PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Matzer

Publications and source records attributed to M Matzer.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire: reliability, validity, responsiveness, and comparison with the Short Form 36 and Constant score--a prospective evaluation of patients undergoing repair for rotator cuff tear.

In a prospective clinical trial, first the German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D) was tested for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in 23 patients with rotator cuff tears, and secondly the Short Form (SF)-36, and the Constant score were evaluated comparatively in 45 patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing open repair. Retest reliability was excellent for the functional index of the SMFA-D and satisfactory for the bother index. The SMFA-D showed good validity and responsiveness. All three instruments demonstrated significantly the positive effect of rotator cuff repair at 12-month follow-up. Using comparable scales, effect sizes were bigger with the SMFA-D than with the SF-36 and as big as the Constant score. Significant correlations of the SMFA-D indices with the SF-36 scales and the Constant score could be shown preoperatively. At 12-month follow-up, all correlations between SMFA-D indices, SF-36 scales, and Constant score function scales were still significant. We recommend use of the SMFA-D to assess changes in functional status concerning patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing open repair.

Adult↗

Ultrasonographic appearance of os acromiale.

AIM: Ossa acromiale are rare anatomical conditions and have been evaluated with plain radiographs, CT- and MRI-scans, but not with ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appearance and the characteristics of os acromiale with ultrasound. METHODS: 25 patients with unilateral radiologically prediagnosed os acromiale had bilateral examination with ultrasound. Recorded details were bilateral appearance, the width of the non-ossified space and the shape of the bony margins of the os acromiale. As a control group 25 patients without radiological appearance of os acromiale had identical ultrasound examination. RESULTS: The os acromiale could be identified in all 25 patients (100%) with radiologically confirmed os acromiale. In 12 patients an os acromiale could be identified on the contralateral side (48%). The average width of the non ossified space was 4.3 mm (2.5 to 7.6 mm). Three different sonographic types of bony margins of the os acromiale and the acromion exist: Type I with flat bony margins; Type II with marginal osteophytes and Type III with inverted bony margins. In the control group no os acromiale could be identified. CONCLUSION: With ultrasonographic assessment, os acromiale can be accurately identified in each case. Three differently shaped bony margins exist. Ultrasound can give additional information about the os acromiale if radiological assessment is unclear because of superimposing bones.

Acromion↗

Os acromiale associated with tear of the rotator cuff treated operatively. Review of 33 patients.

Os acromiale is a rare anatomical abnormality and treatment is controversial. Our retrospective study analyses the outcome of excision, acromioplasty and bony fusion of the os acromiale when it is associated with a tear of the rotator cuff. After a mean follow-up of 41 months, 33 patients were radiologically and clinically assessed using the Constant score. The surgical procedure was to repair the rotator cuff together with excision of the os acromiale in six patients, acromioplasty in five, and fusion in 22. Of the 22 attempted fusions seven failed radiologically. The Constant scores were 82%, 81%, 81% and 84% for patients who had excision, acromioplasty, successful fusion and unsuccessful fusion respectively. There were no statistically significant differences. We conclude that a small mobile os acromiale can be resected, a large stable os acromiale treated by acromioplasty and a large unstable os acromiale by fusion to the acromion. Even without radiological fusion the clinical outcome can be good.

Acromion↗

German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

In a prospective clinical trial, the German short musculoskeletal function assessment (SMFA-D), the short form (SF)-36, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) were evaluated in 63 patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. All instruments were sensitive to change, demonstrating the effect of total knee arthroplasty at 1-year follow-up. The SMFA-D effect sizes in comparable scales were bigger than in the SF-36 and similar to those of the WOMAC. Significant correlations of the SMFA-D indices with the SF-36 and WOMAC scales preoperatively could be shown. After 1-year follow-up, all correlations between the SMFA-D indices and SF-36 scales were significant. In other comparison, only the correlation between the SMFA-D function index and the WOMAC function scales remained significant. The correlation of the SMFA-D function index with external validation criteria was higher than that using the other instruments. We recommend the SMFA-D for assessing change in functional status of patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee following arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗

[II. Validity and sensitivity to change of the Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment Questionnaire in primary gonarthrosis and total endoprosthetic joint replacement].

INTRODUCTION: Scoring systems used so far in total knee arthroplasty are limited by their non-fulfillment of basic test criteria. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the validity and responsiveness of a German version of the new short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D) in patients with primary osteoarthritis and total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: 66 patients with a tricompartmental cemented PFC-Sigma total knee arthroplasty completed the SMFA-D and the WOMAC questionnaire preoperatively and at 12 to 16 weeks follow-up. Preoperatively, physicians' rating of function of the leg, patients' self-selected walking speed, pain and arthritis severity score were registered for demonstration of criterion validity. Construct validity was evaluated with the WOMAC. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing patients with or without previous surgery at the knee, use of pain medication and use of walking aids. The function and bother indexes of the SMFA-D were correlated with these parameters. Standardized response means were calculated. RESULTS: The function index correlated with physicians' rating (r = 0.51), walking speed (r = 0.61), pain (r = 0.36) and the arthritis severity index (r = 0.36). The bother index correlated with pain (r = 0.37) and the arthritis severity index (r = 0.25). The function and bother index correlated with the WOMAC (r = 0.77) and (r = 0.81), respectively. Patient groups with or without walking aids (p = 0.02) and with or without pain medication (p = 0.001) differed in the function index. The bother index of patients with or without pain medication (p < 0.001) and with or without walking aids (p < 0.006) differed. Function and bother index improved from 46 (SD 17) to 34 (SD 19, p < 0.001) and 43 (SD 18) to 33 (SD 22 p < 0.001), respectively. The standardized response mean was 0.86 for the function index and 0.53 for the bother index. CONCLUSIONS: The SMFA-D questionnaire is valid and responsive in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee and total knee arthroplasty. It measures function and bother from the perspective of these patients.

Aged↗