PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Forrest

Publications and source records attributed to M R Forrest.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The effects of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin on the tone of human saphenous vein.

Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCL-Hb), when infused into animals, causes vasoconstriction thought to be caused by nitric oxide (NO) binding by the hemoglobin molecule. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether DCL-Hb causes vasoconstriction in human saphenous vein taken from patients undergoing myocardial revascularization and whether NO scavenging is the mechanism. The direct effect of DCL-Hb on saphenous vein tone was tested by adding increasing concentrations (10(-8) to 10(-5)M) of the drug. In an additional series of experiments, the influence of DCL-Hb on the dilator response to endothelial dependent and independent vasodilators was tested. This was achieved by attempting either to reverse the effects of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, or S-nitrosylglutathione with prior incubation with DCL-Hb or to inhibit the dilator response in vessels preconstricted with 10(-6)M norepinephrine. There was no effect of DCL-Hb alone on saphenous vein tone. DCL-Hb significantly reduced vasodilatation with all vasodilators (P < 0.05). After maximal relaxation with sodium nitroprusside and s-nitrosylglutathione, there was significant vasoconstriction with DCL-Hb at concentrations larger than 10(-6)M, (P < 0.05). The authors conclude that DCL-Hb does not constrict human saphenous vein but can affect vessel tone by reversal of the effect of endogenously or exogenously released NO.

Acetylcholine↗

Protecting hearing in a military environment.

In the Army, as in civil industry, there are many noise sources where the noise can not be reduced to safe levels except by use of hearing protectors, such as ear plugs, ear muffs or noise-excluding helmets. This paper shows how the effectiveness of hearing protectors can be determined for both continuous and impulse (gunfire) noise. It is shown that the results are in most cases in agreement with results for the real-ear attenuation at threshold method; the reasons for the exceptions are discussed. Hearing protection is often unpopular with users; reasons for this include discomfort, difficulty in speech communication, and incompatibility with other headgear. The degree of protection in practical usage is often much less than that measured in the laboratory. Possible solutions to these problems are described.

Ear Protective Devices↗