PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M M Raats

Publications and source records attributed to M M Raats.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour.

Although the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) has been applied successfully in the area of food choice, it has been criticized for its pure utilitarian approach to the factors determining behaviour. Despite the increase in predictive power of the model with added components such as affective attitude and moral and ethical concerns, in most studies the elicitation process still only addresses people's utilitarian beliefs about the behaviour with little attention paid to other aspects. This study compares the traditional method of elicitation of advantages and disadvantages with two other methods (word association and open-ended) in the elicitations of beliefs, attitudes and moral concerns in relation to the consumption of organic foods. Results show the traditional method to be best for eliciting cognitive beliefs, open-ended emotion task for eliciting emotional beliefs and open-ended beliefs task best for moral concerns. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.

Agriculture↗
PubMed1999

The effects of providing personalized dietary feedback. A semi-computerized approach.

There not only seems to be a trend for people to underestimate the dietary risks that they face, but it appears that this underestimation may be related to the difficulties they encounter when trying to assess their own dietary intake. A study (n = 118) examining the effects of providing people with information about their own dietary fat intake on their attitudes towards dietary change and their subsequent fat consumption is described. Participants in a group receiving feedback about their fat intake did not decrease their consumption of fat more than did those in a control group. No effects on subsequent fat consumption were observed in a group who had higher than average levels of fat consumption, higher perceived fat consumption than actual fat consumption and who received feedback information about their fat consumption. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for health promotion strategies that focus on the motivational effects of providing people with information about their fat consumption.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1997

Perceptions of starchy food dishes: application of the Repertory Grid Method.

The Repertory Grid Method (RGM) was applied to obtain an understanding of the characteristics used by U.K. consumers in discriminating amongst different common starchy food dishes, including potatoes, rice and pasta. Twenty-nine subjects generated a large number of constructs, relating to perceived nutrition, health physiological effect, sensory, and use attributes of these products. Coupling of RGM with Generalized Procrustes Analysis produced detailed qualitative and quantitative information describing common and individual characteristics of particular dishes. The results indicate that starchy foods are in general seen as "filling", but specific products are clearly discriminated along two dimensions, predominantly relating to nutritional value ("healthy", "fatty", "fattening") and sensory/functional characteristics ("versatile", "bland", "boring", "a meal in itself"). Along with further analysis of the sensory descriptors, these results indicate the utility and efficiency of RGM for clarifying consumer views of broad food categories, while identifying the potential acceptability of particular starchy foods in fulfilling current dietary goals.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Developing a subject-derived terminology to describe perceptions of chemicals in foods.

Risk perception may be influenced by a number of factors, such as unfamiliarity, lack of control, perceived consequences, and hazards being seen as catastrophic and having risk for future generations. Risk perception researchers have typically used such investigator-selected characteristics to assess hazards. In the first study reported here, the repertory grid method was used to elicit the terminology that subjects (n = 30) use to distinguish between 30 different chemicals. The data were submitted to generalized Procrustes analysis. The first principal axis of the resulting consensus plot separated the chemicals ranging from "poisonous or toxic," "harmful or dangerous," and "sounds negative" at one end, to "positive effect on health," "often present in food nowadays," and "sounds positive" at the other end. The second principal axis ranged from "familiar with or knowledge of" and "chemical" to "natural." A second study (n = 226) was carried out to look at the general validity of the results of the repertory grid interviews using a fixed questionnaire. The data were submitted to principal components analysis and internal preference mapping. The first principal component ranged from "safe" and "healthy" at one end, to "poisonous" and "harmful" at the other end. The chemicals also separated in terms of "familiar," "chemical," and "natural." All three methods of data collection and analysis yield essentially similar results.

Attitude↗