Isolation of trophoblast basement membrane from full-term human placenta.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M M Gelfand.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The endocrine physiology of the climacteric supports a rationale for the concomitant replacement of androgen and estrogen following menopause. Clinical and research experience with estrogen-androgen hormone replacement therapy, as well as androgen-only therapy, suggests that the health benefit offered by androgen replacement exceeds the potential risk when treatment is properly managed. In this review, we concentrate on the effects of oral alkylated androgens. The virilizing effects (e.g., hirsutism, acne, voice change, and alopecia) of oral androgens are typically dose and duration dependent; androgen replacement at doses < or = 10 mg once daily administered for prolonged periods (> 6 months) produces masculinization effects that generally abate with dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment. No clinical sequelae or irreversible pathophysiologic effects have been associated with any virilization that may occur. Changes in lipoprotein metabolism associated with oral estrogen-androgen use include reduced total cholesterol levels and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels which may reduce the long-term risk of cardiovascular disease. No clinically identifiable risk with respect to other cardiovascular variables, such as blood pressure, has been associated with the longterm administration of low doses of oral androgen. With regard to liver toxicity, reports of jaundice, peliosis hepatis, and hepatocellular carcinoma are extremely rare at the dose levels of androgen used in hormone replacement therapy, although individual sensitivity to the potential hepatotoxic effects of oral alkylated and nonalkylated androgen may vary considerably. Daily dosing with oral alkylated androgen in combination with estrogen is well tolerated. Retrospective and prospective studies involving the use of androgens alone and in combination with estrogens demonstrate that concerns about the adverse effects of androgen use associated with supraphysiologic, self-escalated doses in men do not apply to the much lower doses combined with estrogens for hormone replacement in postmenopausal women.
Various parameters of sexual functioning were assessed in a prospective, crossover investigation of 53 surgically menopausal women. Patients randomly received either an estrogen-androgen combined preparation, an estrogen-alone drug, an androgen-alone drug, or a placebo. Also included were a group of women who had undergone hysterectomy and whose ovaries had been left intact. Two treatment phases, each of 3 months' duration, were separated by an intervening placebo month. Additionally, plasma levels of total estrogens and testosterone were assayed four times during the study concurrent with monitoring of sexual behaviors. It was clear that exogenous androgen enhanced the intensity of sexual desire and arousal and the frequency of sexual fantasies in hysterectomized and oophorectomized women. However, there was no evidence that testosterone affected physiologic response or interpersonal aspects of sexual behavior. These findings suggest that the major impact of androgen in women is on sexual motivation and not on sexual activity per se.
Five aspects of sexual behavior were monitored daily in three groups of women who had undergone total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy approximately 4 years ago for benign disease. One group had been receiving an estrogen-androgen preparation intramuscularly once a month since their surgery (E-A). The second group had been receiving estrogen alone (E) and the third group of women had remained untreated. Plasma estradiol and testosterone were measured at an established baseline and again on days 2, 4, 8, 15, 21, and 28 postinjection. Women who received both sex steroids reported higher rates of sexual desire (p less than 0.01), sexual arousal (p less than 0.01), and numbers of fantasies (p less than 0.01) than those who were either given E or who were untreated. Moreover, changes in these behaviors covaried with plasma testosterone but not with plasma estradiol levels during the treatment month as the drug was being metabolized. Rates of coitus and orgasm were also higher in the E-A group during the first two postinjection weeks (p less than 0.01) coincident with their higher testosterone levels. These findings imply that androgen may be critical for the maintenance of optimal levels of sexual functioning in postmenopausal women.
OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of 25-microg 17beta-estradiol vaginal tablets (Vagifem) were assessed and compared with 1.25-mg conjugated equine estrogen vaginal cream (Premarin Vaginal Cream) for the relief of menopausal-derived atrophic vaginitis, resulting from estrogen deficiency. DESIGN: In a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, 159 menopausal women were treated for 24 weeks with either vaginal tablets or vaginal cream. Efficacy was evaluated by relief of vaginal symptoms and concentrations of serum estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone. Safety was monitored by the incidence of adverse events, evaluation of endometrial biopsies, and clinical laboratory results. Patients also assessed the acceptability of the study medications. RESULTS: Composite scores of vaginal symptoms (dryness, soreness, and irritation) demonstrated that both treatments provided equivalent relief of the symptoms of atrophic vaginitis. At weeks 2, 12, and 24, increases in serum estradiol concentrations and suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone were observed in significantly more patients who were using the vaginal cream than in those who were using the vaginal tablets (p < 0.001). Fewer patients who were using the vaginal tablets experienced endometrial proliferation or hyperplasia compared with patients who were using the vaginal cream. Significantly more patients who were using the vaginal tablets rated their medication favorably than did patients who were using the vaginal cream (p < or = 0.001). Patients who were receiving the vaginal tablets also had a lower incidence of patient withdrawal (10% versus 32%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment regimens with 25-microg 17beta-estradiol vaginal tablets and with 1.25-mg conjugated equine estrogen vaginal cream were equivalent in relieving symptoms of atrophic vaginitis. The vaginal tablets demonstrated a localized effect without appreciable systemic estradiol increases or estrogenic side effects. Vaginal tablet therapy resulted in greater patient acceptance and lower withdrawal rates compared with vaginal cream therapy.