PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Lansdown

Publications and source records attributed to M R Lansdown.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of inter-institutional surgical pathology review of thyroid cancer on patients' treatment and prognosis. METHODS: All cases referred to the Institute of Pathology at Leeds for thyroid pathology review between January 2001 and March 2003 were included. The referring pathologists reports were compared to those produced in the MDT meeting by the expert pathologist. Whenever there was disagreement a third expert opinion was sought who was blinded for both diagnoses. Effects on management and prognosis were evaluated if there was disagreement. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients reviewed, 12 (18%) had a different pathological diagnosis (kappa=0.33). Two had their diagnosis changed from malignant to benign and a further two from benign to malignant. Eight patients had their prognosis downgraded and four upgraded after histopathological review. Five patients had their management affected by the new pathological diagnosis. CONCLUSION: A second opinion of surgical pathology for thyroid tumours can result in major therapeutic and prognostic modifications. All cases of suspected thyroid cancers should be reviewed in a multidisciplinary meeting supported by pathologist with experience in thyroid pathology.

Diagnostic Errors↗
PubMed1994

Teaching laparoscopic surgery: the need for guidelines.

There is a risk that minimally invasive surgery will fall into disrepute unless adequate steps are taken to reassure the public. Some form of accreditation after a recognised training scheme would go a long way towards allaying these fears. The cost of training surgeons must be addressed. Adequate training will probably pay dividends in reduced litigation. The royal colleges should be responsible for maintaining standards of teaching on recognised courses, setting criteria for accreditation, and supervising a national audit of all laparoscopic procedures.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1993

Gastric cancer: a curable disease in Britain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether more vigorous efforts aimed at earlier diagnosis allied to radical surgical resection lead to improved survival of patients with gastric cancer. DESIGN: Prospective audit of all cases of gastric cancer treated during 1970-89. SETTING: Department of surgery, general hospital. SUBJECTS: 493 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative mortality, postoperative morbidity, and five year survival after radical potentially curative resection. RESULTS: 207 (42%) patients underwent potentially curative resection. The proportion of all patients in whom this was possible increased significantly (p < 0.01) from 31% in the first five year period to 53% in the last five year period. The proportion of patients who had early gastric cancer rose from 1% to 15% (p < 0.01) and stage I disease rose from 4% to 26% (p < 0.001). After potentially curative resection, mortality 30 days after operation was 6%. Operative mortality decreased from 9% in the 1970s to 5% in the 1980s. Likewise, the incidence of serious postoperative complications decreased from 33% in the 1970s to 17% in the 1980s (p < 0.01). Five year survival was 60% in patients who underwent curative resection, 98% in patients with early gastric cancer, and 93%, 69%, and 28% in stage I, II, and III disease respectively. By the late 1980s five year survival after operation was about 70%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that an increasing proportion of patients with gastric cancer could be diagnosed at a relatively early pathological stage when about two thirds are curable by means of radical surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗