PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M L Radelet

Publications and source records attributed to M L Radelet.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

The debate on treating individuals incompetent for execution.

The question of whether to provide mental health treatment to prisoners under death sentence who have been judged incompetent for execution presents a powerful ethical dilemma for mental health professionals. Arguments that favor or oppose the provision of treatment are discussed in the context of the nature of the disorder to be treated, the type of treatment to be provided, the goals of treatment, and the relevant legal standard for determining competency for execution. Arguments against treating the incompetent include 1) the need to avoid harming those who are treated, 2) the risk that disclosures in therapy will be used for assessment purposes, 3) the need for paternalism when sufficient harm is necessary, 4) the adverse impact on the clinician, 5) the potential undermining of patient and public perceptions of mental health professionals, and 6) the poor allocation of limited resources. Arguments for treating the incompetent include 1) respect for the wishes of the prisoner, 2) the need to clarify the values underlying the refusal to treat, 3) the low risk of harm from some forms of treatment, and 4) the adverse impact on the milieu stemming from failure to treat. The authors conclude that treating incompetent prisoners may not violate ethical standards under some circumstances, and that some forms of treatment will require the informed consent of the prisoner.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed1988

Treating those found incompetent for execution: ethical chaos with only one solution.

In early 1988 the population on America's death rows climbed above the 2,000 mark for the first time in history. In 1986 the United States Supreme Court firmly stated that the Constitution will have been violated if any of these prisoners is put to death while mentally incompetent for execution. In this article we discuss the case of Gary Alvord, the only inmate to be formally found incompetent for execution in modern times. Interviews with psychiatrists and mental health professionals at the Florida psychiatric hospital where Alvord was treated between 1984 and 1987 reveal much ambivalence and anger about the case. We conclude that, out of respect for the rights of these mental health professionals and the ethical codes of their professions, any prisoner found incompetent for execution should have his or her death sentence commuted to long-term imprisonment before treatment is requested or given.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Socioeconomic influences in patient assignment to PA or MD providers.

Previous research conducted in solo fee-for-service physicians' offices in southern Appalachia reports that physicians treat patients of higher socioeconomic status and PAs treat those of lower status. However, these findings may not necessarily apply to other types of primary care practices, and the data were compiled more than ten years ago. Since then, the PA profession has greatly expanded, necessitating more current investigation (especially into publicly subsidized primary care settings). The original research reported here was undertaken to provide a more contemporary analysis of patient triage based on socioeconomic status. Three rural primary care centers in northern Florida were examined. Data show no consistent or substantively significant relationships between the patients' social status and the type of provider.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1986

Ethics and the psychiatric determination of competency to be executed.

For the last several centuries, most jurisdictions using capital punishment have had formal or informal rules that prohibit the execution of the mentally ill. In this article, the procedures for such exclusions in Florida are examined. The article begins by attempting to answer the question of why legislators and judges, at least nominally, have prohibited the execution of the mentally ill. Next, Florida's criteria for defining and procedures for excluding mentally ill prisoners are examined and found to be vague. We then turn attention to the ethical problems created by the statute and its implementation that face the participating psychiatrists and the profession. These problems are compounded because the physician's findings are not acted upon by politically neutral authorities and the inmate has no opportunity to challenge the findings with his own panel of experts. Finally, since any exclusion of the mentally ill from execution is temporary and the patient will be executed if he recovers, the dilemmas facing the treatment staff if the death sentence is not commuted to life imprisonment before treatment are discussed.

Capital Punishment↗
PubMed1984

Physician assistants in primary care. Patient assignment and task delegation.

This paper reports a concurrent self-report study of 2,456 office encounters with physicians and/or physician assistants (PAs) in 16 primary care, private practices in Florida. Initial patient assignment to either a physician or PA varies according to demographic and visit-specific characteristics. Patients who are male, younger than 65 years, new patients, seeking help for acute problems, and those who are "walk-in" or "work-in" patients are more likely to be assigned to a PA. Among frequently performed procedures, physicians are more likely to perform the partial histories, partial physicals, and pelvic examinations, as well as counsel patients on diet and psychosocial problems. PAs are more likely to perform the complete physical examinations, record vital signs, conduct diagnostic tests, and perform therapeutic procedures (administer injections, change dressings, etc.). Most tasks performed by PAs receive supervision through chart review rather than direct oversight. The typical patient visit in a practice employing a PA involves the receipt of services from only one provider. Approximately 50% of patient services are performed by physicians only, while 35% of the services are performed solely by PAs, and 15% are performed by both. Most patients have received care from both the physician and the PA.

Age Factors↗