PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Turnak

Publications and source records attributed to M R Turnak.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Antibiotic susceptibilities among recent clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from fifteen countries.

Between July 1998 and July 1999, 3,060 Haemophilus influenzae and 1,486 Moraxella catarrhalis strains were isolated in 31 centers in 15 countries in order to determine their antimicrobial susceptibilities and the presence of beta-lactamase production in Haemophilus influenzae. Overall 17.1% of the Haemophilus influenzae isolates were beta-lactamase positive, while more than 95% were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, loracarbef, cefuroxime, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. Eleven (0.3%) isolates were beta-lactamase positive and ampicillin resistant and 7 (0.2%) isolates were ciprofloxacin resistant. The minimum inhibitory concentrations for 90% of the isolates tested were lowest for ciprofloxacin (0.03) and highest for cefprozil (8) against Moraxella catarrhalis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2001

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis collected during 1999-2000 from 13 countries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine antimicrobial activity against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. METHODS: A central laboratory performed NCCLS susceptibility testing for all isolates and beta-lactamase and capsular serotype determinations for H. influenzae. RESULTS: A total of 2712 H. influenzae and 1079 M. catarrhalis were collected. H. influenzae susceptibilities were >90% for amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, loracarbef, cefprozil, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin and clarithromycin and were <80% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin. 19.3% were beta-lactamase positive. The most common serotype was type-b (5.6%); 86.1% were nontypeable. M. catarrhalis had MIC90 within therapeutic range for all antimicrobials except ampicillin. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of the study is that antimicrobials, except ampicillin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, remain good empiric choices against H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Assessment of the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to cefaclor and loracarbef in 13 countries.

Between July 1998 and July 1999, 2,644 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from 27 study centers in 13 countries and their susceptibilities to penicillin, cefaclor and loracarbef were determined by E-test" (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden). Overall, 96.3% of isolates were penicillin-susceptible (79.8%) or -intermediate (16.6%) (MIC, < or = 1 microg/ml). Rates of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolation varied widely and were highest in the study centers tested in New Zealand (10.9%), Canada (10.0%), Mexico (9.1%) and the United States (5.1%). Low rates of penicillin-resistance were found in the study centers tested in Russia (0%), Turkey (0%), Brazil (0.5%), Germany (0.6%), Philippines (1.6%), Italy (2.1%), United Kingdom (2.3%), Australia (3.0%) and Poland (3.1%). Using recently published NCCLS interpretative breakpoints (M100-S10, 2000), 87.2% (median) of all isolates tested were cefaclor-susceptible and 87.8% (median) of all isolates tested were loracarbef-susceptible. Of the penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae isolates, 99.5% were susceptible to both cefaclor and loracarbef. Susceptibility to cefaclor and loracarbef was also retained by 30.8% and 32.9% of penicillin-intermediate isolates, respectively. These findings are in contrast to recent publications reporting lower cefaclor and loracarbef activities using non-validated interpretative criteria. In conclusion, rates of penicillin resistance among recent clinical isolates of pneumococci remain low in many centers worldwide. Cefaclor and loracarbef demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against recent clinical isolates of penicillin-susceptible and many isolates of penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae.

Cefaclor↗
PubMed2000

Oral antimicrobial susceptibilities of Streptococcus pyogenes recently isolated in five countries.

Between July 1998 and July 1999 1050 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes were collected from 11 study centres in five countries. Isolates were shipped to a co-ordinating laboratory for NCCLS specified broth microdilution susceptibility testing for penicillin, cefaclor, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin and roxithromycin. All 1050 isolates of S. pyogenes tested were susceptible to penicillin (MIC < or = 0.12 microgram/ml) and cefaclor (MIC < or = 0.25 microgram/ml). Azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin resistance rates were 15.9%, 15.4% and 15.8%, respectively. MIC90S for penicillin, cefaclor, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, and roxithromycin were 0.015, 0.12, > 4, 8, > 1 and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively. Macrolide (erythromycin) resistance rates were highest in study centres in Italy (31.0%) and Spain (26.6%). Lower macrolide resistance rates were identified in study centres in Turkey (4.8%), France (3.8%), and Sweden (3.7%). In conclusion, the isolates of S. pyogenes tested were universally susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin and cefaclor, while resistance to macrolides was significant and ranged from 3.2% to 31%.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

Cefaclor af versus amoxycillin/clavulanate in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a randomised multicentre study.

Cefaclor and amoxycillin/clavulanate are active against Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Staphylococcus aureus--pathogens commonly associated with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). This randomised, parallel-group, single-blind, multicentre study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of 7-day treatment regimens of cefaclor AF (750 mg b.d. [n = 73]) and amoxycillin/clavulanate (875/125 mg b.d. [n = 72]) in AECB. A favourable clinical response was obtained in 95.9% of patients on cefaclor AF and 97.2% of patients on amoxycillin/clavulanate. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for improvement in clinical response measured by pulmonary peak expiratory flow (PPEF), or for common symptoms associated with AECB. Both agents were well tolerated, with no statistically significant differences in overall safety; however, nausea and vomiting, and abdominal pain, the most frequently occurring adverse events in the amoxycillin/clavulanate group, were not reported in the cefaclor group. In conclusion, cefaclor AF and amoxycillin/clavulanate have similar efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of AECB.

Adult↗