PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Namer

Publications and source records attributed to M Namer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in elderly breast cancer patients: preliminary institutional experience.

Breast cancer is a major source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and the number of patients will increase by 30% in future decades. Surgery and endocrine therapy could be considered as the standard treatment in elderly breast cancer patients, but anaesthesia for surgery requires a specific approach taking into account physiological and psychological alterations secondary to ageing. In cases with major alterations of performance status, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) could be substituted for the surgical treatment. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of this technique. Five tumours in four consecutive patients (aged 79-82 years) contraindicated for surgery with symptomatic cT1-2N0M0, positive oestrogen receptor status, low grade were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency-lump ablation under local analgesia, using percutaneous ultrasound guidance. Thermal lesions were produced with RF power 30 W, at a frequency of 500 kHz. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of the RF treated breast was performed during the follow-up. We report a successful RFA lump ablation experience in the treatment of four tumours (4/5). One local recurrence occurred within 4 months after RFA. The other biopsies taken during the follow up showed all fat necrosis within the oil cyst and no malignant cells. One abscess occurred at 9 months within the treated area. After a mean follow up of 29.4 months, all the patients are still alive without any other signs of recurrence or metastases. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA is safe and feasible in the management of breast cancer in elderly patients. Nevertheless, further large comparative studies are needed in order to validate such a minimally invasive procedure in current practice.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Phase II study of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) in recurrent or disseminated squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

OBJECTIVE: We carried out a phase II trial with BEMP [bleomycin, vindesine (Eldisine(R)), mitomycin C and cisplatin] in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with the specific aim to assess whether BEMP was of particular interest when certain disease sites were involved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received four cycles of E 3 mg/m(2), day 1 + 8; P 50 mg/m(2), day 1; B 15 mg/day (continuous infusion), day 2-4 and M 8 mg/m(2), day 5 (on alternate cycles), every 3 weeks during an induction phase. Thereafter, those without progression continued with MEP every 4 weeks in a maintenance phase. MEP consisted of E 3 mg/m(2), day 1 + 8, M 6 mg/m(2) (on alternate cycles) and P 50 mg/m(2), both on day 1. All drugs were given i.v. Both response evaluation and toxicity grading were assessed according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: Of the 161 eligible patients, 143 were assessable for survival, 148 for toxicity and 131 for response. Overall response rate was 45% [complete (CR) 14.5%, partial response (PR) 30.5%]. Most responsive disease sites were lung, lymph nodes and skin metastases (>60% response, CR rate >25%). Median duration of response was 7.6 months. Survival was significantly better in patients with only distant metastases: 12.9 months versus 8.6 months in those with other disease sites involved (P = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, patients with a good performance status yielded a better prognosis (P = 0.0017), as did the patients with only metastatic disease compared with those who had pelvic disease also or solely (P = 0.045). There were two toxic deaths and 21% of patients stopped treatment because of excessive toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a good performance status and only distant metastases seem optimal candidates to receive the BEMP regimen. This benefit should be balanced against the expected serious toxic effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Different clinical impact of estradiol receptor determination according to the analytical method: A study on 1940 breast cancer patients over a period of 16 consecutive years.

The knowledge of estrogen receptor (ER) status is important in the management of breast cancer patients. More precisely, analytical methods for ER determination have changed over the last two decades from ligand binding assay (LBA) dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) to enzyme immuno-assay (EIA) and more recently immunohistochemistry (IHC). We examined the respective clinical impact of ER determination according to these 3 methods over the period 1983-1999 within a group of 1940 patients, all operated and followed in the single institution Centre Antoine Lacassagne. Validated cut off values were 10 and 15 fmol/mg protein for both LBA-DCC and EIA, respectively and 10% of stained cells for IHC. During the years it was noted that the initial size of the tumor decreased and that the proportion of positive axillary nodes and negative ER tumors was different according to the ER method. ER negativity was 20, 13 and 10% in LBA-DCC, EIA, IHC, respectively. ER was a strong predictor of overall survival in the whole population (Mantel-Cox, p < 0.00001); however when stratifying the analysis on ER method groups, ER was still a prognostic indicator in the EIA, LBA-DCC group but not in the IHC group (the follow-up was too short). It is important to keep these data in mind when conducting large retrospective studies evaluating prognostic markers in breast cancer patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Improved disease-free survival with epirubicin-based chemoendocrine adjuvant therapy compared with tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive, estrogen-receptor-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results of French Adjuvant Study Group 02 and 07 trials.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between epirubicin-based chemoendocrine therapy and tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive (N1-3), estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed, retrospectively, 457 patients randomized in FASG 02 and 07 trials who received: tamoxifen alone (30 mg/day, 3 years); or FEC50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, six cycles every 21 days) plus tamoxifen started concurrently. Radiotherapy was delivered after the third cycle in FASG 02 trial, and after the sixth in FASG 07 trial. RESULTS: The 9-year DFS rates were 72% with tamoxifen and 84% with FEC50-tamoxifen (P = 0.008). The multivariate analysis showed that pathological tumor size >2 cm was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002), and treatment effects remained significantly in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.0008). The 9-year overall survival rates were 78% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.11). In the multivariate model, there was a trend in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The addition of FEC50 adjuvant chemotherapy to tamoxifen significantly improves long-term DFS in N1-3, ER+ and postmenopausal women. Chemoendocrine therapy seems to be more effective than tamoxifen in terms of long-term survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Long-term cardiac toxicity after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in early breast cancer: French Adjuvant Study Group results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare incidence and risk factors of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in early breast cancer patients receiving (E+) or not (E-) epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among eight FASG trials, 3577 assessable patients were analyzed retrospectively: 2553 received epirubicin, 662 received hormonotherapy alone and 362 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 86% of cases (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). Epirubicin cumulative dose was < 300 mg/m2 in 1040 patients, 300-600 in 1155, > or = 600 in 279, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. RESULTS: Twenty delayed LVD occurred: two in E- patients and 18 in E+ patients. In E+ patients, 14 patients normalized their cardiac function or did not require further investigations, one patient was stabilized with specific treatment, two patients worsened their functions and one died of congestive heart failure. The 7-year risk of LVD was 1.36% (95% CI 0.85-1.87) in E+ patients and 0.21% (95%CI: 0.00-0.52) in E- patients (P = 0.004). Two significant risk factors were identified: age > or = 65 years and body mass index > 27 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: After a long-term follow-up, epirubicin-related LVD risk was acceptable (1.36%) with one toxic death (0.04%). In 78% of cases, LVD were transient or well controlled.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Secondary leukemia after epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients: 16 years experience of the French Adjuvant Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among eight French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 3653 patients were assessable: 2603 received epirubicin; 682 received hormonotherapy; and 368 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 85% of cases (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50, 75 or 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, three or six cycles). Epirubicin cumulative dose was <300 mg/m2 in 1045 patients; 300-600 mg/m2 in 1187; and > or =600 mg/m2 in 286, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. The median follow-up was 104 months. RESULTS: Eight cases of leukemia occurred in epirubicin-exposed patients and one in non-exposed patients. After 9 years, the risk of developing a leukemia was 0.34% (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.57) in epirubicin-exposed patients. In patients receiving chemotherapy, leukemia subtypes were: AML2 (two), AML3 (one), AML4 (three) and ALL (two). None of the classically recognized risk factors was significantly correlated with the occurrence of a leukemia. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the dose, the incidence of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy was low. After a long follow-up, the benefit/risk ratio for early breast cancer patients remained in favor of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: eight cases (0.31%) occurred, and in some of them, treatment causality could be debatable.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Randomized trial of adjuvant ovarian suppression in 926 premenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter trial was to evaluate the role of ovarian suppression in patients with early breast cancer previously treated with local surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and twenty-six premenopausal patients with completely resected breast cancer and either axillary node involvement or histological grade 2 or 3 tumors were randomized after surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm) or adjuvant chemotherapy plus ovarian suppression (ovarian suppression arm). Ovarian suppression was obtained by either radiation-induced ovarian ablation or triptorelin for 3 years. The analyses were performed with Cox models stratified by center. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9.5 years. Mean age was 43 years. Ninety per cent of patients had histologically proven positive axillary nodes, 63% positive hormonal receptors and 77% had received an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen. Ovarian suppression was by radiation-induced ovarian ablation (45% of patients) or with triptorelin (48%). At the time of randomization, all patients had regular menses or their follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels indicated a premenopausal status. The 10-year disease-free survival rates were 49% [95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 54%] in both arms (P = 0.51). The 10-year overall survival rates were 66% (95% CI 61% to 70%) for the ovarian suppression arm and 68% (95% CI 63% to 73%) for the control arm (P = 0.19). There were no variations in the treatment effect according to age, hormonal receptor status or ovarian suppression modality. However, in patients <40 years of age and with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, ovarian suppression significantly decreased the risk of recurrence (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial, after at least 10 years of follow-up, do not favor the use of ovarian suppression after adjuvant chemotherapy. The potential beneficial effect in younger women with hormono-dependent tumors should be further assessed.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The present study is designed to evaluate and compare percutaneous radiologic arm port (R) and surgical subclavian port (S) devices in two homogeneous sets of breast cancer patients in terms of safety, efficacy, quality of life (QoL) and cost analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study involved a retrospective review of a prospective databank including 200 consecutive port device implantation attempted procedures performed over a 4-year period, in two similar groups of 100 breast cancer women who underwent either the surgical cephalic vein cutdown approach or the percutaneous basilic vein catheterization for intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy. Parameters analyzed included technical success, procedure duration, complications, QoL and cost evaluation for both techniques. RESULTS: The success rate for port implantation was higher for R than for S placement (96% versus 91%). Mean implant duration time was 5.6 and 7.6 months for R and S, respectively. The overall complication rate was 10 and 16% for R and S, respectively. Mean implant duration time, without any complication or death, was 6.4 and 7.8 months for R and S, respectively. Six and seven percent for R and S, respectively, had to be removed prematurely. Both techniques exhibited very good QoL. Direct costs were respectively euro 230.8 and 219.1 for R and S, respectively. CONCLUSION: The significant advantages of R over S include higher success rate, higher cosmetic results despite a 15% relative overcost for R placement. Both are indicated for breast cancer chemotherapy treatment, nevertheless R placement is mandatory in anxious patients who fear surgery, in case of previous cervico-thoracic irradiation or upper extremity venous thrombosis, or in patients at risk of respiratory insufficiency.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of single agent capecitabine in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients from the French compassionate use program.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective source review identifying predictive factors and assessing safety and efficacy in pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with capecitabine in a French compassionate-use program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 197 patients received capecitabine at an initial total dose 0.25-3.0 g/m2/day, twice daily for 14 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Median patient age was 56 years (range, 31-88), 19% had performance status (PS) 3-4. Prior palliative and adjuvant treatment was reported in 96 and 61% of patients respectively. Best overall response rate (ORR) was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11-21%) and 49% had benefit (CR, PR or SD). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were 4.8 and 14.7 months, respectively. Median TTP in responders was 8.9 months (95%CI 6.1-11.7). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 8 and 3% of patients respectively. Hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 in 16% of patients), diarrhea, stomatitis and asthenia were prevalent. Multivariate analysis showed ORR was significantly influenced by PS > or = 2 (p = 0.004), time from metastases diagnosis to capecitabine treatment (p = 0.015) and presence of liver metastases at inclusion (p = 0.047). Abnormal liver function tests at baseline were associated with severe thrombocytopenia and anemia. Four treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is active in heavily pretreated MBC patients and has a favorable toxicity profile with the added advantage of being an oral drug administered in an outpatient setting.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Treating patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents a significant challenge to oncologists. The tumour-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, is the only treatment approved for these patients. Our study evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QOL) of capecitabine in this setting. Patients (n=126) with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer received capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.0-6.4). Thirty-five patients (28%) achieved an objective response (95% CI: 20-36%), including five (4%) complete responses. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-19.6 months). Capecitabine demonstrated a favourable safety profile, with a low incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal effects. QOL assessment showed that capecitabine treatment was associated with an increase in mean Global Health Score. Capecitabine is active, well tolerated and improves the QOL of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Based on the consistently high activity demonstrated in clinical trials, capecitabine has become the reference treatment in this setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase II study of fotemustine in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. A trial of the EORTC Gynecological Cancer Group.

30 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, all platinum pretreated, were treated with an induction cycle of fotemustine. Maintenance therapy was given to 6 patients. No objective response was observed among the 21 evaluable patients. The main toxicities were gastrointestinal, with grade 3 nausea and vomiting reported in 40% of the patients, and haematological, with grade 4 leucopenia reported in 2 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 5 patients. Therefore, no role has been demonstrated in our cohort for the use of fotemustine, a nitrosourea, in pretreated ovarian cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Survival analyses from the ZEBRA study. goserelin (Zoladex) versus CMF in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer.

The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association (ZEBRA) trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of goserelin (Zoladex) with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal women with node-positive early breast cancer. The results of disease-free survival (DFS) analyses have already been published. Here we present an update including data on overall survival (OS) from the ZEBRA trial at a median follow-up of 7.3 years. In patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumours, non-inferiority of goserelin versus CMF for OS was shown; goserelin was again shown to be equivalent to CMF for DFS. This updated analysis has demonstrated that the two treatments are also equivalent for distant disease-free survival (DDFS). In patients with ER-negative disease, goserelin was inferior to CMF for DFS, DDFS and OS. This follow-up analysis confirms the previously reported outcomes from the ZEBRA trial and demonstrates that goserelin offers an effective alternative to CMF chemotherapy for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive early breast cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Breast cancer in elderly women: is partial breast irradiation a good alternative?

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all breast cancer occurs after age 65. Several aspects for the treatment of early breast cancer may be influenced by patient age, including postoperative radiation therapy (RT), in order to prevent the risk of local recurrence (LR). Postoperative adjuvant RT, improving the chances of local control, is not always completed because of comorbidity-associated factors. Does an alternative exist between a 5-week radiotherapy regime and no irradiation after breast conservative surgery without burdening the overall therapeutic management? METHODS: The authors review the literature regarding age-specific issues in the irradiation of breast cancer and the potential role of a partial breast irradiation (PBI) to prevent LR in the ipsilateral breast. RESULTS: Phase II and III trials have been analyzed for feasibility, efficacy and toxicity. PBI may be delivered with low or high dose rate brachytherapy and intra operative, or external beam radiation therapy. PBI satisfies the control quality criteria. The majority of the teams provide PBI recurrence rates lower than 5% (0-4.4%) with a median follow-up varying between 8 and 72 months, associated with cosmetic results comparable to those achieved with conventional external beam. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer in elderly women represents a medical and economical problem. The recommended conservative treatment includes RT for 50 Gy over 5 weeks. Some subgroups of patients did not receive radiotherapy because of comorbidity-associated factors or more favorable tumor biology. PBI seems to be an acceptable alternative to adjuvant RT over 5 weeks and no irradiation. The evaluation of toxicity and efficacy, especially in terms of local control, is necessary and large multicentric phase III trials comparing the two irradiation approaches are needed, including quality of life, economic considerations and longer follow-up.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in endometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy yields better response rates which do not always lead to a survival advantage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reported differences in the efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with doxorubicin (DOX) versus combination therapy with cisplatin (CDDP) in endometrial adenocarcinoma lead to significant advantage in favour of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically-proven advanced and/or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and were chemo-naïve. Treatment consisted of either DOX 60 mg/m(2) alone or CDDP 50 mg/m2 added to DOX 60 mg/m2, every 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were entered and median follow-up is 7.1 years. The combination DOX-CDDP was more toxic than DOX alone. Haematological toxicity consisted mainly of white blood cell toxicity grade 3 and 4 (55% versus 30%). Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 3 and 4 alopecia (72% versus 65%) and nausea/vomiting (36 % versus 12%). The combination DOX-CDDP provided a significantly higher response rate than single agent DOX (P <0.001). Thirty-nine patients (43%) responded on DOX-CDDP [13 complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs)], versus 15 patients (17%) on DOX alone (8 CR and 7 PR). The median overall survival (OS) was 9 months in the DOX-CDDP arm versus 7 months in the DOX alone arm (Wilcoxon P = 0.0654). Regression analysis showed that WHO performance status was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for survival, and stratifying for this factor, treatment effect reaches significance (hazard ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.03, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to single agent DOX, the combination of DOX-CDDP results in higher but acceptable toxicity. The response rate produced is significantly higher, and a modest survival benefit is achieved with this combination regimen, especially in patients with a good performance status.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Phase II study of pemetrexed in breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines.

BACKGROUND: To assess antitumor activity and toxicity of pemetrexed in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracyclines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven MBC patients from 12 European institutions were entered into the study. Seventy-two patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity. Forty-two patients were classified as anthracycline-failure (relapse >30 days after completion of a prior anthracycline regimen) and 30 as anthracycline-refractory (progression within 30 days after anthracycline therapy). Pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were three complete and 12 partial responders [response rate 21% (95% confidence interval 12%)]. Response rates in the anthracycline-failure and anthracycline-refractory groups were 24% and 17%, respectively. A subset of 31 patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes had a response rate of 26%. Median duration of response and median survival were 5.5 and 10.7 months, respectively (13 months in the failure group and 5.7 months for refractory). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 56% and 19% of patients, respectively. Nine patients (12%) experienced neutropenic fever. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included skin rash (10%), nausea (12%), fatigue (10%) and stomatitis (5%). CONCLUSION: Our trial demonstrates pemetrexed to be active in breast cancer, with manageable toxicity. Activity of pemetrexed did not appear to be adversely affected by prior taxane, 5-fluorouracil or endocrine treatments.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing two doses of arzoxifene (LY353381) in hormone-sensitive advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, phase II study assessed two doses of the selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene in women with advanced breast cancer. The primary end point was to choose the best of two doses of arzoxifene based on the response rate or the clinical benefit rate (CBR). Pharmacokinetics and toxicities were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients with advanced breast cancer received arzoxifene 20 or 50 mg/day. Tumor response was assessed using World Health Organization criteria. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) system. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using the NONMEM software program (GloboMax, Hanover, MD, USA). RESULTS: Response rates in the 20 mg arm were numerically higher than the 50-mg arm according to the investigator (40.5% versus 36.4%) and the independent review panel (42.9% versus 27.3%). CBR was higher in the 20 mg arm according to the investigator (64.3% versus 61.4%) and the independent review panel (59.5% versus 47.7%). Arzoxifene was well tolerated. There were no study drug-related deaths. Mean observed steady-state plasma concentrations of arzoxifene were 3.62 and 7.48 ng/ml for the 20 and 50 mg doses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in efficacy or safety between 20 and 50 mg of arzoxifene. Accordingly, arzoxifene 20 mg/day was selected for further study in patients with breast cancer.

Aged↗