PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R First

Publications and source records attributed to M R First.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Strategies to minimize immunological and nonimmunological risk factors in the renal transplant population.

To improve long-term outcome after renal transplantation, attention should be placed on the tailored use of immunosuppressive regimens that have a more favorable impact on the immunological and nonimmunological risk profiles of an individual recipient. Tacrolimus is widely used for maintenance and rejection immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation, and compared with cyclosporine, its use in renal transplantation is associated with a reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection and a more positive effect on known cardiovascular risk factors. Recent experience with tacrolimus-based therapy has demonstrated an improved lipid profile and lower arterial blood pressure, with less requirement for lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medication compared with cyclosporine, without significantly increasing the risk of long-term insulin-dependent posttransplant diabetes mellitus. The advantageous effects of tacrolimus on both immunological and nonimmunological risk factors offer potential benefits for long-term graft function and survival.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Immediate allograft dysfunction due to atheroembolic disease.

Atheroembolic disease is a known cause of renal failure following invasive vascular procedures in patients with atherosclerosis. It is, however, not generally associated with renal transplant dysfunction. We report on a case of donor-transmitted atheroembolic renal disease, which led to an immediate loss of the transplant kidney in the operating room. Risk factors associated with this condition and methods to prevent this complication are discussed.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2001

Transmission of donor cancer into cardiothoracic transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The demand for transplantable organs exceeds donor supply. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) or other tumors are controversial donors, and the donor cancer transmission rates in cardiothoracic transplant recipients have not been determined. The Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry (IPITTR) was queried to define the risk of donor cancer transmission in cardiothoracic transplant recipients. METHODS: All heart, lung, or heart-lung recipients of organs from donors with a history of malignancy were reviewed. Donor and recipient demographics, histologic findings, and recurrence were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received 17 hearts, 3 lungs, and 2 heart-lung transplants from donors with known CNS or other malignancies. No malignancy transmissions were noted with astrocytomas (n = 3) or glioblastomas (n = 1), except a medulloblastoma that recurred at 6 months. The transmission rate for CNS tumors was 17% (1 of 6), and 1- and 3-year survivals were 67% and 50%, respectively. The most common non-CNS donor cancer was renal cell carcinoma (n = 5). Two renal cell cancer transmissions occurred, both when vascular extension was present. The most aggressive tumor transmission was choriocarcinoma (n = 2) and melanoma (n = 2). Two of 3 choriocarcinomas metastasized with 67% mortality, and both melanomas were transmitted and resulted in death. Other donor cancers included angiosarcoma (n = 2), cervical (n = 1), lung (n = 1), prostate (n = 1), and a liver adenocarcinoma. The transmission rate for all non-CNS groups was 56% (9 of 16) with a 2-year survival of 40%. CONCLUSIONS: The IPITTR experience indicates that tumor transmission is high (10 of 22, 45%) in cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Similar to intra-abdominal organ recipients in the IPITTR, (1) renal cell carcinomas without capsular invasion appear safe with no transmission, (2) vascular invasion in renal cell carcinoma appears to result in early tumor transmission, and (3) melanoma and choriocarcinoma have high rates of transmission with early and almost universal death.

Brain Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

Economic cost of expanded criteria donors in cadaveric renal transplantation: analysis of Medicare payments.

BACKGROUND: The use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) in cadaveric renal transplantation is increasing in the US. We assess the economic impact of the use of ECDs to the Medicare end stage renal disease program. METHODS: The United Nations for Organ Sharing renal transplant registry was merged to Medicare claims data for 42,868 cadaveric renal transplants performed between 1991-1996 using USRDS identifiers. Only recipients for whom Medicare was the primary payer were considered, leaving 34,534 transplants. An ECD was defined as (1) age < or =5 or > or =55 years, (2) nonheart-beating donors, donor history of (3) hypertension or (4) diabetes. High-risk recipients (HRR) were age >60 years, or a retransplant. Medicare payments from the pretransplant dialysis period were projected forward to provide a financial "breakeven point" with transplantation. RESULTS: There were 25,600 non-HRR transplants, with 5,718 (22%) using ECDs, and 8,934 HRR transplants, of which 2,200 (25%) used ECDs. The 5-year present value of payments for non-ECD/non-HRR donor/recipient pairings was $121,698 vs. $143,329 for ECD/non-HRR pairings (P<0.0001) and, similarly was $134,185 for non-ECD/HRR pairings vs. $165,716 for ECD/HRR pairings (P<0.0001). The break even point with hemodialysis ranged from 4.4 years for non-ECD/ non-HRR pairings to 13 years for the ECD/HRR combinations but was sensitive to small changes in graft survival. Transplantation was always less expensive than hemodialysis in the long run. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of ECDs on Medicare payments is most pronounced in high-risk recipients. Cadaveric renal transplantation is a cost-saving treatment strategy for the Medicare ESRD program regardless of recipient risk status or the use of ECDs.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

HPV subtype analysis in lower genital tract neoplasms of female renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Immunocompromised patients, such as female renal transplant recipients, have an increased incidence of neoplasms involving the lower genital tract (i.e., cervix, vagina, vulva). The relationship between lower genital tract neoplasms and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been established and high-risk oncogenic subtypes have been identified (HPV 16, 18, 45, and 56). The purpose of this study is to evaluate HPV subtypes present in lower genital tract neoplasms of post renal transplant women and compare HPV subtypes found in these patients with immunocompetent patients having similar neoplasms and normal immunocompetent controls. METHODS: Twenty specimens from lower genital tract neoplasms of 16 renal transplant patients, 13 specimens from 13 immunocompetent patients with similar histology, and 13 patients with normal lower genital tract histology were analyzed for the presence of HPV using polymerase chain reaction. HPV primers including the L1 (late) region consensus primers and primers specific for the HPV E6 (early) region for subtypes 6, 11, 16, and 18 were amplified with DNA from the above patient samples. RESULTS: Overall, HPV was detected in 21/46 specimens tested. Thirteen of the HPV-positive specimens were from transplant patients, and 8 were from immunocompetent patients (5 immunocompetent with disease and 3 normal patients). This difference in the total number of HPV-positive cases was statistically significant between the transplant and immunocompetent group (P = 0.02). Although no difference in HPV 6 and/or 11 was detected between the two groups, HPV subtypes 16 and/or 18 approached statistical significant difference (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk oncogenic HPV subtypes 16 and/or 18 were found at a higher rate in transplant patients compared with their immunocompetent counterparts. The combination of immunocompromise and increased HPV 16 and/or 18 positivity may place these patients at increased risk for aggressive lower genital tract neoplastic progression.

DNA, Viral↗
PubMed2000

Recommendations for bioequivalence testing of cyclosporine generics revisited.

The immunosuppressant cyclosporine is generally considered a critical-dose drug. The validity of standard criteria to establish bioequivalence between cyclosporine formulations has recently been challenged. Recommendations included establishment of individual bioequivalence rather than average bioequivalence, establishment of bioequivalence in transplant patients and in subgroups known to be poor absorbers, as well as long-term efficacy and safety studies in transplant patients. However, at the moment individual bioequivalence is a theoretical concept, the practical benefits of which have not statistically been proven. The proposed patient pharmacodynamic studies can be expected to require an unrealistically high number of subjects to achieve sufficient statistical power. It is well established that the common practice of blood-concentration-guided dosing of cyclosporine efficiently compensates for interindividual and intraindividual variability and allows for safely switching cyclosporine formulations as bioinequivalent as Sandimmune and Neoral. Recent studies comparing the generic cyclosporine formulation SangCya with Neoral, including individual bioequivalence, bioequivalence in transplant patients, and long-term safety after switching from Sandimmune to SangCya, confirmed that it was valid to conclude bioequivalence of both cyclosporine formulations based on standard average bioequivalence criteria. Present FDA guidelines for approving bioequivalence can be considered adequate and sufficient for generic cyclosporine formulations.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗
PubMed1999

Merkel's cell carcinoma in organ recipients: report of 41 cases.

In the general population Merkel's cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. More than 600 cases have been reported. MCC seems to be common in transplant recipients, with 41 cases being reported to the Cincinnati Transplant Tumor Registry, and another 11 in the transplant literature. In the general population, it is a disease of older adults, with only 51% of cases occurring below the age of 50 years. In transplant patients, the mean age at diagnosis was 53 (range 33-78) years, and 29% of recipients were <50 years old. The tumor appeared from 5 to 286 (mean 91.5) months after the transplant. Of 44 lesions that occurred in 41 patients, the distribution was similar to that seen in the general population, with 36% occurring on the head and neck, 32% on the upper extremities, 16% on the trunk, 9% at unknown sites, and 7% on the lower extremities. Twenty of the patients (49%) had 22 other malignancies, the great majority of which (91%) were other skin cancers. Treatment depended on the stage of the disease and included wide surgical excision, radical lymph node dissection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. In transplant patients, MCC probably proved to be more aggressive than in the general population in that 68% of patients developed lymph node metastases and 56% died of their malignancies. Furthermore, one third of surviving patients still have active cancers from which they may die. Also, follow-up of survivors has been relatively short, with a mean of only 18 (range 0-135) months.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Evaluation of pre- and posttransplant donor-specific transfusion/cyclosporine A in non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant recipients. Cooperative Clinical Trials in Transplantation Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of donor specific transfusion (DST) have become controversial in the cyclosporine era. This study was performed to evaluate the potential benefits of a new protocol for administering DSTs in the perioperative period. METHODS: Non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized prospectively to control or to receive a DST 24 hr before transplant and 7-10 days posttransplant. All patients received similar immunosuppression according to protocol. RESULTS: The protocol had 212 evaluable patients (115 transfused and 97 control). There were no differences in 1- and 2-year graft and patient survival, causes of graft failure, incidence and types of infection, repeat hospitalization, or the ability to withdraw steroids. Immunological hyporesponsiveness (by mixed lymphocyte culture) occurred more frequently in transfused patients (18%) than controls (3%) (P = 0.04). Blood stored for > or =3 days was associated with fewer early rejections than blood stored < or =2 days. Overall, class II antigen mismatches were associated with more rejection episodes than class I antigen mismatches. However, transfused patients, but not control patients, with more class I antigen mismatches were more likely to have rejections. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of DSTs by the method described had no practical influence on patient or graft survival for up to 2 years. However, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was more common in transfused patients (18 vs. 3%). Longer follow-up will be needed to determine whether DST will be associated with long-term benefit.

Blood Preservation↗
PubMed1999

Recurrent and de novo glomerular disease after renal transplantation: a report from Renal Allograft Disease Registry (RADR).

INTRODUCTION: Short-term and long-term results of renal transplantation have improved over the past 15 years. However, there has been no change in the prevalence of recurrent and de novo diseases. A retrospective study was initiated through the Renal Allograft Disease Registry, to evaluate the prevalence and impact of recurrent and de novo diseases after transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1987 to December 1996, a total of 4913 renal transplants were performed on adults at the Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Cincinnati, University of California at San Francisco, University of Louisville, University of Washington, Seattle, and Washington University School of Medicine. The patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. A total of 167 (3.4%) cases of recurrent and de novo disease were diagnosed by renal biopsy. These patients were compared with other patients who did not have recurrent and de novo disease (n=4746). There were more men (67.7% vs. 59.8%, P<0.035) and a higher number of re-transplants (17% vs. 11.5%, P<0.005) in the recurrent and de novo disease group. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent and de novo disease according to the transplant type (living related donor vs. cadaver, P=NS). Other demographic findings were not significantly different. Common forms of glomerulonephritis seen were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 57; immunoglobulin A nephritis, 22; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (GN), 18; and membranous nephropathy, 16. Other diagnoses include: diabetic nephropathy, 19; immune complex GN, 12; crescentic GN (vasculitis), 6; hemolytic uremic syndrome-thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (HUS/TTP), 8; systemic lupus erythematosus, 3; Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, 2; oxalosis, 2; and miscellaneous, 2. The diagnosis of recurrent and de novo disease was made after a mean period of 678 days after the transplant. During the follow-up period, there were significantly more graft failures in the recurrent disease group, 55% vs. 25%, P<0.001. The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4, and 5-year kidney survival rates for patients with recurrent and de novo disease was 86.5%, 78.5%, 65%, 47.7%, and 39.8%. The corresponding survival rates for patients without recurrent and de novo disease were 85.2%, 81.2%, 76.5%, 72%, and 67.6%, respectively (Log-rank test, P<0.0001). The median kidney survival rate for patients with and without recurrent and de novo disease was 1360 vs. 3382 days (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model for graft failure was performed to identify various risk factors. Cadaveric transplants, prolonged cold ischemia time, elevated panel reactive antibody, and recurrent disease were identified as risk factors for allograft failure. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for graft failure because of recurrent and de novo disease was 1.9 (1.57-2.40), P<0.0001. The relative risk for graft failure because of posttransplant FSGS was 2.25 (1.6-3.1), P<0.0001, for membranoprolifera. tive glomerulonephritis was 2.37 (1.3-4.2), P<0.003, and for HUS/TTP was 5.36 (2.2-12.9), P<0.0002. There was higher graft failure (64.9%) and shorter half-life (1244 days) in patients with recurrent FSGS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, recurrent and de novo disease are associated with poorer long-term survival, and the relative risk of allograft loss is double. Significant impact on graft survival was seen with recurrent and de novo FSGS, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and HUS/TTP.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A blinded retrospective analysis of renal allograft pathology using the Banff schema: implications for clinical management.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether diagnoses established through the Banff schema for evaluation of renal allograft pathology have implications for clinical management, compared with diagnoses established using descriptive terminology. METHODS: All patients included in this study had mild to severe allograft rejection diagnosed, and, as part of a therapeutic protocol, they received OKT3 as primary anti-rejection therapy. We conducted a retrospective review of their renal allograft biopsy specimens and reclassified them, using the Banff schema, without knowledge of clinical information, laboratory data, or previous biopsy interpretation. Although there is no strict correspondence between descriptive diagnostic terminology and the criteria used in the Banff schema, for the purpose of comparisons, the following approximation was used: mild and mild to moderate rejection=Banff borderline and Banff grade 1, moderate and moderate to severe rejection=Banff grades 2A and 2B, and severe rejection=Banff grade 3. The diagnosis was considered concordant when the diagnosis by descriptive terminology and Banff grading were within the adopted approximation. RESULTS: Of 96 biopsies specimens with mild to severe allograft rejection, 10 were insufficient for diagnosis, and three had changes of chronic allograft rejection. Of the remaining 83 biopsy specimens, 34 (41%) were concordant in interpretation of rejection grades, whereas 49 (59%) were discrepant. The greatest degree of concordance was in grades 2A (66.7%, 18 of 27) and 2B (64.7% 11 of 17), and the lowest was in the borderline category (11.8%, 2 of 17). The greatest degree of discrepancy was in normal and grade 3 (100%, 3 of 3 and 2 of 2, respectively), and the lowest was in grade 2A (33.3%, 9 of 27). Although primary anti-rejection therapy with OKT3 resulted in a high reversal rate of rejection (98%), there were 5 deaths, 12 graft loses, six episodes of serious infections, and three malignancies in this group of patients during a mean follow-up period of approximately 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: Because patients with borderline changes and grades 1 and 2A rejection may be treated differently from patients with higher grades (2B and 3), the use of the Banff schema may allow for better adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy in response to specific grades of acute allograft rejection and may result in decreased complications of immunosuppressive therapy.

Graft Rejection↗
PubMed1999

The evaluation of the safety and tolerability of two formulations of cyclosporine: neoral and sandimmune. A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoral, a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, was approved for use in the United States in 1995. Many studies comparing Neoral and Sandimmune have been conducted, and although most state that Neoral is the superior cyclosporine formulation, results have failed to conclusively demonstrate this claim. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of Neoral and Sandimmune. METHODS: Publications comparing the use of Neoral and Sandimmune were reviewed for demographic variables, adverse events, rejection incidence, graft losses, and serum creatinine. Neoral and Sandimmune were compared in all patients and in the following subgroups: (1) age (adult or pediatric), (2) transplant type (kidney, liver, or heart), (3) indication (de novo or stable), and (4) study design (randomized prospective trials versus nonrandomized, blinded versus open-labeled studies). RESULTS: The rate of graft loss was similar when comparing Neoral and Sandimmune in all analyses. The incidence of rejection was lower in Neoral-treated de novo renal, liver, and cardiac transplants (P<0.05). There were significantly more adverse events in Sandimmune-treated de novo liver transplants than Neoral-treated de novo liver transplants (P<0.00001). When considering only randomized prospective trials, the incidence of rejection was lower in Neoral-treated de novo and stable patients (P<0.05). However, there were more adverse events in Neoral-treated stable patients (P<0.00001). When considering only blinded studies, there were more adverse events in Neoral-treated patients (P<0.05), whereas in open-labeled studies there was no difference in adverse events comparing Neoral and Sandimmune (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Considering all published trials, the data seem to indicate that Neoral therapy is preferred because of a lower rejection incidence, with a trend toward less adverse events. However, when limiting the analysis to only randomized prospective trials, and specifically assessing blinded studies, the data become less clear. Neoral use was associated with more adverse events in blinded studies, and Sandimmune use was associated with more adverse events in open-labeled studies. Careful individual consideration must be given in choosing the best possible cyclosporine formulation.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗