PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Gecht

Publications and source records attributed to M R Gecht.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

What happens to patients who teach?

BACKGROUND: Over the last 35 years, the use of lay people as teaching patients has evolved from novel to routine. PURPOSE: Although many studies have examined the effectiveness, reliability, and validity of using trained patients to evaluate medical students and residents, little is known about the effect on patients of being teachers. This study addresses that question. METHODS: Patients-in-training with actual musculoskeletal conditions completed 3 questionnaires: the SF-36 to evaluate perceived health status, the Chubon Life Situation Survey to examine perceived quality of life, and 3 visual analogue scales to assess the relationship with their personal physicians. One year later, the same questionnaires were readministered to patients who were actively teaching and those who had dropped out of training. RESULTS: In comparison to those who dropped out of training, patients who were actively teaching demonstrated a trend toward lower health status but higher quality of life; they also reported more satisfying relationships with their personal physicians. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that patient-teachers appear to benefit from teaching despite lowered health status. Similar to other studies, instructors' personal relationships with their respective physicians were positively influenced.

Case-Control Studies↗

A method for measuring interrater agreement on checklists.

A method for measuring interrater agreement on checklists is presented. This technique does not assign individual scores to raters, but computes a single agreement score from the concordance of their check mark configurations. An overall coefficient of agreement, called phi, is derived. The agreement coefficient that is expected by chance and the statistical significance of phi are determined by statistical simulation. Despite the dichotomous nature of the checklist agreement (raters either agree or disagree on items), we show that the binomial distribution does not provide a means for testing the statistical significance of phi. A medical education study is used to illustrate the phi methodology.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗

A survey of exercise beliefs and exercise habits among people with arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore a possible explanation for the problem of why few people exercise despite the positive health advantages, by examining the relationship between exercise beliefs and participation in exercise activities. METHODS: Eighty-one respondents aged 27-80 were recruited from 3 Chicago-area health care facilities to complete the study survey; 68 (84%) did so. Participants were asked about their participation in 6 types of exercise activities; they also reported their beliefs concerning their ability to exercise (self-efficacy for exercise), barriers to exercise, benefits of exercise, and the impact of exercise on their arthritis. RESULTS: Study results indicate that belief in the benefits of exercise and self-efficacy for exercise are associated with participation in exercise activities. Also, severity of disease differentiated exercisers from non-exercisers. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the importance of finding ways to strengthen belief in the benefits of exercise and self-efficacy for exercise in people with arthritis, particularly people with moderate to severe disease-related limitations.

Adult↗