Biomedical subjects

M M Amonkar

Publications and source records attributed to M M Amonkar.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Obesity and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional analysis of the US population.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQL), in the presence of dietary controls and/or exercise in a national sample in the United States. METHODS: BMI and its association with HRQL domains (physical, mental and activity limitations) were examined using the Centers' for Disease Control and Prevention's 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillence System (BRFSS) data, after adjusting for various sociodemographic factors, self-reported health-status, and diet/exercise behavior. RESULTS: Based on World Health Organization's (WHO) classification of obesity, the study sample (N=182 372) included approximately 43.7% nonoverweight, 36% overweight, 14% obese, and 7% severely obese respondents. Exercise and dietary modifications were used by 17.5% of overweight, 15.2% of obese, and 12.5% of severely obese individuals. Logistic regression results using nonoverweight BMI as the reference category showed that severely obese (OR=1.87, 95% CI 1.64-2.12) and obese (OR=1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.33) were more likely to experience greater than 14 unhealthy days affecting the physical health domain. Severely obese (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.26-1.59) and obese (OR=1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28) were also more likely to experience greater than 14 unhealthy days affecting the mental health domain. Similarly, severely obese (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.50-1.99) and obese (OR=1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.37) were more likely to experience greater than 14 days with activity limitations. Exercise and dietary controls were associated with better HRQL across all three domains. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the relationship between BMI and HRQL in the United States. The study also underlines the positive correlation of exercise and dietary modifications with HRQL.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2001

Pharmacists' preferences for continuing education and certificate programs.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an assessment of the needs and interests of West Virginia pharmacists with respect to continuing education (CE) and certificate programs (CP) versus a nontraditional PharmD program (NTP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The survey was mailed to 2800 West Virginia University School of Pharmacy alumni and West Virginia licensed pharmacists. The survey collected data pertaining to pharmacists' perceptions for the needs of CE, CP, and the NTP program; the optimal structuring of these programs; and the demographics of participants. RESULTS: A 24% (674) usable response rate was achieved from two mailings. Respondents were asked to address all areas of interest: approximately 75% showed interest in enrolling in CE, 45% in CP, and 40% in the NTP program. Interest levels varied across demographic and practice characteristics. Seven methods of instruction were evaluated by pharmacists, with live lectures being the most preferred for both CE and CP. Interest for specific content areas and topics for CE workshops and CP were identified. The type and amount of employer support and willingness to pay for enrollment in the two types of programs were obtained. Markets' needs for CE and CP were identified for five typical pharmacists' profiles (e.g., staff pharmacists in community practice). CONCLUSIONS: Results can be used by CE providers to develop CE and CP programs of most interest to pharmacists and target them to appropriate demographic segments in order to be cost-effective.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Assessing managed care's role in promoting preventive care.

The current trend of managed health care systems opens the door to more effective control of chronic diseases through preventive care. The goal of this study was to assess managed care's role in promoting preventive care. A mail survey was conducted of a national sample of 1,200 directors, associated with preventive care, in managed care organizations (MCOs) in the U.S. Data was obtained on perceived effectiveness, degree of importance, and likelihood of support for implementation of strategies recommended (case management, utilization review programs, selective contracting, and cost sharing) for ensuring appropriate utilization of preventive services. Also, information was collected on interventions perceived effective in encouraging plan members to utilize and providers to offer preventive services. Response rate was 17.3%. Case management and prospective and concurrent utilization review programs were perceived most effective, important, and likely to receive support for implementation while cost sharing (using deductibles and coinsurance) and retrospective utilization review programs ranked low on all dimensions. Plan member-directed interventions perceived effective in encouraging utilization of preventive services included telephone and mail reminders while computer-generated reminders and medical record audits with feedback were perceived effective in encouraging providers to offer such services. Results identified preferred MCO strategies and interventions for ensuring appropriate utilization of preventive services. Further research is needed to develop methods to encourage people at high risk for chronic diseases not currently utilizing preventive services to receive such services.

Case Management↗

PubMed1999

Barriers and facilitators to providing common preventive screening services in managed care settings.

Despite increasing emphasis on disease prevention and health promotion, and ample evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of preventive services, such services are underutilized in the United States. The current trend of health care toward health maintenance organizations and other managed care systems opens the door, perhaps to more effective control of heart disease, cancers and other chronic diseases through preventive care. This warrants attention to the barriers/facilitators to the provision/utilization of preventive screening services in such settings. Overall goal of this study was to assess barriers/facilitators to the provision/utilization of preventive services in managed care organizations (MCOs). This was accomplished by a) identifying barriers/facilitators to the provision/utilization of three common preventive screening services (cholesterol screenings, mammograms, and Pap smears); and b) profiling typical MCO recipients of these three preventive screening services. A self-administered, mail questionnaire was used to obtain information from a national sample of 1,200 Directors of MCOs associated with preventive care. A total of 175 usable responses were received resulting in a 17.3 percent net response rate. The strongest barrier to the provision of all three screening services is the inability of them to generate short term savings for the MCO. Other barriers include high disenrollment rates, conflicting recommendations about effectiveness (for mammograms and cholesterol screenings), and patients' fears of getting a positive result (for mammograms and Pap smears). The improved health status as a result of early intervention, high consumer awareness (for mammograms and Pap smears), and long term savings are important facilitators to the provision/utilization of these screening services. Comparing barriers and facilitators across the three services shows the stronger barriers affecting the provision/utilization of mammograms. For all three screening services, typical managed care recipients are those in the high income groups with greater education levels. However, with the increasing enrollment of Medicaid beneficiaries into managed care, MCOs may find themselves selectively targeting these high risk low income and less educated individuals to receive the preventive screening services. Study findings should be useful to health planners, policymakers and researchers at all levels in their efforts to encourage and promote healthier lifestyle choices among U.S. residents. Future studies should address receipt of preventive services by Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries in managed care settings.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The gift relationship between pharmaceutical companies and physicians: an exploratory survey of physicians.

The purpose of this exploratory study was to survey physicians' attitudes surrounding the 'gift relationship' between pharmaceutical companies and physicians. A survey was mailed to 1000 randomly selected West Virginia physicians, of which 283 (28.3%) responses were received. The most commonly received gifts reported by the study physicians were trinkets (77.4%), followed by books (41.7%) and meals (41%). Principal component analysis and varimax rotation identified seven physician belief constructs. The mean ratings of the constructs indicated that the physicians slightly agreed that pharmaceutical companies give gifts to physicians to influence their prescribing, moderately disagreed that they do so as a form of professional recognition of physicians, and strongly disagreed that their prescribing behaviour could be influenced by the gifts they receive. Physicians slightly disagreed that pharmaceutical companies' sponsoring of CME programmes are only promotional gimmicks. Although the study physicians slightly disagreed that it may be inappropriate for them to accept gifts from pharmaceutical companies, they seemed slightly averse to having 'gift relationships' between pharmaceutical companies and physicians made public. Correlation analysis suggested that physicians who have a large number of patients in their practice, see a larger number of patients per day, or write a large number of prescriptions per day are more likely to be offered gifts by pharmaceutical companies, and they are also more likely to condone the practice of gift giving and receiving.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗