Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. New technologies enable screening to be carried out in schools and the community.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Polaneczky.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a self-collected vaginal introital specimen, obtained by women using only an instruction booklet as a guide, for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: Comparison analysis in an Urban hospital clinic, using a convenience sample of 101 women undergoing screening or treatment for C trachomatis infection. Subjects were given an illustrated instruction booklet and were asked to collect a single specimen from the vaginal introitus using the Amplicor collection kit. Cervical and introital specimens then were obtained by clinicians. The presence of C trachomatis in patient-collected versus clinician-collected samples was determined by PCR. Discordant specimens were retested by PCR, using primer pairs to the C trachomatis major outer membrane protein gene, and were screened for the presence of PCR assay inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety-nine subjects completed the self-collection. Sixty-two percent were adolescents and 17% spoke English as their second language. Forty-three percent had never used tampons, and 36% had never looked at their own genitals. Twenty-eight cervical specimens (28%), 32 clinician-collected introital specimens (32%), and 33 self-collected introital specimens (33%) were positive for C trachomatis infection. All clinician-collected introital specimens that were positive for C trachomatis and all cervical specimens that were positive for C trachomatis were positive on self-test. Compared with clinician-collected introital specimens, self-collected specimens had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.5%. Compared with cervical specimens, self-collected specimens had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93.4%. After discrepant analysis, self-test had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94.6% for detection of C trachomatis cervical infection. CONCLUSION: Self-collection of introital samples is both sensitive and specific in screening for C trachomatis.
PURPOSE: To determine Depo-Provera continuation rates and reasons for its discontinuation among adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: Medical record reviews and telephone interviews with 159 adolescents who initiated Depo-Provera use between 1 December 1992 and 31 December 1995 at two clinics in New York City. Depo-Provera continuation was measured using lifetable analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 17.7 +/- 1.5 years, with a median of 1 pregnancy (range 0-11). Mean follow-up was 23.4 +/- 10.7 months. Depo-Provera continuation rates were 71% at 3 months, 48% at 6 months, and 27% at 12 months, and were not affected by age, race, pregnancy or contraceptive history, clinic, or foster care status. Forty-three subjects (37% of discontinuers) restarted Depo-Provera during the study period, with a mean time to restart of 8.4 months after the last Depo-Provera injection. Side effects were the main reported reason for Depo-Provera discontinuation, primarily menstrual irregularities (26%) and weight gain (18%). Seventy percent of those discontinuing Depo-Provera owing to irregular bleeding did so after only one injection. For 23%, the single reason for discontinuation was appointment noncompliance. Restart rates were lowest among those who reported irregular bleeding (15%), weight gain (9%), and hair loss (10%), and highest among those discontinuing owing to missed appointments (87%) (p < 0.05). Pregnancies occurred in 19% of Depo-Provera discontinuers. CONCLUSION: Although Depo-Provera continuation rates among adolescents are low, over a third of discontinuers may restart the method. Aggressive management of side effects and assistance with appointment follow-up may improve long-term use. High pregnancy rates warrant close follow-up after Depo-Provera discontinuation.
Adolescent pregnancy rates have declined modestly, most likely because of the increased use of condoms, especially at first intercourse. Condom distribution in schools appears to be effective in promoting condom use without increasing sexual activity. Although, to date, no contraceptive has been as effective as Norplant in reducing teen pregnancy, use of the method has declined dramatically. Depo-Provera use is increasing, but continuation rates are disappointing and the impact on teen pregnancy rates is as yet unknown. Emergency contraception remains underutilized, and interventions to improve oral contraceptive compliance are beginning to be explored. School-based programs that provide contraception without adding a strong educational component fail to improve contraceptive use or reduce pregnancy rates. Use of any contraceptive by teens is cost effective.
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed whether specimens obtained from the vaginal introitus were comparable to endocervical and posterior vaginal vault specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction. STUDY DESIGN: Introital and endocervical specimens were obtained from 300 women at the first prenatal visit. Specimens from the posterior vaginal vault were also obtained from 219 of these patients. All samples were tested for C. trachomatis and T. vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: C. trachomatis was identified in the endocervices of 36 women (12.0%); all but one of these women and none of the endocervical-negative women were positive for this organism in the introitus. T. vaginalis was detected in 22 women (10.0%); all but one were also introitus positive for this organism. Compared with endocervical and vaginal polymerase chain reaction, introital testing had a 100% specificity and a 97.2% and 95.5% sensitivity for detecting C. trachomatis and T. vaginalis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Polymerase chain reaction analysis of vaginal introital specimens is highly sensitive and specific in detecting C. trachomatis and T. vaginalis in pregnant women and thus provides an alternative to speculum examination in screening for these pathogens.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the risk for preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia in triplet and twin gestations and to evaluate the effect of successful implantation on the development of preeclampsia and on perinatal outcome in triplet pregnancies conceived by means of in vitro fertilization. STUDY DESIGN: A case control study was conducted of triplet pregnancies (n = 38) matched for maternal age, parity, race, and delivery date with twin pregnancies (n = 38) resulting from a single fetal reduction (spontaneously or by means of multifetal pregnancy reduction) after successful implantation of triplets. All pregnancies were conceived by means of in vitro fertilization. Rates of preeclampsia and other maternal complications, factors affecting implantation, and perinatal outcomes were compared. Preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia were defined by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria. The Student t test and the chi(2) test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The triplet group had a higher rate of severe preeclampsia (26.3%) than the twin (reduced triplet) group (7.9%). The prevalence of preeclampsia (mild and severe combined) also was higher among the triplet group (44.7%) than among the twin group (15.8%). There was no difference in other maternal complications of pregnancy or in factors potentially affecting implantation, such as assisted hatching. Mean fetal weight was lower among the triplet group, but gestational age at delivery was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of preeclampsia is higher among triplets conceived by means of in vitro fertilization than among triplets conceived by means of in vitro fertilization and reduced to twins. This finding suggests that fetal number, placental mass, or factors unrelated to the success of implantation are more important to the development of preeclampsia than is successful implantation alone.
BACKGROUND: Although levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) would appear to be a good contraceptive option for adolescent mothers, there is little information about the use of Norplant in this population. METHODS: We studied 100 postpartum adolescents who chose a contraceptive method at an urban teaching hospital between September 1991 and July 1992. Structured interviews were conducted and medical records were reviewed soon after delivery and at a mean (+/- SD) of 15.5 +/- 2.9 months post partum. RESULTS: Forty-eight of the adolescent mothers chose Norplant, 50 chose oral contraceptives, and 2 (not further studied) chose barrier methods of contraception. The factors significantly associated with the choice of Norplant were older age (16.7 years among those who chose Norplant, vs. 16.2 years among those who chose oral contraceptives), multiparity (24 subjects vs. 6 subjects), and previous use of oral contraceptives (34 subjects vs. 21 subjects). During follow-up, there were no differences between the Norplant group and the oral-contraceptive group in the frequency of clinic visits (an average of 2.3 visits per subject in each group), failure to return after the postpartum visit (9 subjects vs. 11 subjects), or the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (42 percent vs. 36 percent). At follow-up, 95 percent of the subjects in the Norplant group and 33 percent of those in the oral-contraceptive group were still using the method they had chosen (P < 0.001). During the first postpartum year 1 subject in the Norplant group and 19 in the oral-contraceptive group became pregnant (P < 0.001). Norplant users did not differ from all other adolescents studied with regard to sexual activity or condom use. CONCLUSIONS: The selection of Norplant by adolescent mothers as a method of contraception is associated with higher rates of continued use and lower rates of new pregnancy than the selection of oral contraceptives and does not affect the use of health care services, sexual activity, condom use, or the rate of sexually transmitted diseases.
There are few data on the experience of American women with the injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) since its recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration for contraceptive use in the United States. An exploratory study was conducted using chart reviews and telephone interviews of 261 women who initiated DMPA use between December 1992 and June 1994 at either a hospital-based (48%) or community-based (49%) clinic in New York City. Most DMPA users were single (70%), had had at least one birth (88%), had had at least one abortion (67%) and had ever practiced contraception (75% of those with available data). Life-table DMPA continuation rates were 63% at six months and 42% at 12 months and were not affected by the users' age, marital status, pregnancy history, clinic site or proximity of residence to the clinic. Among adults, the risk of DMPA discontinuation was highest during the three-month period following the second injection, while among adolescents, this risk increased throughout the duration of use. The most commonly reported reasons for method discontinuation were side effects, primarily menstrual irregularities (30%) and weight gain (24%).