[Role of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of peritoneo-intestinal lesions resulting from closed trauma. Experience at 2 emergency departments].
INTRODUCTION: Small and large bowel mesenteric injuries from blunt abdominal trauma are rare and often difficult to diagnose. Computed Tomography used in cases of blunt abdominal trauma has been found sensitive in detection of bowel and mesenteric injuries and discrimination of operable from nonoperable candidates. PURPOSE: A retrospective study of the CT examination of 24 patients, with surgically confirmed bowel and mesenteric injuries, was performed. Our goal was to evaluate the various CT signs of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury and the related frequency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series includes 24 patients, 16 of them (first group) were investigated with CT at Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, while the remaining 8 (second group) at University of Bari. Patients of the first group, 11 men and 5 women, age ranging from 18 to 77 years, were submitted to a conventional abdominal CT performed after i.v. administration of contrast media. Patients of the second group, 7 men and 1 woman, age ranging from 4 to 81 years, were submitted to helical CT performed with the following parameters: 10 mm slice thickness, 5-mm contiguous intervals from the level of the diaphragm to the pubic bone, pitch 1.5. Helical CT was performed in all cases before and after i.v. administration of contrast material injected at a rate of 3.5 ml/sec. A scanning delay of 40 seconds after the beginning of contrast injection was routinely used. In all patients the following CT signs were retrospectively searched on: peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid, mesenteric hematoma, hazy streaky changes in mesenteric fat, high-density clot (sentinel clot) adjacent to the involved bowel, pneumoperitoneum, retropneumoperitoneum, extravasation of intravenous contrast material, bowel wall thickening. RESULTS: In the first group the following CT signs were observed: mesenteric hematoma (87.5%), hazy streaky changes in mesenteric fat (56.25%), peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid (37.5%), sentinel clot (25%), bowel wall thickening (18.75%), extravasation of intravenous contrast material (12.5%). In the second group the following CT signs were observed: peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid (87.5%), bowel wall thickening (50%), mesenteric hematoma (37.5%), sentinel clot (25%), pneumoperitoneum (12.5%), retropneumoperitoneum (12.5%), hazy streaky changes in mesenteric fat (12.5%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Bowel and mesenteric injuries from blunt trauma are infrequent and difficult to diagnose clinically, as the physical and laboratory findings may be subtle and are often overshadowed by other injuries in patients with multisystem trauma. CT represents a proven modality in the evaluation of bowel and mesenteric injuries: careful inspection and technique are required to detect often subtle findings. In our series of 24 patients with surgically confirmed bowel and mesenteric injuries, the presence of mesenteric hematoma and of peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid were the more frequent CT signs observed. Radiologists may play a crucial role in the timely diagnosis of these injuries, allowing prompt and appropriate management of these patients.