PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M M Haugen

Publications and source records attributed to M M Haugen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experience of the users of a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (Nor-plant) and reasons for early removal. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred fifty-one women who had Norplant placed through the Ohio State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were sent a questionnaire that included general demographic questions and questions regarding preplacement education; reasons for choosing Norplant; problems experienced due to Norplant; reasons for removal, if applicable; and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred eleven questionnaires (44%) were completed and analyzed. Twenty-four (21.6%) of patients had Norplant removed, 32 (28.8%) planned on early removal, and 55 (49.5%) desired continued use. Ninety-eight percent of women who planned continued use of Norplant had received reading material as part of their preplacement counseling and 95% felt adequately counseled. This is significantly higher than women who had Norplant removed or planned on early removal. Convenience, problems with other contraceptive methods and effectiveness were the most important reasons why patients chose Norplant. Menstrual changes were the most common side effect, experienced by 80% of all women in the study. Weight gain, headache, mood changes, mastalgia and acne were also frequently reported. Women who had Norplant removed were significantly more likely to have experienced dizziness when compared to women desiring continued use. Women planning early removal were also more likely to have experienced dizziness in addition to acne, headache, hair loss and other side effects. Menstrual irregularities, followed by mood changes and headaches, were the most important side effects associated with early Norplant removal. Overall, 68% of users were at least somewhat satisfied with Norplant. CONCLUSION: Norplant contraception was a satisfactory form of birth control for the majority of patients in the study despite the frequent occurrence of side effects. Reading material regarding benefits and side effects of Norplant is an important aspect of patient counseling and may improve long-term use of Norplant.

Adolescent↗

Lead-based paint testing technologies: summary of an EPA/HUD field study.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development sponsored a field study of portable technologies for testing for lead in paint in three U.S. cities in 1993. Six chemical test kits and six X-ray fluorescence instruments, which represented the two main types of portable technologies available for residential lead testing at that time, were evaluated. Painted building components in single-family and multifamily housing units were selected to assess the performance of these products under real-world conditions. The study found that the chemical test kits were not effective in distinguishing lead-based paint, as defined by federal standards, from nonlead based paint. The X-ray fluorescence instruments were, under certain circumstances, found to be effective. The study filled an informational gap about the accuracy and precision of the portable lead-testing technologies. This article describes the design of the study and its major findings.

Environmental Monitoring↗