotension and mental changes were increased. Bromocriptine appears to be a major new agent in Parkinson's disease that is especially promising in patients no longer responding to levodopa.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment of Parkinson's disease with dopamine agonists: a review.

Bromocriptine and lergotrile were administered to 81 patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and increasing disability despite optimal treatment with levodopa (secondary levodopa failures). Sixty-six patients were treated with bromocriptine and 53 patients were treated with lergotrile. Both groups had significantly decreased rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia and gait disturbance upon addition of bromocriptine or lergotrile to levodopa. Twenty-five patients improved at least one-stage on bromocriptine, and 21 improved at least one-stage on lergotrile. The mean dose of bromocriptine was 47 mg, and the mean dose of lergotrile was 49 mg, permitting a 10% reduction in levodopa. Bromocriptine was discontinued in 29 of 66 patients because of adverse effects, including mental changes (14 patients) and involuntary movements (9 patients). Lergotrile was discontinued in 33 of 53 patients because of adverse effects including hepatotoxicity (11 patients) and mental changes (12 patients). The results of treatment with bromocriptine or lergotrile were comparable, with patients either responding or not. Bromocriptine will shortly be available for use in PD. Lergotrile, because of the hepatotoxicity, will not.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intracranial hemorrhage and infarction in anticoagulated patients with prosthetic heart valves.

In 1 year 6 patients with prosthetic heart valves (PHVs) treated with anticoagulants suffered intracranial hemorrhage. In 4, hemorrhage occurred into the site of a recent non-hemorrhagic infarction. In the others, both of whom had endocarditis, hemorrhages probably occurred as the result of rupture of a mycotic aneurysm. Five patients were treated with warfarin, 1 with heparin. In all patients the level of anticoagulant activity was greater than 1.5 times control. Five patients were in atrial fibrillation; 1 was hypertensive. The diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage was made and its location and extent accurately determined by computed tomography (CT). Three patients underwent surgery and 2 are alive with only minor neurological deficits. Among the 3 patients who did not undergo surgery 2 died and 1 is alive with a moderate neurological deficit. The management of PHV patients with use of anticoagulants is discussed in terms of the mechanisms involved in intracranial bleeding. Emphasis is placed on prevention of emboli, discontinuation of anticoagulants once non-hemorrhagic infarction has occurred and the primacy of CT scan in diagnosis when hemorrhage is suspected. The special problems of anticoagulation in the presence of endocarditis are also discussed.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of methotrexate in the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

OBJECTIVE: To determine if methotrexate has disease-controlling and corticosteroid (cs)-sparing effects in the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial comparing methotrexate versus placebo in addition to corticosteroid therapy in patients with newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis. Patients with giant cell arteritis were enrolled and treated with high dose corticosteroids as well as methotrexate starting at 7.5 mg/week or placebo. Corticosteroids were tapered by the treating physician as guided by the clinical picture, with methotrexate or placebo dose increased by 2.5 mg/week for disease flare with a maximum allowable dose of 20 mg/week. After a clinically-defined remission and steroid discontinuation, methotrexate or placebo was tapered monthly to zero by 2.5 mg/week. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled, 12 randomized to methotrexate, 9 to placebo. Baseline characteristics (age, height, weight, sedimentation rate, bone mineral density, total corticosteroid dose prior to randomization, and quality of life as measured by SF-36 and function as measured by AIMS) were comparable between groups. At completion, there was no significant difference between methotrexate- and placebo-treated patients with regard to the cumulative corticosteroid dose (6469 mg and 5908 mg respectively, p = 0.6), number of weeks to completion of steroids (68 and 60 respectively, p = 0.5), time (weeks) to taper prednisone to less than 10 mg prednisone/day (23 and 25 respectively, p = 0.5), bone mineral density in lumbar spine (p = 0.2) or hip (p = 0.4) at one year, or functional status as measured by AIMS and quality of life as measured by SF36. There was no late vision loss in either group, and only one major treatment-responsive relapse in a methotrexate-treated patient. There were few major corticosteroid-related side effects and these did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSION: With this study design, no corticosteroid-sparing benefit could be attributed to the combination of methotrexate with corticosteroid therapy for the treatment of patients with giant cell arteritis. Both groups did well, with few major corticosteroid-related side effects, and most patients were safely tapered off corticosteroids sooner than reported in many series. The shorter overall duration of steroid treatment in this study probably contributed to the remarkably low frequency of side effects, without increased ischemic risk for the patient.

Aged↗