PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M L Collaer

Publications and source records attributed to M L Collaer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Human behavioral sex differences: a role for gonadal hormones during early development?

Evidence that gonadal hormones during prenatal and neonatal development influence behavior is reviewed. Several theoretical models of hormonal influences, derived from research in other species, are described. These models are evaluated on the basis of data from humans with either normal or abnormal hormonal exposure. It is concluded that the evidence is insufficient to determine which model best explains the data. Sexual differentiation may involve several dimensions, and different models may apply to different behaviors. Gonadal hormones appear to influence development of some human behaviors that show sex differences. The evidence is strongest for childhood play behavior and is relatively strong for sexual orientation and tendencies toward aggression. Also, high levels of hormones do not enhance intelligence, although a minimum level may be needed for optimal development of some cognitive processes. Directions for future research are proposed.

Adolescent↗

Magnetoencephalographic localization of a language processing cortical area adjacent to a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Case report.

In order to accurately estimate the risk of surgery for dominant perisylvian arteriovenous malformations, the topographical relationship of the lesion to language cortex must be determined. A case is presented in which a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study was used to map preoperatively and noninvasively an intracortical source of speech-receptive cortex in a 25-year-old right-handed man with a dominant left temporal lobe arteriovenous malformation. The speech-evoked magnetic field was analyzed at 36 positions over the left hemisphere in response to presentations of the consonant-vowel syllables "da" and "ga." A topographical map of the magnetic component evoked at 110 msec after stimulus onset, which was negative going to the vertex in concurrent electrical recordings, was congruent with a superficial cortical neuronal current source. This source was displaced from that usually observed in normal individuals to tonal or click stimuli, being superior to the probable location of auditory cortex, and superior and anterior to the probable location of Wernicke's area as conventionally described. The MEG results were in accord with the determination of position of a language-processing cortical area as assessed by direct electrical stimulation of the cortex during surgery under local anesthesia, and by superselective Amytal (amobarbital) injection during angiography. The MEG recordings and exposed brain stimulation sites were coordinated by cranial measurements, skull x-ray landmarks, and angiographic anatomy. Investigations such as this, which compare MEG findings with those from established clinical procedures, are an essential step in determining the physiological and anatomical utility of magnetoencephalography for noninvasive clinical functional localization.

Adult↗

A measure of short-term visual memory based on the WISC-R coding subtest.

Adapted the Coding subtest of the WISC-R to provide a measure of visual memory. Three hundred and five children, aged 8 through 12, were administered the Coding test using standard directions. A few seconds after completion the key was taken away, and each was given a paper with only the digits and asked to write the appropriate matching symbol below each. This was termed "Coding Recall." To provide validity data, a subgroup of 50 Ss also was administered the Attention Span for Letters subtest from the Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude (as a test of visual memory for sequences of letters) and a Bender Gestalt recall test (as a measure of visual memory for geometric forms). Coding Recall means and standard deviations are reported separately by sex and age level. Implications for clinicans are discussed. Reservations about clinical use of the data are given in view of the possible lack of representativeness of the sample used and the limited reliability and validity of Coding Recall.

Attention↗