Biomedical subjects

M L Dordain-Bigot

Publications and source records attributed to M L Dordain-Bigot.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

[Fusarium onychomycosis].

INTRODUCTION: A 69-year-old man with an uneventful past history consulted for a proximal subungueal leukonychia and associated paronychia of the right greater toe. Macroscopic examination and culture lead to the diagnosis of Fusarium oxysporum. Local treatment with bifonazol and cyclopirox was effective. DISCUSSION: Fungal onychomycoses are uncommon and usually present as superficial leukonychia. The association of a proximal localization with paronychia would suggest possible Fusarium infection. Though no specific treatment protocol is well-established, this case emphasizes the importance of effective treatment since invasive fusariosis is described in immunosuppressed patients with ungueal localizations can be an important portal for infection.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

[Histopathology of exogenous and idiopathic lucites and provocation phototests].

OBJECTIVE: Provocative phototests are used regularly to explore photobiology in patients with photodermatoses. Our objective was to determine the reliability of the phototest in the diagnosis of idiopathic and exogenous light eruption in order to identify the ideal date for the histological examination by correlation between the histological aspects of light- triggered and spontaneous lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 66 patients, there were 48 with polymorphous light eruptions, 13 with exogenous eruptions and 5 with chronic actinodermatitis. The histological findings of the provocative phototests were correlated with the clinical aspect, the date of biopsy and the histological aspect of the spontaneous lesions. RESULTS: In polymorphous light eruptions (48 cases) this test triggered a photoallergic reaction in 48% of the patients. There was a good correlation between the histological findings and clinical features in 96% of the cases. The histological image of the light-triggered lesion on day 6 was the closest to that of the spontaneous lesion. In exogenous eruptions and chronic actinodermatitis (18 cases), only 33% of the clinically positive phototests were also positive at histological examination. The histological image was the same for the provocative tests whether they were clinically positive or negative, with signs of epidermal phototoxicity, regeneration acanthosis and moderate perivascular lymphocyte infiltration of the superficial dermal layer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed that the phototest provides a good correlation between histological findings and clinical presentation in idiopathic polymorphous light eruptions, justifying simple clinical interpretation, but did not demonstrate a rate of positive results as high as reported in the literature. Day 6 is the ideal date for a phototest biopsy. In exogenous light eruptions, the phototest is less reliable since the correlation between histology and clinical presentation is weaker. It is difficult to reproduce spontaneous lesions with the phototest, but if used, the phototest biopsy should be done on day 18.

Humans↗

PubMed1996

[Recurrent phototriggered summer light eruption of the axillary and inguinal area: an atypical topographic form of benign summer lucitis].

UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION This case report of benign summer light eruption emphasizes the importance of phototests in the diagnosis of photosensitive dermatoses. CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old man, phototype II, had experienced a pruriginous papulovesicular erythematous eruption of the axillary and inguinal regions each summer for 12 years. A high-dose UV phototest (40 J/cm2 x 3 days) directed on the right posterior axillary area and a whole body exposure test (4 J/cm2 UVA, 20 mJ/cm2 UVB x 3 days) were positive both clinically and histologically on day 4. DEM B was normal at 26 mJ/cm2. Iterative polychromatic phototest (DEM x 3 days) in the area usually involved (left posterior axillary region) was negative. The simple UVA (13 J/cm2) and iterative phototests performed on the back were negative. The results of the phototests led to the diagnosis of benign light eruption despite the unusual localization. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis of benign light eruption is generally clinical. Phototests are unnecessary in most cases. Benign light eruption can be triggered by high-dose iterative UVA exposure of the susceptible area or whole body phototests (UVA-UVB). These specific phototests are indicated in atypical forms or localizations in order to determine the course of benign light eruption and to uncover simulations.

Adolescent↗