Biomedical subjects

M L Latash

Publications and source records attributed to M L Latash.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Vertical posture and head stability in patients with chronic neck pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postural performance and head stabilization of patients with chronic neck pain. DESIGN: A single-blind comparative group study. SUBJECTS: Patients with work-related chronic neck pain (n = 9), with chronic whiplash associated disorders (n = 9) and healthy subjects (n = 16). METHODS: During quiet standing in different conditions (e.g. 1 and 2 feet standing, tandem standing, and open and closed eyes) the sway areas and the ability to maintain the postures were measured. The maximal peak-to-peak displacement of the centre of pressure and the head translation were analysed during predictable and unpredictable postural perturbations. RESULTS: Patients with chronic neck pain, in particular those with whiplash-associated disorders, showed larger sway areas and reduced ability to successfully execute more challenging balance tasks. They also displayed larger sway areas and reduced head stability during perturbations. CONCLUSION: The results show that disturbances of postural control in chronic neck pain are dependent on the aetiology, and that it is possible to quantify characteristic postural disturbances in different neck pain conditions. It is suggested that the dissimilarities in postural performance are a reflection of different degrees of disturbances of the proprioceptive input to the central nervous system and/or of the central processing of such input.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Prehension synergies: effects of object geometry and prescribed torques.

We studied the coordination of forces and moments exerted by individual digits in static tasks that required balancing an external load and torque. Subjects ( n=10) stabilized a handle with an attachment that allowed for change of external torque. Thumb position and handle width systematically varied among the trials. Each subject performed 63 tasks (7 torque values x 3 thumb locations x 3 widths). Forces and moments exerted by the digit tips on the object were recorded. Although direction and magnitude of finger forces varied among subjects, each subject used a similar multidigit synergy: a single eigenvalue accounted for 95.2-98.5% of the total variance. When task parameters were varied, regular conjoint digital force changes (prehension synergies) were observed. Synergies represent preferential solutions used by the subjects to satisfy mechanical requirements of the tasks. In particular, chain effects in force adjustments to changes in the handle geometry were documented. An increased handle width induced the following effects: (a). tangential forces remained unchanged, (b). the same tangential forces produced a larger moment T (t), (c). the increased T (t) was compensated by a smaller moment of the normal forces T(n), and (d). normal finger forces were rearranged to generate a smaller moment. Torque control is a core component of prehension synergies. Observed prehension synergies are only mechanically necessitated in part. The data support a theory of hierarchical organization of prehension synergies.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

EMG discharge patterns during human grip movement are task-dependent and not modulated by muscle contraction modes: a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study.

Our previous study revealed that, during tonic muscle contraction, remarkable functional differences among intrinsic and extrinsic muscles were observed during two different grip movements, i.e., precision and power grips. To verify whether this evidence is true even under the phasic muscle contraction, magnetic stimulation was delivered over the left scalp while a normal human subject performed phasic precision or power grip responses of the right-hand fingers in a simple reaction time (SRT) paradigm. Magnetic stimulation delivered during the latent period revealed different cortico-motoneuronal excitations between the two grip responses. In particular, the contributions of extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle were definitely different between the two grip responses, although motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of first dorsal interosseous (FDI) prior to, and after EMG onset of movement initiation, were not different. These results were similar to previous results obtained during tonic muscle contraction. Thus, we have concluded that the task-dependent EMG discharge pattern in finger manipulation could not be modulated by muscle contraction modes.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2001

Bilateral deficit and symmetry in finger force production during two-hand multifinger tasks.

A comprehensive study of patterns of finger forces during one-hand and two-hand multifinger maximal force production trials was performed with particular emphasis on differences between tasks involving symmetrical and asymmetrical finger groups (symmetrical and asymmetrical tasks). Twelve healthy right-handed subjects performed maximal voluntary force production tasks with different finger combinations. Force deficit (FD) for a finger group within a hand was defined as a drop in peak force in a multifinger task as compared to the sum of individual finger peak forces in single-finger tasks. FD showed a dependence on both the number of fingers within the hand and the number of fingers in the other hand. An additional drop in peak finger forces was seen in two-hand tests (bilateral deficit, BD). BD summed over two hands was independent of the number of fingers involved in the two-hand tasks, but dependent on the distribution of fingers between the two hands. BD for a hand was larger for tasks involving fewer fingers within the hand and more fingers in the other hand. It was higher for asymmetrical tasks than for symmetrical tasks. The difference between asymmetrical and symmetrical tasks was due to the different behavior of asymmetrically involved fingers. FD was larger for asymmetrical master (explicitly involved) fingers, while forces produced involuntarily by asymmetrical slave (explicitly non-involved) fingers were larger. These differences brought down the total moment produced by both hands in the frontal plane. FD and BD are phenomena of different origin whose effects sum up. The observations have led to further development of a previously proposed double-representation, mirror-image (DoReMi) hypothesis and refinement of the neural network underlying the two-hand finger interaction.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The effect of a fatiguing exercise by the index finger on single- and multi-finger force production tasks.

We studied the effects of fatigue, induced by a 60-s maximal isometric force production with the index finger, on multi-finger coordination and force production by the other fingers of the hand. Finger forces were measured during single- and multi-finger maximal voluntary force production (MVC) at two sites, the middle of the distal or the middle of the proximal phalanges. Two fatiguing exercises involving force production by the index finger were used, one at the distal phalanx and the other at the proximal phalanx. The MVC of the index finger dropped by about 33% when it was produced at the site involved in the fatiguing exercise. In addition, large transfer effects of fatigue were observed across sites of force application and across fingers. Force deficit increased under fatigue, especially due to a drop in the recruitment of the index finger. Under fatigue, the index finger was less enslaved during force production by other fingers. During multi-finger tasks, the percentage of total force produced by the index finger was significantly reduced after the fatiguing exercise. The principle of minimization of secondary moments was violated under fatigue. We suggest that the most impaired (fatigued) finger shows less interaction with other fingers or, in other words, is being progressively removed from the multi-finger synergy. Some of the observed changes in finger coordination suggest effects of fatigue at a central (neural) level.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The role of action in postural preparation for loading and unloading in standing subjects.

The main purpose of the present study has been to find an answer to the question: Can the subject generate anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) when a predictable postural perturbation occurs in the absence of a voluntary action? Answering this question would allow us to distinguish between two competing hypotheses on the relation between APAs and voluntary movements. One hypothesis considers both APAsigma and voluntary "focal" movements different peripheral patterns associated with a single control process, while the alternative hypothesis considers them outcomes of two parallel control processes. Healthy subjects performed series of loading and unloading trials that included: (1) catching a falling load onto another load held in extended hands; (2) catching a falling load onto a tray attached to the trunk; (3) allowing a falling load to hit another load out of the extended hands, causing an unloading; and (4) releasing a load held in extended hands by a voluntary shoulder movement. In series 1, precautions were taken to avoid possible small hand movements prior to the impact of the falling load. Available visual information on the trajectory of the falling load was manipulated. In all conditions, except when the subject's eyes were closed, APAs were seen with patterns that were adequate for counteracting expected perturbations. Quantitative electromyographic indices of APAs depended on the availability of visual information and particular methods of introducing postural perturbations despite the fact that the magnitude of the perturbation was always the same. Our findings support a hypothesis that control processes resulting in APAs can be different from control processes associated with focal voluntary movements.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Bilateral multifinger deficits in symmetric key-pressing tasks.

Maximal voluntary force during simultaneous bilateral and multifinger exertion has been shown to be smaller than the sum of unilateral or single-finger exertions. The goal of this study was to study the force deficit associated with bilateral multifinger tasks. Eight normal college students performed four types of maximal isometric key-pressing tasks: (1) unilateral single-finger, (2) bilateral single-finger, (3) unilateral multifinger, and (4) bilateral multifinger. Forces produced by the index (I), middle (M), ring (R), and little (L) fingers and surface electromyography (EMG) of extrinsic finger flexors were recorded. Multifinger deficit (MFD) was defined as the percentage difference between the force (or EMG) produced by a set of fingers and the sum of the forces (or EMGs) produced by the individual fingers in their unilateral single-finger tasks. Bilateral deficit (BLD) was defined as the percentage difference between the force (or EMG) produced by a set of fingers and the sum of the forces (or EMGs) produced by the finger subsets of the left and right hands. Significant BLD and MFD in force and EMG were found for all bilateral multifinger tasks and some of the bilateral single-finger tasks. Both BLD and MFD were dependent on the number of fingers involved. BLD ranged from 3% to 22.7% for force and from 8.9% to 31.0% for EMG, including bilateral single-finger and bilateral multifinger tasks. MFDs in force during bilateral I-, IM-, IMR-, and IMRL-finger tasks were 13.2%, 37.8%, 53.2%, 52.3%, respectively; and the corresponding MFDs in EMG were 11.7%, 51.3%, 67.6%, and 71.0%, respectively. BLD and MFD in EMG were found to vary in parallel with the corresponding force deficits. It was suggested that the neural ceiling effect remains the most plausible mechanism underlying the observed deficits. The central nervous system is unable to activate maximally a large number of muscle groups at the same time during tasks involving multiple body parts. During bilateral multifinger tasks, the ceiling effect may be organized hierarchically: (1) a certain limited neural drive is shared bilaterally, leading to a BLD; (2) at each hand, a certain limited neural drive is shared by multiple fingers, leading to MFD within a hand; (3) the deficits at bilateral and unilateral multifinger levels are cumulative during bilateral multifinger tasks, leading to a higher deficit associated with the tasks.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks.

The framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis (UCM hypothesis) was applied to the analysis of the structure of finger force variability during oscillatory force production tasks. Subjects produced cycles of force with one, two (index and middle), or three (index, middle, and ring) fingers acting in parallel against force sensors mounted inside a small frame. The frame could be placed on the top of a table (stable conditions) or on a 4-mm-wide supporting surface (unstable conditions). Subjects were less variable when they used two fingers than when using one finger; adding the third finger did not change indices of variability of the performance. Components of finger force variance that did (VUN) or did not (VCOMP) change the value of a particular functional variable were computed for two control hypotheses: (1) at each time, the subjects tried to stabilize the total value of force (force-control); and (2), at each time, the subjects tried to stabilize the total moment produced with respect to an axis parallel to the hand/forearm (moment-control). Most subjects showed selective stabilization of moment and destabilization of force throughout most of the force cycle, in both stable and unstable conditions. The shapes of VUN and VCOMP suggested a possibility of selective compensation of timing errors across fingers within force cycles. One subject showed different relations between VUN and VCOMP, suggesting that these relations did in fact reflect particular central strategies of solving the tasks. The UCM method is applicable to force production tasks. It allows the comparison of control hypotheses in a quantitative way and unveils central strategies of control of redundant motor systems. Within this approach, redundancy (rather, abundance) is not a problem but an inherent part of a solution for natural motor tasks.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The effect of finger extensor mechanism on the flexor force during isometric tasks.

The role of the intrinsic finger flexor muscles was investigated during finger flexion tasks. A suspension system was used to measure isometric finger forces when the point of force application varied along fingers in a distal-proximal direction. Two biomechanical models, with consideration of extensor mechanism Extensor Mechanism Model (EMM) and without consideration of extensor mechanism Flexor Model (FM), were used to calculate forces of extrinsic and intrinsic finger flexors. When the point of force application was at the distal phalanx, the extrinsic flexor muscles flexor digitorum profundus, FDP, and flexor digitorum superficialis, FDS, accounted for over 80% of the summed force of all flexors, and therefore were the major contributors to the joint flexion at the distal interphalangeal (DIP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. When the point of force application was at the DIP joint, the FDS accounted for more than 70% of the total force of all flexors, and was the major contributor to the PIP and MCP joint flexion. When the force of application was at the PIP joint, the intrinsic muscle group was the major contributor for MCP flexion, accounting for more than 70% of the combined force of all flexors. The results suggest that the effects of the extensor mechanism on the flexors are relatively small when the location of force application is distal to the PIP joint. When the external force is applied proximally to the PIP joint, the extensor mechanism has large influence on force production of all flexors. The current study provides an experimental protocol and biomechanical models that allow estimation of the effects of extensor mechanism on both the extrinsic and intrinsic flexors in various loading conditions, as well as differentiating the contribution of the intrinsic and extrinsic finger flexors during isometric flexion.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed2001

Anticipatory postural adjustments associated with lateral and rotational perturbations during standing.

We studied the role of different leg and trunk muscle groups in the generation of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) prior to lateral and rotational perturbations associated with predictable and self-triggered postural perturbations during standing. Postural perturbations were induced by a variety of manipulations including catching and releasing a load with the right hand extended either in front of the body or to the right side, performing bilateral fast shoulder movements in different directions, and applying brief force pulses with a hand against the wall. Perturbations in a frontal plane ("lateral perturbations") were associated with significant asymmetries in APAs seen in the right and left distal (soleus and tibialis anterior) muscles; these asymmetries dependent on the direction of the perturbation. Rotational perturbations about the vertical axis of the body generated by fast movements of the two shoulders in the opposite directions were also associated with direction-dependent asymmetries in the APAs in soleus muscles. However, rotational perturbations generated by an off-body-midline force pulse application were accompanied by direction-dependent asymmetries in proximal muscle groups, but not in the distal muscles. We conclude that muscles controlling the ankle joint play an important role in the compensation of lateral and rotational perturbations. The abundance of muscles participating in maintaining vertical posture allows the control system to use different task-dependent strategies during the generation of APAs in anticipation of rotational perturbation.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Anticipatory postural adjustments during load catching by standing subjects.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To study differences in the generation of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) in arm and trunk/leg muscles prior to catching a load released either by the subject him-/herself or by the experimenter. (2) To study the importance of different mechanical characteristics of the load at impact for the generation of APAs prior to load catching. METHODS: Standing subjects were asked to catch loads dropped onto the left hand from different heights either by the experimenter or by the subject's right hand. The load mass and release height were manipulated to keep either the mass or the momentum of the load at impact constant. APAs were quantified with integral electromyographic indices. RESULTS: APAs were observed in leg, trunk and arm muscles prior to load impact for both self- and experimenter-release trials. Kinetic energy showed higher correlations with the magnitude of APA than momentum, but only in experimenter-release trials. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects can generate APAs in both arm and trunk/leg muscles in the absence of an explicit voluntary action. The relative importance of kinetic energy and momentum for defining the magnitude of APAs can reflect the difference in the sources of information used to prepare for the forthcoming perturbation during self- and experimenter-released load catch.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The effect of fatigue on multifinger co-ordination in force production tasks in humans.

1. This study investigated the effects of fatigue, induced by production of maximal isometric force for 60 s with four fingers, upon indices of multifinger co-ordination. 2. Measurements of individual finger forces were performed during single- and multifinger maximal force production (maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) for two sites of force application, the middle of the distal or the middle of the proximal phalanxes. Two fatiguing exercises were used, involving force production at the distal phalanxes and at the proximal phalanxes. Fourteen subjects were tested. 3. The total force in four-finger tasks dropped by about 43 % when it was produced at the site involved in the fatiguing exercise. During force production at the other site, MVC dropped by 23 %. During single-finger MVC tests, force drop with fatigue was similar across all four fingers (about -25 % of their corresponding MVCs). 4. Force production by one finger was accompanied by involuntary force production by other fingers (enslaving). Enslaving remained unchanged by fatigue when measured during force generation at the site involved in the fatiguing exercise, but increased during force production at the other site. 5. The total MVC of four fingers acting in parallel was smaller than the sum of the MVCs of these fingers in single-finger tasks (force deficit). The force deficit increased with fatigue. Force-sharing patterns during four-finger tasks showed only minor changes under fatigue. 6. These results indicate that the effects of fatigue were not limited to changes in the force-generating capabilities of the muscles. In particular, fatigue could lead to a reorganisation at a neural level that defines commands to individual fingers.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting.

The question of degrees of freedom in the control of multijoint movement is posed as the problem of discovering how the motor control system constrains the many possible combinations of joint postures to stabilize task-dependent essential variables. Success at a task can be achieved, in principle, by always adopting a particular joint combination. In contrast, we propose a more selective control strategy: variations of the joint configuration that leave the values of essential task variables unchanged are predicted to be less controlled (i.e., stabilized to a lesser degree) than joint configuration changes that shift the values of the task variables. Our experimental task involved shooting with a laser pistol at a target under four conditions. The seven joint angles of the arm were obtained from the recorded positions of markers on the limb segments. The joint configurations observed at each point in normalized time were analyzed with respect to trial-to-trial variability. Different hypotheses about relevant task variables were used to define sets of joint configurations ("uncontrolled manifolds" or UCMs) that, if realized, would leave essential task variables unchanged. The variability of joint configurations was decomposed into components lying parallel to those sets and components lying in their complement. The orientation of the gun's barrel relative to a vector pointing from the gun to the target was the task variable most successful at showing a difference between the two components of joint variability. This variable determines success at the task. Throughout the movement, not only while the gun was pointing at the target, fluctuations of joint configuration that affected this variable were much reduced compared with fluctuations that did not affect this variable. The UCM principle applied to relative gun orientation thus captures the structure of the motor control system across different parts of joint configuration space as the movement evolves in time. This suggests a specific control strategy in which changes of joint configuration that are irrelevant to success at the task are selectively released from control. By contrast, constraints representing an invariant spatial position of the gun or of the arm's center of mass structured joint configuration variability in the early and mid-portion of the movement trajectory, but not at the time of shooting. This specific control strategy is not trivial, because a target can be hit successfully also by controlling irrelevant directions in joint space equally to relevant ones. The results indicate that the method can be successfully used to determine the structure of coordination in joint space that underlies the control of the essential variables for a given task.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production.

When a person produces isometric force with one, two, or three fingers, the other fingers of the hand also produce a certain force. Enslaving is the involuntary force production by fingers not explicitly involved in a force-production task. This study explored the enslaving effects (EE) in multi-finger tasks in which the contributions of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), and intrinsic muscles (INT) were manipulated. A new experimental technique was developed that allows the redistribution of the muscle activity between the FDP, FDS, and INT muscles. In the experiment, ten subjects were instructed to perform maximal voluntary contractions with all possible one-, two-, three-, and four-finger combinations. The point of force application was changed in parallel for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers from the middle of the distal phalanx, to the distal interphalangeal joint, and then to the proximal interphalangeal joint. It was found that: (1) the EE of similar amplitude were present in various experimental conditions that involved different muscle groups for force production; (2) the EE were large on average--the slave fingers could produce forces reaching 67.5% of the maximal forces produced by themselves in a single-finger task; (3) the EE were larger for neighboring fingers; and (4) the EE were non-additive--in most cases, the EE from two or three fingers were smaller than the EE from at least one finger. EE among different muscles suggest a widespread neural interaction among the structures controlling flexor muscles in the hand as the main mechanism of finger enslaving.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Modulation of simple reaction time on the background of an oscillatory action: implications for synergy organization.

The hypothesis put forward here is that simple reaction time (SRT) modulation on the background of an oscillatory motor action is due to central neural coupling between signals to the effectors involved in the focal and the oscillatory action. The strength of the coupling may be defined by various factors ranging from anatomy to personal lifetime practice or to a particular task context. In one experiment, subjects performed an SRT task (ipsi or contralateral elbow flexion or ipsilateral ankle plantar flexion) in response to a visual imperative signal presented during a continuous oscillatory movement of the right wrist. Discrete elbow movements lead to nearly simultaneous large bursts of activity in both biceps and the wrist flexor of the arm. Strong modulation of premotor time (peak to peak changes of about 80 ms) with the phase of oscillatory action (f(OSC)) was seen in both biceps and wrist flexor when the two movements were performed by joints of the same limb but not when they were performed by joints of different limbs. The order of recruitment of proximal and distal muscles was also dependent on the phase of oscillatory action: the typical proximal-to-distal order was seen at relatively long premotor times (PMTs) while simultaneous muscle activation was seen at the shortest PMTs. In the second experiment, the subjects held a cylindrical plastic cup in the left hand and applied sine-like isometric force to the bottom of the cup with the other hand. The SRT in the task requiring a quick increase in the grip force in response to a visual imperative stimulus was modulated with the phase of the oscillatory action. This modulation disappeared when the right hand applied similarly modulated force to another surface. The conclusion is that an interaction between control signals for the focal and oscillatory actions at a supraspinal level led to the observed modulation of the SRT during the phase of oscillatory action. The possible role of cortical and subcortical mechanisms is discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Contribution of the extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles to the moments in finger joints.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this current work is to develop a method of estimating force produced by the extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles, and to estimate the contribution of these muscles to the finger joint moments. DESIGN: Experimental methods and a biomechanical model were developed for the estimation of (a) moments produced at finger joints, and (b) contribution of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles to the moments, (c) forces of the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles within individual fingers. BACKGROUND: Because of the differential insertions of the extrinsic flexors, it is possible to isolate their mechanical effect at finger joints. METHODS: During the experiment, the location of force application was varied in parallel along individual fingers. The points of force application were on the distal phalanx, at the distal interphalangeal joint, or at the proximal interphalangeal joint. RESULTS: When the point of force application was varied in the proximal direction from the distal phalanx to the proximal interphalangeal joint the moment at a given joint decreased. The intrinsic and extrinsic muscle forces were dependent on the experimental conditions. The extrinsic muscles were the major contributors in counterbalancing finger joint moments when the point of force application was distal beyond the proximal interphalangeal joint. CONCLUSION: This current work provides both an experimental protocol and a biomechanical model that allows estimation of the contribution of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles to finger joint moments. RELEVANCE: This study suggests ways of identifying the source of functional deficiency in the hand.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The organization of quick corrections within a two-joint synergy in conditions of unexpected blocking and release of a fast movement.

OBJECTIVE: Within this study, we tested a hypothesis that common organization of central commands to the elbow and the wrist joints within a two-joint synergy is associated with a similar organization of pre-programmed corrections to unexpected changes in the external conditions. DESIGN AND METHODS: The subjects (n = 7) performed series of very fast movements or isometric contractions against a pad at the level of the palm or at the level of the forearm. Some trials within a series of movements were unexpectedly blocked at the initial position leading to an isometric contraction, while some trials within a series of isometric contractions were unexpectedly released leading to a movement. Movement kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) patterns were analyzed. RESULTS: In cases of unexpectedly blocked or unexpectedly released trials, differences in the EMG patterns between perturbed and unperturbed trials were seen at latencies between 50 and 80 ms. Two patterns were observed representing interindividual differences among subjects. One included reciprocal changes in the flexor-extensor pairs controlling both joints. The other pattern included reciprocal changes in the wrist flexor-extensor pair and unidirectional changes in the EMGs of biceps and triceps. The patterns were reproducible within each individual subject across tasks and conditions. In particular, the same pattern in the wrist flexor-extensor pair was seen when the pad was applied to the palm and when it was applied to the forearm, despite the fact that early wrist joint deviations were in opposite directions. CONCLUSIONS: It is argued that the observed early EMG changes may be unrelated to local joint kinematics and stretch reflexes, and represent consequences of control patterns for fast corrective movements that are organized with respect to the motion of the endpoint of the limb similarly to the organization of voluntary movements. Within this framework, the organization of joints of a multi-joint limb into a synergy implies a simultaneous, automatic organization of pre-programmed reactions into a similarly organized synergy.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

30 years later: On the problem of the relation between structure and function in the brain from a contemporary viewpoint (1996), part II.

In the first half of the present paper, which appeared in vol. 3, issue 4 issue of Motor Control, the authors elaborated on Bernstein's (1935/1967) idea of the ambiguity of the relationship between the central command and the peripheral effect. The authors presented maybe the strongest statement so far: It is because the means are variant that the results can be invariant. As in Bernstein's 1935 paper, this was taken as evidence that there is no one-to-one relationship between structure and function in the brain. The authors discussed the history of localization theories, pointing out that neither strong localizationism nor strong anti-localizationism (as in Lashley's equipotentiality) would help understand the relation between brain structure and function. In order to understand the nature of a "brain center" for a function, the authors argued, one has to understand the concept of "function" itself. The development of "function" does not imply that the organism learns to (re)act in a stereotyped fashion, but that a control matrix is established, with non-single-valued relationships, allowing the organism to (re)act differently every time, in accordance with the need and actual situation. At the end of the first part of the paper, the authors emphasized the importance of a new basic logic of neurophysiology. In that sense, there are certain parallels between neurophysiology in the 60s (and also today, the present editors would add) and physics around the turn of the century, when Maxwell, Boltzmann, Planck, and others, created a completely new framework for theoretical physics.

Animals↗