PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M M Limbos

Publications and source records attributed to M M Limbos.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Psychological functioning and quality of life in lung transplant candidates and recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychological functioning and quality of life (QOL) of lung transplant candidates and recipients. METHODS: The following measures were completed by 36 lung transplant candidates (the pretransplant group [PRE]) and 73 recipients (the posttransplant group [POST]): the Rand-36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36), visual analog scale of overall QOL (OQOL), Brief Symptoms Inventory (BSI), Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (DSFI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and Body Cathexis Scale (BC). RESULTS: Compared to the PRE, POST patients had significantly better scores on the following measures: RAND-36 total, physical health, role limitations due to physical health, general health, vitality, and social functioning subscales (all p < 0.0001); visual analog scale of OQOL (p < 0.0001); BSI (p < 0.05); BC (p < 0.05); HAD anxiety (p < 0.05) and depression (p < 0.0001); and RSES (p < 0.05). Despite better scores, some areas did not differ between the PRE and the POST, and many patients continued to experience impairments in psychological functioning. Specifically, the RAND-36 emotional health and role limitations due to emotional health subscale scores did not differ between the PRE and the POST and they remained lower than published norms. A significant proportion of patients in both groups (44% of PRE patients and 28% of POST patients) had borderline or clinical levels of anxiety (ie, the HAD). Finally, PRE and POST mean scores were significantly lower than published norms on the RSES (p < 0.05) and the body image scale of the DSFI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although lung transplant recipients have better general, physical, and psychological health than their pretransplant counterparts, the present research suggests that both groups experience impairment in several areas of psychological functioning. Future research into the QOL of the lung transplant population should be aimed at recognizing, intervening, and improving patients' psychological and emotional well-being.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1997

Quality of life in female lung transplant candidates and recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Quality of life (QOL) studies of lung transplant recipients indicate that there are improvements following transplantation. More recently, there has been some suggestion that certain QOL issues are different for men and women. The purpose of the present study was to examine changes in QOL, body satisfaction, and sexual functioning in women lung transplant recipients. STUDY POPULATION: Seven prelung transplant (PRE) and 34 postlung transplant (POST) women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The RAND-36 Health Survey, Body Cathexis Scale, Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory, Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and an open-ended questionnaire. RESULTS: Higher scores were found in the POST group with respect to general health and role limitations due to physical health. We were unable to detect significant differences between the groups with respect to emotional well-being, role limitations due to emotional health, and social functioning. There were significant differences between the PRE and the POST body satisfaction scores. Although there was no significant difference in overall sexual functioning, recipients in the PRE group reported higher sex drive. Eleven of the POST recipients (52%) scored below the 10th percentile in overall sexual functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Overall QOL improves following lung transplantation; however, the lack of differences in many domains of QOL raises the concern that women lung transplant recipients may continue to have significant impairments, including those regarding sexuality and body satisfaction.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accuracy of teacher assessments of second-language students at risk for reading disability.

This study examined the accuracy of teacher assessments in screening for reading disabilities among students of English as a second language (ESL) and as a first language (L1). Academic and oral language tests were administered to 369 children (249 ESL, 120 L1) at the beginning of Grade 1 and at the end of Grade 2. Concurrently, 51 teachers nominated children at risk for reading failure and completed rating scales assessing academic and oral language skills. Scholastic records were reviewed for notation of concern or referral. The criterion measure was a standardized reading score based on phonological awareness, rapid naming, and word recognition. Results indicated that teacher rating scales and nominations had low sensitivity in identifying ESL and L1 students at risk for reading disability at the 1-year mark. Relative to other forms of screening, teacher-expressed concern had lower sensitivity. Finally, oral language proficiency contributed to misclassifications in the ESL group.

Child↗