Biomedical subjects

M L Giretti

Publications and source records attributed to M L Giretti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1977

Response characteristics and vestibular receptor convergence of frog cerebellar purkinje cells. A natural stimulation study.

1. The horizontal sinusoidal frequency response and the problem of vestibular receptor convergence in Purkinje cells (P-cells) of the auriculum, dorsal rim and corpus cerebelli were studied in curarized frogs with natural stimulation. 2. Primarily "simple" but also "complex" spikes were evoked by sinusoidal stimulation of the horizontal canals. P-cell "simple" spike activity could be grouped into types I-IV. Type I and II responses were directionally sensitive and thus were evoked at the stimulus frequency. Type III (and IV) cells, on the other hand, had response waveforms double that of the input frequency, with peak increases (or decreases) in discharge inphase with head velocity in the mid-frequency range. Except in the cerebellar midline regions where type III response waveforms were symmetrical, ipsilateral sinusoidal responses were larger in magnitude than those evoked during contralateral rotation. Despite the differences in magnitudes, ipsi- and contralateral response phase angles for one cell were approximately equal. "Complex" spikes were evoked with ipsi (type I) or contralateral (type II) horizontal rotation. Generally only 1-2 spikes were evoked per cycle with short (0-60 degrees) or long (120-150 degrees) phase-lags following acceleration. 3. A Bode analysis of type I "simple" spike activity in yaw indicates a slightly greater phase-lag and a 10-15 fold smaller P-cell gain in the range 0.05-0.5 Hz when compared to peripheral horizontal canal neurons. 4. Stimulation of the vertical canals and otolith organs also evoked "simple" and, to a lesser extent, "complex" P-cell spikes. "Simple" spikes were in most cases (85%) evoked by stimulation of several canal and/or otolithic receptors thus demonstrating a high degree of receptor convergence. "Complex" spikes, however, were only evoked by stimulation of one canal or otolith receptor. 5. Otolithic input to P-cells, examined statically and with low level constant velocity rolls, was mainly phasic or phasic-tonic in nature.

Animals↗

PubMed1976

The effects of stimulating the cerebellar nodulus in the cat on the responses of vestibular neurons.

In a first series of experiments, recordings were obtained from cat abducens and trochlear motorneurons and from axons of secondary vestibular neurons terminating in these motor nuclei, and the effects of cerebellar nodulus stimulation on utricular- and canal-evoked responses in these neurons were studied. Ultricular activation of vestibular axons recorded in the ipsilateral VIth and contralateral IVth nuclei was probably monosynaptically inhibited by nodular stimulation provided conditioning-test intervals were in the range between 0-10 ms and the test stimuli were close to threshold intensities. Of the vestibular axons activated by stimulation of the semicircular canal nerves only those evoked by the horizontal canal stimulation and recorded in the ipsilateral VIth nucleus were weakly inhibited. When the vestibular stimuli were strong enough to produce clear field potentials in the motor nuclei and/or postsynaptic potentials in motorneurons, nodular stimulation had practically no effect on their amplitudes. It is concluded that inhibition of vestibuloocular transmission is weak as compared to floccular inhibition studied previously. In a second series of experiments, recordings were obtained from vestibular neurons which were activated antidromically and/or transsynaptically by stimulation of the contralateral fastigial nucleus, and the effects of ipsilateral nodular stimulation on these responses were studied. It was found that nodular stimulation inhibited both antidromic as well as transsynaptic fastigial activations of vestibular neurons. Most of these vestibular neurons were located in the descending vestibular nucleus and received polysynaptic vestibular and spinal inputs. It is concluded that in addition to its weak inhibitory effect on vestibuloocular transmission the nodulus exerts a powerful inhibition on vestibular neurons transmitting vestibular and spinal inputs to cerebellar nuclei and/or cortex. It is suggested that the nodulus controls cerebellar projecting vestibular neurons which carry vestibular and spinal information to the cerebellum. The vestibular, proprioceptive and visual information which is present in the nodulus may aid the role of the nodulus in controlling body posture.

Abducens Nerve↗

PubMed1975

Cerebellar control of vestibular neurons of the frog.

Intra- and extracellular potentials were recorded from vestibular neurons of the frog following stimulation of the ipsilateral cerebellar cortex (auricular lobe). Single neurons were identified as vestibular neurons by their location within the borders of the vestibular nuclei and by their activation via stimulation of the anterior branch of the VIIIth nerve. 2. Stimulation of the cerebellar auricular lobe provoked in some vestibular neurons apparently pure IPSPs with latencies as short as 1.5 msec suggesting a monosynaptic linkage between Purkinje cells and vestibular neuron. Vestibular-evoked responses were inhibited by cerebellar conditioning stimuli for as long as 50 msec. 3. Cerebellar stimulation also elicited an EPSP-IPSP sequence or occasionally pure EPSPs in vestibular neurons. These EPSPs were probably generated by axon reflex activation via the excitation of axons of primary and secondary vestibular neurons terminating in the cerebellum since they persisted after chronic VIIIth nerve section. Some vestibular evoked resonses were facilitated by cerebellar stimuli for 40-50 msec. 4. Occasionally an inhibitory effect was also induced in vestibular neurons by paired ipsilateral VIIIth nerve stimulation; it's latency of onset and time course suggested that a vestibulo-cerebello-vestibular loop was mainly responsible for the inhibition.

Animals↗

PubMed1974