PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Mennuni

Publications and source records attributed to M Mennuni.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Comparison between propafenone and digoxin administered intravenously to patients with acute atrial fibrillation. PAFIT-3 Investigators. The Propafenone in Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial.

In recent-onset atrial fibrillation, intravenous propafenone has been shown to effectively restore sinus rhythm, whereas the efficacy of intravenous digoxin has been questioned. We directly compared these 2 drugs and placebo in acute atrial fibrillation. One hundred twenty-three patients with atrial fibrillation lasting <72 hours were randomized to a 10-minute intravenous infusion of either propafenone (2 mg/kg, 41 patients) or digoxin (0.007 mg/kg, 40 patients) or placebo (42 patients). After 1 hour, nonconverted propafenone or digoxin patients were switched to the alternative drug, while nonconverted placebo patients were randomized to either propafenone or digoxin. The observation time ended 1 hour later. By 1 hour, conversion rates were 49% in the propafenone group, 32% in the digoxin group (p = 0.12), and 14% in placebo group (p <0.001 vs propafenone, p = 0.08 vs digoxin). After crossover, digoxin converted 5% of propafenone patients, while propafenone converted 48% of digoxin patients (p <0.05). In the 36 nonconverted placebo patients, sinus rhythm was obtained in 53% of cases with propafenone, and in 5% with digoxin (p < 0.05). Globally, among the 116 patients who received a drug as first treatment, 30 of 60 patients (50%) were converted by propafenone versus 14 of 56 (25%) by digoxin (p <0.01) (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 3.36). In nonconverters, the ventricular rate reduction was faster (15 vs 45 minutes) and more prominent (-24% vs -14%) with propafenone than with digoxin. In conclusion, intravenous propafenone terminates atrial fibrillation more effectively than either placebo or intravenous digoxin. In addition, in nonconverted patients, it obtains a more rapid and marked control of the ventricular rate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Effects of oral propafenone administration before electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and risks of administering propafenone before electrical defibrillation for chronic atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: In this context, an antiarrhythmic drug-although potentially useful in preventing early recurrence of arrhythmia-could adversely affect the defibrillation threshold and reduce the cardioversion success rate. METHODS: We randomly assigned 100 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation to oral treatment with either placebo (51 patients) or 750 mg/day of propafenone (49 patients) for 48 h before administration of direct current shock. After successful cardioversion, all patients received propafenone therapy and were followed up for 48 h. RESULTS: Before defibrillation, three patients in the propafenone group (6.1%) had reversion to sinus rhythm and one had sustained ventricular tachycardia. Shock efficacy (82.4% vs. 84.4%) and the cumulative effective energy (395 +/- 258 vs. 421 +/- 236 J) were not different between the placebo and propafenone groups. In the propafenone group, 11 patients had their arrhythmia transformed into atrial flutter and required a lower energy level for arrhythmia conversion than did the other patients with continued atrial fibrillation (245 +/- 197 vs. 493 +/- 215 J, p < 0.01); the latter patients showed a trend (p < 0.10) toward higher energy requirements than that of patients who received placebo. The incidence of asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias was higher in the propafenone group (28.9% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.02), but more patients who received placebo had early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (16.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.02). Two days after cardioversion, more patients given propafenone (73.5% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.05) were discharged from the hospital with sinus rhythm. During the in-hospital stay, propafenone was withdrawn from six patients (6.6%) because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Propafenone, given before electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation does not affect the mean defibrillation threshold or the rate of successful arrhythmia conversion. It decreases the recurrence of atrial fibrillation early after shock, thus allowing more patients to be discharged from the hospital with sinus rhythm.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Transthoracic DC shock may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients.

External defibrillation is widely used for the termination of various atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, including pacemaker patients. Our study was intended to evaluate the effects of DC shocks in 36 patients with unipolar pacemakers implanted in the right pectoral region (25 DDD, 10 VVI, 3 AAI). The shocks were delivered with paddles on the anterior surface of the thorax, as far as possible away from the pacemaker. The pacing output was programmed at 0.5 msec and 5 V (25 patients), 4 V (1 patient), and 2.5 V (10 patients). Transient loss of capture occurred in 18 patients (50%). These patients, compared with those without capture failure, received higher peak and cumulative shock energies, respectively, 216 +/- 99 versus 123 +/- 50 joules (P < 0.002) and 352 +/- 62 versus 147 +/- 98 joules (P < 0.004) and had a lower pacemaker pulse amplitude (4.0 +/- 1.2 vs 4.6 +/- 1.0 V, P = 0.11). Failure to capture lasted from 5 seconds to 30 minutes (mean 157 sec). In 15 patients the ventricular stimulation threshold was measured before and serially after cardioversion. A six-fold threshold increase was observed 3 minutes after the shock (P < 0.004) with gradual recovery to nearly baseline values at 24 hours. Transient sensing failure occurred in 7 of the 17 patients in whom it could be evaluated (41%). Furthermore, three cases of shock induced pacemaker malfunctions were observed requiring replacement of the stimulator in two patients. In conclusion, the incidence of loss of capture in pacemaker patients subjected to electrical cardioversion/defibrillation is high.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗