PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Procopio

Publications and source records attributed to M Procopio.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH alone or combined with pyridostigmine and on sympathoadrenal activity in patients with hypogonadism.

There is evidence suggesting that androgens influence GH secretion in man. Our aim was to verify whether the GH releasable pool is preserved and influenced by testosterone replacement in male hypogonadism. To this goal, in eight male hypogonadal patients (HP, age 32.2 +/- 5.0 yr; Body Mass Index 23.9 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) before and after 3 months testosterone therapy, we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) alone and combined with pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg po), a cholinesterase inhibitor which likely inhibits hypothalamic somatostatin release allowing exploration of the maximal somatotrope secretory pool. Sixteen normal subjects (NS, age 30.1 +/- 3.5 yr; Body Mass Index 22.5 +/- 1.8 kg/m2) were studied as controls. The GH response to GHRH in HP was similar to that in NS (AUC, mean +/- SE: 1238 +/- 362 vs 1018 +/- 182 micrograms/L/h). PD potentiated to the same extent the GH response to GHRH in both groups (2092 +/- 807 and 2840 +/- 356 micrograms/L/h). After three month testosterone therapy, in HP the GH responses to GHRH alone (1352 +/- 612 micrograms/L/h) and combined with PD (1948 +/- 616 microgram/L/h) were unchanged. Also IGF-I levels in HP were similar to those in NS (222 +/- 42 vs 210.6 +/- 55.8 micrograms/L) and were unchanged during testosterone replacement (280 +/- 31 micrograms/L). As androgens have been reported to modulate sympathoadrenal activity in the rat, both before and during testosterone replacement, we also measured plasma catecholamine levels. Basal NE (p < 0.05) but not E levels were lower in HP than in NS; testosterone restored basal NE levels to normal without affecting basal E. delta absolute increase of NE and E (p < 0.05 and 0.01 vs baseline, respectively) after PD in HP were similar to those in NS and were unchanged during testosterone replacement. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the GH releasable pool is preserved in male hypogonadism. As in this condition a reduction of spontaneous GH secretion has been reported, it could be due to neurosecretory dysfunction but not to pituitary impairment. Subtle alterations of sympathoadrenal activity seem to be present in male hypogonadism and reversed by testosterone replacement.

Adrenal Glands↗
PubMed1995

Metabolic modulation of the growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in man.

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new potent synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man has never been evaluated. Hexarelin may act directly on specific pituitary receptors and indirectly on the hypothalamus. To elucidate its mechanism of action in man, we studied the interaction of hexarelin with glucose and free fatty acids (FFA), two metabolic factors known to inhibit both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulated GH secretion. Glucose is thought to inhibit GH secretion via stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release, whereas FFA could also act directly on somatotrope cells. Therefore, we investigated the effect of oral glucose (100 g) and lipid-heparin infusion (250 mL of a 10% lipid solution + 2,500 U heparin) on the GH response to a maximal dose (2 micrograms/kg intravenously [IV]) of hexarelin or GHRH in six normal men. Hexarelin elicited a clear-cut GH response (mean +/- SEM; peak, 62.6 +/- 8.0 micrograms/L) that was higher (P < .01) than that observed after GHRH (peak, 19.8 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L). Although similar increases in plasma glucose were observed with the two peptides, oral glucose almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 5.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 38.4 +/- 7.9 micrograms/L, P < .05). Similarly, lipid-heparin infusion nearly abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 4.9 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 34.2 +/- 4.5 micrograms/L, P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Blunted GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or combined with arginine in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

An increased spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion is well documented in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. On the contrary, in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) conflicting results arise from literature. In 14 patients with NIDDM, 7 normal weight (NWD) and 7 obese (OD), we investigated the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH (1 microgram/kg) alone or combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg), which is able to enhance the GH response to GHRH, probably by inhibiting somatostatin release from hypothalamus. Baseline IGF-I, IRI FFA and glucose levels were also determined. Twelve healthy normal subjects (NS) and 12 obese patients (OP) were evaluated as control groups. GH but not IGF-I levels were higher (p < 0.05) in NS than in OP (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2 microgram/l). Insulin levels were higher (p < 0.05) in OP than in NS, NWD and OD (18.7 +/- 1.8 vs 8.7 +/- 0.5, 6.4 +/- 1.9 and 11.8 +/- 1.2 microU/l). FFA were higher (p < 0.05) in NWD. OD and OP than in NS (0.69 +/- 0.04, 0.70 +/- 0.04 and 0.65 +/- 0.06 vs 0.39 +/- 0.03 mmol/l). Plasma glucose was higher (p < 0.05) in diabetic patients than in normal and obese subjects. GH responses to GHRH in NWD, OD and OP were similar (AUC: 221.6 +/- 33.3, 206.0 +/- 35.9 and 177.2 +/- 57.3 micrograms/l/min, respectively) and all lower (p < 0.05) than that in NS (776.7 +/- 206.5 micrograms/l/min). ARG determined a significant increase of GHRH-induced GH release in all groups (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Short-term fasting in obesity fails to restore the blunted GH responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone alone or combined with arginine.

OBJECTIVE: Fasting is known to clearly increase both spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in normal subjects and this effect is likely to be due to hypothalamic mechanism(s). Our aim was to clarify the effect of a 3 or 4-day fast, on the GH response to GHRH alone or combined with arginine, an amino acid probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. DESIGN: Two tests with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.), administered either alone or in combination with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) were performed, in a randomized order at least 3 days apart. In obese women the two tests were repeated after a 3 or 4-day fast. PATIENTS: Seven obese women (OB, aged 17-54 years, BMI 42.4 +/- 3.6 kg/m2, waist-hip ratio (WHR) 0.85 +/- 0.01) and ten healthy women, as control subjects (CS, aged 20-44 years, BMI 23.1 +/- 1.1 kg/m2, WHR 0.79 +/- 0.01) were studied. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH and IGF-I levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. The GH secretory responses were expressed either as absolute values (mU/l) or as areas under the curve (AUC, mU/l/h) calculated by trapezoidal integration. IGF-I concentrations were expressed as absolute values (microgram/l) with reference to a pure recombinant IGF-I preparation. Results are expressed as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS: Basal GH and IGF-I levels in OB were lower than in CS (0.8 +/- 0.2 vs 4.8 +/- 1.0 mU/l, P < 0.0001 and 120.1 +/- 21.4 vs 188.7 +/- 13.1 micrograms/l, P < 0.02, respectively). The GHRH-induced GH rise in OB was lower (P < 0.00001) than in CS (AUC 340.2 +/- 81.0 vs 2125.0 +/- 199.6 mU/l/h). ARG increased the GHRH-induced GH rise in both groups, but in OB the GH response to ARG+GHRH (1458.4 +/- 439.0 mU/l/h, P < 0.03 vs GHRH alone) remained lower (P < 0.0001) than in CS (6396.2 +/- 772.2 mU/l/h, P < 0.01 vs GHRH alone). In spite of a reduction in body weight and IGF-I, insulin and glucose levels, in OB fasting failed to modify both the basal GH levels and the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH when administered either alone or combined with ARG. An increase in free fatty acids (FFA) was also found after fasting. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that in obesity the somatotroph hyporesponsiveness to GHRH, either alone or combined with arginine, is not improved by short-term fasting. As fasting is considered a CNS mediated stimulus to GH secretion, its ineffectiveness in obesity does not support a hypothalamic pathogenesis and suggests that long standing metabolic alterations, such as hyperinsulinaemia and/or elevated free fatty acids, could play a major role in causing GH insufficiency in obese patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

In obesity the somatotrope response to either growth hormone-releasing hormone or arginine is inhibited by somatostatin or pirenzepine but not by glucose.

It is known that spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion is reduced in obesity. On the other hand, it has been recently reported that, in obese subjects, plasma GH levels did not change during a hyperglycemic clamp. To further study the sensitivity of somatotrope cells to inhibitory influences in obesity, we studied the effect of somatostatin, pirenzepine, or glucose on the GH response to GHRH or arginine in 32 obese patients and 30 controls. Basal GH levels were lower in obese than in normal subjects (1.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.7 micrograms/L, P < 0.05), while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were similar in both groups (137.3 +/- 13.2 vs. 138.8 +/- 12.2 micrograms/L). In obese as well as in control subjects pirenzepine abolished the GH response to either GHRH (AUC0-120: 43.7 +/- 9.6 vs. 258.3 +/- 59.9 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.04 and 113.0 +/- 75.0 vs. 870.5 +/- 255 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.01, respectively) or arginine (6.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 118.7 +/- 55.9 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05 and 47.7 +/- 7.3 vs. 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.01, respectively). Differently from pirenzepine, glucose blunted the GH response to either GHRH or arginine in control subjects (260.8 +/- 38.3 vs. 479.5 +/- 83.9 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.03 and 294.8 +/- 46.3 vs. 625.1 +/- 139.1 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05, respectively), but failed to modify it in obese patients (193.7 +/- 39.4 vs. 172.4 +/- 33.6 micrograms/L.h and 121.1 +/- 43.4 vs. 155.1 +/- 39.7 micrograms/L.h, respectively). On the other hand, somatostatin deeply blunted the GHRH-induced GH release in obese patients (58.5 +/- 25.4 vs. 548.7 +/- 196.6 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05) as well as in controls (181.4 +/- 44.4 vs. 759.7 +/- 46.6 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.04). In conclusion, our results show that, in obesity, the stimulated GH release is refractory to the inhibitory effect of glucose but not of pirenzepine, in spite of their likely common mechanism of action, i.e. increase of hypothalamic somatostatin release. Exogenous somatostatin is able to abolish GH secretion both in normal and obese subjects. These data suggest the existence of a peculiar inhability of hyperglycemia to trigger somatostatinergic release in obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effect of arginine and pyridostigmine on the GHRH-induced GH rise in obesity and Cushing's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to clarify the mechanisms underlying growth hormone (GH) hyposecretion in Cushing's syndrome (CS) and in obesity. We studied the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone and combined with arginine or pyridostigmine, two substances likely to inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin release. DESIGN: Three tests with GHRH alone (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min) and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg infused over 30 min) or pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally at -60 min) were performed 3 days apart and in random order in eight women with CS (five with ACTH-dependent and three with ACTH-independent hypercortisolism, age 18-56, BMI 26.1 +/- 1.5 Kg/m2) and 11 with OB (age 17-54, BMI 42.9 +/- 2.2 Kg/m2). Eleven normal women (age 23-50, BMI 21.9 +/- 0.3 Kg/m2) were studied as controls (C). MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH and IGF-I levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. The GH secretory responses were expressed either as absolute values (micrograms/L) or as areas under the curve (AUC, micrograms/L/h) calculated by trapezoidal integration. IGF-I concentrations were expressed as absolute values (micrograms/L) with reference to a pure recombinant IGF-I preparation. RESULTS: Basal GH levels in CS were similar to those registered in OB (mean +/- s.e.m. 0.7 +/- 0.1 vs 0.9 +/- 0.2 microgram/L) and lower than in C (3.4 +/- 0.5 microgram/L, P < 0.00001). On the other hand, IGF-I levels were similar in all groups. The GHRH-induced GH rise in CS was lower, though not significantly, to that observed in OB (AUC: 65.6 +/- 13.2 vs 192.5 +/- 61.7 microgram/L/h) and both GH responses were significantly lower than that of C (1029.9 +/- 98.0 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.00001). ARG enhanced the GHRH-induced GH release in CS (331.9 +/- 51.9 micrograms/L/h vs GHRH alone, P < 0.0001), OB (852.4 +/- 162.1 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0001) and C (3362.6 +/- 386.0 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0002). However, the GH response to GHRH plus ARG in CS was lower (P < 0.002) than that in OB which, in turn, was lower than that in C (P < 0.00001). Pyridostigmine significantly enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise in C (2808.5 +/- 221.2 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.00001) and, to a lesser extent, in OB (627.3 +/- 84.7 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0002) but not in CS (102.9 +/- 25.0 micrograms/L/h). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the GH releasable pool is reduced in obesity and, to an even greater extent, in Cushing's syndrome. The inability of pyridostigmine and arginine to restore a normal GH response to GHRH in these conditions makes the existence of a hypothalamic somatostatinergic hyperactivity unlikely.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Effects of direct and indirect acetylcholine receptor agonists on growth hormone secretion in humans.

Cholinergic pathways in the central nervous system positively influence growth hormone (GH) secretion. In fact pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion while, conversely, pirenzepine, an antagonist of muscarinic M1 receptors, inhibits the GH response to GHRH and to other physiological and pharmacological stimuli. The effect of the cholinergic system on GH secretion probably takes place via inhibition of the release of endogenous somatostatin. In this study in 36 normal adults (26 males and 10 females, age 22-35 years) we compared the effects of three cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine, 120 mg p.o., n = 19; neostigmine, 10 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6; physostigmine, 12.5 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6) and bethanechol, a direct muscarinic receptor agonist that is mainly active on muscarinic M3 receptors (25 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 5), on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.)-stimulated GH secretion. Pyridostigmine, neostigmine and physostigmine induced a significant GH increase (peak vs. basal levels, mean +/- S.E.: 10.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 13.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.004; and 14.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.025;, respectively). These drugs also induced a similar potentiation of the GH response to GHRH (peak: 48.3 +/- 5.6 vs. 16.2 +/- 2.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 49.2 +/- 2.2 vs. 19.9 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.006; and 76.9 +/- 12.4 vs. 18.1 +/- 5.3 micrograms/l, P = 0.001, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Interaction of free fatty acids and arginine on growth hormone secretion in man.

We studied the interaction between free fatty acids (FFAs) and arginine (ARG) on basal and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in 14 normal subjects. Compared with placebo, ARG induced a significant increase of GH secretion (334.0 +/- 157.5 v 36.9 +/- 27.6 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). The increased levels of FFAs (1.9 +/- 0.4 mEq/L), obtained by the infusion of a lipid-heparin emulsion, abolished the effect of ARG (55.8 +/- 45.6 v 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). GHRH-induced GH secretion was potentiated by ARG (2,009.9 +/- 463.2 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .05) and suppressed by lipid-heparin infusion (106.2 +/- 28.3 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). Moreover, the lipid-heparin infusion inhibited the potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH increase (527.9 +/- 113.6 v 2,009.9 +/- 463.2 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). These results confirm the strong inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion, showing that they are even able to inhibit the potentiating effect of ARG on the GH response to GHRH. Since ARG likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, the inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion could take place directly at the pituitary level and/or at the hypothalamic level, counteracting the effect of ARG.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Repetitive GHRH administration fails to increase the response to GHRH in obese subjects. Evidence for a somatotrope defect in obesity?

Spontaneous GH secretion as well as GH response to several stimuli including GHRH have been shown to be reduced in obesity. To clarify the pathogenesis underlying these alterations, in six obese patients (3 males and 3 females, age 20-44 yrs, BMI = 42.1 +/- 2.2) on unrestricted diet we studied the effect of 8 day GHRH pretreatment (1 micrograms/kg iv each day) on the acute somatotropic response to the neurohormone administered both alone and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv infused from 0 to 30 min) which likely inhibits the release of hypothalamic somatostatin. Before treatment the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 231.9 +/- 106.4 micrograms/l/h) was potentiated (p < 0.001) by ARG (932.6 +/- 166.2 micrograms/l/h). However, the GH responses to the neurohormone both alone and combined with ARG were lower (p < 0.02 and 0.002, respectively) than in normals (712.4 +/- 111.6 and 2608.3 +/- 453.2 micrograms/l/h, respectively). After repetitive GHRH administration, in obese subjects baseline GH and IGF-I levels were unchanged. Also the GH responses to GHRH both alone (217.3 +/- 68.1 micrograms/l/h) and combined with ARG (756.3 +/- 202.9 micrograms/l/h) were not modified. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the failure of GHRH pretreatment to improve the somatotrope hyporesponsiveness to GHRH both alone and combined with ARG suggesting the existence of a somatotropic defect in obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Evidence against depletion of the growth hormone (GH)-releasable pool in human primary hypothyroidism: studies with GH-releasing hormone, pyridostigmine, and arginine.

We investigated whether the impaired GH secretion of hypothyroid patients could be due to an increase in hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone. Twenty-four patients with primary hypothyroidism [20 females and 4 males; mean age (+/- SE), 47.5 +/- 2.7 yr] and 20 normal subjects (17 females and 3 males; age, 47.6 +/- 3.0 yr) were studied. In the first group of 12 hypothyroid patients, administration of pyridostigmine, a cholinergic agonist drug (120 mg, orally, at -60 min), notably increased GH responses to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg, iv, at 0 min; peak GH levels for pyridostigmine plus GHRH vs. placebo plus GHRH, 16.6 +/- 4.9 vs. 6.0 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L; P < 0.01). The GH responses to pyridostigmine plus GHRH, however, were considerably lower than those in 10 normal subjects (peak GH levels, 53.0 +/- 3.5 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). In the second group of 12 hypothyroid patients, arginine infusion (30 g, iv, from 0-30 min) markedly increased the GH responses induced by GHRH administration (1 microgram/kg, iv, at 0 min; peak GH levels for arginine plus GHRH vs. placebo plus GHRH, 30.6 +/- 4.7 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). However, GH release after GHRH plus arginine was greater in 10 normal subjects than in the hypothyroid patients (peak GH levels, 50.9 +/- 5.3 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). Pyridostigmine and arginine inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin tone. The stimulatory effect of both agents on GHRH-induced GH release indicates that reduced GH secretion in hypothyroidism can be reversed to a considerable extent by inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone. The relatively greater potency of arginine compared to pyridostigmine suggests that hypothyroid patients may have an impairment of the cholinergic pathways. Furthermore, these data show that hypothyroid patients have a somatotrope secretory capacity much greater than previously thought.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of the potentiating effect of pyridostigmine, arginine and propranolol on the GHRH-induced GH release in short children.

The effect of pyridostigmine (60 mg orally), arginine (0.5 g/kg iv) and propranolol (PROP, 40 mg orally) on GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv)-induced GH release was studied in seven short children. Pyridostigmine and arginine induced a similar potentiating effect on GHRH-induced GH rise (Peak, mean +/- SEM: 56.9 +/- 12.8 and 48.6 +/- 8.5 micrograms/L, respectively vs 12.3 +/- 1.6 micrograms/L; p < 0.05). Combination of GHRH with propranolol induced an increase of GH that was significant only with regard to peak (28.9 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L) but not to AUC. However, GH rises observed after GHRH combined with PD or ARG did not significantly differ from that recorded after coadministration of GHRH and PROP both for peak and AUC. Our results confirm that pyridostigmine and arginine have a striking potentiating effect on the GHRH-induced GH rise in children and show that the tests with GHRH + PD and GH + H + ARG are ore reliable than that with GHRH + PROP to explore the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Arginine abolishes the inhibitory effect of glucose on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in man.

Acute hyperglycemia inhibits the growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), likely acting by stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release. The aim of our study was to verify whether arginine ([Arg] 30 g intravenously [IV] in 30 minutes), a well-known GH secretagogue likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, counteracts the inhibitory effect of oral glucose (OG) administration (100 mg orally) on the GH response to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg IV bolus) in seven normal subjects (aged 20 to 30 years). The GH response to GHRH (peak, 11.6 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L) was inhibited by previous OG load (peak, 7.4 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L; P less than .02 v GHRH alone) and potentiated by Arg coadministration (peak, 36.2 +/- 8.8 micrograms/L; P less than .03 v GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of Arg on the GHRH-induced GH increase was unaffected by previous OG load (peak, 30.4 +/- 6.9 micrograms/L). In conclusion, our results show that Arg abolishes the inhibitory effect of OG administration on the GHRH-induced GH response in man. These data, although indirect, suggest that both acute hyperglycemia and Arg act at the hypothalamic level, stimulating and inhibiting, respectively, the release of somatostatin.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity.

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Arginine reinstates the somatotrope responsiveness to intermittent growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in normal adults.

It is well known that in normal adults the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is inhibited by previous administration of the neurohormone. In 7 healthy volunteers (age 20-34 years) we studied the GH responses to two consecutive GHRH boluses (1 microgram/kg i.v. every 120 min) alone or coadministered with arginine (30 g i.v. over 30 min). The GH response to the first GHRH bolus (area under the curve, mean +/- SEM: 506.3 +/- 35.1 micrograms/l/h) was higher (p = 0.0001) than that to the second one (87.1 +/- 14.6 micrograms/l/h). The latter response was clearly increased (p = 0.0001) by coadministering arginine (980.5 +/- 257.5 micrograms/l/h). When every GHRH bolus was combined with arginine a marked potentiation of GH response to both boluses was found. However, the second combined administration of arginine and GHRH induced a GH increase which was lower compared to the first one (p = 0.016). In conclusion, our results show that arginine potentiates the GHRH-induced GH secretion preventing the lessening of somatotrope responsiveness to the neurohormone alone. As there is evidence that this phenomenon is due to an enhanced somatostatin release, these findings give further evidence of a somatostatin-suppressing effect of arginine.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Intranasal administration of neostigmine potentiates both intravenous and intranasal growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH release in short children.

Administration of cholinergic agonists increases both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion, probably acting via inhibition of endogenous somatostatin release. The aim of our study was to verify in two groups of children with idiopathic short stature the effect of intranasal administration of neostigmine (inNS; 3 mg), a cholinesterase inhibitor, on basal GH levels as well as on the somatotroph response to GHRH when the peptide was administered either iv (ivGHRH; 1 microgram/kg) or intranasally (inGHRH; 10 micrograms/kg). In group A (n = 6; age, 10.6-16.0 yr) inNS induced a significant GH increase [inNS vs. saline, area under the curve (AUC; mean +/- SEM), 263.7 +/- 60.2 vs. 73.8 +/- 3.1 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03] and potentiated the somatotroph response to ivGHRH (inNS with ivGHRH vs. ivGHRH, 1316 +/- 183.0 vs. 644.9 +/- 154.5 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03). In group B (n = 6; age, 11.5-15.9 yr) ivGHRH induced a GH rise clearly higher than that induced by inGHRH (604.2 +/- 154.3 vs. 137.1 +/- 28.2 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.03). Administration of inNS induced a GH rise similar to that occurring after inGHRH (AUC, 239.2 +/- 69.5 micrograms/L.h) and markedly increased the inGHRH-induced GH response (482.4 +/- 103.6 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.05 and 0.03 vs. inNS and inGHRH, respectively), so that it overlapped with that induced by ivGHRH alone. In conclusion, cholinergic agonists such as neostigmine are able to increase both basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion in short children even when given intranasally. Combined intranasal administration of neostigmine and GHRH (10 micrograms/kg) is able to induce a GH rise similar to that induced by ivGHRH alone (1 microgram/kg), suggesting the potential usefulness of this combination cocktail and route of administration for the treatment of short stature.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1990

A new test for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency due to primary pituitary impairment: combined administration of pyridostigmine and growth hormone-releasing hormone.

The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is currently based on failure to increase plasma GH levels to an arbitrary cutoff point of 7 or 10 micrograms/l in response to two provocative stimuli. False negative responses to these tests, however, frequently occur thus reducing their diagnostic reliability. The aim of this study was to assess a combination of pyridostigmine (PD) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (60 mg oral PD 60 min before 1 microgram/Kg GHRH iv) as a reliable test probing pituitary somatotropic function. In fact PD, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, strikingly potentiates GH response to GHRH likely by inhibiting somatostatin release. The combination PD + GHRH was tested in normal children and adolescents (NS, n = 27) and in a large group of short children classified as having familial short stature (FSS, n = 24), constitutional growth delay (CGD, n = 34) and GH deficiency (organic, oGHD, n = 6; idiopathic, iGHD, n = 10). In all groups results obtained by PD + GHRH were compared with those obtained by testing with GHRH, clonidine (CLON) and PD alone and by studying spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion over 8 hours. Assuming 7 micrograms/l as minimum normal GH peak, a positive response occurred in only 18/24, 11/12 and 12/13 NS for GHRH, CLON, and PD, respectively. In contrast even assuming a minimum normal GH peak as high as 20 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH induced a positive response in 27/27 NS all having a nocturnal GH mean concentration (MC) greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. Therefore PD + GHRH test gave no false negative responses and this was true not only in NS but even in all FSS and CGD having a GH MC greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. On the other hand, PD + GHRH induced a negative GH response in all oGHD and in 8/10 iGHD patients. In the remaining two iGHD patients, PD + GHRH demonstrated a normal pituitary GH reserve in spite of a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l and low IGF-I level, thus pointing to a hypothalamic pathogenesis for the GHD. Considering FSS and CGD children having a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH showed a primary pituitary GH deficiency in 3/12 CGD with low plasma IGF-I levels. In conclusion, in slowly growing children PD + GHRH test is the most reliable provocative test for the diagnosis of primary pituitary GH deficiency being capable to discriminate between an unequivocally normal and impaired somatotropic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Arginine potentiates the GHRH- but not the pyridostigmine-induced GH secretion in normal short children. Further evidence for a somatostatin suppressing effect of arginine.

To investigate the mechanism underlying the GH-releasing effect of arginine (ARG), we studied the interactions of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused i.v. over 30 min) with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) and with pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg orally) on GH secretion in 15 children and adolescents with familial short stature (5.1-15.4 years). In a group of eight subjects ARG induced a GH increase not statistically different to that observed after GHRH (peak, mean +/- SEM: 38.0 +/- 10.4 vs 64.0 +/- 14.4 mU/l). The combined administration of ARG and GHRH led to GH levels (101 +/- 15.2 mU/l) higher than those observed after GHRH (P less than 0.025) or ARG alone (P less than 0.001) and overlapping with those recorded after combined PD and GHRH administration (111 +/- 22.4 mU/l). In the other seven subjects, ARG and PD administration induced a similar GH response either when administered alone (25.2 +/- 13.6 and 27.8 +/- 4.0 mU/l, respectively) or in combination (33.8 +/- 5.4 mU/l). In conclusion, our results show that in children ARG administration potentiates GHRH- but not PD-induced GH increase. These findings agree with the hypothesis that the GH-releasing effect of both ARG and PD is mediated via the same mechanism, namely, by suppression of endogeneous somatostatin release. Combined administration of either ARG or PD with GHRH has a similar striking GH-releasing effect which is clearly higher than that of GHRH alone.

Adolescent↗