PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Milán

Publications and source records attributed to M Milán.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The LRR proteins capricious and Tartan mediate cell interactions during DV boundary formation in the Drosophila wing.

Mechanisms to segregate cell populations play important roles in tissue patterning during animal development. Rhombomeres and compartments in the ectoderm and imaginal discs of Drosophila are examples in which initially homogenous populations of cells come to be separated by boundaries of lineage restriction. Boundary formation depends in part on signaling between the distinctly specified cell populations that comprise compartments and in part on formation of affinity boundaries that prevent intermingling of these cell populations. Here, we present evidence that two transmembrane proteins with leucine-rich repeats, known as Capricious and Tartan, contribute to formation of the affinity boundary between dorsal and ventral compartments during Drosophila wing development.

Animals↗

Transmission to eels, portals of entry, and putative reservoirs of Vibrio vulnificus serovar E (biotype 2).

Vibrio vulnificus serovar E (formerly biotype 2) is the etiologic agent that is responsible for the main infectious disease affecting farmed eels. Although the pathogen can theoretically use water as a vehicle for disease transmission, it has not been isolated from tank water during epizootics to date. In this work, the mode of transmission of the disease to healthy eels, the portals of entry of the pathogen into fish, and their putative reservoirs have been investigated by means of laboratory and field experiments. Results of the experiments of direct and indirect host-to-host transmission, patch contact challenges, and oral-anal intubations suggest that water is the prime vehicle for disease transmission and that gills are the main portals of entry into the eel body. The pathogen mixed with food can also come into the fish through the gastrointestinal tract and develop the disease. These conclusions were supported by field data obtained during a natural outbreak in which we were able to isolate this microorganism from tank water for the first time. The examination of some survivors from experimental infections by indirect immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy showed that V. vulnificus serovar E formed a biofilm-like structure on the eel skin surface. In vitro assays demonstrated that the ability of the pathogen to colonize both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces was inhibited by glucose. The capacity to form biofilms on eel surface could constitute a strategy for surviving between epizootics or outbreaks, and coated survivors could act as reservoirs for the disease.

Anguilla↗

msh specifies dorsal cell fate in the Drosophila wing.

Drosophila limbs develop from imaginal discs that are subdivided into compartments. Dorsal-ventral subdivision of the wing imaginal disc depends on apterous activity in dorsal cells. Apterous protein is expressed in dorsal cells and is responsible for (1) induction of a signaling center along the dorsal-ventral compartment boundary (2) establishment of a lineage restriction boundary between compartments and (3) specification of dorsal cell fate. Here, we report that the homeobox gene msh (muscle segment homeobox) acts downstream of apterous to confer dorsal identity in wing development.

Alleles↗

Regulation of Apterous activity in Drosophila wing development.

Apterous is a LIM-homeodomain protein that confers dorsal compartment identity in Drosophila wing development. Apterous activity requires formation of a complex with a co-factor, Chip/dLDB. Apterous activity is regulated during wing development by dLMO, which competes with Apterous for complex formation. Here, we present evidence that complex formation between Apterous, Chip and DNA stabilizes Apterous protein in vivo. We also report that a difference in the ability of Chip to bind the LIM domains of Apterous and dLMO contributes to regulation of activity levels in vivo.

Animals↗

Evidence that water transmits the disease caused by the fish pathogen Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae.

The transmission through water of the disease caused by the fish pathogen, Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae, as well as the role of the skin mucus in the initial steps of the infection, have been studied. All tested strains resisted the bactericidal activity of the mucus and showed an ability to adhere to it, but only those virulent by the intraperitoneal route were infective through water. Moribund fishes showed the typical signs of the disease: haemorrhaged areas on the body surface and ulcerative lesions with mucus degradation. These results suggest that the pathogen can be transmitted to fish through water and use the skin as a portal of entry.

Animals↗

An indirect immunofluorescent antibody technique for detection and enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus serovar E (biotype 2): development and applications.

The applications of an indirect fluorescent antibody technique (IFAT), developed to detect and enumerate the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio vulnificus serovar E from water and clinical samples, are described. This technique proved accurate for detecting V. vulnificus, even under starvation conditions and in the non-culturable state, and could differentiate this species from other bacteria which share the same habitats. The IFAT was successfully used to diagnose vibriosis from naturally- and artificially-infected eels. The overall data suggest that applying this technique properly in environmental and epidemiological/epizootiological studies could significantly increase our knowledge of this bacterium.

Animals↗

Temporal regulation of apterous activity during development of the Drosophila wing.

Dorsoventral axis formation in the Drosophila wing depends on the activity of the selector gene apterous. Although selector genes are usually thought of as binary developmental switches, we find that Apterous activity is negatively regulated during wing development by its target gene dLMO. Apterous-dependent expression of Serrate and fringe in dorsal cells leads to the restricted activation of Notch along the dorsoventral compartment boundary. We present evidence that the ability of cells to participate in this Apterous-dependent cell-interaction is under spatial and temporal control. Apterous-dependent expression of dLMO causes downregulation of Serrate and fringe and allows expression of delta in dorsal cells. This limits the time window during which dorsoventral cell interactions can lead to localized activation of Notch and induction of the dorsoventral organizer. Overactivation of Apterous in the absence of dLMO leads to overexpression of Serrate, reduced expression of delta and concomitant defects in differentiation and cell survival in the wing primordium. Thus, downregulation of Apterous activity is needed to allow normal wing development.

Animals↗

Notch signaling is not sufficient to define the affinity boundary between dorsal and ventral compartments.

The developing limbs of Drosophila are subdivided into distinct cells populations known as compartments. Short-range interaction between cells in adjacent compartments induces expression of signaling molecules at the compartment boundaries. In addition to serving as the sources of long-range signals, compartment boundaries prevent mixing of the adjacent cell populations. One model for boundary formation proposes that affinity differences between compartments are defined autonomously as one aspect of compartment-specific cell identity. An alternative is that the affinity boundary depends on signaling between compartments. Here, we present evidence that the dorsal selector gene apterous plays a role in establishing the dorsoventral affinity boundary that is independent of Notch-mediated signaling between dorsal and ventral cells.

Animals↗

Regulation of LIM homeodomain activity in vivo: a tetramer of dLDB and apterous confers activity and capacity for regulation by dLMO.

Dorsal-ventral axis formation in the Drosophila wing depends on the activity of the LIM homeodomain transcription factor Apterous and its cofactor, dLDB/Chip. We present evidence that Apterous activity depends on the formation of a LIM homeodomain dimer bridged by a dimer of cofactor. We show that Apterous activity levels are regulated in vivo by dLMO, an antagonist of homodimer formation. Making use of a constitutively active form of Apterous and dominant-negative forms of Apterous and dLDB/Chip, we show that the normal function of dLMO is to downregulate Apterous activity and that the dLMO mutant phenotype is due to excess Apterous activity. These findings may point to a general mechanism for regulation of LIM homeodomain protein activity.

Animals↗

Beadex encodes an LMO protein that regulates Apterous LIM-homeodomain activity in Drosophila wing development: a model for LMO oncogene function.

Formation of the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila wing depends on activity of the LIM-homeodomain protein Apterous (Ap). Here we report that Ap activity levels are modulated by dLMO, the protein encoded by the Beadex (Bx) gene. Overexpression of dLMO in Bx mutants interferes with Apterous function. Conversely, Bx loss-of-function mutants fail to down-regulate Apterous activity at late stages of wing development. Biochemical analysis shows that dLMO protein competes for binding of Apterous to its cofactor Chip. These data suggest that Apterous activity depends on formation of a functional complex with Chip and that the relative levels of dLMO, Apterous, and Chip determine the level of Apterous activity. The dominant interference mechanism of dLMO action may serve as a model for the mechanism by which LMO oncogenes cause cancer when misexpressed in T cells.

Animals↗

Two-dimensional gel analysis of proteins in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc mutants fat and lethal (2) giant discs.

High-resolution two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis coupled with computer analysis has been used to construct a quantitative protein database of Drosophila mature wing imaginal discs. The level of expression for all of the detected proteins has been quantitatively determined. This database has been used to evaluate changes in the patterns of protein synthesis in wing imaginal discs from two Drosophila melanogaster mutants with abnormal wing disc development: fat (ft) and two different alleles of lethal (2) giant disc (l(2)gd). Patterns of pulse-labeled proteins of the different mutants show variations in both qualitative and quantitative parameters of synthesis. In this comparison we have detected specific sets of protein changes characteristic of both alleles of the same locus and a set of protein changes common to both loci. How the abnormal expression of these proteins relates to the abnormal process of mutant hyperplasia is discussed.

Animals↗

Cell cycle control in the Drosophila wing.

How Wingless and Decapentaplegic regulate cell proliferation in the developing Drosophila limbs and how cell proliferation and limb growth are coordinated are two of the most intriguing questions in developmental biology nowadays. Two recent reports [Johnston LA, Edgar BA. Nature 1998;394:82-84 (Ref. 1) and Neufeld TP, et al. 1998; Cell 93:1183-1193 (Ref. 2)] have shed new light on these questions. The first report [Johnston LA, Edgar BA. Nature 1998;394:82-84 (Ref. 1)] shows how Wingless regulates the cell cycle of a particular group of cells in the late wing discs. A second paper [Neufeld TP, et al. 1998; Cell 93:1183-1193 (Ref. 2)] shows the role of cell cycle regulators in proliferating wing disc cells and the relationship between cell division and limb growth.

Animals↗

Systematic gain-of-function genetics in Drosophila.

A modular misexpression system was used to carry out systematic gain-of-function genetic screens in Drosophila. The system is based on inducible expression of genes tagged by insertion of a P-element vector carrying a GAL4-regulated promoter oriented to transcribe flanking genomic sequences. To identify genes involved in eye and wing development, the 2300 independent lines were screened for dominant phenotypes. Among many novel genes, the screen identified known genes, including hedgehog and decapentaplegic, implicated in these processes. A genetic interaction screen for suppressors of a cell migration defect in a hypomorphic slow border cells mutant identified known genes with likely roles in tyrosine kinase signaling and control of actin cytoskeleton, among many novel genes. These studies demonstrate the ability of the modular misexpression system to identify developmentally important genes and suggest that it will be generally useful for genetic interaction screens.

Animals↗

Developmental parameters of cell death in the wing disc of Drosophila.

Apoptotic cell death in wing imaginal discs takes place in single cells or small clusters of neighboring cells. These cells are distributed throughout the anlage at early stages and in recognizable territories at late larval and pupal stages. Apoptotic cells remain in the epithelium 2-4 h, prior to being engulfed in place by hemolymph cells. Experimentally induced apoptosis in single cells or territories is accompanied by nonautonomous death of adjacent cells and of cells further away in adjacent territories. These effects are followed by changes in cell proliferation in both territories. Apogenetic mosaics in mutant discs show cell death throughout the anlage. Apoptosis provides a mechanism, in addition to cell proliferation control, for matching territories with different positional values or different genetic specifications.

Animals↗

Wing surface interactions in venation patterning in Drosophila.

The adult wing of Drosophila consists of two wing surfaces apposed by their basal membranes which first came into contact following disc eversion at metamorphosis. Veins appear in these surfaces in a dorsal-ventral symmetric pattern, but are 'corrugated' (vein cells are more compacted and more pigmented) in a dorsal-ventral asymmetric pattern. We prevented dorsal-ventral contact apposition during wing imaginal disc morphogenesis by implanting fragments of discs into metamorphosing hosts. In these implants, longitudinal veins differentiate but with wider corrugation and in both surfaces. These results and those of genetic mosaics of mutants removing veins or causing ectopic veins reveal mutual dorso-ventral induction/inhibition at work to modulate the final vein differentiation pattern and corrugation.

Animals↗

Cell cycling and patterned cell proliferation in the Drosophila wing during metamorphosis.

In metamorphosing wing discs, progression through the cell cycle takes place, as in larval discs, in nonclonally derived clusters of cells synchronized in the same cell cycle stage. Contrary to early discs, there are temporal and spatial heterogeneities in cell proliferation associated with wing margin, vein, intervein, and middle intervein territories. Within these territories, there are no indications of a wave progression of the cell cycle. Mitotic orientations are, as in early discs, at random but there is a preferential allocation of postmitotic cells along the proximodistal axis, thus explaining the elongated shape of the resulting clones along this axis. Shapes of clones in mature discs and in evaginated wings are similar, thus excluding major morphogenetic movements during evagination. After the proliferative period, all the cells are arrested in G1 phase. The final number of cells of the wing is fixed independently of experimental perturbations that alter the cell division schedule. These results are discussed in the context of a model of wing morphogenesis.

Animals↗

Cell cycling and patterned cell proliferation in the wing primordium of Drosophila.

The pattern of cell proliferation in the Drosophila imaginal wing primordium is spatially and temporally heterogeneous. Direct visualization of cells in S, G2, and mitosis phases of the cell cycle reveals several features invariant throughout development. The fraction of cells in the disc in the different cell cycle stages is constant, the majority remaining in G1. Cells in the different phases of the cell cycle mainly appear in small synchronic clusters that are nonclonally derived but result from changing local cell-cell interactions. Cluster synchronization occurs before S and in the G2/M phases. Rates of cell division are neither constant nor clonal features. Cell cycle progression is linear rather than concentric. Clusters appear throughout the disc but with symmetries related to presumptive wing patterns, compartment boundaries, and vein clonal restrictions.

Animals↗