PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Pincus

Publications and source records attributed to M R Pincus.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 1A2 by flavones: a molecular modeling study.

Cytochrome P450 1A2 metabolizes a number of important drugs, procarcinogens, and endogenous compounds. Several flavones, a class of phytochemicals consumed in the human diet, have been shown to differentially inhibit human P450 1A2-mediated methoxyresorufin demethylase. A molecular model of this P450 was constructed in order to elucidate the molecular basis of the P450-flavone interaction. Flavone and its 3,5,7-trihydroxy and 3,5,7-trimethoxy derivatives were docked into the active site to assess their mode of binding. The site is hydrophobic and includes several residues that hydrogen bond with substituents on the flavone nucleus. The binding interactions of these flavones in the modeled active side are consistent with their relative inhibitory potentials, namely 3,5,7-trihydroxylflavone > flavone > 3,5,7-trimethoxylflavone, toward P450 1A2-mediated methoxyresorufin demethylation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Molecular markers of carcinogenesis.

The protein products of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes play critical roles in the development of many cancers. The expression of a number of these proteins can be detected in extracellular fluids such as blood. This article reviews the literature on the application of methods for the detection of the proteins of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in the blood of humans with cancer or at risk for the development of cancer. The detection of these proteins in blood may be useful molecular markers of carcinogenesis that could play an important part in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention.

Antibodies↗

Molecular modeling of cytochrome P450 2B1: mode of membrane insertion and substrate specificity.

A molecular model of a mammalian membrane-bound cytochrome P450, rat P450 2B1, was constructed in order to elucidate its mode of attachment to the endoplasmic reticulum and the structural basis of substrate specificity. The model was primarily derived from the structure of P450BM-3, which as a class II P450 is the most functionally similar P450 of known structure. However, model development was also guided by the conserved core regions of P450cam and P450terp. To optimally align the P450 2B1 and P450BM-3 sequences, multiple alignment was performed using sequences of five P450s in the II family, followed by minor adjustments on the basis of secondary structure predictions. The resulting P450 2B1 homology model structure was refined by molecular dynamics heating, equilibration, simulation, and energy minimization. The model suggests that the F-G loop serves as both a hydrophobic membrane anchor and entrance channel for hydrophobic substrates from the membrane to the P450 active site. To assess the mode of substrate binding, benzphetamine, testosterone, and benzo[a]pyrene were docked into the active site. The hydrophobic substrate-binding pocket is consistent with the preferences of this P450 toward hydrophobic substrates, while the presence of an acidic Glu-105 in this pocket is consistent with the preference of this P450 for the cationic substrate benzphetamine. This model is thus consistent with several known experimental properties of this P450, such as membrane attachment and substrate selectivity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Conformation-dependent phosphorylation of p53.

Phosphorylation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein is known to modulate its functions. Using bacterially produced glutathione S-transferase (GST)-p53 fusion protein and baculovirus-expressed histidine-tagged p53 ((His)p53), we have determined human p53 phosphorylation by purified forms of jun-N-kinase (JNK), protein kinase A (PKA), and beta subunit of casein kinase II (CKIIbeta) as well as by kinases present in whole cell extracts (WCEs). We demonstrate that PKA is potent p53 kinase, albeit, in a conformation- and concentration-dependent manner, as concluded by comparing full-length with truncated forms of p53. We further demonstrate JNK interaction with GST-p53 and the ability of JNK to phosphorylate truncated forms of GST-p53 or full-length (His)p53. Dependence of phosphorylation on conformation of p53 is further supported by the finding that the wild-type form of p53 (p53wt) undergoes better phosphorylation by CKIIbeta and by WCE kinases than mutant forms of p53 at amino acid 249 (p53(249)) or 273 (p53(273)). Moreover, shifting the kinase reaction's temperature from 37 degrees C to 18 degrees C reduces the phosphorylation of mutant p53 to a greater extent than of p53wt. Comparing truncated forms of p53 revealed that the ability of CKIIbeta, PKA, or WCE kinases to phosphorylate p53 requires amino acids 97-155 within the DNA-binding domain region. Among three 20-aa peptides spanning this region we have identified residues 97-117 that increase p53 phosphorylation by CKIIbeta while inhibiting p53 phosphorylation by PKA or WCE kinases. The importance of this region is further supported by computer modeling studies, which demonstrated that mutant p53(249) exhibits significant changes to the conformation of p53 within amino acids 97-117. In summary, phosphorylation-related analysis of different p53 forms in vitro indicates that conformation of p53 is a key determinant in its availability as a substrate for different kinases, as for the phosphorylation pattern generated by the same kinase.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Selective inhibition of oncogenic ras-p21 in vivo by agents that block its interaction with jun-N-kinase (JNK) and jun proteins. Implications for the design of selective chemotherapeutic agents.

We have obtained evidence that oncogenic and activated normal ras-p21 proteins utilize overlapping but distinct signal transduction pathways. Recently, we found that ras-p21 binds to both jun and its kinase, jun kinase (JNK). We now present evidence that suggests that oncogenic but not normal activated p21 depends strongly on early activation of JNK/jun. This early activation most likely involves direct interaction between oncogenic p21 and JNK/jun because p21 peptides that blocked the binding of p21 to JNK and jun strongly inhibited oncogenic p21-induced oocyte maturation while they did not inhibit insulin-activated normal cellular p21-induced maturation. Very similar results were also obtained for a newly characterized specific inhibitor of JNK which blocked oncogenic but not normal activated p21-induced oocyte maturation. We also found that both jun and JNK strongly enhanced oncogenic p21-induced oocyte maturation while they inhibited insulin-activated normal p21-induced oocyte maturation. These results suggest that the peptides and JNK inhibitor may be useful agents in selectively blocking the effects of oncogenic but not normal p21 in cells.

Animals↗

Molecular dynamics on complexes of ras-p21 and its inhibitor protein, rap-1A, bound to the ras-binding domain of the raf-p74 protein: identification of effector domains in the raf protein.

We have computed the average structures for the ras-p21 protein and its strongly homologous inhibitor protein, rap-1A, bound to the ras-binding domain (RBD) of the raf protein, using molecular dynamics. Our purpose is to determine the differences in structure between these complexes that would result in no mitogenic activity of rap-1A-RBD but full activity of p21-RBD. We find that despite the similarities of the starting structures for both complexes, the average structures differ considerably, indicating that these two proteins do not interact in the same way with this vital target protein. p21 does not undergo major changes in conformation when bound to the RBD, while rap-1A undergoes significant changes in structure on binding to the RBD, especially in the critical region around residue 61. The p21 and rap-1A make substantially different contacts with the RBD. For example, the loop region from residues 55-71 of rap-1a makes extensive hydrogen-bond contacts with the RBD, while the same residues of p21 do not. Comparison of the structures of the RBD in both complexes reveals that it undergoes considerable changes in structure when its structure bond to p21 is compared with that bound to rap-1A. These changes in structure are due to displacements of regular structure (e.g., alpha-helices and beta-sheets) rather than to changes in the specific conformations of the segments themselves. Three regions of the RBD have been found to differ significantly from one another in the two complexes: the binding interface between the two proteins at residues 60 and 70, the region around residues 105-106, and 118-120. These regions may constitute effector domains of the RBD whose conformations determine whether or not mitogenic signal transduction will occur.

GTP-Binding Proteins↗

Inhibition of oncogenic and activated wild-type ras-p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation by peptides from the ras-binding domain of the raf-p74 protein, identified from molecular dynamics calculations.

In the preceding paper we found from molecular dynamics calculations that the structure of the ras-binding domain (RBD) of raf changes predominantly in three regions depending upon whether it binds to ras-p21 or to its inhibitor protein, rap-1A. These three regions of the RBD involve residues from the protein-protein interaction interface, e.g., between residues 60 and 72, residues 97-110, and 111-121. Since the rap-1A-RBD complex is inactive, these three regions are implicated in ras-p21-induced activation of raf. We have therefore co-microinjected peptides corresponding to these three regions, 62-76, 97-110, and 111-121, into oocytes with oncogenic p21 and microinjected them into oocytes incubated in in insulin, which activates normal p21. All three peptides, but not a control peptide, strongly inhibit both oncogenic p21- and insulin-induced oocyte maturation. These findings corroborate our conclusions from the theoretical results that these three regions constitute raf effector domains. Since the 97-110 peptide is the strongest inhibitor of oncogenic p21, while the 111-121 peptide is the strongest inhibitor of insulin-induced oocyte maturation, the possibility exists that oncogenic and activated normal p21 proteins interact differently with the RBD of raf.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Activation of c-Jun-NH2-kinase by UV irradiation is dependent on p21ras.

We have demonstrated previously that Jun-NH2-kinase (JNK) activation in vitro is potentiated by association with the p21(ras) protein. To determine if in vivo activation of JNK also depends on p21(ras), we have used M1311 cells that carry the cDNA for the neutralizing antibody to p21(ras), Y13-259, under a dexamethasone-inducible promoter. The ability of UV to activate JNK gradually decreased over a 4-day period of cell growth in dexamethasone. This decrease coincides with weaker transcriptional activation measured via gel shift and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase assays. Peptides corresponding to amino acids 96-110 on p21(ras), which were shown to block Ras-JNK association, inhibited UV-mediated JNK activation in mouse fibroblast 3T3-4A cells as well as in M1311 cells, further supporting the role of p21(ras) in UV-mediated JNK activation. Overall, the present studies provide in vivo confirmation of the role p21(ras) plays in JNK activation by UV irradiation.

3T3 Cells↗

Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the rap-1A protein from its homology to the ras-gene-encoded p21 protein.

rap-1A, an anti-oncogene-encoded protein, is a ras-p21-like protein whose sequence is over 80% homologous to p21 and which interacts with the same intracellular target proteins and is activated by the same mechanisms as p21, e.g., by binding GTP in place of GDP. Both interact with effector proteins in the same region, involving residues 32-47. However, activated rap-1A blocks the mitogenic signal transducing effects of p21. Optimal sequence alignment of p21 and rap-1A shows two insertions of rap-1A at ras positions 120 and 138. We have constructed the three-dimensional structure of rap-1A bound to GTP by using the energy-minimized three-dimensional structure of ras-p21 as the basis for the modeling using a stepwise procedure in which identical and homologous amino acid residues in rap-1A are assumed to adopt the same conformation as the corresponding residues in p21. Side-chain conformations for homologous and nonhomologous residues are generated in conformations that are as close as possible to those of the corresponding side chains in p21. The entire structure has been subjected to a nested series of energy minimizations. The final predicted structure has an overall backbone deviation of 0.7 A from that of ras-p21. The effector binding domains from residues 32-47 are identical in both proteins (except for different side chains of different residues at position 45). A major difference occurs in the insertion region at residue 120. This region is in the middle of another effector loop of the p21 protein involving residues 115-126. Differences in sequence and structure in this region may contribute to the differences in cellular functions of these two proteins.

Algorithms↗

Conformational effects in the p53 protein of mutations induced during chemical carcinogenesis: molecular dynamic and immunologic analyses.

The tumor suppressor gene p53 has been identified as the most frequent target of genetic alterations in human cancers. Vinyl chloride, a known human carcinogen that induces the rare sentinel neoplasm angiosarcoma of the liver, has been associated with specific A-->T transversions at the first base of codons 249 and 255 of the p53 gene. These mutations result in an Arg-->Trp amino acid substitution at residue 249 and an Ile-->Phe amino acid substitution at residue 255 in a highly conserved region in the DNA-binding core domain of the p53 protein. To determine the effects of these substitutions on the three-dimensional structure of the p53 protein, we have performed molecular dynamics calculations on this core domain of the wild-type and the Trp-249 and Phe-255 mutants to compute the average structures of each of the three forms. Comparisons of the computed average structures show that both mutants differ substantially from the wild-type structure in certain common, discrete regions. One of these regions (residues 204-217) contains the epitope for the monoclonal antibody PAb240, which is concealed in the wild-type structure but accessible in both mutant structures. In order to confirm this conformational shift, tumor tissue and serum from vinyl chloride-exposed individuals with angiosarcomas of the liver were examined by immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Individuals with tumors that contained the p53 mutations were found to have detectable mutant p53 protein in their tumor tissue and serum, whereas individuals with tumors without mutations and normal controls did not.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Computed three-dimensional structures for the ras-binding domain of the raf-p74 protein complexed with ras-p21 and with its suppressor protein, rap-1A.

The three-dimensional structures of the ras-p21 protein and its protein inhibitor, rap-1A, have been computed bound to the ras-binding domain, RBD (residues 55-131), of the raf-p74 protein, a critical target protein of ras-p21 in the ras-induced mitogenic signal transduction pathway. The coordinates of RBD have been reconstructed from the stereoview of an X-ray crystal structure of this domain bound to rap-1A and have been subjected to energy minimization. The energy-minimized structures of both ras-p21 and rap-1A, obtained in previous studies, have been docked against RBD, using the stereo figure of the RBD-rap-1A complex, based on a six-step procedure. The final energy-minimized structure of rap-1A-RBD is identical to the X-ray crystal structure. Comparison of the ras-p21- and rap-1A-RBD complexes reveals differences in the structures of effector domains of ras-p21 and rap-1a, including residues 32-47, a domain that directly interacts with RBD, 60-66, 96-110, involved in the interaction of ras-p21 with jun kinase (JNK) and jun protein, and 115-126, involved in the interaction of p21 with JNK. The structure of the RBD remained the same in both complexes with the exception of small deviations in its beta-2 binding loop (residues 63-71) and residues 89-91, also involved in binding to rap-1A. The results suggest that the binding of these two proteins to RBD may allow them to interact with other cellular target proteins such as JNK and jun.

GTP-Binding Proteins↗

Oncogenic amino acid substitutions in the inhibitory rap-1A protein cause it to adopt a ras-p21-like conformation as computed using molecular dynamics.

rap-1A is a membrane-bound G-protein in the ras superfamily that, like the ras-p21 protein, is activated by binding GTP in place of GDP. When activated, however, this protein inhibits the action of ras-p21, which is to induce mitogenesis in cells A chimeric protein containing RAS-p21 residues 1-65 and rap-1A residues 66-184 becomes ras-p21-like in its activity. The critical changes in sequence that result in this transformation are G26N, 127H, E30D, K31E, and E45V. All of these substitutions occur in or around a critical effector domain of p21 that is involved in interacting with GTPase activating protein (GAP), raf-p74 protein and inositol-3-hydroxy kinase. Using molecular dynamics, we have computed the average low energy structures for each of the three proteins, ras-p21, rap-1A and mutant rap1A, called rap-M, that contains these critical amino acid substitutions. We find that rap-M more closely superimposes on ras-p21 (rms deviation 1.9 A) than on wild-type rap-1A (rms deviation 3.4 A). In particular, the amino terminal domains (residues 3-59) of both RAS-p21 and rap-M are superimposable while they deviate when the average structures of these two proteins are superimposed on that of wild-type rap-1A. We have identified Pro 34 as a critical residue which may determine if the protein transforms cells or inhibits cell transformation. In addition, we have found that ras-p21 and rap-M proteins are superimposable in the region 96-110 except at Asp 105. The 96-110 domain of ras-p21 has been found to be involved in the binding of this protein to the nuclear transcription protein, jun and its kinase, jun kinase, JNK. Both segments differ in structure from that of the rap-1A segment at Asp 108, implicating this residue as also being important in determining the activity of the protein. Overall, the oncogenic substitutions introduced into the rap-1A protein cause it to adopt a conformation that is very similar to that of ras-p21 rather than wild-type rap-1A.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Effects of chemopreventive selenium compounds on Jun N-kinase activities.

Activation of Jun-N-kinases (JNK) is stimulated by diverse agents including UV-irradiation, heat shock, tumor necrosis factor and osmotic shock. In the present study we have elucidated the effect of the organoselenium chemopreventive agent 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)selenocyanate (p-XSC, on UV-mediated JNK activation. Using mouse fibroblasts as a model cell system we found that low concentrations (1-10 microM range) of p-XSC did not affect JNK activity, yet were capable of potentiating JNK activity when administered prior to UV-irradiation. While higher doses of p-XSC have minimal effect on JNK activation, when combined with UV, there is a dose-dependent decrease in JNK activation. Similar to its effects on JNK, p-XSC is a potent inducer of src-related tyrosine kinases. p-XSC mediated changes in JNK activation correlate with its ability to potentiate the association of JNK with p21ras, in a manner similar to that we have previously observed with GTP or sodium vanadate. That p-XSC can modulate JNK activities points to a possible mechanism by which it contributes to the cell's ability to cope with stress.

3T3 Cells↗

Complexes of p21RAS with JUN N-terminal kinase and JUN proteins.

RAS gene-encoded p21 protein has been found to increase in vitro phosphorylation of JUN via its kinase, JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK). This effect is mediated by increased phosphorylation of JNK in the presence of wild-type and oncogenic (Val-12) p21 protein in a dose-dependent manner. Oncogenic p21 protein is more potent in mediating this effect than its normal counterpart. Both normal and oncogenic p21 proteins bind to purified JNK and to JNK that is present in cell extracts from transformed fibroblasts and melanoma cells. Oncogenic and normal p21 proteins have also been found to bind to bacterially expressed JUN protein. This binding is dose dependent, enhanced by the presence of GTP, and depends on the presence of the first 89 amino acids of JUN (the delta domain), as it does not occur with v-jun. While the ability of both normal and oncogenic p21 proteins to bind JNK is strongly inhibited by a p21 peptide corresponding to aa 96-110, and more weakly inhibited by the p21 peptide corresponding to aa 115-126, p21-JUN interaction is inhibited by peptides corresponding to aa 96-110 and, to a lesser degree, by peptides corresponding to aa 35-47. The results suggest that the p21 protein interacts specifically with both JNK and JUN proteins.

3T3 Cells↗

Structural effects of the binding of GTP to the wild-type and oncogenic forms of the ras-gene-encoded p21 proteins.

Molecular dynamics calculations have been performed to determine the average structures of ras-gene-encoded p21 proteins bound to GTP, i.e., the normal (wild-type) protein and two oncogenic forms of this protein, the Val 12- and Leu 61-p21 proteins. We find that the average structures for all of these proteins exhibit low coordinate fluctuations (which are highest for the normal protein), indicating convergence to specific structures. From previous dynamics calculations of the average structures of these proteins bound to GDP, major regional differences were found among these proteins [Monaco et al. (1995), J. Protein Chem., in press]. We now find that the average structures of the oncogenic proteins are more similar to one another when the proteins are bound to GTP than when they are bound to GDP [Monaco et al. (1995), J. Protein Chem., in press]. However, they still differ in structure at specific amino acid residues rather than in whole regions, in contradistinction to the results found for the p21-GDP complexes. Two exceptions are the regions 25-32, in an alpha-helical region, and 97-110. The two oncogenic (Val 12- and Leu 61-) proteins have similar structures which differ significantly in the region of residues 97-110. This region has recently been identified as being critical in the interaction of p21 with kinase target proteins. The differences in structure between the oncogenic proteins suggest the existence of more than one oncogenic form of the p21 protein that can activate different signaling pathways.

Binding Sites↗

Comparison of the computed three-dimensional structures of oncogenic forms (bound to GDP) of the ras-gene-encoded p21 protein with the structure of the normal (non-transforming) wild-type protein.

The ras-oncogene-encoded p21 protein becomes oncogenic if amino acid substitutions occur at critical positions in the polypeptide chain. The most commonly found oncogenic forms contain Val in place of Gly 12 or Leu in place of Gln 61. To determine the effects of these substitutions on the three-dimensional structure of the whole p21 protein, we have performed molecular dynamics calculations on each of these three proteins bound to GDP and magnesium ion to compute the average structures of each of the three forms. Comparisons of the computed average structures shows that both oncogenic forms with Val 12 and Leu 61 differ substantially in structure from that of the wild type (containing Gly 12 and Gln 61) in discrete regions: residues 10-16, 32-47, 55-74, 85-89, 100-110, and 119-134. All of these regions occur in exposed loops, and several of them have already been found to be involved in the cellular functioning of the p21 protein. These regions have also previously been identified as the most flexible domains of the wild-type protein and have been bound to be the same ones that differ in conformation between transforming and nontransforming p21 mutant proteins neither of which binds nucleotide. The two oncogenic forms have similar conformations in their carboxyl-terminal domains, but differ in conformation at residues 32-47 and 55-74. The former region is known to be involved in the interaction with at least three downstream effector target proteins. Thus, differences in structure between the two oncogenic proteins may reflect different relative affinities of each oncogenic protein for each of these effector targets. The latter region, 55-74, is known to be a highly mobile segment of the protein. The results strongly suggest that critical oncogenic amino acid substitutions in the p21 protein cause changes in the structures of vital domains of this protein.

Cell Transformation, Neoplastic↗

Conformation of the transmembrane domain of the c-erbB-2 oncogene-encoded protein in its monomeric and dimeric states.

The human c-erbB-2 oncogene is homologous to the rat neu oncogene, both encoding transmembrane growth factor receptors. Overexpression and point mutations in the transmembrane domain of the encoded proteins in both cases have been implicated in cell transformation and carcinogenesis. In the case of the neu protein, it has been proposed that these effects are mediated by conformational preferences for an alpha-helix in the transmembrane domain, which facilitates receptor dimerization, an important step in the signal transduction process. To examine whether this is the case for c-erbB-2 as well, we have used conformational energy analysis to determine the preferred three-dimensional structures for the transmembrane domain of the c-erbB-2 protein from residues 650 to 668 with Val (nontransforming) and Glu (transforming) at position 659. The global minimum energy conformation for the Val-659 peptide from the normal, nontransforming protein was found to contain several bends, whereas the global minimum energy conformation for Glu-659 peptide from the mutant, transforming protein was found to be alpha-helical. Thus, the difference in conformational preferences for these transmembrane domains may explain the difference in transforming ability of these proteins. The presence of higher-energy alpha-helical conformations for the transmembrane domain from the normal Val-659 protein may provide an explanation for the presence of a transforming effect from overexpression of c-erbB-2. In addition, docking of the oncogenic sequences in their alpha-helical and bend conformations shows that the all-alpha-helical dimer is clearly favored energetically over the bend dimer.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Three-dimensional energy-minimized model of human type II "Smith" collagen microfibril.

A procedure is described for constructing a three-dimensional model of fibril-forming human type II collagen based on the "Smith" microfibril model. This model is a complex of five individual collagen triple-helical molecules, and is based on known structural parameters for collagen. Both experimental and theoretical data were used as constraints to guide the modeling. The resulting fibril model for type II collagen is in agreement with both physical and chemical characteristics produced by experimental staining patterns of type II fibrils. Some advantages of the type II model are that the stereochemistry of all the sidechain groups is accounted for, and specific atomic interactions can now be studied. This model is useful for: development of therapeutics for collagen related diseases; development of synthetic collagen tissues; design of chemical reagents (i.e., tanning agents) to treat collagen-related products; and study of the structural and functional aspects of type II collagen. Described is the procedure by which the Smith microfibril of type II collagen was developed using molecular modeling tools, validation of the model by comparison to electron-microscopic images of fibril staining patterns, and some applications of this microfibril model.

Amino Acid Sequence↗