PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Pfeffer

Publications and source records attributed to M Pfeffer.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

MRI and determination of T1 and T2 of solid polymers using a 1.5 T whole-body imager.

Spin-echo sequences with echo times as short as 3.5 msec were implemented on a standard 1.5 T NMR whole-body imager for 1H imaging of polymers in the solid-state. No modification of the NMR hardware designed for clinical usage was made. Beside images of different polymers a "self-portrait" of the polymeric materials of the receiver coil is given as a neat application. Based on imaging experiments the longitudinal and transverse relaxation time of polymers were investigated. The results indicate that using a standard whole-body imager, it is possible to provide additional information to other examination techniques in polymer and materials science.

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy↗
PubMed1992

Localized phosphorus NMR spectroscopy: a comparison of the FID, DRESS, CRISIS/CODEX, and STEAM methods in vitro and in vivo using a surface-coil.

The FID, DRESS, CRISIS/CODEX, and STEAM techniques for localized 31P NMR spectroscopy were compared using a Siemens Magnetom SP63 1.5 T whole-body imager and a surface-coil, 80 mm in diameter, acting as transmitter and receiver coil. The comparison was performed with phantom experiments and human in vivo investigations on the calf muscle. The phantom experiments which used the same volume size showed a comparable signal-to-noise ratio for FID and DRESS, while the two fully localized techniques showed a reduction in signal-to-noise ratio to 76% for CRISIS/CODEX and 31% for STEAM. The in vivo measurements confirm the phantom results and reveal that CRISIS/CODEX gains a 2.5 fold higher signal-to-noise ratio than STEAM under the same conditions.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between cefepime and amikacin in humans.

The interaction potential between cefepime and amikacin was investigated in a steady-state pharmacokinetic study in 16 healthy male subjects. Eight subjects (group A) received a first course of 2,000 mg of cefepime; this was followed by a second course of 2,000 mg of cefepime with 300 mg of amikacin and a third course of 2,000 mg of cefepime. Eight other subjects (group B) received a first course of 300 mg of amikacin, a second course of 300 mg of amikacin with 2,000 mg of cefepime, and a third course of 300 mg of amikacin. Each course consisted of four consecutive doses administered every 8 h as 30-min intravenous infusions. Serial plasma and urine samples, which were collected after administration of the fourth dose of each course, were assayed for cefepime and/or amikacin by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assays. Trough levels of cefepime and amikacin indicated that these antibiotics attained a steady state prior to administration of the fourth dose of each course. Key pharmacokinetic parameters for each antibiotic were determined by noncompartmental methods. The peak concentrations of cefepime and amikacin in plasma when the drugs were given alone were about 160 and 27 micrograms/ml, respectively. Levels of each antibiotic in plasma declined, with an apparent half-life of approximately 2.2 h. Urinary recovery of cefepime and amikacin accounted for more than 85% of the administered dose of each antibiotic. Mean renal clearances for cefepime and amikacin ranged from 79 to 95 ml/min and suggested that glomerular filtration is the primary excretion mechanism. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime following the concurrent administration of amikacin and following the discontinuation of the amikacin following the concurrent administration of cefepime and following the discontinuation of the cefepime therapy were not significantly altered. Cefepime and amikacin can be coadministered to patients with normal renal function by using the standard recommended dosing regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime were studied in 10 male patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis therapy. Five patients received a single 1,000-mg dose and the other five received a single 2,000-mg dose; all doses were given as 30-min intravenous infusions. Serial plasma, urine, and peritoneal dialysate samples were collected; and the concentrations of cefepime in these fluids were measured over 72 h by using a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with UV detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. The peak concentrations in plasma and the areas under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve for the 2,000-mg dose group were twice as high as those observed for the 1,000-mg dose group. The elimination half-life of cefepime was about 18 h and was independent of the dose. The steady-state volume of distribution was about 22 liters, and values for the 1,000- and 2,000-mg doses were not significantly different. The values for total body clearance and peritoneal dialysis clearance were about 15 and 4 ml/min, respectively. No dose dependency was observed for the clearance estimates. Over the 72-h sampling period, about 26% of the dose was excreted intact into the peritoneal dialysis fluid. For 48 h postdose, mean concentrations of cefepime in dialysate at the end of each dialysis interval exceeded the reported MICs for 90% of the isolates (MIC90s) for bacteria which commonly cause peritonitis resulting from continuous peritoneal dialysis. A parenteral dose of 1,000 or 2,000 mg of cefepime every 48 h would maintain the antibiotic levels in plasma and peritoneal fluid above the MIC90s for the most susceptible bacteria for the treatment of systemic and intraperitoneal infections [corrected].

Cefepime↗
PubMed1991

Oral iloprost in healthy volunteers.

Iloprost is a potent chemically stable PGI2-mimetic. Therapeutic efficacy was shown after i.v. infusion treatment in several states of peripheral vascular disease. For out-patient therapy an oral dosage form should be developed. Based upon dissolution profiles and in vivo data of a pig model, three different film-coated pellet formulations were selected for pharmacokinetic characterization in nine healthy volunteers. In the first part of the study groups of three test subjects were treated with increasing dosages (150-300 micrograms) of iloprost. At 300 micrograms flush and headache led to the discontinuation of those titration. All formulations exhibited dose-dependent serum level profiles. The cross-over characterization in all test subjects showed that one formulation, which exhibited a modified in vitro dissolution of 60% of the dose within 1 h in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, was optimal from the pharmacokinetic profile. After oral administration of this formulation the bioavailable dose fraction was highest and half-maximal serum levels lasted for 2.4 h (mean); therapeutic serum levels were maintained for 2.1-5.0 h. This formulation was chosen for further investigation to imitate therapeutic serum level profiles as obtained after i.v. infusion for 4-6 h with a once-a-day dosage form.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Protein binding of active ingredients and comparison of serum ethinyl estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, corticosteroid-binding globulin, and cortisol levels in women using a combination of gestodene/ethinyl estradiol (Femovan) or a combination of desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol (Marvelon) and single-dose ethinyl estradiol bioequivalence from both oral contraceptives.

Results from two clinical pharmacokinetic studies are given. The first study was an observational study in oral contraceptive users who took either a combination of gestodene and ethinyl estradiol (pill A, Femovan) or desogestrel and ethinyl estradiol (pill B, Marvelon). A total of 69 women (39 receiving pill A and 30 receiving pill B) were evaluated to determine serum ethinyl estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, corticosteroid-binding globulin, and cortisol levels. Samples were obtained on 1 day during the tenth to twenty-first days of pill intake. All women received the respective oral contraceptive for at least 3 months. The test power was such that an 80% difference of 1 standard deviation of each target variable would have been detected (alpha = 0.05; beta = 0.1). No statistically significant differences were found in sex hormone-binding globulin, corticosteroid-binding globulin, or cortisol serum levels between both groups. Time and height of maximum ethinyl estradiol levels were identical as was the area under the curves. Ex vivo protein-binding analysis of the progestins revealed a free portion of 0.6% for gestodene and 2.5% for 3-ketodesogestrel as the active metabolite of desogestrel. Sex hormone-binding globulin-bound portions were much higher for gestodene (75.3% +/- 9.1%) than for 3-ketodesogestrel (31.6% +/- 12%). The remaining fractions were bound to albumin. In a second study, ethinyl estradiol-bioequivalence from pills A and B was investigated in 18 women in a controlled, single-dose, randomized, crossover design. The area under the ethinyl estradiol serum levels were identical up to 4 hours after pill intake between both treatments. According to the relatively low variation in data in this group of women, a 10% difference in ethinyl estradiol-availability could have been detected. Both studies indicate that the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol were independent of the concomitantly administered progestin, that is, desogestel and gestodene.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Protein binding of the contraceptive steroids gestodene, 3-keto-desogestrel and ethinylestradiol in human serum.

The protein binding of ethinylestradiol (EE2), gestodene (GEST) and 3-keto-desogestrel (KDG) has been determined by ultrafiltration in the serum of women who had either taken a gestodene (n = 37) or desogestrel (n = 28) containing oral contraceptive for a time period of at least 3 months. GEST and KDG were analyzed in individual serum pools whereas EE2 was repeatedly measured in two serum pools, each one representing one treatment group. The respective free fractions of the three steroids were 0.6 +/- 0.1% (GEST), 2.5 +/- 0.2% (KDG), 1.7 +/- 0.6% (EE2, in the gestodene-group) and 1.5 +/- 0.2% (EE2, in the desogestrel-group). EE2 was exclusively bound to albumin, whereas GEST and KDG were also bound to sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). The distribution of the two progestins over the serum binding proteins was determined after heat-treatment of serum samples. For GEST, the contribution of albumin and SHBG was 24.1 +/- 9.1 and 75.3 +/- 9.1%, respectively and for KDG it was 65.9 +/- 11.9 and 31.6 +/- 12.0%, respectively. SHBG and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) concentrations were measured in the serum samples obtained from both treatment groups. In the gestodene-group 180 +/- 61 nmol/l (SHBG) and 89 +/- 13 mg/l (CBG) were measured, the corresponding values in the desogestrel-group were 226 +/- 64 nmol/l (SHBG) and 93 +/- 14 mg/l (CBG). SHBG concentrations were correlated with the total concentration of GEST and its free fraction and a positive (r = 0.395) and negative (r = -0.491) correlation respectively was found. Only a weak negative correlation (r = -0.291) was found for SHBG and the free fraction of KDG in the serum. These data demonstrate that the three contraceptive steroids EE2, GEST and KDG were all bound extensively to serum proteins, however, with pronounced differences concerning their distribution over the various binding proteins.

Blood Proteins↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of serum ethinyl estradiol, sex-hormone-binding globulin, corticoid-binding globulin and cortisol levels in women using two low-dose combined oral contraceptives.

The study included 69 women taking a desogestrel (n = 30)- or gestodene (n = 39)-containing low-dose combined oral contraceptive for at least 3 months. Group size was calculated to detect a difference in mean values of 80% of 1 standard deviation (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.1). Seven serum samples were obtained up to 4 h, and 1 sample 24 h, after drug intake on 1 day between the 10th and the 21st day of the cycle. The concentrations of sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), corticoid-binding globulin (CBG) and cortisol were measured in a 0- to 4-hour serum pool by radioimmunoassay. Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) levels were analyzed in single and pooled samples using anti-EE2-6 beta-carboxymethyloxime-bovine serum albumin antiserum. The area under the curves (AUC) up to 4 and 24 h and Cmax and tmax were evaluated. Statistical analysis (analysis of covariance) did not reveal a dependence of values on duration of treatment or day of cycle. Both treatments resulted in almost identical values for all parameters evaluated. The mean levels of SHBG, CBG and cortisol were in the range of 186-226 nmol/l, 89-93 mg/l and 280-281 micrograms/l, respectively. Mean maximum EE2 levels of 106-129 pg/ml were found 1.6-1.8 h after pill intake and AUC0-4 h accounted for 329-374 pg.h.ml-1. The recently reported differences in serum EE2 and CBG levels between two groups of 11 women each treated with desogestrel- and gestodene-containing pills, respectively, could not be confirmed.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

In-vitro and in-vivo characterisation of two sustained release formulations for the antidepressant rolipram.

Using the pellet technology two sustained release formulations for (dl)-rolipram (ZK 62 711; CAS 61413-54-5) were developed and characterised by in-vitro dissolution tests and in a cross-over study in healthy male volunteers. In-vitro, 50% release was achieved within 2.5 h for formulation A and within 4 h for B. In-vivo, Cmax values of 4.4 +/- 0.9 ng/ml (A) and 2.1 +/- 0.8 ng/ml (B) were observed 2.8 +/- 0.8 h or 10.3 +/- 3.7 h after oral intake of 3 mg (dl)-rolipram. The terminal disposition half-life in the plasma was similar for both formulations (12 +/- 13 h and 11 +/- 2 h). Expectedly, the relative bioavailability of formulation B was lower compared to A (72%). Using the pellet technology, formulations with an intended release profile can be tailored to suit by mixing pellets with different release characteristics within one dosage form.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Effect of terfenadine and ranitidine on histamine and suxamethonium wheals.

The effects of the H-1 receptor blocker terfenadine and the H-2 receptor blocker ranitidine have been experimentally tested in wheals induced with histamine and suxamethonium chloride. Ranitidine alone in the standard and a four-fold higher dose did not notably reduce the size of the wheal and flare as compared to placebo. As expected, both parameters were markedly reduced by the H-1 antihistamine terfenadine in full and half-dosage. A combination of the two drugs both in "standard" and modified dosage resulted in the greatest reduction in the wheal and flare. Histamine and suxamethonium-induced wheals reacted in a similar manner to the antihistamines.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral buspirone in patients with impaired renal function.

12 patients with mild to moderate impairment of renal function and 12 healthy subjects each received 20mg buspirone as a single dose in this acute study. Six anuric patients with chronic renal failure were given two 20mg doses of buspirone, the first 2 days before haemodialysis (between dialyses) and the second during hemodialysis (2 hours before dialysis began). The differences between the median pharmacokinetic values of buspirone for healthy subjects, patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, and anuric patients were not statistically significant. Similarly, there were no significant differences between values in mild to moderate renal failure vs healthy subjects. Some of the median pharmacokinetic values for the active buspirone metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP), however, differed significantly for anuric patients, compared with healthy subjects or patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. When assessed between and during haemodialysis, the anuric patients had significantly (p less than 0.05) greater pharmacokinetic median values: half-life (t 1/2) = 15.2 vs 9.8 hours; area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) = 604 vs 404 nmol/L.h; and mean residence time (MRT) = 9.28 vs 6.96 hours. No firm recommendation for specific dosage can be made based on the present data. However, it does appear that in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, the pharmacokinetics of buspirone and its active metabolite 1-PP are similar to those in individuals with normal renal function. For anuric patients higher concentrations of the 1-PP metabolite are attained while they are not undergoing haemodialysis. A dosage reduction of 25 to 50% might be necessary when buspirone is given to anuric patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1987

[Therapy of urticaria with H1 and H2 antihistaminics. Results of clinical and experimental studies].

The antipruritic effect of modern H1- and H2-receptor blockers in chronic urticaria, that had been clinically proved, was experimentally studied by means of the histamine weal test. The H2-antihistamine preparation ranidine alone did not clearly reduce weals or erythemas induced by histamine when compared with a placebo. As expected, both parameters were markedly reduced by the H1-antihistamine preparation terfenadine. After combined administration of both drugs, the effect of the H1-blocker proved to be significantly increased. We discuss the possible mode of action and the consequences for anti-allergic therapy.

Benzhydryl Compounds↗
PubMed1987

Lack of interaction between cimetidine and buspirone.

Simultaneous administration of cimetidine and many benzodiazepine anxiolytics has resulted in decreased body clearance and marked prolongation of the half-life of these agents. The pharmacokinetic interaction of buspirone, a new nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic, and cimetidine was studied in 10 healthy male volunteers. Each received, in order, buspirone 45 mg/day (days 1-7), no drug (days 8-14), cimetidine 1 g/day (days 15-21), buspirone 45 mg/day plus cimetidine 1 g/day (days 22-28), and cimetidine 1 g/day (days 29-31). Buspirone and 1-pyrimidinyl piperazine (1-PP), an active metabolite, pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion of cimetidine, a manual dexterity test, the Stroop color-word interference test, and a visual analog mood scale were evaluated on each treatment. There were no significant (p greater than 0.05) differences among treatments for any measurement except for a slight (31%) but significant (p less than 0.05) increase in the 1-PP Cmax value. These results suggest that within the normal therapeutic dosage ranges for both drugs, it is unlikely that a clinically significant interaction between them will occur.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Buspirone pharmacokinetics in patients with cirrhosis.

The pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of buspirone (20 mg) were determined in 12 patients with cirrhosis and 12 normal subjects. The mean AUC of buspirone was 55 +/- 38 s.d. ng ml-1 h in cirrhotics and 3.5 +/- 2.4 s.d. ng ml-1 h in normals. The time until maximum concentration (tmax) attained was similar in the two groups (0.6 vs 0.7 h), but mean maximum concentration Cmax was higher in patients (18.8 +/- 16.3 s.d. ng ml-1) than in normals (1.2 +/- 0.8 s.d. ng ml-1). Mean elimination half-life of buspirone was greater in cirrhotics, but this difference was marginally significant statistically (cirrhotics, 6.1 +/- 3.5 s.d. h, normals 3.2 +/- 1.5 s.d. h, P = 0.05). Eight of 12 patients and seven of 12 normal subjects had a second peak in the plasma concentrations of buspirone. In patients this occurred at 10.8 +/- 7.4 s.d. h after the dose, and its mean concentration was 3.1 +/- 6.6 ng ml-1. In normal subjects the second peak occurred at 4.3 +/- 2.1 h after the dose and its mean concentration was 0.5 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1. On the kinetic evidence buspirone should be used with caution in liver disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Prefeeding-dependent anaerobic metabolization of xenobiotics by intestinal bacteria--methods for acarbose metabolites in an artificial colon.

The biotransformation of Acarbose (Bay g 5421) by an artificial in vitro system with viable intestinal microorganisms was investigated. The bacteria were obtained from the colon of man or from the caecum and colon of rats and were incubated anaerobically with 14C-Acarbose in a nutrient solution. The metabolites were separated and purified by chromatographic methods and identified by nuclear magnetic resonance (1H; 13C) spectrometry and by mass spectrometry. Metabolites in man and rat are component 2 (minus the terminal glucose of Acarbose), a basic disaccharide consisting of rings B and C, and component 1. This latter substance is formed, after hydrolytic cleavage of the internal glucose of Acarbose, by spontaneous rearrangement of rings A and B (Acarviosine) into a tricyclic oxazolidine. The metabolite pattern of Acarbose is changed profoundly after several weeks of pretreatment of man or rat with this compound. The microflora adapted in such a manner yields in addition methylated, hexosylated, and n-butyroylated derivatives of Acarbose and/or component 2.

Acarbose↗