PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M N Levine

Publications and source records attributed to M N Levine.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Economic and policy implications of adopting paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer: an Ontario perspective.

PURPOSE: To determine the potential economic and policy implications that result from incorporating paclitaxel into first-line therapy for stage 3 and 4 ovarian cancer patients in the province of Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (CC), a standard therapy, with cisplatin/paclitaxel (CT). Based on survival curves from a clinical trial, mean costs and survival were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted based on altering the duration of paclitaxel infusion, discount rates, and efficacy of paclitaxel. RESULTS: The mean survival duration is prolonged from 2.06 years with the standard therapy to 2.44 years with the paclitaxel combination. The paclitaxel therapy is more expensive, with a mean cost of $17,469 (Canadian) per patient treated with CT compared with $5,228 per patient with CC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $32,213 per year gained. Sensitivity analyses show that the conclusions remain unchanged. The use of CT as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer patients in Ontario requires an additional $9 million per year over and above the present costs to treat this patient population. CONCLUSION: Although paclitaxel-based therapy prolongs survival, it comes at an increased cost. It may not be possible to fund paclitaxel treatment using resources presently allocated to first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. The policy implications for absorbing the cost of paclitaxel in the context of a publicly funded health care system are discussed.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1996

Gene therapy: socioeconomic and ethical issues. A roundtable discussion.

Gene therapy research has the potential to revolutionize the way in which many human diseases are treated. Despite its enormous potential, roundtable panelists concluded that the field needs time to mature scientifically without pressure to develop a marketable therapeutic product. In addition, health care decision makers, physicians, and the lay public need to be educated on the future medical, economic, and ethical ramifications of gene therapy.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1996

Ardeparin (low-molecular-weight heparin) vs graduated compression stockings for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. A randomized trial in patients undergoing knee surgery.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis is common in patients undergoing major knee surgery. Static graduated compression stockings effectively prevent venous thrombosis in general surgery. Because of the demonstrated prophylactic efficacy of pneumatic compression in knee surgery, the similar efficacy of static graduated compression and pneumatic compression in neurosurgery, and the easier use of static graduated compression in knee surgery, graduated static compression stockings were used as the control arm in our clinical trial. Although low-molecular-weight heparin had been shown to be effective in general surgery and hip replacement, its efficacy was unproved in knee surgery. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized trial compared the combination of low-molecular-weight heparin and graduated compression stockings with graduated compression stockings alone in patients undergoing major knee surgery. Patients received either ardeparin (Normiflo) (low-molecular-weight heparin), 0.005 mL/kg (50 anti-Xa U/Kg), or placebo. Both were administered subcutaneously twice daily commencing 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge, if sooner. Both study groups wore graduated compression stockings. Bilateral venography was performed on day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were allocated to receive ardeparin and 124 received placebo. Ninety-six patients in the ardeparin group and 103 in the placebo group had evaluable venograms. Deep vein thrombosis was detected in 28 patients in the ardeparin group and in 60 in the placebo group. Proximal deep vein thrombosis was detected in two patients who received ardeparin and 16 who received placebo. One patient in each group, both of whom did not have venography, experienced pulmonary embolism. Thus, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was detected in 29 (29.9%) of the 97 patients in the ardeparin group and in 61 (58.7%) of the 104 patients in the placebo group, a relative risk reduction of 49% (P < 00.1). The rate of major bleeding in the ardeparin group was 2.5%, compared with 2.4% in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Ardeparin administered postoperatively twice daily is effective and safe for the prevention of venous thrombosis in patients undergoing major knee surgery. Whereas graduated compression stockings have been shown to be effective prophylactic agents in general surgery and neurosurgery, they have little effect in knee surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Low-molecular-weight heparinoid orgaran is more effective than aspirin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after surgery for hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to determine the relative efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparinoid (Orgaran) compared with aspirin for the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for fractured hips. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was used to study 251 consecutive eligible and consenting patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture in seven participating hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients received either fixed-dose Orgaran by subcutaneous injection every 12 hours in a dose of 750 anti-Factor Xa units or aspirin 100 mg orally twice daily; both regimens were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge, if sooner. All patients had postoperative 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. If the results of one or both tests were positive, then venography was performed. Otherwise, venography was done at day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. Pulmonary embolism in symptomatic patients was diagnosed on the basis of a high probability perfusion/ventilation lung scan, a positive angiogram, or a clinically significant embolism detected at autopsy. Evaluable venograms were obtained in 90 of the 125 patients randomly assigned to receive Orgaran and in 87 of the 126 patients assigned to receive aspirin. Venous thromboembolism was detected in 25 (27.8%) patients in the Orgaran group and in 39 (44.3%) patients in the aspirin group. Thus, there was a relative risk reduction of 37% with Orgaran (P=.028; 95% confidence interval, 3.7% to 59.7%). Six (6.8%) of 88 patients in the Orgaran group and 12 (14.3%) of 84 patients in the aspirin group developed proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, a relative risk reduction of 52% with Orgaran (P=.137; 95% confidence interval, -30.7% to 84.6%). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients given Orgaran and 8 (6.4%) patients given aspirin (P=.10). There was one major bleed in the Orgaran group compared with four in the aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that Orgaran is significantly more efficacious than aspirin in preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for fractured hips, with no evidence of any increase in hemorrhagic complications.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument.

The objective of this study was to determine a patient's preference for treatment in the poor prognostic situation of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. A standardized method of information transfer was developed and pretested for feasibility, acceptability, comprehension, interobserver reliability, and validity. The Decision Board (DB) describes to the patient who has completed surgery for suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer two treatment options, their potential side effects, and possible outcomes. The psychometric properties of the DB were determined in 37 volunteers without cancer and 11 women following first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. The Board was then administered to 12 patients with stage IIIc and IV ovarian cancer at the point of deciding future chemotherapy. The feasibility of presenting poor prognostic information, patient comprehension in an emotionally charged situation, and her treatment choice were determined. Observation of patient-physician interviews revealed that survival information is not usually discussed on the initial consultation. Using the DB, it was feasible to provide survival information to 98% of the healthy women. Comprehension was high, with 96% of the questions being correctly answered. Interobserver reliability was high (kappa = 1.00). The construct that hypothesized that understanding information is a determinant of choice was verified, as 95.2% of women had predictable shifts in expressed preference. The strength of preference in healthy women was statistically significantly higher for Plan B (paclitaxel-cisplatin) than for Plan A (cisplatin-cyclophosphamide) (P < 0.001). The method of presenting survival information (median survival versus percentage survival at 3.5 years) influenced choice (P < 0.04). At the point of decision making, 33% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer chose Plan A and 67% chose Plan B. All volunteers and patients stated that they wanted to be fully informed of the choices of therapy for their disease and to be involved in treatment decisions. The DB is a reliable and valid method for sharing information about advanced ovarian cancer with patients. At the point of deciding first-line chemotherapy in this poor prognostic situation, patients still value survival more highly than the quality of life during chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

A randomised trial of two information packages distributed to new cancer patients before their initial appointment at a regional cancer centre.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which a new patient information package (NPIP) or a mini version of the same package (mini-NPIP) reduces emotional distress and meets the informational needs of patients arriving at a tertiary cancer centre for the first time. A comprehensive package, NPIP, consisting of procedural information regarding cancer centre location, description of the health care team, treatment services, research, educational activities, accommodation and community services provided at the centre; and a condensed version of the same package, mini-NPIP, were developed. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast, gynaecological, lung and prostate cancer, referred to the centre for the first time were prerandomised to receive NPIP, mini-NPIP or no information package. Patients randomised to NPIP or mini-NPIP were mailed the information package at least one week before their first appointment. On arrival at the centre, patients were administered the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) which measures psychological distress, and interviewed regarding preferences for information and acceptability of the information packages. Of 465 randomised patients, 161 were excluded post-randomisation and 304 completed the entire interview: 100 were randomised to the NPIP, 102 to the mini-NPIP and 102 to the control group. Emotional distress as measured by the BSI was similar for all groups (P = 0.98). Most patients preferred to receive the information (98%), receive it before the first appointment (84%) and by mail (79%). These preferences were more evident for those given the information packages. The majority of patients found the information packages easy to understand (88%) and useful (89%), and no differences were detected between packages. The cost of production and dissemination of NPIP was more than double the cost for mini-NPIP: $ 8.93 vs $ 3.98 (Canadian dollars) per patient. For patients presenting to a cancer centre for the first time, packages of procedural information do not appear to reduce psychological distress, but are preferred by patients. Given the cost of producing NPIP, mini-NPIP is the preferred approach.

Feasibility Studies↗
PubMed1995

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, defined by the presence of heparin-dependent IgG antibodies, typically occurs five or more days after the start of heparin therapy and can be complicated by thrombotic events. The frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and of heparin-dependent IgG antibodies, as well as the relative risk of each in patients given low-molecular-weight heparin, is unknown. METHODS: We obtained daily platelet counts in 665 patients in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing unfractionated heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis after hip surgery. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in the platelet count below 150,000 per cubic millimeter that began five or more days after the start of heparin therapy, and a positive test for heparin-dependent IgG antibodies. We also tested a representative subgroup of 387 patients for heparin-dependent IgG antibodies regardless of their platelet counts. RESULTS: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurred in 9 of 332 patients who received unfractionated heparin and in none of 333 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin (2.7 percent vs. 0 percent; P = 0.0018). Eight of the 9 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia also had one or more thrombotic events (venous in 7 and arterial in 1), as compared with 117 of 656 patients without heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (88.9 percent vs. 17.8 percent; odds ratio, 36.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.8 to 1638; P < 0.001). In the subgroup of 387 patients, the frequency of heparin-dependent IgG antibodies was higher among patients who received unfractionated heparin (7.8 percent, vs. 2.2 percent among patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, associated thrombotic events, and heparin-dependent IgG antibodies are more common in patients treated with unfractionated heparin than in those treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Confidence Intervals↗
PubMed1995

The use of anti-D to improve post-transfusion platelet response: a randomized trial.

Patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute leukaemia often become refractory to platelet transfusions. Increased clearance of transfused platelets due to alloimmune destruction has been identified as one of the primary mechanisms contributing to this refractory state. We performed a double-blind randomized trial to determine whether the administration of anti-D to Rh-positive individuals could prevent the refractory state and improve post-transfusion platelet response. Rh-positive patients with acute leukaemia undergoing induction chemotherapy and requiring platelet transfusions were allocated to weekly intravenous anti-D (20 micrograms/kg) or placebo. Platelets and red cell concentrates were administered according to standardized transfusion guidelines. Outcome measures included platelet transfusion utilization, red cell utilization, platelet recovery 18-24 h post-infusion, and the percentage of patients refractory to platelet transfusion. There were 43 patients studied: 21 received anti-D and 22 saline placebo. The mean number of platelet concentrates required per day of observation was 0.59 (SD 0.22) in the anti-D group and 0.61 (SD 0.22) in the placebo group, P = 0.86. No difference was detected between groups in terms of platelet recovery post-infusion, refractoriness to platelet transfusion or frequency of infection (P = 0.97). Red cell concentrate utilization was significantly increased in the anti-D group compared to the placebo group, 0.58 units per day versus 0.37 units per day respectively, P = 0.005. We conclude that the use of anti-D did not improve post-transfusion platelet response in Rh positive patients with acute leukaemia, but did result in an increased need for red cell transfusion.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.

PURPOSE: To develop a conceptual tool for the systematic development of cancer treatment practice guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The guidelines development tool, the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle, was derived from observing an evidence-based practice guidelines initiative at a comprehensive cancer center in Ontario, Canada, and from a literature review that uncovered barriers to guidelines development and implementation. Based on the literature findings and direct observations of how clinicians struggled with evidence-based guidelines development, we evolved a framework to incorporate clinical and administrative factors (eg, costs) into evidence-based guidelines. Use of the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle is illustrated with a clinical example (the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in good-risk, node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients). RESULTS: The result is the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle, which consists of eight sequential steps, from topic selection to policy formulation. Independent validation of guidelines is included. The cycle products are the evidence-based recommendation, the practice guideline, and the practice policy. The main features of the cycle are emphasis on scientific evidence, acknowledgment of the roles of clinical experience and nonclinical (administrative) factors through consensus, and explicit separation of clinical and cost considerations in guidelines development. Twenty guidelines are currently in development. CONCLUSION: Attention to the barriers of guidelines development and the sociocultural nature of clinical practice, and respect for clinical experience, can lead to improved strategies for guidelines development.

Cancer Care Facilities↗
PubMed1995

Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument.

PURPOSE: To develop an instrument to help clinicians inform patients about the benefits and risks of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and to help an informed patient decide whether she prefers this treatment. METHODS: A Decision Board consisting of written material and visual aids was developed. It provides the patient with detailed information about her choices (breast irradiation or not), outcomes (breast recurrence and survival), probability of those outcomes, and quality of life associated with treatment and outcome. We studied the decision-making process in 82 consecutive node-negative lumpectomy patients who were seen in consultation by a radiation oncologist and oncology nurse. The Decision Board was used in the last 30 patients in the cohort. RESULTS: Patient comprehension following the consultation without the Decision Board was greater than 65% for all questions addressed, except for poor understanding of the lack of survival benefit associated with breast irradiation (12% of patients answered correctly) and that it could not be repeated (15% of patients answered correctly). Comprehension following the consultation with the Decision Board was similar, but understanding regarding the repetition of radiation (83%) was improved. Only 70% of patients in the no-Decision Board group felt they were offered a choice. This was increased to 97% in the Decision-Board group. Overall, 95% of patients chose breast irradiation, and this did not differ between groups. Patients reported several reasons for choosing breast irradiation, all of equal importance. CONCLUSION: The Decision Board facilitated shared decision making in node-negative lumpectomy patients who chose breast irradiation, but it did not affect a patient's choice to select breast irradiation.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1995

Thrombolytic therapy for venous thromboembolism. Complications and contraindications.

There is renewed interest in the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis and acute pulmonary embolism with thromboembolytic therapy because of the demonstrated mortality reduction in patients with acute myocardial of the demonstrated mortality reduction in patients with acute myocardial infarction and because of the development of newer, fibrin-specific drugs. Bleeding is the major complication of thrombolytic therapy. This article addresses the benefits and risks of using thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis or acute pulmonary embolism.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1995

Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.

The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is uncertain. Based on the hypothesis that a normal impedance plethysmogram (IPG) following DVT defines a group of patients at low risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), a trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of only four weeks of warfarin. Patients with venographically confirmed acute proximal DVT who had received four weeks of warfarin after initial heparin and whose four week IPG was normal were allocated to either continue warfarin (targeted International Normalized Ratio 2.0 to 3.0) for a further eight weeks or receive placebo. Patients with an abnormal four week IPG received warfarin for a further eight weeks. Based on clinical characteristics at the time of the qualifying thrombosis, all patients were classified as having either continuing or transient risk factors for recurrent VTE. During the eight weeks following randomization, nine (8.6%) of the 105 placebo patients developed recurrent VTE compared to one (0.9%) of the 109 warfarin patients, P = 0.009. Over the entire 11 months of follow-up, 12 placebo patients developed recurrence compared to seven warfarin patients, P = 0.3. Nineteen of the 192 patients with an abnormal four week IPG experienced recurrence during the nine months after discontinuing warfarin. In the 301 patients who received three months of warfarin in the randomized trial or in the cohort study, all 26 recurrent events were in the 212 patients with continuing risk factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A randomized trial comparing activated thromboplastin time with heparin assay in patients with acute venous thromboembolism requiring large daily doses of heparin.

BACKGROUND: The management of heparin therapy in patients who have a subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) despite high doses of heparin is problematic because the risk of heparin-associated bleeding increases with dose. Results of experimental studies in animals indicate that when the APTT response to heparin is blunted by infusion of procoagulants, dose escalation can be avoided without compromising efficacy, by monitoring treatment with a heparin assay. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in which patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or axillary vein thrombosis who required 35,000 U or more of intravenous heparin by continuous infusion during the previous 24 hours were allocated to have their heparin therapy monitored either by anti-factor Xa levels (targeted range, 0.35 to 0.67 U/mL) or by the APTT (targeted range, 60 to 85 seconds). Both ranges were equivalent to a heparin level of 0.2 to 0.4 U/mL by protamine titration. RESULTS: Three (4.6%) of 65 patients in the anti-factor Xa group experienced recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with four (6.1%) of 66 patients in the APTT group (difference, 1.5%; confidence interval, -6.7% to 8.4%) (P = .7). There were four bleeding events (6.1%) in the APTT group compared with one (1.5%) in the anti-factor Xa group (difference, 4.6%; confidence interval, -3.3% to 7.5%) (P = .4). During the period of heparin therapy before warfarin treatment was begun, the patients in the APTT group required a statistically significantly greater amount of heparin compared with the patients in the anti-factor Xa group. The daily mean APTT was subtherapeutic in patients in the anti-factor Xa group, and it was within the therapeutic range in the APTT group. The daily mean anti-factor Xa levels for both groups were within the therapeutic range. CONCLUSION: The heparin assay is a safe and effective method for monitoring heparin treatment in patients with acute venous thromboembolism whose APTT remains subtherapeutic despite large daily doses of heparin. In such patients, dosage escalation can be avoided if the heparin level is therapeutic.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Use of Hirulog in the prevention of venous thrombosis after major hip or knee surgery.

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to determine whether Hirulog, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has potential efficacy and safety in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in orthopedic patients. A phase 2 open-label, dose-escalating design was used to study 222 unselected patients undergoing major hip or knee surgery in tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subcutaneous Hirulog was initiated postoperatively. Patients were evaluated for bleeding and symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and mandatory bilateral venography was performed before discharge. Dose escalations were made on the basis of observed rates of bleeding and venous thrombosis. There were five dosage regimens used: 0.3 mg/kg every 12 hours, 0.6 mg/kg every 12 hours, 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours for 3 days followed by 0.6 mg/kg every 12 hours for up to 11 days, 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours, and 1.0 mg/kg every 8 hours. One hundred seventy-seven patients who had technically adequate bilateral venography or objectively documented pulmonary embolism were included in the primary analysis of efficacy. The highest dosage regimen (1.0 mg/kg every 8 hours) provided the lowest rates of total DVT (17%) and proximal DVT (2%), both of which were significantly lower (P = .010 and P = .023, respectively) than the pooled rates of total (43%) and proximal (20%) DVT seen with the first four regimens. Bleeding rates were low (< 5%) with all regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 1.0 mg/kg Hirulog every 8 hours started postoperatively is potentially efficacious and safe for the prevention of DVT after major hip or knee surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Placebo-controlled randomized trial of infusional fluorouracil during standard radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of infusional fluorouracil (I-FU) to standard radiotherapy improves survival at acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (SCHNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consenting patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < or = 2; with stage III or IV SCHNC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx; and who were recommended for radiotherapy with curative intent received 66 Gy of radiation therapy delivered in 2-Gy fractions once daily 5 days per week for 6 1/2 weeks. Those in the experimental arm received I-FU 1.2 g/m2/d, as a 72-hour infusion in the first and third weeks of radiation. Saline infusions were used in the placebo arm. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five patients were randomized (88 to I-FU and 87 to placebo), and the treatment arms were well balanced. The complete response rate was 68% for I-FU and 56% for placebo (P = .04). The overall median survival duration was 33 months for I-FU and 25 months for placebo (P = .08). Progression-free survival also favored I-FU (P = .06). Toxicity was greater in I-FU patients, but did not interfere with the scheduled delivery or completion of radiation. CONCLUSION: The addition of I-FU to standard radiation in SCHNC improved the complete response rate and was associated with beneficial trends in progression-free and overall survival compared with radiation alone. I-FU patients also experienced greater morbidity, but this did not compromise delivery of radiotherapy.

Aged↗