PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Namer

Publications and source records attributed to M Namer.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Androgen receptor gene mutation in male breast cancer.

We screened thirteen male breast cancers for the presence of germline mutations in exons 2 and 3 encoding the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor. These two exons were amplified from genomic DNA extracted from patients' white blood cells. In one of these thirteen patients, single strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing detected a guanine-adenine point mutation at nucleotide 2185 that changes Arg608 into Lys in a highly conserved region of the second zinc finger of the androgen receptor. This mutation occurred in a 38 year old man with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome and normal androgen-binding capacity in cultured genital skin fibroblasts. To our knowledge, only one germline Arg to Gln androgen receptor gene mutation has been previously reported at position 607 in male breast cancer. This androgen receptor mutation along with the Arg608 into Lys mutation we describe, suggests that this genetic abnormality is not fortuitous: a decrease in androgen action within the breast cells could account for the development of male breast cancer by the loss of a protective effect of androgens on these cells. Activation of estrogen regulated genes by the change of DNA-binding characteristics of the mutant androgen receptor cannot, however, be ruled out.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Phase II trial of weekly intravenous vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the therapeutic effects of single-agent intravenous (IV) weekly Navelbine (vinorelbine or 5'-nor-anhydro-vinblastine; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Boulogne, France), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, in women who had received no prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with assessable advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were entered onto the study. They were stratified into five groups according to the main assessable tumor target: lung, liver, lymph nodes, skin, and others. One hundred forty-five patients were assessable for toxicity and response using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria; the 12 patients who were not evaluated were excluded because they were found not to meet the eligibility criteria. Navelbine was administered as a weekly 30-mg/m2 short IV infusion, and treatment was continued until disease progression. RESULTS: The overall response rate (WHO criteria) was 41% (complete response [CR], 7%; partial response [PR], 34%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 49%). In addition, 30% of the patients had stable disease. The response rate according to target was lymph nodes (28 of 42), 67%; liver (nine of 39), 23%; lung (10 of 30), 33%; skin (21 of 30), 70%; primary tumor (10 of 16), 56%; and bone (three of 10), 30%. The median time to treatment failure was 6 months and the median survival was 18 months. A total of 1,673 cycles were given to 145 eligible patients. At least one episode of WHO grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was seen in 72% of the patients. Nausea and/or vomiting, anemia, and/or thrombocytopenia were seen in less than 1% of cycles. Other side effects were rare, and additional toxicities were documented in the following proportions of patients: grade 2 to 3 alopecia, 8%; infectious episodes, 6%; and peripheral neuropathy, 3%. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that Navelbine has major single-agent antitumor activity as front-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, it should be considered for inclusion in first-line combination chemotherapy regimens.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

Anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

This is a brief review of the trials that have been performed to demonstrate the advantages of doxorubicin over other agents in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Moreover, the cytotoxic potential of doxorubicin, its ability to reduce the duration of treatment, and the importance of the timing of administration are discussed. Unfortunately, none of the reported trials can provide definitive conclusions, since doxorubicin was not used in direct comparisons. The interim results of 2 ongoing direct comparisons with anthracyclines have been reported, but have so far revealed no distinct advantage with regard to antitumour potency, although preliminary results in these and other trials appear to suggest that the doxorubicin analogue, epirubicin, may be better tolerated.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Premenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing 3 adjuvant regimens: FEC 50 x 6 cycles vs FEC 50 x 3 cycles vs FEC 75 x 3 cycles. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

Anthracyclines are among the most active drugs for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Epirubicin has been found to be as effective as doxorubicin at equimolar doses but significantly better tolerated, especially in terms of alopecia, leucopenia, and cardiac toxicity. The role of anthracycline-containing regimens in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer has been studied by only a few clinical trial teams. In 1986, the French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) began a randomised trial aimed to investigate the concept of dose intensity as well as the optimal duration of treatment in patients with early breast cancer. Between 1986 and 1990, 621 patients were included in the trial, of whom 595 were evaluable. Patients were randomised to 1 of 3 treatment groups: Group A (n = 207) received FEC 50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) every 21 days for 6 cycles; Group B (n = 193) received FEC 50 every 21 days for 3 cycles; Group C (n = 195) received FEC 75 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) every 21 days for 3 cycles. Locoregional radiotherapy was administered after the third cycle of chemotherapy in all treatment arms. Clinical prognostic factors were similar between treatment groups. Approximately 62% of all patients had 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes; 50% of patients were hormone receptor positive and 73% were Scarff-Bloom Richardson (SBR) grade 2 to 3. Toxicity was evaluated in 595 patients (207, 193 and 195 patients in Groups A, B and C, respectively), who received a total of 2301 chemotherapy cycles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Postmenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Tamoxifen vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) plus tamoxifen vs control--preliminary results of a 4-arm randomised trial. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

In 1986 the true benefit of adjuvant medical treatment in postmenopausal patients with pathological node-positive breast adenocarcinoma was still controversial. The French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) initiated a randomised trial to elucidate the respective roles of adjuvant chemo-and/or hormonotherapy in this group of patients. Of the 776 patients who have been included between 1986 and 1990, 741 were fully eligible for evaluation. Inclusion criteria were postmenopausal patients aged between 50 and 70 years with adenocarcinoma of the breast, positive pathological nodes and no distant metastasis. Patients were randomised to 1 of 4 treatment arms: Group A (n = 192) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years; Group B (n = 183) received FEC 50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) for 6 cycles; Group C (n = 182) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years plus FEC 50 for 6 cycles; Group D (n = 184) received no medical adjuvant treatment. Surgery was either modified radical mastectomy (n = 363) or tumorectomy (n = 378), and postoperative irradiation was given to all patients. All major prognostic factors were well balanced between the 4 patient groups. Toxicity was evaluated in 348 patients in Groups B and C who received a total of 1983 chemotherapy cycles. Median epirubicin dose intensity (mg/m2/week) was 15.8 in Group B and 15.7 in Group C. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 4.7% of cycles for Group B and 3.7% for Group C. Grade 3 to 4 nausea/vomiting were seen in 18% of treatment cycles in Group B and 15% in Group C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

[Demonstration and characterization of EGF receptors in cancer of the uterine cervix].

Epidermal Growth Factor in a polypeptide growth factor of which receptor EGFR has a prognosis value for some malignant tumours. Data are limited concerning the EGFR value in cervix tumours. EGFR was measured in biopsies obtained in cervix cancer patients before any treatment. Twenty-two patients (18 squamous carcinomas, 4 adenocarcinomas) were studied. EGF binding was characterized in seven tumour samples. Scatchard representation identified a single family of binding sites. Kd value revealed high affinity for EGF binding: 0.645 +/- 0.769 nmol/l. EGFR values were determined by a simplified competition method using a radiolabeled ligand. EGFR was found to be more elevated in tumours (n = 20) than in normal tissue (n = 4): (59.5 vs 10.5 fmol/mg proteins). There was a tendency for higher EGFR values in squamous tumours (m = 83.5 fmol/mg proteins) as compared to adenocarcinomas (m = 35.5 fmol/mg proteins), P = 0.09. There was no difference in the distribution of EGFR values according to tumour differentiation and staging. This work confirms the presence of EGFR in cervix tumours. Interestingly, we found that tumours with high EGFR values were more radiosensitive than tumours with low values.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

[Clinical pharmacokinetics and practical consequences of optimal use of medroxyprogesterone acetate].

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is one of the major drugs used in endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. However, its optimal dose is still not clearly established. Response to treatment and drug-related side effects were analyzed as a function of plasma MPA concentrations during prolonged MPA administration. MPA plasma concentrations were measured (HPLC assay) at steady state (Css min) in 129 patients (mean age 63 years, 34-87) treated by MPA (111 being treated orally exclusively, with daily doses ranging from 400 to 2000 mg). A wide inter-patient variability was noted in MPA Css min for the 70 patients receiving 1000 mg/day per os: median 51 ng/ml, range 10-269 ng/ml. Intra-patient analysis of the evolution of MPA Css min during prolonged treatment showed relative stability of MPA concentrations (mean coefficient of variation = 21%). A weak but nevertheless significant correlation was demonstrated between oral doses and MPA Css min (P = 0.016). Thirty-five percent of patients (45/129) developed MPA-related side effects which were associated with the highest plasma MPA concentrations: medians were 81 and 32 ng/ml for toxic and non-toxic treatments respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, the cumulative incidence of side-effects constantly increases with the elevation of Css min. Objective response was assessable in 55 patients treated by MPA exclusively. Plasma MPA concentrations were significantly different between patients with PD and those with either CR, PR or SD: medians were 46 and 65 ng/ml respectively (P = 0.025). The cumulative incidence of objective response increases up to 70 ng/ml. Analysis of toxicity and response as a function of the oral dose did not reveal any significant relationship. These data suggested an optimal therapeutic window for MPA Css min located within 50-70 ng/ml. This study demonstrates that, as opposed to the administered dose, plasma MPA concentration is a determining factor for toxicity and response to therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Doxorubicin weekly low dose administration: in vitro cytotoxicity generated by the typical pharmacokinetic profile.

The cytotoxic effects of prolonged exposure to low concentrations of doxorubicin or a doxorubicin bolus were examined in vitro on four human breast cancer cell lines to simulate the plasma concentration profile of weekly low-dose (WLD) doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. Cells were exposed to doxorubicin for various prolonged times (24, 72, 120 and 192 h) and with different drug concentrations (5, 10, 20, 50 and 80 nmol/l). In a series of parallel experiments, cell lines were placed in contact with the drug for short periods (1 h) before prolonged exposure to doxorubicin; the concentrations of these pulses were 150, 250 and 350 nmol/l. A constant decrease in tritiated thymidine incorporation was noted as a function of the drug concentration and the duration of the cell contact with the drug. Interestingly the lowest concentrations (5-10 nmol/l) produced marked cytotoxic effects. For equivalent concentration x time values, experiments including doxorubicin pulses resulted in greater cytotoxicity than continuous exposure alone, in a dose-related manner. This finding was related to differences in intracellular doxorubicin concentrations. Results suggest that the rather empirically designed WLD doxorubicin schedule can generate greater cytotoxic effects than continuous doxorubicin administration alone.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Goserelin depot in the treatment of premenopausal advanced breast cancer.

333 pre- and peri-menopausal patients with breast cancer entered a programme of open studies on the effect of goserelin. Of the 333 patients, 265 patients were entered into assessable efficacy studies. Efficacy data were analysed from 228 eligible patients receiving 3.6 mg of goserelin administered as a subcutaneous injection of a depot formulation once every 28 days. Mean serum luteinising hormone (LH) and oestradiol concentrations were suppressed by day 22 after the first injection. Subjective response occurred in 68.3% of patients assessed. Objective response (UICC criteria) occurred in 36.4% of patients and the lifetable median duration of response was 44 weeks. Responses were observed in all histological grades of tumour, and regardless of oestrogen receptor status. Treatment was well tolerated with no withdrawals due to possible adverse reactions of which hot flushes (75.9%) and loss of libido (47.4%) were commonly encountered. Goserelin provides an effective well tolerated medical alternative to ovarian ablation in the management of advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is one of the major drugs used in endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. However, its optimal dose still has not been clearly established. Response to treatment and drug-related side effects were analyzed as a function of plasma MPA concentrations during prolonged MPA treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MPA plasma concentrations were measured (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC] assay) at steady state (Css min) in 129 patients (mean age, 63 years; range, 34 to 87) treated by MPA (86% were treated orally exclusively with daily doses ranging from 400 to 2,000 mg). RESULTS: A wide interpatient variability was noted in MPA Css min for the 70 patients who received 1,000 mg/d orally (median, 51 ng/mL; range, 10 to 269 ng/mL). Intrapatient analysis of the evolution of MPA Css min during prolonged treatment showed relative stability of MPA concentrations (mean CV, 20.6%). A weak but significant correlation was demonstrated between oral doses and MPA Css min (P = .016). Thirty-five percent of patients (45 of 129) developed MPA-related side effects that were associated with the highest plasma MPA concentrations; medians were 81 and 32 ng/mL for toxic and nontoxic treatments, respectively (P less than .001). Objective response was assessable in 55 patients who were treated by MPA exclusively. Plasma MPA concentrations were significantly different (P = .025) between patients with progressive disease (PD) (median, 46 ng/mL) and those with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (median 65 ng/mL). Comparison of CR plus PR versus SD versus PD showed only a tendency toward significant differences in MPA Css min (P = .07). Analysis of toxicity and response as a function of the oral dose did not show any significant relationship. These data suggested an optimal therapeutic window for MPA Css min located within 50 to 70 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that plasma MPA concentration, as opposed to the administered dose, is a determining factor for toxicity and response therapy [corrected].

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of mucositis caused by anticancer chemotherapy].

The appearance of mucositis is a frequent and painful secondary effect of anticancer chemotherapy. Patients who develop oral toxicity during the first course of treatment will almost assuredly show identical side effects during each subsequent course unless the drugs are changed or the doses are lowered. In the absence of an efficacious antidote or preventive prophylaxis for such lesions to date, this report presents the results of a preliminary retrospective non-randomized study of the effect of soft-laser treatments on mucositis in cancer patients receiving combination chemotherapy, including 5-fluorouracil. Iatrogenic mucositis was observed during 43% of 53 chemotherapy cycles in the case control population. Curative laser therapy reduced the time to repair lesions and the rate of therapeutic modifications. For patients who received soft-laser therapy as a preventive measure, the incidence of oral complications was reduced to 6% during 101 cycles of chemotherapy. All of these patients, even those who have encountered mucositis before receiving preventive laser therapy, terminated their cancer therapy as originally scheduled. Well designed and carefully controlled trials will be necessary to define the place of helium-neon laser therapy in the repair and prevention of oral complications due to cancer chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1991

Improved bioavailability of a new oral preparation of medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is widely used in the hormonal therapy of breast cancer. So far, oral formulations of MPA commercially available present a very low bioavailability, with a less than 10% extent of oral absorption. A new oral preparation of MPA has been recently developed. Based on a pilot study, an open, randomized, crossover trial has been performed on 22 breast and endometrial cancer patients to evaluate the relative bioavailability of this new oral formulation (200-mg sachet, twice daily) as compared with a standard formulation (Farlutal, 500-mg tablet, twice daily). The bioavailability evaluation was mainly based on the area under the curve measured between two administrations at steady state, after 15 days of continuous therapy. Wide interpatient variability of MPA plasma levels after oral MPA administration was confirmed. The MPA plasma levels were higher in patients treated with the new formulation than in patients treated with Farlutal. The relative bioavailability of the new preparation was 3.5 times higher than that of the standard. This new formulation represents a great improvement in the extent of oral absorption of MPA and could lead to better management of hormone-responsive tumors by hormonal therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

Polyadenylic-polyuridylic acid plus locoregional and pelvic radiotherapy versus chemotherapy with CMF as adjuvants in operable breast cancer. A 6 1/2 year follow-up analysis of a randomized trial of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (F.F.C.C.).

In this study, patients with operable breast cancer T2 or T3, treated by mastectomy + axillary dissection and with invaded axillary nodes (N+), were randomized to receive either: 1) postoperative locoregional and pelvic radiotherapy (RX) and Poly(A).Poly(U) (AU), 60 mg IV once a week for 6 weeks, or 2) CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/sqm P.O. on days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/sqm IV on day 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/sqm IV on day 1 and 8; monthly cycle, for 6 months. Between March 1982 and December 1985, 517 patients were enrolled, 257 of whom were treated by RX + AU and 260 with CMF. The main clinical, pathological and prognostic characteristics were equally distributed in the two groups. The present analysis was conducted after a mean follow-up of 69 months (S.D. = 13). There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups (test adjusted by center and menopausal status); the five-year OS rate was 74% in the RXAU group and 77% in the CMF group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly higher (p = 0.05) in the RXAU group compared to the MCF group; the five-year RFS rates were 57% and 46% in the two groups respectively. This short, well-tolerated combined RXAU treatment appears to be as efficient as CMF and might offer an alternative to chemo- or hormonotherapy, in case of contraindications to these treatments.

Adult↗