Biomedical subjects

M L Hearns

Publications and source records attributed to M L Hearns.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Mechanical ventilation with or without 7-day circuit changes. A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a practice of not routinely changing ventilator circuits in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased incidence of nosocomial pneumonia. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Intensive care units in two university-affiliated teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: 300 patients admitted to an intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation for more than 5 days. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either no routine ventilator circuit changes or circuit changes every 7 days. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Other outcome measures included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and hospital mortality. RESULTS: 147 patients were randomly assigned to receive no routine ventilator circuit changes, and 153 patients were randomly assigned to receive circuit changes every 7 days. The two groups were similar at the time of randomization with regard to demographic characteristics, intensive care unit admission diagnoses, and severity of illness. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was seen in 36 patients (24.5%) receiving no routine changes and in 44 patients (28.8%) receiving changes every 7 days (relative risk, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.17]). No statistically significant differences for hospital mortality, intensive care unit mortality, death during mechanical ventilation, death in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, or mortality directly attributed to ventilator-associated pneumonia were found between the two treatment groups (P > or = 0.11). Patients receiving changes every 7 days had 247 circuit changes costing a total of $7410; patients receiving no routine changes had a total of 11 circuit changes costing $330. CONCLUSION: The elimination of routine ventilator circuit changes can reduce medical care costs without increasing the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The safety and diagnostic accuracy of minibronchoalveolar lavage in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of minibronchoalveolar lavage done by respiratory therapists for the evaluation of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia and to determine the diagnostic agreement between quantitative lower airway cultures obtained by the minibronchoalveolar lavage and protected specimen brush techniques. DESIGN: A prospective direct comparison of two diagnostic techniques. SETTING: An academic tertiary care center in St. Louis, Missouri. PATIENTS: 72 consecutive patients suspected of having ventilator-associated pneumonia on the basis of clinical evidence. INTERVENTIONS: Sampling of lower airway secretions using the protected specimen brush and minibronchoalveolar lavage techniques. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical complications and quantitative cultures of respiratory secretions. RESULTS: 72 patients suspected of having ventilator-associated pneumonia (first episode) were evaluated using minibronchoalveolar lavage. In 42 patients, lower airway secretions were also obtained using the protected specimen brush technique. No change in arterial blood oxygen saturation or heart rate occurred after minibronchoalveolar lavage (P > 0.2). Mean arterial pressure slightly increased with minibronchoalveolar lavage (baseline mean pressure, 90.1 mm Hg [CI, 88.4 to 91.7 mm Hg]; average within-person change, 2.6 mm Hg; P = 0.024). Good diagnostic agreement was shown for quantitative cultures obtained with the protected specimen brush and minibronchoalveolar lavage techniques (kappa statistic, 0.63; concordance, 83.3%); 10(3) colony forming units/mL was used as the threshold for a clinically significant culture result. CONCLUSIONS: Minibronchoalveolar lavage is a safe and technically simple procedure for obtaining quantitative lower airway cultures in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Quantitative culture results obtained by minibronchoalveolar lavage are similar to those obtained by the protected specimen brush technique.

Adult↗