PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M M Rodríguez

Publications and source records attributed to M M Rodríguez.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

What is the attitude of hospital transplant-related personnel toward donation?

The attitude of health-care workers, especially in transplant-related services, is fundamental in the process of organ procurement. In this study we examine the attitude of workers in transplant-related services toward cadaveric organ donation and transplantation (ODT) in a third-level hospital in Spain. A random sample was stratified according to type of service and job category (n = 309) among personnel in transplant-related services (organ procurement units, transplant units and follow-up units). Attitude toward cadaveric organ donation was evaluated using a validated psychosocial questionnaire. Seventy percent (n = 215) of respondents were found to be in favor of donation, as opposed to 30% against or undecided (n = 94). Regarding job category, attitude was most favorable among physicians (86%, n = 99; p = 0.000). With respect to type of service, attitude tended to be more negative in organ procurement units and more positive in the follow-up units of transplanted patients (41% vs 81%, p = 0.013). Upon analysis of the psychosocial variables, significant results were found with respect to the following factors: (1) age (39 vs 42 years, p = 0.007); (2) having discussed ODT with family members or with a partner (p = 0.007); (3) understanding of the concept of brain death (p = 0.001); (4) attitude toward carrying out an autopsy (p = 0.001); and (5) concern about the possibility of mutilation after organ extraction. Attitude toward cadaveric donation was lower than expected among personnel in transplant-related services, especially among ancillary personnel and workers in organ procurement units.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Attitudes of primary care professionals in Spain toward xenotransplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The deficit in transplantable organs is making it necessary to find alternative sources. One possibility is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs may be rejected by society and among health professionals. Primary Care is fundamental for promoting matters of health; in Spain it has access to nearly 100% of the population. Our objective was to analyze the acceptance of this therapy, although it is experimental, among Primary Care professionals, given that they are the ones most involved in spreading information about this therapy if it was confirmed to be useful. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location among Primary Care personnel, including 428 professionals in 32 health centers among population of 2851 professionals. Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial attitudes validated in our geographical area. Contact was made in each center with the Doctor Coordinator for doctors, the Nursing Coordinator for nurses, and an Administrative Officer for ancillary personnel. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate categorical and continuous data, respectively. RESULTS: Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were similar to those obtained in human organs: favorable in 79% (n = 325), whereas 19% (n = 78) had doubts and 2% (n = 10) were against. The attitude was more favorable in men (89% vs 72%; P < .000), those who had cared for transplant patients (84% vs 71%; P = .009), those with previous experience in organ donation and transplantation (84% vs 75%; P = .033), those with an attitude in favor of cadaveric organ donation (83% vs 66%; P < .0001), and those in favor of living donation of the kidney (P < .000) or the liver (P < .000), as well as those who believed that they may need a transplant at some time in the future (84% vs 74%; P = .045). There was a clear difference in attitude according to job category (P = .018): approval rates were 89% for doctors, 76% for nurses, and 70% for ancillary personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward future application of xenotransplantation were quite positive among doctors. However, the attitudes of nursing and ancillary personnel were similar to those of the general population. The main factors related to such an attitude depended mainly on the previous relationship and attitude of the respondent toward human organ donation and transplantation.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Primary care doctors faced with living organ donation.

OBJECTIVE: The attitudes of health care personnel, specifically doctors, have a significant influence on public attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of Primary Care (PC) doctors toward living organ donation and to determine the psychosocial factors that condition these attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified by geographical location (six health areas in our community) among PC doctors, including 155 respondents from 32 health centers. Attitudes toward donation were evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire validated in our geographical area. Contact was made with the Doctor Coordinator in each center for distribution of the questionnaires, which were completed anonymously. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate the data. RESULTS: When the living donor is not related, only 21% (n = 32) of PC doctors were in favor of living kidney donation, and only 20% (n = 31) for living liver donation (P > .05). In contrast, these percentages were 90% and 89% in favor of kidney and liver related donation, respectively. Upon analysis of the psychosocial variables affecting these attitudes, there was only an association with their partner's opinion (P = .009 for kidney and P = .000 for liver), and the possibility of needing a transplant oneself (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: PC doctors have favorable attitudes toward related living donation. If living donation is promoted by transplant coordination units, such PC professionals could act as a source of positive information about the matter for the general public.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Ancillary hospital personnel faced with organ donation and transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To reduce the number of family organ donation refusals, it is necessary not only to act on the general public but also on the health care system. In this respect, there are data suggesting that the percentage of hospital personnel against donation is high, especially among ancillary personnel. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of ancillary hospital professionals toward donation of their own organs and determine factors that conditioned such attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample in a third-level hospital with a solid organ transplant program was stratified by ancillary services: administrative, porters, maintenance, cleaning, and cooking. Attitudes toward donation of one's own organs after death were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial aspects validated in our area. It included various psychosocial variables that could affect such attitudes. The Student t test and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: We analyzed 277 respondents of mean age 43 +/- 8 years and 96% women. The level of acceptance of organ donation was 64% (n = 178), whereas 46% were either against or undecided (n = 98). The variables which determined the attitudes were understanding of brain death (P = .004); attitude toward cadaveric manipulation, especially toward autopsy (P = .013) and cremation (P = .004); concern about mutilation after donation (P = .014); religion (P = .032); partner's attitude toward donation (P < .0001); and possibility of needing an organ in the future (P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Ancillary hospital personnel had similar attitudes toward donation as those of the general public as observed in other studies. The attitudes were determined by many psychosocial factors. A campaign to raise awareness among professionals has become a priority, given that working in a hospital, their unfavorable attitude could have a strong negative impact on the general public.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Attitudes toward organ donation in rural areas of southeastern Spain.

OBJECTIVE: Rural areas present a worse attitude toward organ donation. However, the factors conditioning this attitude are not well known. Our aim was to determine the profile of the population opposed to donation in rural areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample stratified by age and sex was obtained from municipalities with less than 10,000 inhabitants. Attitudes toward donation were assessed by a questionnaire which evaluated variables that may influence these attitudes. A descriptive statistical study used the Student t test and chi-square test as well as a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 181 respondents, 63% were in favor of donation and 37% against or undecided. Among the reasons to be against donation were rejection of body mutilation (43%) and fear of apparent death (41%). The psychosocial variables against donation were age >or=44 years, primary education or below, no previous experience with donation, no prosocial activities, an unfavorable opinion of the partner, and fear of corpse mutilation. The variables persisting in the multivariate analysis were level of education, previous experience, prosocial activities, and fear of corpse manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Among the rural population the profile of a person opposed to donation was someone older than 44 years, with a low level of education and no previous experience with donation, who does not participate in prosocial activities and is opposed to corpse manipulation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Attitudes of resident doctors toward different types of organ donation in a Spanish transplant hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze acceptance of cadaveric and living organ donation for transplantation among resident doctors, given that they are the new professionals of medicine who will have to encourage and develop transplant programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random survey was performed on resident doctors in a third-level hospital with an organ transplant program which is accredited for undergraduate and postgraduate education (n = 171). Attitudes toward cadaveric and living donation were evaluated using a questionnaire including various psychosocial variables that might affect such attitudes. We used the Student t test and the chi-square test. RESULTS: The sample was composed of responses by 171 resident doctors of mean age 28 +/- 4 years with 56% women. Attitudes toward cadaveric donation were favorable in 92% (n = 157). As for living donation, the percentage in favor of nonrelated donation was low: 23% for kidney and 19% for liver. However, when the donation was from a relative, the percentages increased to levels similar to those of cadaveric donation, namely 88% and 85% for kidney and liver, respectively. No differences were observed in attitudes toward cadaveric or living donation according to various psychosocial variables. CONCLUSIONS: The trainee doctors showed favorable attitudes toward human cadaveric organ donation as well as living related donation, which suggests a relaunch of living donors in the near future. However, there was not much acceptance of nonrelated donation, as has also been seen in studies of the general public in our geographical area.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Hospital personnel faced with organ xenotransplantation: an attitudinal survey in a hospital with a pre-clinical liver xenotransplantation program.

BACKGROUND: In situations of extreme urgency when there is a need for vital organs, xenotransplantation could provide a bridge until the arrival of a human organ. However, it is important to find out the level of acceptance of this potential therapy among the health care workers who would be involved in its implementation. The objective of this study is to analyze attitude among personnel in a hospital with a pre-clinical xenotransplantation program toward xenotransplantation and to determine the variables that influence this attitude. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample (n=1168) was taken and stratified according to job category and service. Attitude toward xenotransplantation was evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Contact was made with the head of each service who was given an explanation of the project. This person was made responsible for the distribution and collection of the survey in each service in randomly selected work shifts. Such a survey was completed anonymously and was self-administered. A random sample of 250 individuals from our regional community was used as a control group. RESULTS: The survey completion rate was 98% (n=1148). Most respondents are in favor (67%), 7% are against and 26% undecided. Such an attitude is more favorable in the control group (74% vs. 67%; P=0.0378). The following factors are positively related to such an attitude: (1) male sex (P<0.0005); (2) a younger age (P=0.013); (3) participation in prosocial voluntary activities (P=0.002); (4) knowing that the church has a positive attitude toward donation and transplantation (P<0.0005); (5) a partner's favorable attitude toward transplantation (P<0.0005); (6) a physician's job category (P<0.0005); (7) a resident physician's job contract situation (P=0.017); (8) a respondent's belief that he or she may need a transplant in the future (P<0.0005); and (9) a favorable attitude toward human donation, whether this be cadaveric or living (P<0.0005). In the multivariate analysis, the following persist as independent variables: (1) sex (odds ratio=1.6); (2) participation in prosocial voluntary activities (odds ratio=2.2); (3) a partner's unfavorable attitude toward transplantation (odds ratio=0.3); (4) a favorable attitude toward cadaveric donation (odds ratio=2); and (5) attitude toward living liver donation (odds ratio=3.8). CONCLUSIONS: Attitude toward xenotransplantation is not as favorable among hospital personnel as it is in the general public and this is determined by many factors. It will be necessary for research groups to periodically carry out awareness-raising activities about our findings in our own centers, to avoid the rejection that could be generated by a lack of awareness.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Application of the pupal/demographic-survey methodology in an area of Havana, Cuba, with low densities of Aedes aegypti (L.).

Between the April and December of 2004, an Aedes aegypti (L.) pupal/demographic survey was conducted in the Playa municipality of Havana. The aims were to identify the key types of container in the production of the adult mosquitoes (and so provide a basis for targeted control) and assess transmission risk in terms of the number of pupae/person. Pupal abundance, as measured in the survey, was compared with traditional Stegomyia indices. The immature stages of Ae. aegypti were only found in 70 of the 15,153 containers that were investigated and the pupae of this species were only seen in 52 of the containers. Ground-level water-storage tanks yielded 74.1% of all the pupae, with a further 19.0% found in miscellaneous small containers. The utility of the pupal/demographic-survey methodology in the evaluation of dengue risk in the study area, and other areas of Cuba with low densities of Ae. aegypti, is discussed.

Aedes↗
PubMed2005

(GCG)11 founder mutation in the PABPN1 gene of OPMD Uruguayan families.

The dominant oculo-pharyngeal muscular dystrophy mutation consists of an expanded (GCN)(12-17) in the coding region of the PolyA Binding Protein Nuclear 1 gene. A founder effect has been demonstrated in Canadian and Bukhara Jewish populations with relatively high prevalence of this disease. Since the oculo-pharyngeal muscular dystrophy prevalence was remarkably high in Southern Uruguay, a founder effect was hypothesized. To identify the ancestral haplotype we determined the (GCN) repeat number and the variants of four intragenic SNPs in Uruguayan OPMD families and a control sample. All families carrying the mutation (GCG)(11)(GCA)(3)(GCG) shared a common ancestral haplotype and the age of the mutation was estimated in 37-53 generations by a composite likelihood method. One family carrying the (GCG)(9)(GCA)(3)(GCG) allele had a different haplotype. The genealogical and molecular data suggested that the common ancestors were Canary Islands' settlers that arrived in Uruguay in the XIX century.

DNA Mutational Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Attitude toward deceased organ donation and transplantation among the workers in the surgical services in a hospital with a transplant program.

INTRODUCTION: There are data that suggest that the percentage of hospital workers not in favor of donation is relatively high, even in services that are directly related to transplantation. The objective was to analyze attitudes toward decreased organ donation in the surgical services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified by the surgical service and the job category (n = 263) in a third-level hospital with a transplant program assessed attitudes toward the donation of ones own organs after death using a questionnaire including psychosocial factors as validated in our geographic surroundings. Student t test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Favorable attitudes toward donation were observed in 68% (n = 178) as opposed to 32% with an attitude that was undecided or against the act (n = 85). The psychosocial variables that showed significant relationships with this attitude were age (most in favor are younger; P = .021); nonmedical surgical staff (50% against donation; P = .0001); resident physicians (94% in favor; P = .001); discussion and prior consideration of donation (P = .016); knowledge of the concept of brain death (an important factor in nonhealth staff; P = .010); attitude toward manipulation of the deceased (P = .011) and concerns about mutilation (P = .026); partner's opinion toward organ donation (P = .0001); and existence of frequent medical errors (P = .003). No significant differences were found, depending on whether the services were involved in a specific transplant program (P = .853). CONCLUSIONS: Favorable attitudes toward donation among the hospital staff on surgical services, including those who perform transplants, did not reach more than 70% and was determined by multiple psychosocial factors. Donation promotion activities are necessary for these services, given the importance that this group's negative attitude could have on the attitude of the general population.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Rural primary care centers as a source of information about organ donation.

INTRODUCTION: Primary care is an important way of promoting health in the community, and this includes organ donation. In rural areas, this way of promoting health acquires special importance. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward organ donation among primary care workers in rural health centers to assess their importance in circulating information about donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample, stratified according to job category among the primary care staff (n = 160), of workers in rural areas in our autonomous community (population < 10,000 inhabitants), evaluated attitudes toward donation using a questionnaire validated in our geographic area. To distribute the questionnaire it was necessary to contact the following in each health center: the coordinating physician, the nursing coordinator, and an administrative worker. RESULTS: Of those questioned, 78% (n = 124) were in favor of donation, as opposed to 22% (n = 36) who are against it or undecided. As for the job category, physicians and nurses showed a more favorable attitude than nonhealth workers (90% and 80% vs 61%; P = .000). The psychosocial variables that were related to such an attitude were knowledge of the concept of brain death (P = .013) and lack of fear of manipulation of the deceased person (P = .002). Regarding information about organ donation and transplantation, 54% (n = 86) reported having been provided favorable information, with up to a quarter of the physicians considering other programs to be of greater interest for primary care than organ donation and transplantation. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward organ donation were favorable among a high percentage of primary care workers in rural centers; more than 50% have circulated favorable information on the subject. However, there is a high percentage with a negative or undecided attitude, especially among nonhealth workers, which should be reversed with promotional activities at the level of the health center.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2005

Attitude survey of hospital workers in the surgical services toward living kidney donation.

INTRODUCTION: A living donor kidney is currently the most accepted kind of solid organ donation, given the low level of morbidity and mortality and the good results in the recipient. In Spain, its use is still scarce; even many health service workers are not in favor. Our objective was to analyze the attitudes toward living kidney donation in a surgical department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified according to surgical services and job category in a tertiary hospital with an solid organ transplant program. Attitudes toward living kidney donation were evaluated using a questionnaire on donation and transplantation, which evaluated various psychosocial variables. Student's t test and the Chi square test were used. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-three respondents of mean age 40 +/- 10 years were analysed for attitudes toward living kidney donation. The level of acceptance was 87% (n = 229) versus 13% undecided or against the procedure (n = 34). No differences were observed according to job category. The variables that showed a relationship with the attitude were the partner's attitude toward donation (P = .049); the possible need for an organ oneself (P = .0001); and belief that medical errors occur (P = .001). The attitude toward cadaveric organ donation was not reflective of that toward living kidney donation (P = .241). CONCLUSIONS: A favorable attitude toward living kidney donation was high among hospital staff of the surgical department. Those for whom it was not favorable were influenced by personal factors such as partner's attitude and the possibility of needing a kidney in the future.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Attitude of primary care nurses toward living kidney donation.

INTRODUCTION: Nursing is a fundamental service in caring for the health of the public. The opinion of nurses toward a certain type of donation may have a strong population impact. In this respect, living kidney donation is increasing in Spain; it is important to raise awareness at all levels. The objective here was to analyze the attitudes of primary care nursing personnel toward living kidney donation and to their determinants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample of primary care nurses stratified by geographical location (six health areas in our community), included 139 nurses from 32 health centres. Attitudes toward living donation were evaluated using a questionnaire with various psychosocial variables. For the distribution of the questionnaires, contact was made with the nursing coordinator in each centre. They were completed anonymously. The chi-squared test and Student's t test were applied. RESULTS: The attitudes toward living kidney donation were favorable in 93% of those questioned (n = 129), mainly when the donation is related (78%, n = 109). Only one nurse was against the idea of donating a kidney from a living person (1%); nine had doubts about this kind of donation (7%). Seventy-six percent (n = 106) have cared for patients awaiting a transplant; however, no relationship was found with attitude toward this type of donation (P = .209). Of all analyzed variables, there was only a significant relationship with concern about possible body mutilation (P < .0005) and partner's opinion about the matter (P < .0005). We wish to highlight that no relationship was found with attitudes toward cadaveric organ donation (P = .712). CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes of primary care nursing personnel toward living kidney donation were favorable, especially if it was related donation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Acceptance level of living liver donation among primary care nursing personnel.

INTRODUCTION: Living liver donation is not exempt from risks to the donor, although it is currently ethically accepted. It is important to examine the level of acceptance among the different health levels toward this therapeutic option, in order to design promotion and awareness-raising activities. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes and the factors that condition them among nursing personnel in Primary Care (PC) toward living liver donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This random survey was stratified by geographical location (6 health areas in our community) among PC nurses, obtaining a total of 139 nurses from 34 health centers. Attitudes toward living liver donation were evaluated using a questionnaire on donation which included different psychosocial variables. For the distribution of the questionnaire, the nursing coordinator of each centers was contacted to distribute questionnaires which were completed anonymously. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied. RESULTS: Attitudes toward living liver donation were favorable in 89% of those questioned (n = 124) if it is related donation; 3% (n = 4) were against donating a living hemiliver and 8% (n = 11) had doubts. It is important that up to 76% (n = 106) have cared for transplant patients or patients awaiting transplant, however, no relationship was observed with attitude to this type of donation (P = .489). Of all the analyzed variables, there was only a significant relationship between attitudes and concern about possible body mutilation (P < .0005), and partners attitudes toward this matter (P < .0005). It is noteworthy that no relationship was found with attitudes toward cadaveric donation (P = .062). CONCLUSION: Despite the risk of morbidity and mortality in the donor, the attitude of the PC nursing personnel toward living liver donation was favorable, especially if the donation is related.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Attitudes toward living liver donation among hospital personnel in services not related to transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The deficiency in livers and waiting list mortality have encouraged more living liver donation, although it is not exempt from morbidity and mortality. The enthusiasm of transplant teams for this kind of donation is increasing; however, the attitudes toward it are not so clear among other health professionals. Our objective was to analyze the attitudes toward living liver donation among hospital professionals in services without habitual relations with transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified for service not related to transplantation and job category, in a third level hospital with a transplant program. Attitudes toward living liver donation were evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire on living donation. RESULTS: A total of 419 respondents were analyzed (doctors, n = 184; nurses, n = 119; assistant nurses, n = 80; and non-health workers, n = 36), with a mean age of 37 +/- 10 years. The attitude toward living liver donation was favorable in 82% (n = 344). Among the other respondents, half (9%; n = 38) were against and the other half (9%; n = 37) were undecided. No significant differences were found among the doctors, nurses, assistants, and non-health workers. However, when the three categories were grouped in opposition to the non-health workers, there was greater indecision among non-health workers than the others (19% vs 8%; P = .0001). On analyzing the variables that determine this attitude we observed the following: having commented upon and previously discussed donation (P = .016); believing in the possibility of needing an organ oneself (P = .0001); and being in favor of living kidney donation (P = .0001) and cadaveric donation (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital personnel in services not related to transplantation favor living liver donation, especially if it is a related donation, despite its greater risk, except among non-health workers. However, it is important to conduct informative and awareness-raising campaigns in hospitals if such a type of transplantation is to be encouraged.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Attitudes toward xenotransplantation among nonhealth service workers in a hospital with a preclinical xenotransplantation program.

INTRODUCTION: Our hypothesis was that nonhealth workers (NHW) in our hospital should have a more favorable opinion toward xenotransplantation than the general population, given that this group is in closer contact with a preclinical xenotransplantation program. Therefore, our objective was to determine the attitude of NHW in a hospital with a preclinical liver xenotransplantation program and to determine the factors that influenced this attitude. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample of 276 subjects in nonhealth services was used. For the distribution of the questionnaire, we contacted the head of each of the services and explained the project. They became responsible for the distribution and collection of the questionnaires in randomly selected work shifts. A random sample of 250 individuals from our community was used as a control group. RESULTS: As for animal organ donation for humans, if the results could be superimposed on those achieved by human donors, 63% would be in favor, 30% undecided, and the remaining 7% against. The attitude toward xenotransplantation was more favorable in the control group (74% versus 63%, P < .05). On analyzing the variables that influence attitudes toward xenotransplantation, we found that there is no significant relationship to the classical psychosocial variables (P > .05). However, there is a relationship to prior attitudes toward different types of human organ donation and the possibility of needing a transplant oneself. CONCLUSIONS: The attitudes toward xenotransplantation among NHW are not as favorable as in the general population.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Multivariate study of the psychosocial factors affecting public attitude towards organ donation].

INTRODUCTION: Organ transplantation is a therapy which depends on society for its development. The objectives here are: 1) to understand the structure of public opinion towards organ donation in the population aged over 15 years of age in our Community; 2) to analyse the psychosocial variables which affect this opinion and 3) to define the population profiles on this matter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Random sample (n = 2.000) stratified for age, sex and geographical location (error for 95.5%, e +/- 2.24) to whom we apply a questionnaire about the psychosocial aspects of organ donation. Descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, Chi-squared test and logistical regression analysis. RESULTS: 63% have a favourable attitude towards organ donation, of which 11% have a donor's card. A statistical association has been observed between favourable public opinion and different psychosocial variables (p < 0.05), with some independent variables persisting in the multivariate analysis such as age, level of education (OR = 1.78), information given by family members (OR = 1.62), health workers (OR = 2.01) and talks in educational centres (OR = 2.13); previous experience with donation and transplantation (OR = 2.02), knowledge of the concept of brain death (OR = 1.4); partner's favourable opinion towards donation (OR = 2.6), being a blood donor (OR = 3), taking part in prosocial activities (OR = 1.6) and attitude towards incineration of the cadaver after death (OR = 1.8). CONCLUSIONS: The profile of a person who is against donation is of a man or woman, > 50 years of age, with primary studies or below, with no previous experience of the matter, who does not understand the concept of brain death nor their partner's opinion towards donation, who has not found out any information about donation through specialised forums, with an unfavourable opinion towards blood donation or pro-social activities and who is fearful of manipulation of the cadaver after death.

Adolescent↗