PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Weir

Publications and source records attributed to M R Weir.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Diabetes and hypertension: blood pressure control and consequences.

Diabetes and hypertension are the leading causes of end-stage renal disease in the Western world. Inadequate control of both systemic and glomerular capillary pressure in diabetics results in increasing hydraulic force and mechanical stretch on the glomeruli, with a subsequent increase in proteinuria and ultimately glomerulosclerosis. Therapeutic strategies that combine systemic and glomerular capillary pressure reduction result in reduced proteinuria and are ideal for preventing renal injury. Both experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated the importance of intensive control of blood pressure, preferably to systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or =130 mm Hg to delay progression of renal disease. In particular, drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) offer the advantage of consistently reducing glomerular capillary pressure and proteinuria relative to changes in systemic blood pressure. This combination of events is ideal for delaying progression of renal disease. However, the use of drugs that block the RAS is not a surrogate for maintaining tight control of blood pressure.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed1999

Low-dose combination therapy as first-line hypertension treatment for blacks and nonblacks.

To assess the efficacy and safety of bisoprolol/6.25-mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, and enalapril in black and nonblack patients, data from two comparative studies were pooled and subgroup analyses performed. Both studies had similar designs and included all three active treatments. The second study also included a placebo group. Subjects (n = 541) with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95-114 mmHg were titrated to achieve a diastolic blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg. The studies included 114 blacks and 427 nonblacks. Results of an intention-to-treat analysis of mean change from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment showed the following: 1) blood pressure was significantly lowered by all three active drugs compared with baseline or placebo; 2) in blacks, bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ resulted in significantly greater reductions of systolic and diastolic blood pressure than enalapril or placebo, but was not significantly different from amlodipine; 3) in nonblacks, bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ resulted in significantly greater reduction of diastolic blood pressure than amlodipine, enalapril, or placebo. The placebo-corrected change in blood pressure was greater for blacks than whites on the bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ combination, but this was not statistically significant. Bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ controlled diastolic blood pressure to < or = 90 mmHg in significantly more patients than enalapril or placebo in blacks and nonblacks. The difference in control rates was not significant versus amlodipine. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar between treatments; however, bisoprolol/6.25-mg HCTZ had a lower discontinuation rate due to lack of blood pressure control or adverse experiences in both blacks and nonblacks.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Seizures induced by theophylline and isoniazid in mice.

Isoniazid-induced seizures respond poorly to anticonvulsants but well to pyridoxine (Vitamin B6); theophylline produces difficult-to-treat seizures with substantial morbidity and mortality. Theophylline therapy depresses plasma pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP), the active metabolite of pyridoxine, suggesting that theophylline-induced seizures might be amenable to treatment with pyridoxine. Our study established the dose-response relationship for convulsions due to isoniazid and theophylline in mice and determined if pyridoxine antagonized such seizures. Female CD-1 outbred mice weighing 25 to 30 g were used. Clonic seizures had clonic activity lasting 5 sec; tonic seizures had loss of the righting reflex with tonic hindlimb extension. Groups of 10 mice received single doses of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 or 300 mg aminophylline/kg i.p. or 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 or 350 mg isoniazid/kg i.p. and were observed for seizures or death. Pyridoxine or saline with aminophylline or isoniazid were administered simultaneously. The LD50 for aminophylline was 266 mg/kg; for isoniazid it was 160 mg/kg. Doses of 150 mg aminophylline/kg or 100 mg isoniazid/kg did not induce seizures. Pyridoxine with aminophylline or isoniazid did not alter the frequency or time of onset of seizures or death. This was unexpected because pyridoxine antagonizes theophylline-induced seizures in mice and reverses isoniazid-induced seizures in humans. We found no evidence that PLP depletion in mice is a mechanism for seizures induced by isoniazid or aminophylline in a fashion similar to isoniazid in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Histologic grading of acute allograft rejection in pancreas needle biopsy: correlation to serum enzymes, glycemia, and response to immunosuppressive treatment.

BACKGROUND: Allograft rejection continues to be the most common cause of graft failure in technically successful pancreas transplants. Early diagnosis and treatment of rejection is essential for long-term graft survival. Pancreas graft biopsies are now used routinely for the diagnosis of acute allograft rejection. The correlation between clinical evidence of graft dysfunction (increased serum enzymes and glucose), severity of acute rejection on biopsy (rejection grade), and response to treatment has not been previously studied. METHODS: A total of 151 pancreas transplant needle biopsy specimens from 57 patients were evaluated. Statistical correlation was done between the histologic rejection grade (O-V) and the peak level of enzymes in serum, glycemia, type of antirejection treatment instituted, and response to treatment. Differentiation between grades was also evaluated statistically. RESULTS: Response to antirejection treatment was 25%, 40%, 88%, 78%, 50%, and 17% for grades O-V, respectively. The response for grades II and III was better than for grades 0-I and IV-V (P=0.0003 and 0.0008, respectively). The response to corticosteroids alone was 36%, 86%, 68%, and 0% for grades I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The response to antilymphocyte regimen was 50%, 89%, 85%, 71%, and 17% for grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Overall correlation between the mean levels of enzymes and rejection grade was seen; the increase of lipase was statistically significant (r=0.24, P=0.012). Amylase and lipase correlated very well with each other (r=0.84, P=0.0001). No correlation was found in the mean values of blood glucose with the serum enzyme increase and with severity of rejection. Hyperglycemia was present in 12 patients; this abnormality in patients with grades II-IV responded promptly to treatment, whereas in patients with grade V, hyperglycemia persisted despite antirejection treatment. Other causes of increased enzymes were found in patients with biopsy specimens showing no rejection (grades 0 and I, 43% and 31%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum enzymes, particularly lipase, correlate with the grade of acute rejection, but their lack of specificity precludes their use as sole markers of acute rejection. Glucose levels are not a sensitive marker for acute rejection. Rejection grades II and III are the most responsive to treatment, and a significant proportion of these cases respond to treatment with corticosteroids only. The higher rejection grades (IV and V) require treatment with antilymphocytic regimens, and their overall response to treatment is moderate to poor, respectively.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces the risk of acute rejection less in African-American than in Caucasian kidney recipients.

BACKGROUND: Multicenter clinical trials have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces the risk of acute rejection, but it is unknown whether African-Americans constitute a subgroup of recipients less likely to benefit from MMF. METHODS: This study compared the acute rejection rates within 6 months of kidney transplantation in MMF-treated transplant patients with those on azathioprine (AZA) at a single center. The study population consisted of 353 consecutive recipients of cadaver or living donor kidney transplants. African-Americans constituted 43% of the patients on AZA and 49% of the patients on MMF. Variables used in a Cox regression analysis included MMF immunosuppression, recipient race, type of transplant, delayed graft function, postoperative immune induction, average cyclosporine trough level, and HLA mismatch. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients on MMF experienced a biopsy-proven rejection episode than those treated with AZA (24% vs. 42%, respectively; relative risk [RR]=0.57, P=0.001). This decrease in risk was greater in Caucasian transplant recipients (MMF vs. AZA: 16% vs. 46%, RR=0.35, P < 0.001) than in African-American patients (32% vs. 36%, RR=0.88, P=0.6). Within each race stratum, the mean cyclosporine trough levels averaged over 2-week intervals were nearly identical for AZA- compared with MMF-treated patients. In the regression model, the effect of MMF on the incidence of rejection was again less in African-American than in Caucasian patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney recipients treated with MMF have a significantly lower risk of acute rejection within 6 months of transplantation than those given AZA. This reduction in risk is significantly less in African-American recipients than Caucasians.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Dose-related antihypertensive effects of irbesartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the angiotensin II receptor (AT1 subtype) antagonist irbesartan. The effect of irbesartan withdrawal and the effect of adding hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to irbesartan were also assessed. After a placebo lead-in phase, all patients were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind therapy with either placebo (n = 158) or irbesartan at doses of 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, or 300 mg (n = 731 total) orally once daily. Irbesartan reduced blood pressure in a dose-related manner. Reductions from baseline in trough seated diastolic blood pressure ranged from 7.5 mm Hg for 50 mg irbesartan to 11.6 mm Hg for 300 mg irbesartan. At week 8, statistically significant reductions over placebo were observed in trough seated blood pressure with all irbesartan doses > or = 50 mg. These reductions reached statistical significance versus placebo within 2 weeks with 100, 200, and 300 mg irbesartan. Plasma irbesartan concentrations correlated with dose. Angiotensin II and aldosterone levels generally showed dose-related changes, consistent with AT1 receptor blockade. In patients not controlled at 8 weeks, the addition of 12.5 mg HCTZ resulted in further dose-related reductions in blood pressure. Irbesartan demonstrated a placebo-like safety profile and no dose-related toxicity. Irbesartan, administered alone or in combination with HCTZ, was well tolerated. Withdrawal of irbesartan did not result in rebound hypertension or adverse events. Thus, once-daily irbesartan is both an effective and safe antihypertensive agent for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Nocturnal reduction of blood pressure and the antihypertensive response to a diuretic or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in obese hypertensive patients. TROPHY Study Group.

During a 12-week, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for the treatment of obesity-related hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring was performed both at baseline and at study completion in 124 patients. Patients were randomized to three groups: placebo, lisinopril (10, 20, or 40 mg/day), or HCTZ (12.5, 25, or 50 mg/day). All groups were matched with regard to sex, race, age, body mass index, and waist/hip ratio. The primary analysis of ABP data revealed that both lisinopril and HCTZ effectively lowered mean 24-h systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure compared with placebo, (mean change from baseline SBP/DBP: -12.0/-8.2, -10.6/-5.5, and -0.3/-0.5 mm Hg, respectively); however, lisinopril lowered DBP better than HCTZ (P < .05). Secondary analyses of groups revealed that men responded better to lisinopril than HCTZ (-11.9/-7.3 v -6.6/-3.5 mm Hg, respectively), whereas women responded well to both drugs. White patients responded better to lisinopril than HCTZ, whereas black patients showed a significant response to HCTZ only. Response to treatment was also influenced by patient classification of 24-h blood pressure profiles, ie, "dipper" or "nondipper." Overall, the majority of obese hypertensives were nondippers. Nondippers (n = 82) responded well to both drugs (-10.4/-6.9 v -12.5/-5.7 mm Hg, P < .05 v placebo), whereas dippers (n = 42) responded to lisinopril (-11.7/ -9.4 mm Hg, P < .05 v placebo and HCTZ), but not HCTZ (-5.6/-4.1 mm Hg, P = NS v placebo). Results of 24-h ABP data show that both lisinopril and HCTZ are effective therapies for obesity-related hypertension and that response to treatment is influenced by sex, race, and dipper/nondipper status.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The rationale for combination versus single-entity therapy in hypertension.

The rationale behind combination therapy relates to the fact that when two different classes of agents are combined, they may provide complementary, additive, or synergistic antihypertensive effects through different mechanisms. Lower doses of two drugs, which provide blood pressure reduction similar to higher doses of one drug, may enhance tolerability and improve compliance. Investigative efforts have been undertaken to explore fixed-dose combinations of drugs that do not include diuretics. The first nondiuretic fixed-dose combinations are an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-calcium antagonist combination or a beta-blocker-calcium antagonist combination. The rationale for an ACE inhibitor-calcium antagonist combination is based on the fact that both drugs reduce vasoconstriction through different mechanisms. The ACE inhibitor largely attenuates vasoconstriction through augmentation of vasodilatory kinins and reduction of the vasoconstrictive effect of angiotensin II, whereas the calcium antagonists, through attenuating the transmembrane flux of calcium, inhibit calcium-mediated electromechanical coupling in contractile tissue in response to numerous stimuli. Moreover, both classes of drugs facilitate salt and water excretion by the kidney through different mechanisms. The ACE inhibitor restores the renal-adrenal response to salt loading, whereas the calcium antagonist possesses intrinsic natriuretic properties through poorly described mechanisms of inhibiting renal tubular salt and water reabsorption. The combination of a beta-blocker and dihydropyridine calcium antagonist is logical due to the different antihypertensive mechanisms of these drugs without risk of cardiac conduction abnormalities. There is evidence in clinical trials that ACE inhibitors may offset one of the major side effects associated with calcium antagonist therapy: pedal edema. Although the studies are small and the observations subjective, there is consistent evidence that the combination may provide an opportunity to reduce the likelihood of this common clinical problem. There is also evidence of reduced calcium antagonist-associated constipation and headache with this type of drug combination, likely because lower doses of this agent are used in combination with ACE inhibitors. However, there is no published evidence that calcium antagonists reduce the cough associated with the ACE inhibitor.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1998

Renin status does not predict the anti-hypertensive response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in African-Americans. Trandolapril Multicenter Study Group.

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor trandolapril, a non-sulfhydryl prodrug which is hydrolysed into trandolaprilat, was studied in 322 hypertensives of African-American descent using a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel study design. Following 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo or 0.25 to 16 mg/day trandolapril, an analysis of drug effect on trough blood pressure (BP) stratified by age, gender, weight, pre-treatment plasma renin activity, and trandolaprilat concentration was performed. Two mg was the lowest effective trandolapril dose, whereas doses above 4 mg did not significantly reduce trough BP. Reduction in BP did not correlate with trough plasma trandolaprilat concentration. Pre-treatment plasma renin activity was not a reliable indicator of anti-hypertensive response, as similar reductions in BP occurred even in patients with the lowest renin levels. There were no observable differences based on age, gender or measurements of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. In conclusion, neither age, gender or plasma renin activity influenced anti-hypertensive response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in African-Americans.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Effects of an ACE inhibitor/calcium antagonist combination on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: The degree of proteinuria in patients with diabetes correlates strongly with both an increase in progression of nephropathy as well as cardiovascular events. Moreover, post hoc analyses of recent clinical trials support the concept that reductions of blood pressure and proteinuria correlate with a slowed progression of nephropathy. Both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists, (non-DHPCAs) reduce both arterial pressure and proteinuria in those with diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: The present randomized, open label, parallel group designed study tests the hypothesis that, at similar levels of blood pressure, the combination of an ACE inhibitor, trandolapril (T) with the non-DHPCA, verapamil (V) produces a greater reduction in proteinuria over either agent alone at one year. Thirty-seven participants, mean age 59.6 +/- 5.8 years, with nephropathy (baseline creatinine 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dl and proteinuria of 1342 +/- 284 mg/dl) secondary to type 2 diabetes completed the study. Doses of drug were titrated in each group over eight weeks to achieve a goal blood pressure of < 140/90 mm Hg. All participants were counseled to ingest a sodium diet of < 120 mEq/day. RESULTS: Proteinuria reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the T+V group compared to either T alone (-33 +/- 8%, T vs. -62 +/- 10%, T+V; P < 0.001) or V alone (-27 +/- 8%, V vs. -62 +/- 10%, T+V; P < 0.001). No significant differences in either glomerular filtration rate, arterial pressure, fasting blood glucose or urinary sodium excretion were noted at one year. The mean daily dose of the individual components of T+V (2.9 +/- 0.8 mg, T/219 +/- 21.1 mg V) was significantly lower than the dose of either T alone 5.5 +/- 1.1 mg/day (P < 0.01) or V alone 314.8 +/- 46.3 mg, given in two divided doses (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data support the concept that the combination of an ACE inhibitor with a non-DHPCA reduce proteinuria to a greater extent than either agent alone. This added antiproteinuric effect occurs at lower doses of each drug and is independent of further reductions in arterial pressure. These findings could have ramifications for slowing renal disease progression in patients with nephropathy from type 2 diabetes.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Antihypertensive drugs, dietary salt, and renal protection: how low should you go and with which therapy?

Although it is clear that hypertension accelerates the rate of progression of most forms of chronic renal disease, many unanswered questions remain concerning how to optimally preserve kidney function in patients with hypertension and renal insufficiency. The mechanisms by which hypertension accelerates progression of renal disease have been extensively studied in experimental models. Glomerular capillary hypertension, consequent to an increase in systemic blood pressure combined with a reduction in preglomerular resistance and/or an increase in postglomerular resistance, results in increased hydraulic stress to the glomerular capillary wall. This and other mechanisms result in the release of growth-promoting cytokines and soluble mediators of fibrosis that stimulate cellular proliferation and matrix accumulation, ultimately leading to glomerular sclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. Almost without exception, studies in animals demonstrate that blood pressure reduction reduces the rate of progression of experimental renal disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and, possibly, calcium antagonists may have a therapeutic advantage compared with other antihypertensive drugs in preventing kidney damage. This has been linked to both blood pressure-dependent and -independent actions. However, most experimental studies have failed to reduce blood pressure to a level sufficient to establish the clinical relevance of potential blood pressure-independent effects. Experimental studies comparing various types of antihypertensive drugs in which a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of approximately 92 mm Hg is achieved are necessary to determine whether clinically important differences in the effects of these drugs on the rate of progression of renal disease exist. Clinical experience with high blood pressure and kidney disease in humans suggests that the risk of developing hypertension-associated renal disease is a continuous variable across the entire range of systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Logically, optimal protection of kidney function may therefore be a continuous function of declining systemic blood pressure. Consistent with this view, recent clinical trials suggest that reducing MAP to 92 mm Hg, corresponding to a blood pressure reading of 125/75 mm Hg, provides more optimal stabilization of renal function in patients with nondiabetic proteinuric kidney disease (>1 g/d) compared with more conventional therapy with a blood pressure goal of 140/90 mm Hg (MAP 107 mm Hg). Clinical trials in patients with diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency also demonstrate the benefits of reducing blood pressure to approximately 95 mm Hg MAP. Dietary salt consumption may be another important variable affecting the rate of progression of renal disease due to both direct, salt-dependent effects on renal growth and the action of decreased salt intake to augment the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric properties of many drugs. The precise role of alterations in dietary salt consumption on progression of renal disease directly as well as on the effectiveness of various antihypertensive drugs has yet to be examined in clinical trials.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Low-dose combination treatment for hypertension versus single-drug treatment-bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine, enalapril, and placebo: combined analysis of comparative studies.

To assess the efficacy and safety of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg bisoprolol/6. 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), 2.5, 5, and 10 mg amlodipine; and 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg enalapril in subjects (n = 541) with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 114 mm Hg, data from two comparative studies were pooled. All drugs were titrated to a diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg or less. Both studies were double-blind, randomized, parallel dose escalation trials with similar designs and included three active treatments. The second study also had a placebo group. The mean change from baseline of systolic and diastolic blood pressure for placebo (n = 79) was -0. 1/-2.2 mm Hg; amlodipine (n = 154), -12.4/-10.3 mm Hg; enalapril (n = 155), -9.4/-8.2 mm Hg; and bisoprolol/HCTZ (n = 155), -14.0/-12.0. Overall efficacy analyses documented a statistically significant decrease in sitting diastolic blood pressure for bisoprolol/6.25 mg HCTZ compared with placebo, amlodipine, and enalapril. There was a significant reduction in sitting systolic blood pressure for bisoprolol/6.25 mg HCTZ compared with placebo and enalapril but not amlodipine. Also, there was a significant decrease in sitting heart rate for bisoprolol/6.25 mg HCTZ (-6.2 beats/min) compared with placebo (+0.1 beats/min), amlodipine (+1.2 beats/min), and enalapril (+0.5 beats/min). The control rate (diastolic blood pressure < or = 90 mm Hg) for bisoprolol/6.25 mg HCTZ (66.5%) was significantly better than for placebo (21.8%) and enalapril (47.1%) but not amlodipine (58.4%). Of those patients achieving and maintaining control, 49% of the bisoprolol/6.25 mg HCTZ subjects were on the lowest two doses compared with 30% of the amlodipine and 26% of the enalapril subjects. Percentages of patients reporting at least one drug-related adverse event through week 12 were 27%, 24%, 28%, and 25% for placebo, bisoprolol/6.25 mg HCTZ, amlodipine, and enalapril (not significant). Lower doses of two drugs in fixed combination can provide as good or better blood pressure control compared with higher doses of a single drug with similar tolerability and safety.

Amlodipine↗
PubMed1998

Impact of salt intake on blood pressure and proteinuria in diabetes: importance of the renin-angiotensin system.

Patients with hypertension and diabetes are frequently salt-sensitive. Consequently, increasing dietary salt intake results in a rise in systemic arterial pressure and an increase in proteinuria, as well as a progressive risk for developing renal injury. A difference in the renal hemodynamic response to salt appears, at least in part, to determine how the salt intake affects blood pressure. Greater dietary salt intake in salt-sensitive patients results in a blunted rise in renal plasma flow and an increase in body weight. Greater dietary salt consumption also results in a rise in glomerular filtration fraction and increasing proteinuria. Pharmacologic antagonism of the renin-angiotensin system helps restore the blunted renal plasma flow response to high salt intake and correlates with the fall in mean arterial pressure. Consequently, the pressor response to increasing dietary salt consumption in patients with diabetes and hypertension may be related to insufficient renal vasodilation, perhaps due to inadequate suppression of the renin-angiotensin system. Moreover, inadequate suppression of the renin-angiotensin system within the kidney results in an increase in efferent glomerular arteriolar tone and a rise in glomerular capillary pressure, increased proteinuria and a greater risk for renal injury. Many of the coexisting cardiovascular risk factors associated with salt sensitivity may be explainable in part by the overactivity of the renin-angiotensin system.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Influence of race and dietary salt on the antihypertensive efficacy of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel antagonist in salt-sensitive hypertensives.

Dietary salt restriction is a recommended adjunct with antihypertensive therapy. There may be racial differences in blood pressure response to salt restriction while on antihypertensive therapy. We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial (black, n=96; Hispanic, n=63; white, n=232). Participants were initially preselected for stage I to III hypertension and then further selected for salt sensitivity (> or = 5 mm Hg increase in diastolic blood pressure after 3 weeks of low salt [< or = 88 mmol/d Na+] and high salt [>190 mmol/d Na+] diet). We compared the antihypertensive effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril 5 or 20 mg BID) or a calcium channel antagonist (isradipine 5 or 10 mg BID) during alternating periods of high and low salt intake. The main outcome measure was blood pressure change and absolute blood pressure level achieved with therapy. During the high salt diet (314.7+/-107.5 mmol/d urinary Na+) there was greater downward change in blood pressure with both enalapril and isradipine compared with the low salt diet (90.1+/-50.8 mmol/d Na+); however, the absolute blood pressure achieved in all races was consistently lower on a low salt diet for both agents. Black, white, and Hispanic isradipine-treated salt-sensitive hypertensives demonstrated a smaller difference between high and low salt diets (black, -3.6/-1.6 mmHg; white, -6.2/-3.9 mmHg; Hispanic, -8.1/-5.3 mm Hg) than did enalapril-treated patients (black, -9.0/-5.3 mm Hg; white, -11.8/-7.0 mm Hg; Hispanic, -11.1/-5.6 mm Hg). On the low salt diet, blacks, whites, and Hispanics had similar blood pressure control with enalapril and isradipine. On the high salt diet, blacks had better blood pressure control with isradipine than with enalapril, whereas there was no difference in the blood pressure control in whites and Hispanics treated with either drug. Dietary salt reduction helps reduce blood pressure in salt-sensitive hypertensive blacks, whites, and Hispanics treated with enalapril or isradipine. These data demonstrate that controlling for salt sensitivity diminishes race-related differences in antihypertensive activity.

Adult↗